-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.013600131 = product of:
0.022666883 = sum of:
0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002786336 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005427992 = score(doc=4215,freq=6.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.014452554 = product of:
0.028905109 = sum of:
0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028905109 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.302-310
- Type
- a
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.013600131 = product of:
0.022666883 = sum of:
0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002786336 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005427992 = score(doc=201,freq=6.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.014452554 = product of:
0.028905109 = sum of:
0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028905109 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
- Type
- a
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.01
0.013600131 = product of:
0.022666883 = sum of:
0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002786336 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005427992 = score(doc=1521,freq=6.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.014452554 = product of:
0.028905109 = sum of:
0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028905109 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Traditional citation analysis has been widely applied to detect patterns of scientific collaboration, map the landscapes of scholarly disciplines, assess the impact of research outputs, and observe knowledge transfer across domains. It is, however, limited, as it assumes all citations are of similar value and weights each equally. Content-based citation analysis (CCA) addresses a citation's value by interpreting each one based on its context at both the syntactic and semantic levels. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of CAA research in terms of its theoretical foundations, methodical approaches, and example applications. In addition, we highlight how increased computational capabilities and publicly available full-text resources have opened this area of research to vast possibilities, which enable deeper citation analysis, more accurate citation prediction, and increased knowledge discovery.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1820-1833
- Type
- a
-
De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and citation analysis : from the Science citation index to cybermetrics (2008)
0.01
0.013293243 = product of:
0.022155404 = sum of:
0.0032173842 = weight(_text_:s in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0032173842 = score(doc=3585,freq=6.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.016848784 = weight(_text_:u in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016848784 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.002089235 = weight(_text_:a in 3585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002089235 = score(doc=3585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 3585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3585)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 61(2010) no.1, S.205-207 (Jeppe Nicolaisen) Weitere Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.134-135 (J. Gorraiz u. M. Wieland): "Das Buch entwickelte sich aus einem mehrjährigen Forschungsprojekt mit dem Ziel, den schwer verständlichen quantitativen Kern der Bibliometrie in einem für primär italienische Bibliothekare leichteren historischen und philosophischen Kontext zu vermitteln, wie der Autor im Vorwort erklärt. Dank einer Empfehlung von Eugene Garfield steht dieses Werk nun auch in englischer Übersetzung einer internationalen Leserschaft zur Verfügung. Die über 400 Seiten lange Monografie von de Bellis gibt in acht Kapiteln einen detaillierten und sehr präzisen Überblick über die Bibliometrie und die Zitationsanalyse, ihre Natur und Entwicklung, ihre Kontroverse und Prognose. . . . Das Buch von de Bellis ist sehr empfehlenswert für alle die beabsichtigen, sich mit dieser neuen Wissenschaft zu beschäftigen. Es endet mit folgendem Statement: "Scientometricians have to learn to live in a multidimensional world". Und genau hier liegt die Herausforderung und Schönheit dieses Metiers."
- Pages
- xxxi, 417 S
-
wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003)
0.01
0.013002497 = product of:
0.021670828 = sum of:
0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002786336 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.004431937 = weight(_text_:a in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004431937 = score(doc=1270,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.014452554 = product of:
0.028905109 = sum of:
0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028905109 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Content
- "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch den Beitrag von H.F. Goenner zu A. Einstein und S.B. Preuss
- Source
- c't. 2003, H.1, S.38
- Type
- a
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.012916129 = product of:
0.02152688 = sum of:
0.0039404742 = weight(_text_:s in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039404742 = score(doc=590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.0031338527 = weight(_text_:a in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031338527 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.014452554 = product of:
0.028905109 = sum of:
0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028905109 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Content
- "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
- Type
- a
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.01
0.010835414 = product of:
0.018059023 = sum of:
0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002321947 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.003693281 = weight(_text_:a in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003693281 = score(doc=1934,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.012043796 = product of:
0.024087591 = sum of:
0.024087591 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024087591 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Um sich einer Antwort auf die Frage anzunähern, welche Bedeutung der Nachlass eines Wissenschaftlers wie jener Paul F. Lazarsfelds (mit zahlreichen noch unveröffentlichten Schriften) für die aktuelle Forschung haben könne, kann untersucht werden, wie häufig dieser Wissenschaftler zitiert wird. Wenn ein Autor zitiert wird, wird er auch genutzt. Wird er über einen langen Zeitraum oft genutzt, ist vermutlich auch die Auseinandersetzung mit seinem Nachlass von Nutzen. Außerdem kann aufgrund der Zitierungen festgestellt werden, was aus dem Lebenswerk eines Wissenschaftlers für die aktuelle Forschung relevant erscheint. Daraus können die vordringlichen Fragestellungen in der Bearbeitung des Nachlasses abgeleitet werden. Die Aufgabe für die folgende Untersuchung lautete daher: Wie oft wird Paul F. Lazarsfeld zitiert? Dabei interessierte auch: Wer zitiert wo? Die Untersuchung wurde mit Hilfe der Meta-Datenbank "ISI Web of Knowledge" durchgeführt. In dieser wurde im "Web of Science" mit dem Werkzeug "Cited Reference Search" nach dem zitierten Autor (Cited Author) "Lazarsfeld P*" gesucht. Diese Suche ergab 1535 Referenzen (References). Werden alle Referenzen gewählt, führt dies zu 4839 Ergebnissen (Results). Dabei wurden die Datenbanken SCI-Expanded, SSCI und A&HCI verwendet. Bei dieser Suche wurden die Publikationsjahre 1941-2008 analysiert. Vor 1956 wurden allerdings nur sehr wenige Zitate gefunden: 1946 fünf, ansonsten maximal drei, 1942-1944 und 1949 überhaupt keines. Zudem ist das Jahr 2008 noch lange nicht zu Ende. (Es gab jedoch schon vor Ende März 24 Zitate!)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.2, S.14-20
- Type
- a
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.010613844 = product of:
0.02653461 = sum of:
0.009673295 = weight(_text_:a in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009673295 = score(doc=40,freq=14.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.016861314 = product of:
0.033722628 = sum of:
0.033722628 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033722628 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
- Type
- a
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.010071728 = product of:
0.025179321 = sum of:
0.005909249 = weight(_text_:a in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005909249 = score(doc=1149,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.019270072 = product of:
0.038540144 = sum of:
0.038540144 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038540144 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper presents a test of the validity of using Google Scholar to evaluate the publications of researchers by comparing the premises on which its search engine, PageRank, is based, to those of Garfield's theory of citation indexing. It finds that the premises are identical and that PageRank and Garfield's theory of citation indexing validate each other.
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
- Type
- a
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0096985595 = product of:
0.016164266 = sum of:
0.0018575575 = weight(_text_:s in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0018575575 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.004671672 = weight(_text_:a in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004671672 = score(doc=5171,freq=10.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.11394546 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.009635036 = product of:
0.019270072 = sum of:
0.019270072 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019270072 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Abstract
- Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
- Type
- a
-
Sandison, A.: Thinking about citation analysis (1989)
0.01
0.009624365 = product of:
0.024060912 = sum of:
0.009287788 = weight(_text_:s in 6888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009287788 = score(doc=6888,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.24024783 = fieldWeight in 6888, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6888)
0.014773124 = weight(_text_:a in 6888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014773124 = score(doc=6888,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.36032718 = fieldWeight in 6888, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=6888)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 45(1989), S.63
- Type
- a
-
Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006)
0.01
0.008149098 = product of:
0.013581828 = sum of:
0.0018575575 = weight(_text_:s in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0018575575 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
0.002089235 = weight(_text_:a in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002089235 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
0.009635036 = product of:
0.019270072 = sum of:
0.019270072 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019270072 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 17:22:15
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 2006, Nr.85, S.18-20 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 59(2006) H.1]
- Type
- a
-
Mendez, A.: Some considerations on the retrieval of literature based on citations (1978)
0.01
0.007699491 = product of:
0.019248728 = sum of:
0.00743023 = weight(_text_:s in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00743023 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
0.011818498 = weight(_text_:a in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011818498 = score(doc=778,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information scientist. 12(1978), S.67-71
- Type
- a
-
Garfield, E.: Is citation analysis a legitime evaluation tool? (1979)
0.01
0.007699491 = product of:
0.019248728 = sum of:
0.00743023 = weight(_text_:s in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00743023 = score(doc=1086,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
0.011818498 = weight(_text_:a in 1086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011818498 = score(doc=1086,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 1086, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1086)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Scientometrics. 1(1979), S.359-375
- Type
- a
-
Vinkler, P.: ¬A quasi-quantitative citation model (1987)
0.01
0.007699491 = product of:
0.019248728 = sum of:
0.00743023 = weight(_text_:s in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00743023 = score(doc=2299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.011818498 = weight(_text_:a in 2299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011818498 = score(doc=2299,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 2299, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2299)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Scientometrics. 12(1987) nos.1-2, S.47-72
- Type
- a
-
Peritz, B.C.: Citation characteristics in library science : some further results from a bibliometric survey (1981)
0.01
0.007699491 = product of:
0.019248728 = sum of:
0.00743023 = weight(_text_:s in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00743023 = score(doc=4170,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
0.011818498 = weight(_text_:a in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011818498 = score(doc=4170,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Library research. 3(1981), S.47-65
- Type
- a
-
Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science : a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas (1955)
0.01
0.007699491 = product of:
0.019248728 = sum of:
0.00743023 = weight(_text_:s in 4342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00743023 = score(doc=4342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 4342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4342)
0.011818498 = weight(_text_:a in 4342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011818498 = score(doc=4342,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 4342, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4342)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Science. 122(1955), S.108-111
- Type
- a
-
Malin, M.V.: ¬The Science Citation Index : a new concept in indexing (1968)
0.01
0.007699491 = product of:
0.019248728 = sum of:
0.00743023 = weight(_text_:s in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00743023 = score(doc=5000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
0.011818498 = weight(_text_:a in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011818498 = score(doc=5000,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Library trends. 16(1968), S.374-387
- Type
- a
-
Trivison, D.: Term co-occurrence in cited/citing journal articles as a measure of document similarity (1987)
0.01
0.007699491 = product of:
0.019248728 = sum of:
0.00743023 = weight(_text_:s in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00743023 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
0.011818498 = weight(_text_:a in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011818498 = score(doc=5656,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 23(1987), S.183-194
- Type
- a
-
MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis : a critical review (1989)
0.01
0.007699491 = product of:
0.019248728 = sum of:
0.00743023 = weight(_text_:s in 6901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00743023 = score(doc=6901,freq=2.0), product of:
0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 6901, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6901)
0.011818498 = weight(_text_:a in 6901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011818498 = score(doc=6901,freq=4.0), product of:
0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.035557263 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 6901, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6901)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 40(1989), S.342-349
- Type
- a
