Search (883 results, page 1 of 45)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.13 
    0.12637448 = product of:
  0.29487377 = sum of:
    0.06973943 = product of:
      0.20921828 = sum of:
        0.20921828 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20921828 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.015916053 = weight(_text_:of in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015916053 = score(doc=862,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.20921828 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20921828 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Handis, M.W.: Greek subject and name authorities, and the Library of Congress (2020) 0.12 
    0.123276636 = product of:
  0.2876455 = sum of:
    0.02348779 = weight(_text_:of in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02348779 = score(doc=5801,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.1727972 = weight(_text_:congress in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1727972 = score(doc=5801,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.82496345 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
    0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09136049 = score(doc=5801,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 5801, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5801)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Some international libraries are still using the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, 2nd edition revised, for cataloging even though the Library of Congress and other large libraries have retired it in favor of Resource Description and Access. One of these libraries is the National Library of Greece, which consults the Library of Congress database before establishing authorities. There are cultural differences in names and subjects between the Library of Congress and the National Library, but some National Library terms may be more appropriate for users than the Library of Congress-established forms.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.2, S.107-126
  3. Thomas, S.E.: ¬The Program for Cooperative Cataloging : backstory and future potential (2020) 0.12 
    0.115364164 = product of:
  0.26918304 = sum of:
    0.02034102 = weight(_text_:of in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02034102 = score(doc=124,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
    0.109286554 = weight(_text_:congress in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.109286554 = score(doc=124,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.5217527 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
    0.13955545 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13955545 = score(doc=124,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.80643946 = fieldWeight in 124, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=124)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    In 1988 the Library of Congress and eight library participants undertook a two-year pilot known as the National Coordinated Cataloging Program (NCCP) to increase the number of quality bibliographic records. Subsequently the Bibliographic Services Study Committee reviewed the pilot. Discussions held at the Library of Congress (LC) and in other fora resulted in the creation of the Cooperative Cataloging Council, and, ultimately, the establishment of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) in 1994. The conditions that contributed to a successful approach to shared cataloging are described. The article concludes with considerations for expanding the future effectiveness of the PCC.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.3/4, S.190-203
  4. Cooey, N.; Phillips, A.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : a post-coordinated future (2023) 0.11 
    0.11437887 = product of:
  0.26688403 = sum of:
    0.027541874 = weight(_text_:of in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027541874 = score(doc=1163,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.40111488 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
    0.13384815 = weight(_text_:congress in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13384815 = score(doc=1163,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.63901395 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
    0.10549401 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10549401 = score(doc=1163,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 1163, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1163)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    This paper is the result of a request from Library of Congress leadership to assess pre-coordinated versus post-coordinated subject cataloging. It argues that the disadvantages of pre-coordinated subject strings are perennial and continue to hinder progress, while the advantages of post-coordinated subject cataloging have expanded, resulting in new opportunities to serve the needs of catalogers and end users alike. The consequences of retaining pre-coordinated headings will have long-term impacts that heavily out-weigh the short-term challenges of transitioning to new cataloging practices. By implementing post-coordinated, faceted vocabularies, the Library of Congress will be investing in the future of libraries.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in Themenheft: Implementation of Faceted Vocabularies.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.5-6, S.491-505
  5. Dutkiewicz, S.M.: Application of faceted vocabularies to cataloging of textbooks (2023) 0.10 
    0.10437734 = product of:
  0.24354711 = sum of:
    0.028766548 = weight(_text_:of in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028766548 = score(doc=1179,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.41895083 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
    0.109286554 = weight(_text_:congress in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.109286554 = score(doc=1179,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.5217527 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
    0.10549401 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10549401 = score(doc=1179,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 1179, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1179)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    This article discusses the practical application of faceted vocabularies to the cataloging of textbooks. Consistent application of faceted vocabularies, specifically Library of Congress Genre/Form Terms for Library and Archival Materials (LCGFT) and Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT), would enhance the discovery of these resources. Alternatives to special cases in Subject Heading Manual H 2187 are proposed. A case study demonstrating the application of LCDGT is provided. Figures illustrate the results of the proposed best practices. The article includes four tables that are designed to streamline term assignments. Consistent cataloging of genre and audience prepares legacy records for future automated enhancement.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in Themenheft: Implementation of Faceted Vocabularies.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.5-6, S.661-685
