-
Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011)
0.16
0.15940443 = product of:
0.55791545 = sum of:
0.13947886 = product of:
0.41843656 = sum of:
0.41843656 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.41843656 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.41843656 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.41843656 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
-
Holloway, S.W.: LCSH in the Southern Levant (2018)
0.14
0.13702182 = product of:
0.23978817 = sum of:
0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018981 = score(doc=5185,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
0.12489891 = weight(_text_:congress in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12489891 = score(doc=5185,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.5962888 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
0.06028229 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06028229 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
0.03562597 = product of:
0.07125194 = sum of:
0.07125194 = weight(_text_:service in 5185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07125194 = score(doc=5185,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.37871996 = fieldWeight in 5185, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5185)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) geographic headings for the Southern Levant mirror the political investment of Congress and the American public in Middle East politics over the last thirty years. These LCSH headings contrast markedly with those established in other national libraries and independent value vocabularies, and global opinion regarding the legal status of the occupied territories. The author offers ways that libraries can "decolonize" their metadata in service of Sanford Berman's "access and equity."
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.7, S.571-591
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.13
0.13283703 = product of:
0.46492955 = sum of:
0.11623239 = product of:
0.34869716 = sum of:
0.34869716 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34869716 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.34869716 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.34869716 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Kaplan, A.G.; Riedling, A.M.: Catalog it! : a guide to cataloging school library materials (2015)
0.13
0.12866956 = product of:
0.22517172 = sum of:
0.011863125 = weight(_text_:of in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011863125 = score(doc=2379,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.055198044 = weight(_text_:congress in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055198044 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26352492 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.1358443 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1358443 = score(doc=2379,freq=26.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.78499407 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.022266233 = product of:
0.044532467 = sum of:
0.044532467 = weight(_text_:service in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044532467 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.23669997 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- This invaluable cataloging resource gives pre-service and practicing school library media specialists the tools they need to be intelligent consumers of commercial cataloging and competent organizers of new materials in their collections. The second edition contains expanded information on Library of Congress Subject Headings and electronic cataloging and cataloging systems, as well as Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC). Whether you're a practicing cataloger looking for a short text to update you on the application of RDA to cataloging records or a school librarian who needs a quick resource to answer cataloging questions, this guide is for you. - Thoroughly updates a best-selling, essential guide to cataloging - Addresses the new standards specifically as they apply to school libraries - Helps school librarians understand and implement the new cataloging standards in their collections - Distills the latest information and presents it in a format that is clear and accessible - Fills the need for up-to-the-minute cataloging guidance for the busy librarian who wants information in a hurry
- LCSH
- Cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc
- Subject
- Cataloging / Handbooks, manuals, etc
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.13
0.12702551 = product of:
0.29639286 = sum of:
0.06973943 = product of:
0.20921828 = sum of:
0.20921828 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20921828 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.01743516 = weight(_text_:of in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01743516 = score(doc=400,freq=12.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.20921828 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20921828 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
- Source
- Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov
-
Debus-López, K.E.; Barber, D.; Saccucci, C.; Williams, C.: ¬The Electronic Cataloging in Publication Cataloging Partnership Program : a model for cooperative cataloging for the twenty-first century (2013)
0.12
0.12261269 = product of:
0.28609627 = sum of:
0.018568728 = weight(_text_:of in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018568728 = score(doc=1938,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
0.109286554 = weight(_text_:congress in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109286554 = score(doc=1938,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.5217527 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
0.158241 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.158241 = score(doc=1938,freq=18.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.9144164 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress' Cataloging in Publication (CIP) Program has been in existence for forty years. During this time, the CIP Program has moved from a model where the Library of Congress created all pre-publication metadata for publishers to a partnership where other libraries share in the creation of metadata. This article documents the evolution of the Electronic Cataloging in Publication (ECIP) Cataloging Partnership Program. The ECIP Cataloging Partnership Program can be used as a model to leverage limited resources across libraries to the benefit of library users nationwide.
