Search (154 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  1. Handis, M.W.: Greek subject and name authorities, and the Library of Congress (2020) 0.12
    0.123276636 = product of:
      0.2876455 = sum of:
        0.02348779 = weight(_text_:of in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02348779 = score(doc=5801,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.1727972 = weight(_text_:congress in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1727972 = score(doc=5801,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.82496345 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
        0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09136049 = score(doc=5801,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Some international libraries are still using the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd edition revised, for cataloging even though the Library of Congress and other large libraries have retired it in favor of Resource Description and Access. One of these libraries is the National Library of Greece, which consults the Library of Congress database before establishing authorities. There are cultural differences in names and subjects between the Library of Congress and the National Library, but some National Library terms may be more appropriate for users than the Library of Congress-established forms.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.2, S.107-126
  2. Byrum, J.D.: ¬The emerging global bibliographical network : the era of international standardization in the development of cataloging policy (2000) 0.11
    0.10772027 = product of:
      0.18851046 = sum of:
        0.018757246 = weight(_text_:of in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018757246 = score(doc=190,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.055198044 = weight(_text_:congress in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055198044 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.26352492 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.099682465 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099682465 = score(doc=190,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.57602817 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
        0.014872721 = product of:
          0.029745443 = sum of:
            0.029745443 = weight(_text_:22 in 190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029745443 = score(doc=190,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 190, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    Catalogers have become interdependent in their pursuit to provide bibliographic control and access. This interdependency has brought with it the need for greater agreement in applying common cataloging policies and rules. The expanded application of AACR2 (Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules) is fostering greater uniformity in the provision of bibliographic description and access. The rules have been translated into numerous languages and used in European, Middle Eastern, and Latin American countries. Cataloging committees and individual libraries in Europe and South Africa have expressed strong interest in adopting, adapting, or aligning with AACR2. PCC (Program for Cooperative Cataloguing) is one of the most successful cooperative cataloging efforts and has a considerable international component, which encourages the use of AACR, LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), and MARC. AACR2 is successful on an international level because it is based in internationally developed standards, including ISBDs and the Paris Principles. ISBDs (International Standard Bibliographic Description) and the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records are examples of the contributions that IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions) has made to the internationalization of cataloging. IFLA sponsored the international conference that resulted in the Paris Principles as well as subsequent projects to craft international policy in relation to uniform headings for persons, corporate bodies, and titles.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
  3. Hearn, S.: Machine-assisted validation of LC Subject Headings : implications for authority file structure (2000) 0.08
    0.0806973 = product of:
      0.1882937 = sum of:
        0.026260145 = weight(_text_:of in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026260145 = score(doc=5607,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
        0.109286554 = weight(_text_:congress in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109286554 = score(doc=5607,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.5217527 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
        0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052747004 = score(doc=5607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5607)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Many kinds of structure can be discerned in the headings and rules governing the Library of Congress Subject Headings. By addressing these structures at different levels, librarians can develop different approaches to the machine-assisted validation of subject headings, from the checking of individual words to the validation of complex forms of heading/subdivision compatibility. Using computer programs to assist with maintenance of subject headings is becoming increasingly necessary as technical services librarians strive to create consistent and useful patterns of subject collocation in library catalogs
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  4. Dobreski, B.; Snow, K.; Moulaison-Sandy, H.: On overlap and otherness : a comparison of three vocabularies' approaches to LGBTQ+ identity (2022) 0.08
    0.07885902 = product of:
      0.18400437 = sum of:
        0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021970814 = score(doc=1141,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
        0.109286554 = weight(_text_:congress in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.109286554 = score(doc=1141,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.5217527 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
