Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Zumer, M."
  1. Zeng, M.L.; Gracy, K.F.; Zumer, M.: Using a semantic analysis tool to generate subject access points : a study using Panofsky's theory and two research samples (2014) 0.04 
    0.039023817 = product of:
  0.04877977 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
    0.025273174 = weight(_text_:u in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025273174 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
    0.0062677055 = weight(_text_:a in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062677055 = score(doc=1464,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=1464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.8 = coord(4/5)
    Abstract
    This paper attempts to explore an approach of using an automatic semantic analysis tool to enhance the "subject" access to materials that are not included in the usual library subject cataloging process. Using two research samples the authors analyzed the access points supplied by OpenCalais, a semantic analysis tool. As an aid in understanding how computerized subject analysis might be approached, this paper suggests using the three-layer framework that has been accepted and applied in image analysis, developed by Erwin Panofsky.
    Pages
    S.493-500
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  2. Pauman Budanovi, M.; Zumer, M.: Investigating mental models of cataloguers as the first step towards the development of intuitive cataloguer's tools (2015) 0.03 
    0.031193366 = product of:
  0.05198894 = sum of:
    0.004643894 = weight(_text_:s in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004643894 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
    0.042121958 = weight(_text_:u in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042121958 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
    0.0052230875 = weight(_text_:a in 2988) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052230875 = score(doc=2988,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2988, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2988)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Pages
    S.106-117
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
    Type
    a
  3. Brito, M(arcilio), de; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.; Bastos Vieira, S.; Brito, M(arcos), de: Document representation with images : an experimental milestone (2018) 0.03 
    0.025878003 = product of:
  0.043130003 = sum of:
    0.005253966 = weight(_text_:s in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005253966 = score(doc=4694,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
    0.033697568 = weight(_text_:u in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033697568 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
    0.00417847 = weight(_text_:a in 4694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00417847 = score(doc=4694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4694)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Pages
    S.167-175
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  4. Salaba, A.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Records (2006) 0.02 
    0.024029054 = product of:
  0.04004842 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=279,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
    0.029485371 = weight(_text_:u in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029485371 = score(doc=279,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
    0.007312323 = weight(_text_:a in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007312323 = score(doc=279,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Continuing the tradition set by the FRBR model, a new IFLA working group was formed to examine the functional requirements for subject authority records (FRSAR). The focus of the FRSAR Working Group is on the user tasks and functional requirements of authority records for the Group 3 entities as defined by FRBR. This paper presents the Working Group's terms of reference and reports on initial activities and subject authority issues discussed.
    Pages
    S.101-106
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  5. Zumer, M.: FRSAD: challenges of modeling the aboutness (2011) 0.02 
    0.022744015 = product of:
  0.03790669 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 4787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=4787,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4787, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4787)
    0.029485371 = weight(_text_:u in 4787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029485371 = score(doc=4787,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4787, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4787)
    0.0051705935 = weight(_text_:a in 4787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051705935 = score(doc=4787,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4787, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4787)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Records Working Group (FRSAR WG) is the third IFLA Working Group of the FRBR family. It was formed in April 2005 and it was charged with the task of developing a conceptual model of FRBR Group 3 entities within the FRBR framework as they relate to the "aboutness" of works. This paper introduces the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD), the model developed by the FRSAR WG, and discusses issues raised during the world-wide review.
    Pages
    S.149-156
    Source
    Concepts in context: Proceedings of the Cologne Conference on Interoperability and Semantics in Knowledge Organization July 19th - 20th, 2010. Eds.: F. Boteram, W. Gödert u. J. Hubrich
    Type
    a
  6. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.; Mitchell, J.S.: FRBRizing KOS relationships : applying the FRBR model to versions of the DDC (2012) 0.02 
    0.021040212 = product of:
  0.035067018 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=846,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
    0.025273174 = weight(_text_:u in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025273174 = score(doc=846,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
    0.007007508 = weight(_text_:a in 846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007007508 = score(doc=846,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 846, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=846)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The paper presents the approach of using the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model to investigate the complicated sets of relationships among different versions of a classification system for the purposes of specifying provenance of classification data and facilitating collaborative efforts for using and reusing classification data, particularly in a linked data setting. The long-term goal of this research goes beyond the Dewey Decimal Classification that is used as a case. It addresses the questions of if and how the modelling approach and the FRBR-based model itself can be generalized and applied to other classification systems, multilingual and multicultural vocabularies, and even non-KOS resources that share similar characteristics.