  6. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.10 
    0.10216986 = product of:
  0.23839633 = sum of:
    0.058116194 = product of:
      0.17434858 = sum of:
        0.17434858 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17434858 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0059315623 = weight(_text_:of in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0059315623 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.086386204 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.17434858 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17434858 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.37226257 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  7. Hahn, J.: Semi-automated methods for BIBFRAME work entity description (2021) 0.10 
    0.10160307 = product of:
  0.17780536 = sum of:
    0.016608374 = weight(_text_:of in 725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016608374 = score(doc=725,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 725, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=725)
    0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07727726 = score(doc=725,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 725, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=725)
    0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052747004 = score(doc=725,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 725, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=725)
    0.031172724 = product of:
      0.06234545 = sum of:
        0.06234545 = weight(_text_:service in 725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06234545 = score(doc=725,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.33137995 = fieldWeight in 725, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=725)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    Abstract
    This paper reports an investigation of machine learning methods for the semi-automated creation of a BIBFRAME Work entity description within the RDF linked data editor Sinopia (https://sinopia.io). The automated subject indexing software Annif was configured with the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) vocabulary from the Linked Data Service at https://id.loc.gov/. The training corpus was comprised of 9.3 million titles and LCSH linked data references from the IvyPlus POD project (https://pod.stanford.edu/) and from Share-VDE (https://wiki.share-vde.org). Semi-automated processes were explored to support and extend, not replace, professional expertise.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.8, p.853-867
  8. Post, C.; Henry, T.; Nunnally, K.; Lanham, C.: ¬A colossal catalog adventure : representing Indie video games and game creators in library catalogs (2023) 0.09 
    0.09492837 = product of:
  0.22149953 = sum of:
    0.014383274 = weight(_text_:of in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014383274 = score(doc=1182,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
    0.10549401 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10549401 = score(doc=1182,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.6096109 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
    0.101622246 = weight(_text_:distribution in 1182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.101622246 = score(doc=1182,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.42307585 = fieldWeight in 1182, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1182)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Significant changes in how video games are made and distributed require catalogers to critically reflect on existing approaches for representing games in library catalogs. Digital distribution channels are quickly supplanting releases of games on physical media while also facilitating a dramatic increase in independent-made games that incorporate novel subject matter and styles of gameplay. This paper presents an action research project cataloging 18 independently-made digital games from a small publisher, Choice of Games, considering how descriptive cataloging, subject cataloging, and name authority control for these works compares to mainstream video games.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.7-8, S.792-814
  9. Leazer, G.H.; Montoya, R.: introduction to the special issue : ¬The politics of knowledge organization (2020) 0.09 
    0.087924354 = product of:
  0.20515682 = sum of:
    0.027567413 = weight(_text_:of in 5987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027567413 = score(doc=5987,freq=30.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 5987, product of:
          5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
            30.0 = termFreq=30.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5987)
    0.15086992 = weight(_text_:distribution in 5987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15086992 = score(doc=5987,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.6281048 = fieldWeight in 5987, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5987)
    0.02671948 = product of:
      0.05343896 = sum of:
        0.05343896 = weight(_text_:service in 5987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05343896 = score(doc=5987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.28403997 = fieldWeight in 5987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5987)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Politics is about the distribution of goods and risks. We can describe the distribution of goods, and we can also characterize those distributions as a kind of inequality. As a baseline definition of "politics of information" we mean the distribution of information goods across different populations. Despite a strong tradition of disciplinary focus in information science, much of the literature is still given over to fairly simple notions of social form and structure. A nascent knowledge organization practice dedicated to social difference is explicitly motivated by justice and nomenclature. Not only is knowledge organization a tool of cultural hegemony, but also it can be read as a product of cultural ordering and bias. Identifying unjust and politically oppressive practice must be part of the path to justice. Understanding the political construction of knowledge organization is essential for the theory of information service in order to build a more just professional practice.