        0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052747004 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records can include information from controlled vocabularies to capture identities about individuals, especially about authors or intended audiences; personal name authority records can also contain information about identity. Employing a systematic analysis of the overlap of the Homosaurus, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), and Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT), this article explores the extent to which LGBTQ+ identities are represented in the three vocabularies. Despite LCSH's long, iterative history of development and the faceted, post-coordinate nature of LCDGT, neither vocabulary was found to be adequate in covering the complex, LGBTQ+ identities represented in the Homosaurus.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.6-7, p.490-513
  5. Danskin, A.: ¬The Anglo-American Authority File : a PCC story (2020) 0.08
    0.075832255 = product of:
      0.17694193 = sum of:
        0.008304187 = weight(_text_:of in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008304187 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
        0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09136049 = score(doc=121,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines the motivations for the collaboration between the British Library and Library of Congress to develop a joint (Anglo-American) authority file. It describes the obstacles that had to be overcome for the British Library to become a Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) "copy holder", or node. It considers the contribution the British Library made to NACO, the benefits it has derived from participation in Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), and concludes by looking ahead to the next 25 years.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.3/4, S.221-229
  6. Kulczak, D.E.: Name authority work for OCLC copy cataloging : is it worth the effort? (1999) 0.08
    0.075768635 = product of:
      0.17679347 = sum of:
        0.020132389 = weight(_text_:of in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020132389 = score(doc=5341,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
        0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06623765 = score(doc=5341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
        0.090423435 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090423435 = score(doc=5341,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.52252364 = fieldWeight in 5341, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5341)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    In 1996, a study was undertaken at the University of Arkansas Libraries to evaluate the practice of front-end authority work for monographs copy cataloging. A sample of 283 name headings originating from Library of Congress, OCLC "Enhance" member, and general member copy was examined, and analysis revealed that 47.3 percent of headings correctly matched authority records already present in the library's local file. Another 41.3 percent exactly matched records in the OCLC authority file. These findings prompted the library to cease checking name headings at the point of cataloging. However, the level of inaccuracies present, combined with the value of authority records for cross-reference and note information, ensured that the Database Maintenance Unit would continue to review local headings reports and perform needed authority work.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 28(1999) no.1, S.69-81
  7. Dickson, J.; Zadner, P.: Authority control and the authority file : a functional evaluation of LCNAF on RLIN (1989) 0.08
    0.075154535 = product of:
      0.17536058 = sum of:
        0.02348779 = weight(_text_:of in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02348779 = score(doc=425,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
        0.074595526 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074595526 = score(doc=425,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 425, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=425)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The costs of authority control are high and the information provided in authority files is often duplicated in separate bibliographic files. Librarians need to examine the compatibility of traditional methods of authority control with the advanced capabilities of current computer systems. This study investigates the actual use of the Library of Congress Name Authority File (LCNAF) by catalogers in an RLIN member library. Results show that some aspects of authority control could be expedited by changes in cataloging practice and search software.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 9(1989) no.3, S.57-73
  8. El-Sherbini, M.A.: Cataloging and classification : review of the literature 2005-06 (2008) 0.08
    0.07501271 = product of:
      0.17502967 = sum of:
        0.016438028 = weight(_text_:of in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016438028 = score(doc=249,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.1347953 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1347953 = score(doc=249,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.7789323 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
        0.023796353 = product of:
          0.047592707 = sum of:
            0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047592707 = score(doc=249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews library literature on cataloging and classification published in 2005-06. It covers pertinent literature in the following areas: the future of cataloging; Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records (FRBR); metadata and its applications and relation to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC); cataloging tools and standards; authority control; and recruitment, training, and the changing role of catalogers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Figueroa-Servín, R.D.: Subject authority control at El Colegio de Mexico's Library : the whats and hows of a project (2001) 0.07
    0.06916911 = product of:
      0.1613946 = sum of:
        0.022508696 = weight(_text_:of in 5425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022508696 = score(doc=5425,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 5425, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5425)
        0.09367418 = weight(_text_:congress in 5425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09367418 = score(doc=5425,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 5425, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5425)