- Footnote
- Contribution to a special issue "Cataloging collaborations and partnerships"
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 51(2013) no.1/3, S.25-54
-
Knowlton, S.A.: Power and change in the US cataloging community (2014)
0.12
0.11887331 = product of:
0.20802829 = sum of:
0.018568728 = weight(_text_:of in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018568728 = score(doc=2599,freq=10.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07727726 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09136049 = score(doc=2599,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
0.02082181 = product of:
0.04164362 = sum of:
0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 2599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04164362 = score(doc=2599,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2599, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2599)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- The US cataloging community is an interorganizational network with the Library of Congress (LC) as the lead organization, which reserves to itself the power to shape cataloging rules. Peripheral members of the network who are interested in modifying changes to the rules or to the network can use various strategies for organizational change that incorporate building ties to the decision-makers located at the hub of the network. The story of William E. Studwell's campaign for a subject heading code illustrates how some traditional scholarly methods of urging change-papers and presentations-are insufficient to achieve reform in an interorganizational network, absent strategies to build alliances with the decision makers.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.11
0.11233891 = product of:
0.26212412 = sum of:
0.046492957 = product of:
0.13947886 = sum of:
0.13947886 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13947886 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.018378275 = weight(_text_:of in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018378275 = score(doc=5820,freq=30.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.26765788 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.19725288 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19725288 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
- Imprint
- Pittsburgh, PA : Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Language Technologies Institute
-
Groat, G. de: ¬A history of video game cataloging in U.S. libraries (2015)
0.11
0.109268025 = product of:
0.25495872 = sum of:
0.018981 = weight(_text_:of in 2014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018981 = score(doc=2014,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 2014, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2014)
0.08831687 = weight(_text_:congress in 2014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08831687 = score(doc=2014,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.42163986 = fieldWeight in 2014, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2014)
0.14766084 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14766084 = score(doc=2014,freq=12.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.8532775 = fieldWeight in 2014, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2014)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Cataloging practices for video games have been in flux since the late 1970s, often lagging behind technological developments. This article describes the history of descriptive cataloging practices and MARC coding for video games. Also discussed are the special problems presented by Library of Congress subject heading and uniform title practice, which were developed for book cataloging rather than for the cataloging of video games themselves.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.2, S.135-156
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.11
0.10913942 = product of:
0.25465864 = sum of:
0.058116194 = product of:
0.17434858 = sum of:
0.17434858 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17434858 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.022193875 = weight(_text_:of in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022193875 = score(doc=4997,freq=28.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.32322758 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.17434858 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17434858 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- While classifications are heavily used to categorize web content, the evolution of the web foresees a more formal structure - ontology - which can serve this purpose. Ontologies are core artifacts of the Semantic Web which enable machines to use inference rules to conduct automated reasoning on data. Lightweight ontologies bridge the gap between classifications and ontologies. A lightweight ontology (LO) is an ontology representing a backbone taxonomy where the concept of the child node is more specific than the concept of the parent node. Formal lightweight ontologies can be generated from their informal ones. The key applications of formal lightweight ontologies are document classification, semantic search, and data integration. However, these applications suffer from the following problems: the disambiguation accuracy of the state of the art NLP tools used in generating formal lightweight ontologies from their informal ones; the lack of background knowledge needed for the formal lightweight ontologies; and the limitation of ontology reuse. In this dissertation, we propose a novel solution to these problems in formal lightweight ontologies; namely, faceted lightweight ontology (FLO). FLO is a lightweight ontology in which terms, present in each node label, and their concepts, are available in the background knowledge (BK), which is organized as a set of facets. A facet can be defined as a distinctive property of the groups of concepts that can help in differentiating one group from another. Background knowledge can be defined as a subset of a knowledge base, such as WordNet, and often represents a specific domain.
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
- Imprint
- Trento : University / Department of information engineering and computer science
-
Piros, A.: Az ETO-jelzetek automatikus interpretálásának és elemzésének kérdései (2018)
0.11
0.10635352 = product of:
0.24815822 = sum of:
0.058116194 = product of:
0.17434858 = sum of:
0.17434858 = weight(_text_:3a in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17434858 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.01569344 = weight(_text_:of in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01569344 = score(doc=855,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.17434858 = weight(_text_:2f in 855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17434858 = score(doc=855,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 855, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=855)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Converting UDC numbers manually to a complex format such as the one mentioned above is an unrealistic expectation; supporting building these representations, as far as possible automatically, is a well-founded requirement. An additional advantage of this approach is that the existing records could also be processed and converted. In my dissertation I would like to prove also that it is possible to design and implement an algorithm that is able to convert pre-coordinated UDC numbers into the introduced format by identifying all their elements and revealing their whole syntactic structure as well. In my dissertation I will discuss a feasible way of building a UDC-specific XML schema for describing the most detailed and complicated UDC numbers (containing not only the common auxiliary signs and numbers, but also the different types of special auxiliaries). The schema definition is available online at: http://piros.udc-interpreter.hu#xsd. The primary goal of my research is to prove that it is possible to support building, retrieving, and analyzing UDC numbers without compromises, by taking the whole syntactic richness of the scheme by storing the UDC numbers reserving the meaning of pre-coordination. The research has also included the implementation of a software that parses UDC classmarks attended to prove that such solution can be applied automatically without any additional effort or even retrospectively on existing collections.
