-
Classification Plus (1996)
0.34
0.3405851 = product of:
0.47681916 = sum of:
0.020547535 = weight(_text_:of in 6022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020547535 = score(doc=6022,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 6022, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6022)
0.19121163 = weight(_text_:congress in 6022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19121163 = score(doc=6022,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.9128771 = fieldWeight in 6022, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6022)
0.07535286 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 6022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07535286 = score(doc=6022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 6022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6022)
0.14517464 = weight(_text_:distribution in 6022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14517464 = score(doc=6022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.6043941 = fieldWeight in 6022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6022)
0.044532467 = product of:
0.08906493 = sum of:
0.08906493 = weight(_text_:service in 6022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08906493 = score(doc=6022,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.47339994 = fieldWeight in 6022, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6022)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
- Editor
- Library of Congress / Cataloging Distribution Service
- Footnote
- Enthält auch: 'Library of Congress Subject Headings' and 'Cataloger's desktop' - Demo abrufbar unter: ftp.loc.gov im Verzeichnis pub/cds/deskclas; vgl. auch http://www.loc.gov/cds
- Imprint
- Washington : Library of Congress
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.17
0.16644928 = product of:
0.38838166 = sum of:
0.09298591 = product of:
0.27895772 = sum of:
0.27895772 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27895772 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.016438028 = weight(_text_:of in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016438028 = score(doc=230,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.27895772 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.27895772 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Cataloger's desktop (1994)
0.16
0.15903598 = product of:
0.37108395 = sum of:
0.10549401 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10549401 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.20324449 = weight(_text_:distribution in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20324449 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.8461517 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.06234545 = product of:
0.1246909 = sum of:
0.1246909 = weight(_text_:service in 477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1246909 = score(doc=477,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.6627599 = fieldWeight in 477, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=477)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Imprint
- Washington, DC : Cataloging Distribution Service
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.13
0.13283703 = product of:
0.46492955 = sum of:
0.11623239 = product of:
0.34869716 = sum of:
0.34869716 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34869716 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.34869716 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34869716 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Marcum, D.B.: ¬The future of cataloging (2005)
0.09
0.093590565 = product of:
0.21837798 = sum of:
0.023607321 = weight(_text_:of in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023607321 = score(doc=1086,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.34381276 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
0.09367418 = weight(_text_:congress in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09367418 = score(doc=1086,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
0.10109647 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10109647 = score(doc=1086,freq=10.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.5841992 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This thought piece on the future of cataloging is long on musings and short on predictions. But that isn't to denigrate it, only to clarify it's role given the possible connotations of the title. Rather than coming up with solutions or predictions, Marcum ponders the proper role of cataloging in a Google age. Marcum cites the Google project to digitize much or all of the contents of a selected set of major research libraries as evidence that the world of cataloging is changing dramatically, and she briefly identifies ways in which the Library of Congress is responding to this new environment. But, Marcum cautions, "the future of cataloging is not something that the Library of Congress, or even the small library group with which we will meet, can or expects to resolve alone." She then poses some specific questions that should be considered, including how we can massively change our current MARC/AACR2 system without creating chaos
-
Mann, T.: ¬The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools. Final report. March 17, 2006. Prepared for the Library of Congress by Karen Calhoun : A critical review (2006)
0.07
0.06759344 = product of:
0.15771803 = sum of:
0.018832127 = weight(_text_:of in 5012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018832127 = score(doc=5012,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 5012, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5012)
0.09367418 = weight(_text_:congress in 5012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09367418 = score(doc=5012,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.4472166 = fieldWeight in 5012, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5012)
0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045211717 = score(doc=5012,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 5012, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5012)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- According to the Calhoun report, library operations that are not digital, that do not result in resources that are remotely accessible, that involve professional human judgement or expertise, or that require conceptual categorization and standardization rather than relevance ranking of keywords, do not fit into its proposed "leadership" strategy. This strategy itself, however, is based on an inappropriate business model - and a misrepresentation of that business model to begin with. The Calhoun report draws unjustified conclusions about the digital age, inflates wishful thinking, fails to make critical distinctions, and disregards (as well as mischaracterizes) an alternative "niche" strategy for research libraries, to promote scholarship (rather than increase "market position"). Its recommendations to eliminate Library of Congress Subject Headings, and to use "fast turnaround" time as the "gold standard" in cataloging, are particularly unjustified, and would have serious negative consequences for the capacity of research libraries to promote scholarly research.