        0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045211717 = score(doc=5425,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5425, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5425)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes the efforts at the Daniel Cosio Villegas Library of Colegio de Mexico (Mexico) to create a Spanish language authority file on its ALEPH online system. To date, the authorities team, composed of about ten librarians, have created over 10,000 name authorities, and close to 4,000 subject authorities in MARC format, closely following the structure of the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) records. For the subject authority file, it was decided to establish three levels of description, all of which include the LCSH English term. In order to establish the term in Spanish, seven official sources have been used, with Bilindex (1984) having the highest usage, closely followed by the subject headings list developed by Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC) of Spain. As the first Mexican NACO/SACO participants, librarians at the Colegio de Mexico Library also received training by personnel from the Library of Congress in the creation and validation of subject headings.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 32(2001) no.1, S.65-80
  10. Dean, R.J.: FAST: development of simplified headings for metadata (2004) 0.07
    0.0681507 = product of:
      0.1590183 = sum of:
        0.020132389 = weight(_text_:of in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020132389 = score(doc=5682,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
        0.09367418 = weight(_text_:congress in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09367418 = score(doc=5682,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
        0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045211717 = score(doc=5682,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) headings is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains compatibility with LCSH--any valid Library of Congress subject heading can be converted to FAST headings.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 39(2004) nos.1/2, S.xx-xx
  11. McGrath, E.: Developing priorities for authority work at the University at Buffalo Libraries (1993) 0.07
    0.06514075 = product of:
      0.15199508 = sum of:
        0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021970814 = score(doc=557,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=557,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
        0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052747004 = score(doc=557,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 557, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=557)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    A sample was taken of the name and title provisional, or minimal level, authority records created by Blackwell North America, Inc., during its authority control processing in preparation for the implementation of NOTIS at the State Univerity of New York at Buffalo Libraries. Analysis of the sample showed that approximately 10 % of theses provisional records were created unnecessarily, while approximately 7 % had Library of Congress Name Authority File recordsestablished since the vendor's work was completed. The remaining 83 %, which will require original authority work in order to be upgraded to 'full' status, are categorized in such a manner as to determine the best approach to achieving the libraries' goal of absolute authority control.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.4, S.5-23
  12. Cristán, A.L.: SACO and subject gateways (2004) 0.06
    0.061888948 = product of:
      0.14440754 = sum of:
        0.014383274 = weight(_text_:of in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014383274 = score(doc=5679,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=5679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
        0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052747004 = score(doc=5679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5679)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This presentation attempts to fit the subject contribution mechanism used in the Program for Cooperative Cataloging's SACO Program into the context of subject gateways. The discussion points to several subject gateways and concludes that there is no similarity between the two. Subject gateways are a mechanism for facilitating searching, while the SACO Program is a cooperative venture that provides a "gateway" for the development of LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Heading list) into an international authority file for subject headings.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 39(2004) nos.1/2, S.xx-xx
  13. Myntti, J.; Lewis, N.; McCormack, A.M.; Rockwell, K.: Regional connections to national authority files (2020) 0.06
    0.061888948 = product of:
      0.14440754 = sum of:
        0.014383274 = weight(_text_:of in 5796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014383274 = score(doc=5796,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 5796, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5796)
        0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 5796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07727726 = score(doc=5796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 5796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5796)
        0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052747004 = score(doc=5796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5796)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Local and regional authority files exist to cover gaps in national and international authority files. These types of authority files should not exist alone if they are going to be fully utilized by other institutions that may have resources about the same individuals or topics. This article discusses how the Western Name Authority File, a regional controlled vocabulary of personal names and corporate bodies, can link to larger authority files such as the Library of Congress Name Authority File and Wikidata. Workflows and issues encountered with linking this local authority file to larger authority files are discussed.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.1, S.76-89
  14. Virtuelle Normdatei (2008) 0.06
    0.060654614 = product of:
      0.14152743 = sum of:
        0.010066194 = weight(_text_:of in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010066194 = score(doc=2673,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.14660224 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