- Content
- Vgl. auch: New automatic interpreter for complex UDC numbers. Unter: <https%3A%2F%2Fudcc.org%2Ffiles%2FAttilaPiros_EC_36-37_2014-2015.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3kc9CwDDCWP7aArpfjrs5b>
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.11
0.10594197 = product of:
0.24719794 = sum of:
0.020132389 = weight(_text_:of in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020132389 = score(doc=563,freq=16.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.20921828 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20921828 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.017847266 = product of:
0.035694532 = sum of:
0.035694532 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035694532 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- In this thesis we propose three new word association measures for multi-word term extraction. We combine these association measures with LocalMaxs algorithm in our extraction model and compare the results of different multi-word term extraction methods. Our approach is language and domain independent and requires no training data. It can be applied to such tasks as text summarization, information retrieval, and document classification. We further explore the potential of using multi-word terms as an effective representation for general web-page summarization. We extract multi-word terms from human written summaries in a large collection of web-pages, and generate the summaries by aligning document words with these multi-word terms. Our system applies machine translation technology to learn the aligning process from a training set and focuses on selecting high quality multi-word terms from human written summaries to generate suitable results for web-page summarization.
- Content
- A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
- Imprint
- Guelph, Ontario : University of Guelph
-
Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019)
0.10
0.1044625 = product of:
0.36561874 = sum of:
0.06973943 = product of:
0.20921828 = sum of:
0.20921828 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20921828 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2958793 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2958793 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Footnote
- https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
-
Stalberg, E.; Cronin, C.: Assessing the cost and value of bibliographic control (2011)
0.10
0.10193597 = product of:
0.17838794 = sum of:
0.027541874 = weight(_text_:of in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027541874 = score(doc=2592,freq=22.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07727726 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052747004 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.02082181 = product of:
0.04164362 = sum of:
0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 2592) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04164362 = score(doc=2592,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2592, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2592)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- In June 2009, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Heads of Technical Services in Large Research Libraries Interest Group established the Task Force on Cost/Value Assessment of Bibliographic Control to address recommendation 5.1.1.1 of On the Record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, which focused on developing measures for costs, benefits, and value of bibliographic control. This paper outlines results of that task force's efforts to develop and articulate metrics for evaluating the cost and value of cataloging activities specifically, and offers some next steps that the community could take to further the profession's collective understanding of the costs and values associated with bibliographic control.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Maurer, M.B.; Shakeri, S.: Disciplinary differences : LCSH and keyword assignment for ETDs from different disciplines (2016)
0.10
0.09875251 = product of:
0.17281689 = sum of:
0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 5122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021970814 = score(doc=5122,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 5122, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5122)
0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 5122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07727726 = score(doc=5122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 5122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5122)
0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052747004 = score(doc=5122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5122)
0.02082181 = product of:
0.04164362 = sum of:
0.04164362 = weight(_text_:22 in 5122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04164362 = score(doc=5122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
- Abstract
- This research concerns the frequency of the assignment of author-supplied keyword strings and cataloger supplied subject heading strings within a library catalog. The results reveal that, on average, more author-assigned keywords and more cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings were assigned to works emerging from the arts & humanities than to works emerging from the social sciences and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. STEM disciplines in particular received a lower amount of topical metadata, in part because of the under-assignment of name/title, geographical, and corporate subject headings. These findings reveal how librarians could increase their understanding of how topical access is functioning within academic disciplines.