- Content
- Stellungnahme zu: Calhoun, K.: The changing nature of the catalog and its integration with other discovery tools.
-
Beagle, D.: Visualizing keyword distribution across multidisciplinary c-space (2003)
0.07
0.06749098 = product of:
0.118109204 = sum of:
0.018832127 = weight(_text_:of in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018832127 = score(doc=1202,freq=56.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
7.483315 = tf(freq=56.0), with freq of:
56.0 = termFreq=56.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.033118825 = weight(_text_:congress in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033118825 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.15811494 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.022605859 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022605859 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.13063091 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.04355239 = weight(_text_:distribution in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04355239 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.18131822 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- The concept of c-space is proposed as a visualization schema relating containers of content to cataloging surrogates and classification structures. Possible applications of keyword vector clusters within c-space could include improved retrieval rates through the use of captioning within visual hierarchies, tracings of semantic bleeding among subclasses, and access to buried knowledge within subject-neutral publication containers. The Scholastica Project is described as one example, following a tradition of research dating back to the 1980's. Preliminary focus group assessment indicates that this type of classification rendering may offer digital library searchers enriched entry strategies and an expanded range of re-entry vocabularies. Those of us who work in traditional libraries typically assume that our systems of classification: Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), are descriptive rather than prescriptive. In other words, LCC classes and subclasses approximate natural groupings of texts that reflect an underlying order of knowledge, rather than arbitrary categories prescribed by librarians to facilitate efficient shelving. Philosophical support for this assumption has traditionally been found in a number of places, from the archetypal tree of knowledge, to Aristotelian categories, to the concept of discursive formations proposed by Michel Foucault. Gary P. Radford has elegantly described an encounter with Foucault's discursive formations in the traditional library setting: "Just by looking at the titles on the spines, you can see how the books cluster together...You can identify those books that seem to form the heart of the discursive formation and those books that reside on the margins. Moving along the shelves, you see those books that tend to bleed over into other classifications and that straddle multiple discursive formations. You can physically and sensually experience...those points that feel like state borders or national boundaries, those points where one subject ends and another begins, or those magical places where one subject has morphed into another..."
But what happens to this awareness in a digital library? Can discursive formations be represented in cyberspace, perhaps through diagrams in a visualization interface? And would such a schema be helpful to a digital library user? To approach this question, it is worth taking a moment to reconsider what Radford is looking at. First, he looks at titles to see how the books cluster. To illustrate, I scanned one hundred books on the shelves of a college library under subclass HT 101-395, defined by the LCC subclass caption as Urban groups. The City. Urban sociology. Of the first 100 titles in this sequence, fifty included the word "urban" or variants (e.g. "urbanization"). Another thirty-five used the word "city" or variants. These keywords appear to mark their titles as the heart of this discursive formation. The scattering of titles not using "urban" or "city" used related terms such as "town," "community," or in one case "skyscrapers." So we immediately see some empirical correlation between keywords and classification. But we also see a problem with the commonly used search technique of title-keyword. A student interested in urban studies will want to know about this entire subclass, and may wish to browse every title available therein. A title-keyword search on "urban" will retrieve only half of the titles, while a search on "city" will retrieve just over a third. There will be no overlap, since no titles in this sample contain both words. The only place where both words appear in a common string is in the LCC subclass caption, but captions are not typically indexed in library Online Public Access Catalogs (OPACs). In a traditional library, this problem is mitigated when the student goes to the shelf looking for any one of the books and suddenly discovers a much wider selection than the keyword search had led him to expect. But in a digital library, the issue of non-retrieval can be more problematic, as studies have indicated. Micco and Popp reported that, in a study funded partly by the U.S. Department of Education, 65 of 73 unskilled users searching for material on U.S./Soviet foreign relations found some material but never realized they had missed a large percentage of what was in the database.