        0.09367418 = weight(_text_:congress in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09367418 = score(doc=2673,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
        0.03778705 = product of:
          0.0755741 = sum of:
            0.0755741 = weight(_text_:service in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0755741 = score(doc=2673,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.40169317 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    "Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, die Bibliothèque nationale de France, die Library of Congress und das Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) sind übereingekommen, gemeinsam den »Virtual International Authority File« (VIAF), eine Virtuelle Internationale Normdatei, aufzubauen und fortzuentwickeln. Die einzelnen Normdateien sollen im VIAF virtuell zu einem gemeinsamen Normdaten-Service integriert werden, der den Zugang zu den Namen aller einbezogenen Normdateien bietet. Die Vereinbarung baut auf einem vorausgegangenen Forschungsprojekt auf, in dem die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek gemeinsam mit der Library of Congress und OCLC durch die Zusammenführung ihrer Personennamendateien nachgewiesen haben, dass der Aufbau eines Virtual International Authority File auch unter den Bedingungen großer Datenbestände machbar ist. Mit der neuen Kooperationsvereinbarung stößt die Bibliothèque nationale de France hinzu, und der VIAF wird um die französischen Normdaten erweitert. Langfristig zielt das VIAF-Projekt darauf ab, die Normdateien möglichst vieler Bibliotheken zu einem globalen VIAF-Service zu integrieren, der für die Nutzer im Web weltweit frei zugänglich ist."
  15. Byrum Jr., J.D.: NACO: a cooperative model for building and maintaining a shared name authority database (2004) 0.06
    0.059113767 = product of:
      0.13793212 = sum of:
        0.022193875 = weight(_text_:of in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022193875 = score(doc=5675,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
        0.07806182 = weight(_text_:congress in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07806182 = score(doc=5675,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3726805 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
        0.03767643 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03767643 = score(doc=5675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 5675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5675)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Name Authority Cooperative (NACO), founded in 1976, now encompasses some 395 institutions that have collectively developed and maintained a database of more than 2,000,000 authority records in addition to the more than 3,500,000 records created by Library of Congress staff. The NACO family of libraries is expanding at a rate of about 50 new members annually. The membership include institutions from all but four of the 50 U.S. states and 43 institutions in 16 countries within Europe, Africa, Oceania, Asia, and Latin America. The NACO model has changed over time to create more cost-effective and user-friendly policies and procedures to meet participants' needs. Increased recognition, especially by library administrators, of the value of authority control also encouraged NACO to flourish. This presentation explains membership requirements, benefits to the participants, as well as the role of the Library of Congress which serves as secretariat to NACO and oversees a variety of training and documentation activities to support program operations. One of the NACO's unique features - the opportunity to participate via a "Funnel Project" in which a group of institutions band together - is also described. Internationally, as the trend towards adopting AACR and MARC 21 increases, the number of NACO partners outside the U.S. also increases. For countries where other standards prevail or where English is not the official language, NACO can serve as a model to consider to provide a framework for a national program while awaiting longer-term development of a more global approach to authority control.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx
  16. Patton, G.; Hengel-Dittrich, C.; O'Neill, E.T.; Tillett, B.B.: VIAF (Virtual International Authority File) : Linking Die Deutsche Bibliothek and Library of Congress Name Authority Files (2006) 0.06
    0.058947776 = product of:
      0.13754481 = sum of:
        0.019672766 = weight(_text_:of in 6105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019672766 = score(doc=6105,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 6105, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6105)
        0.09560581 = weight(_text_:congress in 6105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09560581 = score(doc=6105,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.45643854 = fieldWeight in 6105, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6105)
        0.022266233 = product of:
          0.044532467 = sum of:
            0.044532467 = weight(_text_:service in 6105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044532467 = score(doc=6105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.23669997 = fieldWeight in 6105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Die Deutsche Bibliothek, the Library of Congress, and OCLC Online Computer Library Center are jointly developing a virtual international authority file (VIAF) for personal names which links authority records from the world's national bibliographic agencies and will be made freely available on the Web. The goals of the project are to prove the viability of automatically linking authority records from different national authority files and to demonstrate its benefits. The authority and bibliographic files from the Library of Congress and Die Deutsche Bibliothek were used to create the initial VIAF which contains over six million names with over a half million links. A key aspect of the project was the development of automated name matching algorithms which use information from both authority records and the corresponding bibliographic records. The practicality of algorithmically linking the personal names between national authority files was demonstrated; seventy percent of the authority records for personal names common to both files were automatically linked with an error rate of less than one percent. The long-term goal of the VIAF project is to combine the authoritative names from many national libraries and other significant sources into a shared global authority service.
  17. Quijano-Solís, A.; Moreno-Jiménex, P.M.; Figueroa-Servín, R.: Automated authority files of Spanish-language subject headings (2000) 0.06
    0.057228405 = product of:
      0.13353294 = sum of:
        0.017794685 = weight(_text_:of in 5922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017794685 = score(doc=5922,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 5922, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5922)
        0.07806182 = weight(_text_:congress in 5922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07806182 = score(doc=5922,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3726805 = fieldWeight in 5922, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5922)
        0.03767643 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03767643 = score(doc=5922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 5922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5922)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control of Spanish-language subject headings is described, with a special focus on Mexico. Efforts currently underway in Colombia, Chile, Spain and Mexico, although they share the same language, are somewhat lacking in standardization and cooperation among countries. In the absence of a national authority for bibliographic control in Mexico, a group of university libraries has initiated a cooperative project to build in the near future a national file of Spanish subject headings for the Social Sciences. The project, based upon the experience and rich collections of El Colegio de Mexico, has attracted support from the U.S. Library of Congress and is being partially financed by the U.S.-Mexican Fund for Culture (sponsored by the Rockefeller and Bancomer Foundations). The paper mentions some of the difficulties found in translating LCSH, which is the main resource for the project. These difficulties can include semantics, syndetic structure, or pragmatic problems; most have been solved by supplementing the LCSH with Spanish-language subject heading lists or thesauri
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  18. Buizza, P.: Bibliographic control and authority control from Paris principles to the present (2004) 0.06
    0.056011 = product of:
      0.13069233 = sum of:
        0.025663862 = weight(_text_:of in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025663862 = score(doc=5667,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
        0.07830899 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07830899 = score(doc=5667,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.45251876 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
        0.02671948 = product of:
          0.05343896 = sum of:
            0.05343896 = weight(_text_:service in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05343896 = score(doc=5667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.28403997 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Forty years ago the ICCP in Paris laid the foundations of international co-operation in descriptive cataloging without explicitly speaking of authority control. Some of the factors in the evolution of authority control are the development of catalogs (from card catalog to local automation, to today's OPAC on the Web) and services provided by libraries (from individual service to local users to system networks, to the World Wide Web), as well as international agreements on cataloging (from Paris Principles to the UBC programme, to the report on Mandatory data elements for internationally shared resource authority records). This evolution progressed from the principle of uniform heading to the definition of authority entries and records, and from the responsibility of national bibliographic agencies for the form of the names of their own authors to be shared internationally to the concept of authorized equivalent heading. Some issues of the present state are the persisting differences among national rules and the aim of respecting both local culture and language and international readability.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx
  19. Smiraglia, R.P.: Authority control of works: cataloging's chimera? (2004) 0.05
    0.051452704 = product of:
      0.12005631 = sum of:
        0.02718183 = weight(_text_:of in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02718183 = score(doc=5678,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.39587128 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
        0.055198044 = weight(_text_:congress in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055198044 = score(doc=5678,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.26352492 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