- Date
- 17. 3.2019 18:04:22
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.4, S.213-243
-
Goldsmith, M.; Adler, E.: RDA in Israel (2014)
0.10
0.095609516 = product of:
0.22308886 = sum of:
0.016608374 = weight(_text_:of in 1988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016608374 = score(doc=1988,freq=8.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 1988, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1988)
0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 1988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07727726 = score(doc=1988,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 1988, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1988)
0.12920323 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12920323 = score(doc=1988,freq=12.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.7466178 = fieldWeight in 1988, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1988)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Israeli cataloging has traditionally followed American standards, with the exception of vernacular cataloging for Hebrew, Arabic and Cyrillic scripts. Each change in American rules has led to the need to adjust Israeli cataloging standards accordingly. The Library of Congress decision to implement Resource Description and Access (RDA) in April 2013 led to the conclusion that the Israeli libraries had no choice but to also adopt RDA. The Israeli Inter-University Cataloging Committee held several meetings in 2012 and 2013 regarding the implications of RDA. This article summarizes the unique issues of Israeli cataloging, the preparations for adjusting them to RDA, and for nationwide implementation.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.6/7, S.677-687
-
Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Informationelle Kompetenz : ein humanistischer Entwurf (2019)
0.09
0.09298591 = product of:
0.3254507 = sum of:
0.08136267 = product of:
0.24408801 = sum of:
0.24408801 = weight(_text_:3a in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24408801 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.24408801 = weight(_text_:2f in 5955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24408801 = score(doc=5955,freq=2.0), product of:
0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 5955, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5955)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Philosophisch-ethische Rezensionen vom 09.11.2019 (Jürgen Czogalla), Unter: https://philosophisch-ethische-rezensionen.de/rezension/Goedert1.html. In: B.I.T. online 23(2020) H.3, S.345-347 (W. Sühl-Strohmenger) [Unter: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.b-i-t-online.de%2Fheft%2F2020-03-rezensionen.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0iY3f_zNcvEjeZ6inHVnOK]. In: Open Password Nr. 805 vom 14.08.2020 (H.-C. Hobohm) [Unter: https://www.password-online.de/?mailpoet_router&endpoint=view_in_browser&action=view&data=WzE0MywiOGI3NjZkZmNkZjQ1IiwwLDAsMTMxLDFd].
-
Julien, C.-A.; Tirilly, P.; Leide, J.E.; Guastavino, C.: Constructing a true LCSH tree of a science and engineering collection (2012)
0.09
0.09033259 = product of:
0.21077605 = sum of:
0.021353623 = weight(_text_:of in 512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021353623 = score(doc=512,freq=18.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 512, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=512)
0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06623765 = score(doc=512,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 512, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=512)
0.12318477 = weight(_text_:distribution in 512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12318477 = score(doc=512,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.5128454 = fieldWeight in 512, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=512)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) is a subject structure used to index large library collections throughout the world. Browsing a collection through LCSH is difficult using current online tools in part because users cannot explore the structure using their existing experience navigating file hierarchies on their hard drives. This is due to inconsistencies in the LCSH structure, which does not adhere to the specific rules defining tree structures. This article proposes a method to adapt the LCSH structure to reflect a real-world collection from the domain of science and engineering. This structure is transformed into a valid tree structure using an automatic process. The analysis of the resulting LCSH tree shows a large and complex structure. The analysis of the distribution of information within the LCSH tree reveals a power law distribution where the vast majority of subjects contain few information items and a few subjects contain the vast majority of the collection.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.12, S.2405-2418
-
Higgins, C.: Library of Congress Classification : Teddy Roosevelt's world in numbers? (2012)
0.09
0.090124585 = product of:
0.2102907 = sum of:
0.025109503 = weight(_text_:of in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025109503 = score(doc=1905,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
0.12489891 = weight(_text_:congress in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12489891 = score(doc=1905,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.5962888 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
0.06028229 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06028229 = score(doc=1905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- This article identifies late nineteenth-century American preoccupations and prejudices within the Library of Congress classification scheme, suggesting that these ought to be of concern to the worldwide community of classifiers who now apply the scheme beyond its original context. The approach of the article is both historical and critical. It uses a number of examples to demonstrate how the ideological content of the classification scheme fails to adequately represent contemporary global realities, while recognizing, and applauding, its essential pragmatism.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.4, S.249-262
-
Devaul, H.; Diekema, A.R.; Ostwald, J.: Computer-assisted assignment of educational standards using natural language processing (2011)
0.09
0.08931847 = product of:
0.20840976 = sum of:
0.018832127 = weight(_text_:of in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018832127 = score(doc=4199,freq=14.0), product of:
0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.07830899 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07830899 = score(doc=4199,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.45251876 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.11126863 = sum of:
0.0755741 = weight(_text_:service in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0755741 = score(doc=4199,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.40169317 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.035694532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035694532 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15376249 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.043909185 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
- Abstract
- Educational standards are a central focus of the current educational system in the United States, underpinning educational practice, curriculum design, teacher professional development, and high-stakes testing and assessment. Digital library users have requested that this information be accessible in association with digital learning resources to support teaching and learning as well as accountability requirements. Providing this information is complex because of the variability and number of standards documents in use at the national, state, and local level. This article describes a cataloging tool that aids catalogers in the assignment of standards metadata to digital library resources, using natural language processing techniques. The research explores whether the standards suggestor service would suggest the same standards as a human, whether relevant standards are ranked appropriately in the result set, and whether the relevance of the suggested assignments improve when, in addition to resource content, metadata is included in the query to the cataloging tool. The article also discusses how this service might streamline the cataloging workflow.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:25:32
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.395-405