-
Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014)
0.07
0.06641851 = product of:
0.23246478 = sum of:
0.058116194 = product of:
0.17434858 = sum of:
0.17434858 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17434858 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17434858 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17434858 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Footnote
- Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
-
Patton, M.; Reynolds, D.; Choudhury, G.S.; DiLauro, T.: Toward a metadata generation framework : a case study at Johns Hopkins University (2004)
0.06
0.064455226 = product of:
0.112796634 = sum of:
0.020684065 = weight(_text_:of in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020684065 = score(doc=1192,freq=38.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.30123898 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
38.0 = termFreq=38.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.044158436 = weight(_text_:congress in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044158436 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.21081993 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.030141145 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030141145 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.17417455 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.017812986 = product of:
0.03562597 = sum of:
0.03562597 = weight(_text_:service in 1192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03562597 = score(doc=1192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.18935998 = fieldWeight in 1192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- In the June 2003 issue of D-Lib Magazine, Kenney et al. (2003) discuss a comparative study between Cornell's email reference staff and Google's Answers service. This interesting study provided insights on the potential impact of "computing and simple algorithms combined with human intelligence" for library reference services. As mentioned in the Kenney et al. article, Bill Arms (2000) had discussed the possibilities of automated digital libraries in an even earlier D-Lib article. Arms discusses not only automating reference services, but also another library function that seems to inspire lively debates about automation-metadata creation. While intended to illuminate, these debates sometimes generate more heat than light. In an effort to explore the potential for automating metadata generation, the Digital Knowledge Center (DKC) of the Sheridan Libraries at The Johns Hopkins University developed and tested an automated name authority control (ANAC) tool. ANAC represents a component of a digital workflow management system developed in connection with the digital Lester S. Levy Collection of Sheet Music. The evaluation of ANAC followed the spirit of the Kenney et al. study that was, as they stated, "more exploratory than scientific." These ANAC evaluation results are shared with the hope of fostering constructive dialogue and discussions about the potential for semi-automated techniques or frameworks for library functions and services such as metadata creation. The DKC's research agenda emphasizes the development of tools that combine automated processes and human intervention, with the overall goal of involving humans at higher levels of analysis and decision-making. Others have looked at issues regarding the automated generation of metadata. A session at the 2003 Joint Conference on Digital Libraries was devoted to automatic metadata creation, and a session at the 2004 conference addressed automated name disambiguation. Commercial vendors such as OCLC, Marcive, and LTI have long used automated techniques for matching names to Library of Congress authority records. We began developing ANAC as a component of a larger suite of open source tools to support workflow management for digital projects. This article describes the goals for the ANAC tool, provides an overview of the metadata records used for testing, describes the architecture for ANAC, and concludes with discussions of the methodology and evaluation of the experiment comparing human cataloging and ANAC-generated results.
-
Byrd, J.; Charbonneau, G.; Charbonneau, M.; Courtney, A.; Johnson, E.; Leonard, K.; Morrison, A.; Mudge, S.; O'Bryan, A.; Opasik, S.; Riley, J.; Turchyn, S.: ¬A white paper on the future of cataloging at Indiana University (2006)
0.06
0.06314053 = product of:
0.1473279 = sum of:
0.016776992 = weight(_text_:of in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016776992 = score(doc=3225,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.24433708 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
0.055198044 = weight(_text_:congress in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055198044 = score(doc=3225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26352492 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
0.07535286 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07535286 = score(doc=3225,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This is a report by a group "charged to identify current trends that will have a direct impact on cataloging operations and to define possible new roles for the online catalog and cataloging staff at Indiana University." Their one general conclusion after nine months of work is that "The need for cataloging expertise within the I.U. Libraries will not be diminished in the coming years. Rather, catalogers of the future will work in the evolving environment of publishing, scholarly communication, and information technology in new expanded roles. Catalogers will need to be key players in addressing the many challenges facing the libraries and the overall management and organization of information at Indiana University." The report also identifies five strategic directions. The report is an interesting read, and taken with the explosion of related reports (e.g., Calhoun's report to the Library of Congress cited in this issue, the UC Bibliographic Services TF Report), adds yet another perspective to the kinds of changes we must foster to create better library services in a vastly changed environment.