        0.03767643 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03767643 = score(doc=5678,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.21771818 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Explicit authority control of works is essentially non-existent. Our catalogs are built on a principle of controlling headings, and primarily headings for names of authors. Our syndetic structure creates a spider's web of networked relationships among forms of headings, but it ends there, despite the potential richness of depth among bibliographic entities. Effective authority control of works could yield richness in the catalog that would enhance retrieval capabilities. Works are considered to constitute the intellectual content of informative artifacts that may be collected and ordered for retrieval. In a 1992 study the author examined a random sample of works drawn from the catalog of the Georgetown University Library. For each progenitor work, an instantiation network (also referred to as a bibliographic family) was constituted. A detailed analysis of the linkages that would be required for authority control of these networks is reviewed here. A new study is also presented, in which Library of Congress authority records for the works in this sample are sought and analyzed. Results demonstrate a near total lack of control, with only 5.6% of works for which authority records were found. From a sample of 410 works, of which nearly half have instantiation networks, only 23 works could be said to have implicit authority control. However, many instantiation networks are made up of successive derivations that can be implicitly linked through collocation. The difficult work of explicitly linking instantiations comes with title changes, translations, and containing relations. The empirical evidence in the present study suggests that explicit control of expressions will provide the best control over instantiation networks because it is instantiations such as translations, abridgments, and adaptations that require explicit linking.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 38(2004) nos.3/4, S.xx-xx
  20. Virtual International Authority File wächst : VIAF-Projekt um französische Normdaten erweitert (2007) 0.05
    0.05054551 = product of:
      0.117939524 = sum of:
        0.008388496 = weight(_text_:of in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008388496 = score(doc=764,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.12216854 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
        0.07806182 = weight(_text_:congress in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07806182 = score(doc=764,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.3726805 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
        0.03148921 = product of:
          0.06297842 = sum of:
            0.06297842 = weight(_text_:service in 764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06297842 = score(doc=764,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043909185 = queryNorm
                0.3347443 = fieldWeight in 764, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=764)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    "Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, die Bibliotheque nationale de France, die Library of Congress und das Online Computer Library Center (OCLC) sind übereingekommen, gemeinsam das "Virtual International Authority File (VIAF)", eine Virtuelle Internationale Normdatei, aufzubauen und fortzuentwickeln. Die einzelnen Normdateien sollen im VIAF virtuell zu einem gemeinsamen Normdaten-Service integriert werden, der den Zugang zu den Namen aller einbezogenen Normdateien bietet. Die Vereinbarung baut auf einem vorausgegangenen Forschungsprojekt auf, in dem die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek gemeinsam mit der Library of Congress und OCLC durch die Zusammenführung ihrer Personennamendateien nachgewiesen haben, dass der Aufbau eines Virtual International Authority File auch unter den Bedingungen großer Datenbestände machbar ist. Mit der neuen Kooperationsvereinbarung stößt die Bibliotheque nationale de France hinzu, und der VIAF wird um die französischen Normdaten erweitert. Die Matching-Routinen werden weiterhin von OCLC entwickelt. Langfristig zielt das VIAF-Projekt darauf ab, die Normdateien möglichst vieler Bibliotheken zu einem globalen VIAF-Service zu integrieren, der für die Nutzer im Web weltweit frei zugänglich ist. Die Erweiterung um die französischen Normdaten stellt einen Meilenstein auf dem Weg in diese Zukunft dar. Die Vereinbarung bietet zudem den organisatorischen Rahmen, weitere Normdateien einbeziehen zu können. Der VIAF stellt einen wichtigen Baustein zur Interoperabilität zwischen den bibliothekarischen Nachweissystemen dar. Durch die Verlinkung der unterschiedlichen Namensformen für identische Personen bzw. Organisationen wird der VIAF schon in der nahen Zukunft die Recherche- und Nachnutzungsmöglichkeiten für Titeldaten aus dem englisch-, französisch- und deutschsprachigen Raum entscheidend verbessern, und es steht zu erwarten, dass er in den kommenden Jahren für eine sogar noch größere Zahl von Sprachgemeinschaften dieselben Vorteile bringen wird."

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 142
  • el 17
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • More… Less…