Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.018758833 = product of:
0.046897084 = sum of:
0.00835694 = weight(_text_:a in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00835694 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.038540144 = product of:
0.07708029 = sum of:
0.07708029 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07708029 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
- Type
- a
Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002)
0.01
0.0052233837 = product of:
0.013058458 = sum of:
0.003715115 = weight(_text_:s in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003715115 = score(doc=3765,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.009343344 = weight(_text_:a in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009343344 = score(doc=3765,freq=10.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.4, S.383-395
- Type
- a