-
Bailey, C.W. Jr.: Scholarly electronic publishing bibliography (2003)
0.06
0.061021157 = product of:
0.1423827 = sum of:
0.010066194 = weight(_text_:of in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010066194 = score(doc=1656,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.14660224 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045211717 = score(doc=1656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
0.08710478 = weight(_text_:distribution in 1656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08710478 = score(doc=1656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36263645 = fieldWeight in 1656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1656)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Content
- Table of Contents 1 Economic Issues* 2 Electronic Books and Texts 2.1 Case Studies and History 2.2 General Works* 2.3 Library Issues* 3 Electronic Serials 3.1 Case Studies and History 3.2 Critiques 3.3 Electronic Distribution of Printed Journals 3.4 General Works* 3.5 Library Issues* 3.6 Research* 4 General Works* 5 Legal Issues 5.1 Intellectual Property Rights* 5.2 License Agreements 5.3 Other Legal Issues 6 Library Issues 6.1 Cataloging, Identifiers, Linking, and Metadata* 6.2 Digital Libraries* 6.3 General Works* 6.4 Information Integrity and Preservation* 7 New Publishing Models* 8 Publisher Issues 8.1 Digital Rights Management* 9 Repositories and E-Prints* Appendix A. Related Bibliographies by the Same Author Appendix B. About the Author
-
Patton, G.; Hengel-Dittrich, C.; O'Neill, E.T.; Tillett, B.B.: VIAF (Virtual International Authority File) : Linking Die Deutsche Bibliothek and Library of Congress Name Authority Files (2006)
0.06
0.058947776 = product of:
0.13754481 = sum of:
0.019672766 = weight(_text_:of in 6105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019672766 = score(doc=6105,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.28651062 = fieldWeight in 6105, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6105)
0.09560581 = weight(_text_:congress in 6105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09560581 = score(doc=6105,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.45643854 = fieldWeight in 6105, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6105)
0.022266233 = product of:
0.044532467 = sum of:
0.044532467 = weight(_text_:service in 6105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044532467 = score(doc=6105,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.23669997 = fieldWeight in 6105, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6105)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Die Deutsche Bibliothek, the Library of Congress, and OCLC Online Computer Library Center are jointly developing a virtual international authority file (VIAF) for personal names which links authority records from the world's national bibliographic agencies and will be made freely available on the Web. The goals of the project are to prove the viability of automatically linking authority records from different national authority files and to demonstrate its benefits. The authority and bibliographic files from the Library of Congress and Die Deutsche Bibliothek were used to create the initial VIAF which contains over six million names with over a half million links. A key aspect of the project was the development of automated name matching algorithms which use information from both authority records and the corresponding bibliographic records. The practicality of algorithmically linking the personal names between national authority files was demonstrated; seventy percent of the authority records for personal names common to both files were automatically linked with an error rate of less than one percent. The long-term goal of the VIAF project is to combine the authoritative names from many national libraries and other significant sources into a shared global authority service.
-
Markey, K.: ¬The online library catalog : paradise lost and paradise regained? (2007)
0.06
0.057805136 = product of:
0.13487865 = sum of:
0.01711952 = weight(_text_:of in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01711952 = score(doc=1172,freq=34.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2493256 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
34.0 = termFreq=34.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.03863863 = weight(_text_:congress in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03863863 = score(doc=1172,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.18446743 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.0791205 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0791205 = score(doc=1172,freq=18.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.4572082 = fieldWeight in 1172, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1172)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This think piece tells why the online library catalog fell from grace and why new directions pertaining to cataloging simplification and primary sources will not attract people back to the online catalog. It proposes an alternative direction that has greater likelihood of regaining the online catalog's lofty status and longtime users. Such a direction will require paradigm shifts in library cataloging and in the design and development of online library catalogs that heed catalog users' longtime demands for improvements to the searching experience. Our failure to respond accordingly may permanently exile scholarly and scientific information to a netherworld where no one searches while less reliable, accurate, and objective sources of information thrive in a paradise where people prefer to search for information.
The impetus for this essay is the library community's uncertainty regarding the present and future direction of the library catalog in the era of Google and mass digitization projects. The uncertainty is evident at the highest levels. Deanna Marcum, Associate Librarian for Library Services at the Library of Congress (LC), is struck by undergraduate students who favor digital resources over the online library catalog because such resources are available at anytime and from anywhere (Marcum, 2006). She suggests that "the detailed attention that we have been paying to descriptive cataloging may no longer be justified ... retooled catalogers could give more time to authority control, subject analysis, [and] resource identification and evaluation" (Marcum, 2006, 8). In an abrupt about-face, LC terminated series added entries in cataloging records, one of the few subject-rich fields in such records (Cataloging Policy and Support Office, 2006). Mann (2006b) and Schniderman (2006) cite evidence of LC's prevailing viewpoint in favor of simplifying cataloging at the expense of subject cataloging. LC commissioned Karen Calhoun (2006) to prepare a report on "revitalizing" the online library catalog. Calhoun's directive is clear: divert resources from cataloging mass-produced formats (e.g., books) to cataloging the unique primary sources (e.g., archives, special collections, teaching objects, research by-products). She sums up her rationale for such a directive, "The existing local catalog's market position has eroded to the point where there is real concern for its ability to weather the competition for information seekers' attention" (p. 10). At the University of California Libraries (2005), a task force's recommendations parallel those in Calhoun report especially regarding the elimination of subject headings in favor of automatically generated metadata. Contemplating these events prompted me to revisit the glorious past of the online library catalog. For a decade and a half beginning in the early 1980s, the online library catalog was the jewel in the crown when people eagerly queued at its terminals to find information written by the world's experts. I despair how eagerly people now embrace Google because of the suspect provenance of the information Google retrieves. Long ago, we could have added more value to the online library catalog but the only thing we changed was the catalog's medium. Our failure to act back then cost the online catalog the crown. Now that the era of mass digitization has begun, we have a second chance at redesigning the online library catalog, getting it right, coaxing back old users, and attracting new ones. Let's revisit the past, reconsidering missed opportunities, reassessing their merits, combining them with new directions, making bold decisions and acting decisively on them.