  10. Samples, J.; Bigelow, I.: MARC to BIBFRAME : converting the PCC to Linked Data (2020) 0.08 
    0.08168939 = product of:
  0.19060856 = sum of:
    0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021970814 = score(doc=119,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
    0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07727726 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
    0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09136049 = score(doc=119,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    The Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC) has formal relationships with the Library of Congress (LC), Share-VDE, and Linked Data for Production Phase 2 (LD4P2) for work on Bibliographic Framework (BIBFRAME), and PCC institutions have been very active in the exploration of MARC to BIBFRAME conversion processes. This article will review the involvement of PCC in the development of BIBFRAME and examine the work of LC, Share-VDE, and LD4P2 on MARC to BIBFRAME conversion. It will conclude with a discussion of areas for further exploration by the PCC leading up to the creation of PCC conversion specifications and PCC BIBFRAME data.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.3/4, S.403-417
  11. Chou, C.; Chu, T.: ¬An analysis of BERT (NLP) for assisted subject indexing for Project Gutenberg (2022) 0.08 
    0.07885902 = product of:
  0.18400437 = sum of:
    0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021970814 = score(doc=1139,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
    0.109286554 = weight(_text_:congress in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.109286554 = score(doc=1139,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.5217527 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
    0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052747004 = score(doc=1139,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 1139, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1139)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    In light of AI (Artificial Intelligence) and NLP (Natural language processing) technologies, this article examines the feasibility of using AI/NLP models to enhance the subject indexing of digital resources. While BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) models are widely used in scholarly communities, the authors assess whether BERT models can be used in machine-assisted indexing in the Project Gutenberg collection, through suggesting Library of Congress subject headings filtered by certain Library of Congress Classification subclass labels. The findings of this study are informative for further research on BERT models to assist with automatic subject indexing for digital library collections.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.8, p.807-835
  12. Dobreski, B.; Snow, K.; Moulaison-Sandy, H.: On overlap and otherness : a comparison of three vocabularies' approaches to LGBTQ+ identity (2022) 0.08 
    0.07885902 = product of:
  0.18400437 = sum of:
    0.021970814 = weight(_text_:of in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021970814 = score(doc=1141,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
    0.109286554 = weight(_text_:congress in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.109286554 = score(doc=1141,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.5217527 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
    0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052747004 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records can include information from controlled vocabularies to capture identities about individuals, especially about authors or intended audiences; personal name authority records can also contain information about identity. Employing a systematic analysis of the overlap of the Homosaurus, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), and Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT), this article explores the extent to which LGBTQ+ identities are represented in the three vocabularies. Despite LCSH's long, iterative history of development and the faceted, post-coordinate nature of LCDGT, neither vocabulary was found to be adequate in covering the complex, LGBTQ+ identities represented in the Homosaurus.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.6-7, p.490-513
  13. Danskin, A.: ¬The Anglo-American Authority File : a PCC story (2020) 0.08 
    0.075832255 = product of:
  0.17694193 = sum of:
    0.008304187 = weight(_text_:of in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008304187 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.120940685 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
    0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07727726 = score(doc=121,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
    0.09136049 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09136049 = score(doc=121,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.52793854 = fieldWeight in 121, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=121)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    This article examines the motivations for the collaboration between the British Library and Library of Congress to develop a joint (Anglo-American) authority file. It describes the obstacles that had to be overcome for the British Library to become a Name Authority Cooperative (NACO) "copy holder", or node. It considers the contribution the British Library made to NACO, the benefits it has derived from participation in Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC), and concludes by looking ahead to the next 25 years.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: 'Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC): 25 Years Strong and Growing!'.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.3/4, S.221-229
  14. Hutchinson, J.; Nakatomi, J.: Improving subject description of an LGBTQ+ collection (2024) 0.07 
    0.074446574 = product of:
  0.17370866 = sum of:
    0.025109503 = weight(_text_:of in 1157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025109503 = score(doc=1157,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.36569026 = fieldWeight in 1157, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1157)