    Pages
    S.190-194
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
    Type
    a
  7. Zumer, M.; Clavel-Merrin, G.: TEL-ME-MOR : investigating subject access tools and practices of European national libraries (2008) 0.02 
    0.020784983 = product of:
  0.03464164 = sum of:
    0.0039404742 = weight(_text_:s in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0039404742 = score(doc=1682,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
    0.025273174 = weight(_text_:u in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025273174 = score(doc=1682,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
    0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 1682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005427992 = score(doc=1682,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1682, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1682)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    TEL-ME-MOR is funded by European Commission, Directorate E - Content, as a result of the third call for proposals published in 2004, under the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6). As part of Workpackage 3 the national libraries of the 10 New Member States responded to a questionnaire to enable the TEL-ME-MOR project to establish an overview of subject access tools and practice in their institutions. Results are analysed and areas for further study are identified, in particular in the field of cross language access.
    Pages
    S.110-119
    Source
    Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  8. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Extending models for controlled vocabularies to classification systems : modelling DDC with FRSAD (2011) 0.02 
    0.019226663 = product of:
  0.032044437 = sum of:
    0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 4828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002321947 = score(doc=4828,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4828, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4828)
    0.021060979 = weight(_text_:u in 4828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021060979 = score(doc=4828,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4828, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4828)
    0.008661511 = weight(_text_:a in 4828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008661511 = score(doc=4828,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 4828, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4828)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) conceptual model identifies entities, attributes and relationships as they relate to subject authority data. FRSAD includes two main entities, thema (any entity used as a subject of a work) and nomen (any sign or sequence of signs that a thema is known by, referred to, or addressed as). In a given controlled vocabulary and within a domain, a nomen is the appellation of only one thema. The authors consider the question, can the FRSAD conceptual model be extended beyond controlled vocabularies (its original focus) to model classification data? Models that are developed based on the structures and functions of controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri and subject heading systems) often need to be adjusted or extended to accommodate classification systems that have been developed with different focused functions, structures and fundamental theories. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system is used as a case study to test applicability of the FRSAD model for classification data, and as a springboard for a general discussion of issues related to the use of FRSAD for the representation of classification data.
    Pages
    S.241-250
    Source
    Classification and ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar, 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, The Netherlands. Eds.: A. Slavic u. E. Civallero
    Type
    a
  9. Zumer, M.; Zeng, M.L.: Application of FRBR and FRSAD to classification systems (2015) 0.02 
    0.018461693 = product of:
  0.030769488 = sum of:
    0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002321947 = score(doc=2284,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
    0.021060979 = weight(_text_:u in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021060979 = score(doc=2284,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
    0.007386562 = weight(_text_:a in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007386562 = score(doc=2284,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) conceptual model defines entities, attributes and relationships as they relate to subject authority data. FRSAD includes two main entities, thema (any entity used as the subject of a work) and nomen (any sign or arrangement of signs that a thema is known by, referred to, or addressed as). In a given controlled vocabulary and within a domain, a nomen is the appellation of only one thema. The authors consider the question: can the FRSAD conceptual model be extended beyond controlled vocabularies (its original focus) to model classification data? Models that are developed based on the structures and functions of controlled vocabularies (such as thesauri and subject heading systems) often need to be adjusted or extended to accommodate classification systems that have been developed with different focused functions, structures and fundamental theories. The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) are used as a case study to test applicability of the FRSAD model for classification data and the applicability of the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) for modelling versions, such as different adaptations and different language editions.