-
Baca, M.; O'Keefe, E.: Sharing standards and expertise in the early 21st century : Moving toward a collaborative, "cross-community" model for metadata creation (2008)
0.06
0.0574106 = product of:
0.13395807 = sum of:
0.022508696 = weight(_text_:of in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022508696 = score(doc=2321,freq=20.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.32781258 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06623765 = score(doc=2321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045211717 = score(doc=2321,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This paper provides a brief overview of the evolving descriptive metadata landscape, one phenomenon of which can be characterized as "cross-community" metadata as manifested in records that are the result of a combination of carefully considered data value and data content standards. he online catalog of the Morgan Library & Museum provides a real-life illustration of how diverse data content standards and vocabulary tools can be integrated within the classic data structure/technical interchange format of MARC21 to better describe unique, museum-type objects, and to provide better end-user access and understanding. The Morgan experience also shows the value of developing a collaborative model for metadata creation that combines the subject expertise of curators and scholars with the cataloging expertise and knowledge of standards possessed by librarians.
- Content
- Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada.
-
BIBFRAME Model Overview (2013)
0.06
0.056743436 = product of:
0.13240135 = sum of:
0.014529302 = weight(_text_:of in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014529302 = score(doc=763,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.21160212 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.09560581 = weight(_text_:congress in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09560581 = score(doc=763,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.45643854 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.022266233 = product of:
0.044532467 = sum of:
0.044532467 = weight(_text_:service in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044532467 = score(doc=763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.23669997 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative is an undertaking by the Library of Congress and the community to better accommodate future needs of the library community. A major focus of the initiative will be to determine a transition path for the MARC 21 exchange format to more Web based, Linked Data standards. Zepheira and The Library of Congress are working together to develop a Linked Data model, vocabulary and enabling tools / services for supporting this Initiative. BIBFRAME.ORG is a central hub for this effort.
- Content
- Vgl. Kommentar Eversberg: Wer dranbleiben will am Puls der Zeit und speziell an der sich dynamisierenden Evolution eines neuen Datenformatkonzepts, der sollte sich langsam beeilen, sich mit BIBFRAME vertraut zu machen: http://bibframe.org Diese Startseite organisiert nun den Zugang zu allem, was schon vorliegt und präsentabel ist, und das ist allerhand. Wer erst mal nur schnuppern will und schauen, wie denn BIBFRAME-Daten wohl aussehen, gehe zur "demonstration area", wo man u.a. auch aufbereitete Daten der DNB findet. Es gibt ferner Online Tools, und darunter einen "Transformation service", dem man eigenes MARC-XML übergeben kann, damit er was draus mache. [Exporte mit unserem MARCXML.APR klappen nicht unmittelbar, man muß zumindest die in der Datei schon vorhandenen zwei Kopfzeilen aktivieren und ans Ende noch </collection> setzen. Und hierarchische Daten machen noch Probleme, die wir uns vornehmen müssen.] Wer jetzt denkt, "Was geht uns das alles an?", der lese die letzte Zeile, die da lautet: "BIBFRAME.ORG is a collaborative effort of US Library of Congress, Zepheira and you!"
-
Vizine-Goetz, D.; Hickey, C.; Houghton, A.; Thompson, R.: Vocabulary mapping for terminology services (2004)
0.06
0.055236224 = product of:
0.12888452 = sum of:
0.01743516 = weight(_text_:of in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01743516 = score(doc=918,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06623765 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.045211717 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045211717 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26126182 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The paper describes a project to add value to controlled vocabularies by making inter-vocabulary associations. A methodology for mapping terms from one vocabulary to another is presented in the form of a case study applying the approach to the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) Thesaurus and the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). Our approach to mapping involves encoding vocabularies according to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards, machine matching of vocabulary terms, and categorizing candidate mappings by likelihood of valid mapping. Mapping data is then stored as machine links. Vocabularies with associations to other schemes will be a key component of Web-based terminology services. The paper briefly describes how the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) is used to provide access to a vocabulary with mappings.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes von: Journal of digital information. 4(2004) no.4.
-
Understanding metadata (2004)
0.05
0.05486974 = product of:
0.12802939 = sum of:
0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018981 = score(doc=2686,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.08525203 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08525203 = score(doc=2686,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.49264002 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.023796353 = product of:
0.047592707 = sum of:
0.047592707 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047592707 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
- Date
- 10. 9.2004 10:22:40
-
Stapleton, M.; Adams, M.: Faceted categorisation for the corporate desktop : visualisation and interaction using metadata to enhance user experience (2007)
0.05
0.052451663 = product of:
0.122387215 = sum of:
0.01743516 = weight(_text_:of in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01743516 = score(doc=718,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
0.08710478 = weight(_text_:distribution in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08710478 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36263645 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
0.017847266 = product of:
0.035694532 = sum of:
0.035694532 = weight(_text_:22 in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035694532 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Mark Stapleton and Matt Adamson began their presentation by describing how Dow Jones' Factiva range of information services processed an average of 170,000 documents every day, drawn from over 10,000 sources in 22 languages. These documents are categorized within five facets: Company, Subject, Industry, Region and Language. The digital feeds received from information providers undergo a series of processing stages, initially to prepare them for automatic categorization and then to format them ready for distribution. The categorization stage is able to handle 98% of documents automatically, the remaining 2% requiring some form of human intervention. Depending on the source, categorization can involve any combination of 'Autocoding', 'Dictionary-based Categorizing', 'Rules-based Coding' or 'Manual Coding'
-
Coyle, K.; Hillmann, D.: Resource Description and Access (RDA) : cataloging rules for the 20th century (2007)
0.05
0.051473763 = product of:
0.120105445 = sum of:
0.013263376 = weight(_text_:of in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013263376 = score(doc=2525,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.19316542 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
0.07535286 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07535286 = score(doc=2525,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.43543637 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
0.03148921 = product of:
0.06297842 = sum of:
0.06297842 = weight(_text_:service in 2525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06297842 = score(doc=2525,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.3347443 = fieldWeight in 2525, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2525)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- There is evidence that many individuals and organizations in the library world do not support the work taking place to develop a next generation of the library cataloging rules. The authors describe the tensions existing between those advocating an incremental change to cataloging process and others who desire a bolder library entry into the digital era. Libraries have lost their place as primary information providers, surpassed by more agile (and in many cases wealthier) purveyors of digital information delivery services. Although libraries still manage materials that are not available elsewhere, the library's approach to user service and the user interface is not competing successfully against services like Amazon or Google. If libraries are to avoid further marginalization, they need to make a fundamental change in their approach to user services. The library's signature service, its catalog, uses rules for cataloging that are remnants of a long departed technology: the card catalog. Modifications to the rules, such as those proposed by the Resource Description and Access (RDA) development effort, can only keep us rooted firmly in the 20th, if not the 19th century. A more radical change is required that will contribute to the library of the future, re-imagined and integrated with the chosen workflow of its users.
-
Hannemann, J.; Kett, J.: Linked data for libraries (2010)
0.05
0.05068305 = product of:
0.11826045 = sum of:
0.01423575 = weight(_text_:of in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01423575 = score(doc=3964,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.20732689 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06623765 = score(doc=3964,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
0.03778705 = product of:
0.0755741 = sum of:
0.0755741 = weight(_text_:service in 3964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0755741 = score(doc=3964,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.40169317 = fieldWeight in 3964, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3964)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The Semantic Web in general and the Linking Open Data initiative in particular encourage institutions to publish, share and interlink their data. This has considerable potential for libraries, which can complement their data by linking it to other, external data sources. This paper details the first linked open data service of the German National Library. The focus is on the challenges met during the inception of this service. Extrapolating from our experiences, the paper further discusses the German National Library's perspective on the future of library data exchange and the potential for the creation of globally interlinked library data. We outline how this process can be facilitated and how new services can be offered based on these growing metadata collections.
- Content
- Vortrag im Rahmen der Session 93. Cataloguing der WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 76TH IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND ASSEMBLY, 10-15 August 2010, Gothenburg, Sweden - 149. Information Technology, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing with Knowledge Management
