Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Bai, G."
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Sun, A.; Bhowmick, S.S.; Nguyen, K.T.N.; Bai, G.: Tag-based social image retrieval : an empirical evaluation (2011) 0.00
    0.0045474404 = product of:
      0.011368601 = sum of:
        0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002321947 = score(doc=4938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
        0.009046654 = weight(_text_:a in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009046654 = score(doc=4938,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Tags associated with social images are valuable information source for superior image search and retrieval experiences. Although various heuristics are valuable to boost tag-based search for images, there is a lack of general framework to study the impact of these heuristics. Specifically, the task of ranking images matching a given tag query based on their associated tags in descending order of relevance has not been well studied. In this article, we take the first step to propose a generic, flexible, and extensible framework for this task and exploit it for a systematic and comprehensive empirical evaluation of various methods for ranking images. To this end, we identified five orthogonal dimensions to quantify the matching score between a tagged image and a tag query. These five dimensions are: (i) tag relatedness to measure the degree of effectiveness of a tag describing the tagged image; (ii) tag discrimination to quantify the degree of discrimination of a tag with respect to the entire tagged image collection; (iii) tag length normalization analogous to document length normalization in web search; (iv) tag-query matching model for the matching score computation between an image tag and a query tag; and (v) query model for tag query rewriting. For each dimension, we identify a few implementations and evaluate their impact on NUS-WIDE dataset, the largest human-annotated dataset consisting of more than 269K tagged images from Flickr. We evaluated 81 single-tag queries and 443 multi-tag queries over 288 search methods and systematically compare their performances using standard metrics including Precision at top-K, Mean Average Precision (MAP), Recall, and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG).
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.12, S.2364-2381
    Type
    a