    0.08831687 = weight(_text_:congress in 1157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08831687 = score(doc=1157,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.42163986 = fieldWeight in 1157, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1157)
    0.06028229 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06028229 = score(doc=1157,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.3483491 = fieldWeight in 1157, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1157)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    This article summarizes the work done as part of a project to improve subject description of an LGBTQ + collection in the ONE Archives, part of the University of Southern California (USC) Libraries. The project involved adding local subject headings to augment existing Library of Congress Subject Headings. The article describes the steps that the project team took, along with the methods that were rejected. The paper discusses reasons why the team chose their course of action.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.3-4, p.380-394
  15. Clarke, R.I.: Library classification systems in the U.S. : basic ideas and examples (2021) 0.07 
    0.07380592 = product of:
  0.17221381 = sum of:
    0.02034102 = weight(_text_:of in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02034102 = score(doc=705,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
    0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07727726 = score(doc=705,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
    0.074595526 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074595526 = score(doc=705,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.43106002 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    This article offers a basic introduction to classification in the context of librarianship in the United States with an aim toward filling gaps in formal education and practical experience. The article defines the concept of classification and discusses the goals and purposes of classification, both functional and intellectual. Overviews of two common classification systems frequently used in U.S. libraries are presented: Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Library of Congress Classification (LCC), as well as an introduction to a group of classifications known as "reader-interest classifications."
    Content
    Vgl.: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1881008. Teil eines Themenheftes: Cataloging and Classification: Back to Basics
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 59(2021) no.2/3, S.203-224
  16. Hider, P.; Coe, M.: Academic disciplines in the context of library classification : mapping university faculty structures to the DDC and LCC schemes (2022) 0.07 
    0.065790884 = product of:
  0.15351206 = sum of:
    0.02348779 = weight(_text_:of in 709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02348779 = score(doc=709,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 709, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=709)
    0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07727726 = score(doc=709,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 709, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=709)
    0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052747004 = score(doc=709,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 709, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=709)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    We investigated the extent to which the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and the Library of Congress Classification reflect the organizational structures of Australian universities. The mapping of the faculty structures of ten universities to the two schemes showed strong alignment, with very few fields represented in the names of the organizational units not covered at all by either bibliographic scheme. This suggests a degree of universality and "scientific and educational consensus" with respect to both the schemes and academic disciplines. The article goes on to discuss the concept of discipline and its application in bibliographic classification.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 60(2022) no.2, p.194-213
  17. Zavalin, V.: Exploration of subject and genre representation in bibliographic metadata representing works of fiction for children and young adults (2024) 0.06 
    0.064941555 = product of:
  0.1515303 = sum of:
    0.021353623 = weight(_text_:of in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021353623 = score(doc=1152,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
    0.06623765 = weight(_text_:congress in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06623765 = score(doc=1152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.31622988 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
    0.06393902 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 1152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06393902 = score(doc=1152,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.36948 = fieldWeight in 1152, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1152)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    This study examines subject and genre representation in metadata that describes information resources created for children and young adult audiences. Both quantitative and limited qualitative analyses were applied to the analysis of WorldCat records collected in 2021 and contributed by the Children's and Young Adults' Cataloging Program at the US Library of Congress. This dataset contains records created several years prior to the data collection point and edited by various OCLC member institutions. Findings provide information on the level and patterns of application of these kinds of metadata important for information access, with a focus on the fields, subfields, and controlled vocabularies used. The discussion of results includes a detailed evaluation of genre and subject metadata quality (accuracy, completeness, and consistency).