    Pages
    S.37-38
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
    Type
    a
  10. Golub, K.; Tudhope, D.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Terminology registries for knowledge organization systems : functionality, use, and attributes (2014) 0.02 
    0.016579622 = product of:
  0.027632704 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
    0.010393814 = weight(_text_:a in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010393814 = score(doc=1347,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.25351265 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=1347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Terminology registries (TRs) are a crucial element of the infrastructure required for resource discovery services, digital libraries, Linked Data, and semantic interoperability generally. They can make the content of knowledge organization systems (KOS) available both for human and machine access. The paper describes the attributes and functionality for a TR, based on a review of published literature, existing TRs, and a survey of experts. A domain model based on user tasks is constructed and a set of core metadata elements for use in TRs is proposed. Ideally, the TR should allow searching as well as browsing for a KOS, matching a user's search while also providing information about existing terminology services, accessible to both humans and machines. The issues surrounding metadata for KOS are also discussed, together with the rationale for different aspects and the importance of a core set of KOS metadata for future machine-based access; a possible core set of metadata elements is proposed. This is dealt with in terms of practical experience and in relation to the Dublin Core Application Profile.
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:12:54
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1901-1916
    Type
    a
  11. Zumer, M.: Guidelines for (electronic) national bibliographies : work in progress (2005) 0.02 
    0.0151695805 = product of:
  0.025282633 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
    0.0051705935 = weight(_text_:a in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051705935 = score(doc=4346,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
    0.016861314 = product of:
      0.033722628 = sum of:
        0.033722628 = weight(_text_:22 in 4346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033722628 = score(doc=4346,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4346, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Date
    1.11.2005 18:56:22
    Footnote
    Vortrag, World Library and Information Congress: 71th IFLA General Conference and Council "Libraries - A voyage of discovery", August 14th - 18th 2005, Oslo, Norway.
    Pages
    8 S
    Type
    a
  12. O'Neill, E.; Zumer, M.; Mixter, J.: FRBR aggregates : their types and frequency in library collections (2015) 0.01 
    0.01454784 = product of:
  0.024246398 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
    0.007007508 = weight(_text_:a in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007007508 = score(doc=2610,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 2610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=2610,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2610, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2610)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Aggregates have been a frequent topic of discussion between library science researchers. This study seeks to better understand aggregates through the analysis of a sample of bibliographic records and review of the cataloging treatment of aggregates. The study focuses on determining how common aggregates are in library collections, what types of aggregates exist, how aggregates are described in bibliographic records, and the criteria for identifying aggregates from the information in bibliographic records. A sample of bibliographic records representing textual resources was taken from OCLC's WorldCat database. More than 20 percent of the sampled records represented aggregates and more works were embodied in aggregates than were embodied in single work manifestations. A variety of issues, including cataloging practices and the varying definitions of aggregates, made it difficult to accurately identify and quantify the presence of aggregates using only the information from bibliographic records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 59(2015) no.3, S.120-129
    Type
    a
  13. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2014) 0.01 
    0.014326665 = product of:
  0.023877773 = sum of:
    0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002321947 = score(doc=1962,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
    0.004523327 = weight(_text_:a in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004523327 = score(doc=1962,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
    0.017032498 = product of:
      0.034064997 = sum of:
        0.034064997 = weight(_text_:22 in 1962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034064997 = score(doc=1962,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1962, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1962)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    This article reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The article discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and/or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the Dewey Decimal Classification [DDC] (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 52(2014) no.1, S.90-101
    Type
    a
  14. Mitchell, J.S.; Zeng, M.L.; Zumer, M.: Modeling classification systems in multicultural and multilingual contexts (2012) 0.01 
    0.009948375 = product of:
  0.024870936 = sum of:
    0.004431937 = weight(_text_:a in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004431937 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
    0.020438999 = product of:
      0.040877998 = sum of:
        0.040877998 = weight(_text_:22 in 1967) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040877998 = score(doc=1967,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 1967, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1967)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    This paper reports on the second part of an initiative of the authors on researching classification systems with the conceptual model defined by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) final report. In an earlier study, the authors explored whether the FRSAD conceptual model could be extended beyond subject authority data to model classification data. The focus of the current study is to determine if classification data modeled using FRSAD can be used to solve real-world discovery problems in multicultural and multilingual contexts. The paper discusses the relationships between entities (same type or different types) in the context of classification systems that involve multiple translations and /or multicultural implementations. Results of two case studies are presented in detail: (a) two instances of the DDC (DDC 22 in English, and the Swedish-English mixed translation of DDC 22), and (b) Chinese Library Classification. The use cases of conceptual models in practice are also discussed.
    Type
    a
  15. Zumer, M.: User interfaces of national bibliographies on CD-ROM : results of a survey (2000) 0.01 
    0.006737055 = product of:
  0.016842637 = sum of:
    0.0065014507 = weight(_text_:s in 4896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0065014507 = score(doc=4896,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4896, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4896)
    0.010341187 = weight(_text_:a in 4896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010341187 = score(doc=4896,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 4896, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4896)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    Program. 34(2000) no.3, S.281-290
    Type
    a
  16. Zumer, M.; Clavel, G.: EDLproject : one more step towards the European digtial library (2007) 0.01 
    0.005781022 = product of:
  0.028905109 = sum of:
    0.028905109 = product of:
      0.057810217 = sum of:
        0.057810217 = weight(_text_:22 in 3184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057810217 = score(doc=3184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3184)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Content
    Vortrag anläasslich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
  17. Brito, M. de; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.; Bastos Vieira, S.: Indexing with images : the imagetic conceptual methodology (2016) 0.00 
    0.004996516 = product of:
  0.0124912895 = sum of:
    0.005253966 = weight(_text_:s in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005253966 = score(doc=4919,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
    0.007237323 = weight(_text_:a in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007237323 = score(doc=4919,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Pages
    S.265-274
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
    Type
    a
  18. Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Consequences of implementing FRBR : are we ready to open pandora's box? (2002) 0.00 
    0.0046600844 = product of:
  0.01165021 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
    0.008863874 = weight(_text_:a in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008863874 = score(doc=637,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The study Functional Requirements for Bibliograpbic Records (FRBR) was commissioned by IFLA and published in 1998. It defines the core functions of a catalogue (and bibliographic records) as a gateway to information. For that purpose an abstract entity-relationship model of a catalogue is proposed. The FRBR model is revolutionary. The (computer) catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a replica of the traditional card catalogue, but rather as a network of connected entities, enabling the user to perform seamlessly all the necessary functions. So far there has been some theoretical discussion of the model and some limited experiments, but there is a lack of research in how to implement this theoretical model in practice, in new-generation catalogues. In this paper some reactions to the model are analysed. The main focus is an consequences of the model for the OPAC interface design, particularly the searching functionality and display of results.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.78-86
    Type
    a
  19. Zumer, M.; O'Neill, E.T.: Modeling aggregates in FRBR (2012) 0.00 
    0.0046600844 = product of:
  0.01165021 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 1913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=1913,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1913, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1913)
    0.008863874 = weight(_text_:a in 1913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008863874 = score(doc=1913,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1913, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1913)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    In the bibliographic environment, the term aggregate is used to describe a bibliographic entity formed by combining distinct bibliographic units together. Aggregates are a large and growing class of information resources-up to twenty percent of the bibliographic records in OCLC's WorldCat may represent aggregates. The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report only briefly references aggregates. Difficulties and inconsistencies in the application of the FRBR model to aggregates have been identified as a significant impediment to FRBR implementation. To address the issue, the FRBR Review Group established a Working Group on Aggregates which completed its charge and submitted its final report in 2011. The Working Group proposed that an aggregate be defined as a "manifestation embodying multiple distinct expressions". This paper examines the proposed definition and explores how aggregates can be modeled.
    Content
    Contribution to a special issue "The FRBR family of conceptual models: toward a linked future"
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 50(2012) no.5/7, S.456-472
    Type
    a
  20. Budanovic, M.P.; Zumer, M.: ¬The catalogers' thought process : a comparison of formal and informal context (2018) 0.00 
    0.0045704604 = product of:
  0.011426151 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
    0.008175425 = weight(_text_:a in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008175425 = score(doc=5180,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The aim of this article is to analyze how catalogers describe publications without cataloging tools in comparison with the current cataloging process. A total of 46 catalogers took part in the first study, a free description of monographic publications, while 30 catalogers performed original cataloging in their actual environment. A combination of observations and think-aloud protocols was used for data gathering in both studies. The focus was on Slovenian catalogers from different types and sizes of libraries. Results revealed both differences and similarities between catalogers' mental models in the respective studies.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.5/6, S.507-529
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 46
  • el 11
  • r 2
  • m 1
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications