Search (283 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.04
    0.037432037 = product of:
      0.062386725 = sum of:
        0.005572672 = weight(_text_:s in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005572672 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
        0.050546348 = weight(_text_:u in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050546348 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
        0.0062677055 = weight(_text_:a in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062677055 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Pages
    S.51-72
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
    Type
    a
  2. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.04
    0.037432037 = product of:
      0.062386725 = sum of:
        0.005572672 = weight(_text_:s in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005572672 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.050546348 = weight(_text_:u in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050546348 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.0062677055 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062677055 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Pages
    S.73-82
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
    Type
    a
  3. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.03
    0.03259639 = product of:
      0.054327313 = sum of:
        0.00743023 = weight(_text_:s in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00743023 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
        0.00835694 = weight(_text_:a in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00835694 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
        0.038540144 = product of:
          0.07708029 = sum of:
            0.07708029 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07708029 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035557263 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
    Source
    Mathematical intelligencer. 14(1992), no.4, S.4-5
    Type
    a
  4. Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999) 0.03
    0.032347504 = product of:
      0.0539125 = sum of:
        0.006567457 = weight(_text_:s in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006567457 = score(doc=4379,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
        0.042121958 = weight(_text_:u in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042121958 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
        0.0052230875 = weight(_text_:a in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052230875 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Footnote
    Zuerst publiziert in: Kommunikation statt Markt: Zu einer alternativen Theorie der Informationsgesellschaft. Hrsg.: J. Becker u. W. Göhring. Sankt Augustin: GMD. (GMD Report; 61) S.27-38.
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 1999, Nr.65, S.7-21 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 52(1999) H.3/4]
    Type
    a
  5. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.03
    0.027542893 = product of:
      0.06885723 = sum of:
        0.009287788 = weight(_text_:s in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009287788 = score(doc=461,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.24024783 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
        0.059569445 = weight(_text_:u in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059569445 = score(doc=461,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.5116319 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Editor
    Cronin, B. u. H.B. Atkins
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
    Pages
    564 S
    Type
    s
  6. Korwitz, U.: Welchen 'Rang' hat ein Wissenschaftler? (1995) 0.02
    0.024954693 = product of:
      0.041591153 = sum of:
        0.003715115 = weight(_text_:s in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003715115 = score(doc=2318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
        0.033697568 = weight(_text_:u in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033697568 = score(doc=2318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
        0.00417847 = weight(_text_:a in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00417847 = score(doc=2318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 46(1995) H.5, S.267-272
    Type
    a
  7. Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996) 0.02
    0.024546914 = product of:
      0.04091152 = sum of:
        0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0032507253 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
        0.029485371 = weight(_text_:u in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029485371 = score(doc=3044,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
        0.008175425 = weight(_text_:a in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008175425 = score(doc=3044,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports recent experiences with the publishing, via the Internet and WWW of ISI's biweekly newspaper, The Scientist; which was originally mounted on the NSFnet. Compares the use of the Internet for SDI by comparing Web searches via AltaVista with similar searches on CD-ROM. Predicts that future current awareness services and SDI services will be linked to electronic periodicals in electronic libraries. Concludes with a note on cited reference searching, a variation on the theme of hypertext searching, with particular reference to SCI and Web crawlers
    Pages
    S.202-222
    Source
    Towards a worldwide library: a ten year forecast. Proceedings of the 19th International Essen Symposium, 23-26 Sept 1996. Ed.: A.H. Helal u. J.W. Weiss
    Type
    a
  8. Feitelson, D.G.; Yovel, U.: Predictive ranking of computer scientists using CiteSeer data (2004) 0.02
    0.022744015 = product of:
      0.03790669 = sum of:
        0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0032507253 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
        0.029485371 = weight(_text_:u in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029485371 = score(doc=1259,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
        0.0051705935 = weight(_text_:a in 1259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051705935 = score(doc=1259,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1259, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1259)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The increasing availability of digital libraries with cross-citation data on the Internet enables new studies in bibliometrics. The paper focuses on the list of 10.000 top-cited authors in computer science available as part of CiteSeer. Using data from several consecutive lists a model of how authors accrue citations with time is constructed. By comparing the rate at which individual authors accrue citations with the average rate, predictions are made of how their ranking in the list will change in the future.
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 60(2004) no.1, S.44-61
    Type
    a
  9. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02
    0.020372745 = product of:
      0.033954572 = sum of:
        0.004643894 = weight(_text_:s in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004643894 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
        0.0052230875 = weight(_text_:a in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052230875 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
        0.024087591 = product of:
          0.048175182 = sum of:
            0.048175182 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048175182 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035557263 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
    Type
    a
  10. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.018758833 = product of:
      0.046897084 = sum of:
        0.00835694 = weight(_text_:a in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00835694 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
        0.038540144 = product of:
          0.07708029 = sum of:
            0.07708029 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07708029 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035557263 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
    Type
    a
  11. Gabel, J.: Improving information retrieval of subjects through citation-analysis : a study (2006) 0.02
    0.018730536 = product of:
      0.031217558 = sum of:
        0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002321947 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
        0.021060979 = weight(_text_:u in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021060979 = score(doc=225,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
        0.007834632 = weight(_text_:a in 225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007834632 = score(doc=225,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 225, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=225)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Citation-chasing is proposed as a method of discovering additional terms to enhance subjectsearch retrieval. Subjects attached to OCLC records for cited works are compared to those attached to original citing sources. Citing sources were produced via a subject-list search in a library catalog using the LCSH "Language and languages-Origin." A subject-search was employed to avoid subjectivity in choosing sources. References from the sources were searched in OCLC where applicable, and the subject headings were retrieved. The subjects were ranked by citation-frequency and tiered into 3 groups in a Bradford-like distribution. Highly cited subjects were produced that were not revealed through the original search. A difference in relative importance among the subjects was also revealed. Broad extra-linguistic topics like evolution are more prominent than specific linguistic topics like phonology. There are exceptions, which appear somewhat predictable by the amount of imbalance in citation-representation among the 2 sources. Citation leaders were also produced for authors and secondary-source titles.
    Pages
    S.19-25
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  12. Safder, I.; Ali, M.; Aljohani, N.R.; Nawaz, R.; Hassan, S.-U.: Neural machine translation for in-text citation classification (2023) 0.02
    0.018110579 = product of:
      0.030184297 = sum of:
        0.0032837286 = weight(_text_:s in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0032837286 = score(doc=1053,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
        0.021060979 = weight(_text_:u in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021060979 = score(doc=1053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
        0.00583959 = weight(_text_:a in 1053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00583959 = score(doc=1053,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1053, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1053)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The quality of scientific publications can be measured by quantitative indices such as the h-index, Source Normalized Impact per Paper, or g-index. However, these measures lack to explain the function or reasons for citations and the context of citations from citing publication to cited publication. We argue that citation context may be considered while calculating the impact of research work. However, mining citation context from unstructured full-text publications is a challenging task. In this paper, we compiled a data set comprising 9,518 citations context. We developed a deep learning-based architecture for citation context classification. Unlike feature-based state-of-the-art models, our proposed focal-loss and class-weight-aware BiLSTM model with pretrained GloVe embedding vectors use citation context as input to outperform them in multiclass citation context classification tasks. Our model improves on the baseline state-of-the-art by achieving an F1 score of 0.80 with an accuracy of 0.81 for citation context classification. Moreover, we delve into the effects of using different word embeddings on the performance of the classification model and draw a comparison between fastText, GloVe, and spaCy pretrained word embeddings.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.10, S.1229-1240
    Type
    a
  13. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.02
    0.017871201 = product of:
      0.029785335 = sum of:
        0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0032507253 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
        0.009673295 = weight(_text_:a in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009673295 = score(doc=6920,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
        0.016861314 = product of:
          0.033722628 = sum of:
            0.033722628 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033722628 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035557263 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Over a 35-year period, Irving H. Sher played a critical role in the development and implementation of the Science Citation Index and other ISI products. Trained as a biochemist, statistician, and linguist, Sher brought a unique combination of talents to ISI as Director of Quality Control and Director of Research and Development. His talents as a teacher and mentor evoked loyalty. He was a particularly inventive but self-taught programmer. In addition to the SCI, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Arts and Humanities Citation Index,
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1197-1202
    Type
    a
  14. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.02
    0.01697248 = product of:
      0.028287465 = sum of:
        0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0032507253 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
        0.008175425 = weight(_text_:a in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008175425 = score(doc=5269,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
        0.016861314 = product of:
          0.033722628 = sum of:
            0.033722628 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033722628 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035557263 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    This comparative case study of the diffusion and nondiffusion over time of eight theories in the social sciences uses citation analysis, citation context analysis, content analysis, surveys of editorial review boards, and personal interviews with theorists to develop a model of the theory functions that facilitate theory diffusion throughout specific intellectual communities. Unlike previous work on the diffusion of theories as innovations, this theory functions model differs in several important respects from the findings of previous studies that employed Everett Rogers's classic typology of innovation characteristics that promote diffusion. The model is also presented as a contribution to a more integrated theory of citation.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.330-341
    Type
    a
  15. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.02
    0.01598427 = product of:
      0.026640449 = sum of:
        0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002786336 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.009401558 = weight(_text_:a in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009401558 = score(doc=994,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
        0.014452554 = product of:
          0.028905109 = sum of:
            0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028905109 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035557263 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Citation rates are becoming increasingly important in judging the research quality of journals, institutions and departments, and individual faculty. This paper looks at the pattern of citations across different management science journals and over time. A stochastic model is proposed which views the generating mechanism of citations as a gamma mixture of Poisson processes generating overall a negative binomial distribution. This is tested empirically with a large sample of papers published in 1990 from six management science journals and found to fit well. The model is extended to include obsolescence, i.e., that the citation rate for a paper varies over its cited lifetime. This leads to the additional citations distribution which shows that future citations are a linear function of past citations with a time-dependent and decreasing slope. This is also verified empirically in a way that allows different obsolescence functions to be fitted to the data. Conclusions concerning the predictability of future citations, and future research in this area are discussed.
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
    Type
    a
  16. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.02
    0.015815513 = product of:
      0.026359187 = sum of:
        0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002786336 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
        0.0031338527 = weight(_text_:a in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031338527 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
        0.020438999 = product of:
          0.040877998 = sum of:
            0.040877998 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040877998 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035557263 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
    Type
    a
  17. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.015715234 = product of:
      0.039288085 = sum of:
        0.0052230875 = weight(_text_:a in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052230875 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
        0.034064997 = product of:
          0.068129994 = sum of:
            0.068129994 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068129994 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035557263 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
    Type
    a
  18. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.01454784 = product of:
      0.024246398 = sum of:
        0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002786336 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
        0.007007508 = weight(_text_:a in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007007508 = score(doc=2064,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
        0.014452554 = product of:
          0.028905109 = sum of:
            0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028905109 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035557263 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    The paper attempts to provide an alternative method for measuring the importance of scientific papers based on the Google's PageRank. The method is a meaningful extension of the common integer counting of citations and is then experimented for bringing PageRank to the citation analysis in a large citation network. It offers a more integrated picture of the publications' influence in a specific field. We firstly calculate the PageRanks of scientific papers. The distributional characteristics and comparison with the traditionally used number of citations are then analyzed in detail. Furthermore, the PageRank is implemented in the evaluation of research influence for several countries in the field of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology during the time period of 2000-2005. Finally, some advantages of bringing PageRank to the citation analysis are concluded.
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
    Source
    Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.800-810
    Type
    a
  19. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01
    0.014292613 = product of:
      0.02382102 = sum of:
        0.0039404742 = weight(_text_:s in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039404742 = score(doc=3692,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
        0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005427992 = score(doc=3692,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
        0.014452554 = product of:
          0.028905109 = sum of:
            0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028905109 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035557263 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to examine the patterns of self citation in 6 disciplines distributed among the physical and social sciences and humanities. Sample articles were examined to deermine the relative numbers and ages of self citations and citations to other in the bibliographies and to the exposure given to each type of citation in the text of the articles. significant differences were found in the number and age of citations between disciplines. Overall, 9% of all citations were self citations; 15% of physical sciences citations were self citations, as opposed to 6% in the social sciences and 3% in the humanities. Within disciplines, there was no significantly different amount of coverage between self citations and citations to others. Overall, it appears that a lack of substantive differences in self citation behaviour is consistent across disciplines
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
    Source
    Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.6, S.431-435
    Type
    a
  20. Umstätter, W.: Szientometrische Verfahren (2004) 0.01
    0.013730888 = product of:
      0.022884812 = sum of:
        0.0018575575 = weight(_text_:s in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0018575575 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
        0.016848784 = weight(_text_:u in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016848784 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
        0.00417847 = weight(_text_:a in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00417847 = score(doc=2920,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Szientometrie beschäftigt sich mit der Messbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Leistungen anhand bibliothekarisch nachweisbarer Publikationsergebnisse. Bei genauer Betrachtung ist es ihr Ziel, die Wissenszunahme der Wissenschaft zu messen. Die wissenschaftliche Produktion in Form von Publikationen wächst seit über dreihundert Jahren konstant mit ca. 3,5% pro Jahr. Das entspricht einerVerdopplungsrate von 20 Jahren, die zuerst dem Bibliothekar Fremont Rider 1948 bei Büchern auffiel und die 1963 von Derek J. de Solla Price auch für das Wachstum von Zeitschriften und Bibliografien bestätigt wurde. Die Konstanz dieser Evolution, unabhängig aller sich ereignenden Katastrophen, ist nur zum Teil verstanden, macht aber den unaufhaltsamen Fortschritt der Wissenschaft deutlich. Alle 20 Jahre wird so viel publiziert wie in allen Jahrhunderten davor. Eine etwa gleiche Zunahme verzeichnen die Wissenschaftler, die damit etwa gleich produktiv bleiben. Von ihnen allen sind damit ca. 87% unsere heutigen Zeitgenossen. Aus diesem Wachstum heraus können wir abschätzen, dass in 100.000 laufenden Zeitschriften heute etwa 10 Mio. Publikationen jährlich erscheinen, die von 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern verfasst werden. Dabei definieren sich nur die als Wissenschaftler, die durchschnittlich eine Publikation jährlich verfassen. Die gesamte Produktion an Buchtiteln, die bisher erschien, dürfte bei etwa 100 Mio. liegen. Davon sind etwa 20 Mio. als wissenschaftlich einzustufen. Wenn folglich 87% aller Wissenschaftler noch heute leben, so betrug die Gesamtzahl der Wissenschaftler in der Welt bisher 11,5 Mio., die in ihrem Leben durchschnittlich 1,5 Bücher pro Kopf verfassten, und etwa das 10-20fache an Zeitschriftenbeiträgen leisteten. Ein Teil dieser Bücher sind allerdings Neuauflagen und Übersetzungen. Nach Lotka, A. J. ist die Produktivität der Wissenschaftler eine schiefe Verteilung von der Form A/n**2, wobei A die Zahl der Autoren mit nur einer Publikation ist und n die Publikationen pro Autor. Während Price in seinen "Networks of Scientific Papers" Vergleichswerte von n**2,5 bis n**3 angab, zeigten Untersuchungen am Science Citation Index (SCI), die auf die gesamte naturwissenschaftliche Literatur hochgerechnet wurden, eher einen Wert von n**1,7. Auf die Tatsache, dass eine Verdopplungsrate der Wissenschaftler von 20 Jahren und eine solche der Menschheit von etwa 50 Jahren dazu führt, dass eines Tages alle Menschen Wissenschaftler werden, hat Price bereits 1963 hingewiesen. Dieser Zustand müsste bei 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern und 6 Mrd. Menschen in etwa 300 Jahren eintreten, ein nur scheinbar absurder Gedanke, wenn man bedenkt, dass man sich vor 300 Jahren auch kaum vorstellen konnte, dass alle Menschen Lesen, Schreiben und Rechnen lernen können, und dass wir uns ungebildete Menschen immer weniger leisten können.
    Pages
    S.237-243
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
    Type
    a

Languages

  • e 241
  • d 40
  • chi 2
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 272
  • el 9
  • m 5
  • s 4
  • r 1
  • More… Less…