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 61(2023) no.1, p.47-66
  18. Lee, T.; Dupont, S.; Bullard, J.: Comparing the cataloguing of indigenous scholarships : first steps and finding (2021) 0.06 
    0.062803976 = product of:
  0.14654261 = sum of:
    0.018757246 = weight(_text_:of in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018757246 = score(doc=582,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.27317715 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
    0.055198044 = weight(_text_:congress in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055198044 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.26352492 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
    0.07258732 = weight(_text_:distribution in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07258732 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.30219704 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    This paper provides an analysis of data collected on the continued prevalence of outdated, marginalizing terms in contemporary cataloguing practices, stemming from the Library of Congress Subject Heading term "Indians" and all its related terms. Using Manitoba Archival Information Network's (MAIN) list of current LCSH and recommended alternatives as a foundation, we built a dataset from titles published in the last five years. We show a wide distribution of LCSH used to catalogue fiction and non-fiction, with outdated but recognized terms like "Indians of North America-History" appearing the most frequently and ambiguous and offensive terms like "Indian gays" appearing throughout the dataset. We discuss two primary problems with the continued use of current LCSH terms: their ambiguity limits the effectiveness of an institution's catalog, and they do not reflect the way Indigenous Peoples, Nations, and communities in North America prefer to represent themselves as individuals and collectives. These findings support those of parallel scholarship on knowl­edge organization practices for works on Indigenous topics and provide a foundation for further work.
  19. Myntti, J.; Lewis, N.; McCormack, A.M.; Rockwell, K.: Regional connections to national authority files (2020) 0.06 
    0.061888948 = product of:
  0.14440754 = sum of:
    0.014383274 = weight(_text_:of in 5796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014383274 = score(doc=5796,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.20947541 = fieldWeight in 5796, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5796)
    0.07727726 = weight(_text_:congress in 5796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07727726 = score(doc=5796,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20946044 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 5796, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5796)
    0.052747004 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 5796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052747004 = score(doc=5796,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17305137 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 5796, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5796)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Local and regional authority files exist to cover gaps in national and international authority files. These types of authority files should not exist alone if they are going to be fully utilized by other institutions that may have resources about the same individuals or topics. This article discusses how the Western Name Authority File, a regional controlled vocabulary of personal names and corporate bodies, can link to larger authority files such as the Library of Congress Name Authority File and Wikidata. Workflows and issues encountered with linking this local authority file to larger authority files are discussed.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 58(2020) no.1, S.76-89
  20. Malik, N.; Spencer, D.; Bui, Q.N.: Power in the U.S. political economy : a network analysis (2021) 0.06 
    0.056852743 = product of:
  0.1326564 = sum of:
    0.018832127 = weight(_text_:of in 3811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018832127 = score(doc=3811,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06866331 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.2742677 = fieldWeight in 3811, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3811)
    0.08710478 = weight(_text_:distribution in 3811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08710478 = score(doc=3811,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24019864 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043909185 = queryNorm
        0.36263645 = fieldWeight in 3811, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4703507 = idf(docFreq=505, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3811)
    0.02671948 = product of:
      0.05343896 = sum of:
        0.05343896 = weight(_text_:service in 3811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05343896 = score(doc=3811,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18813887 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043909185 = queryNorm
            0.28403997 = fieldWeight in 3811, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.284727 = idf(docFreq=1655, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3811)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    Abstract
    Many features of the U.S. political economy arise from the interactions between large political and economic institutions, and yet we know little about the nature of their interactions and the power distribution between these institutions. In this paper, we present a detailed analysis of networks of U.S.-based organizations, where edges represent three different kinds of relationships, namely owner-owned (ownerships), donor-donee (donations), and service provider-payee (transactions). Our findings suggest that in the ownerships network, the financial organizations form the core, and banking organizations hold strategic locations in the network. In the transactions network, the government organizations and agencies form the core, and defense-related organizations form the backbone. In contrast, with the donations network, no specific domain of organizations forms either the core or the backbone.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.7, S.811-823

Authors

Languages

  • e 813
  • d 63
  • pt 4
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 829
  • el 101
  • m 24
  • p 13
  • s 4
  • x 4
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications