Search (146 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Peters, I.: Benutzerzentrierte Erschließungsverfahren (2013) 0.03 
    0.031193366 = product of:
  0.05198894 = sum of:
    0.004643894 = weight(_text_:s in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004643894 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
    0.042121958 = weight(_text_:u in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042121958 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.3617784 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
    0.0052230875 = weight(_text_:a in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052230875 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Pages
    S.229-237
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
    Type
    a
  2. Hotho, A.; Jäschke, R.; Benz, D.; Grahl, M.; Krause, B.; Schmitz, C.; Stumme, G.: Social Bookmarking am Beispiel BibSonomy (2009) 0.03 
    0.026790006 = product of:
  0.044650007 = sum of:
    0.003715115 = weight(_text_:s in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003715115 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
    0.033697568 = weight(_text_:u in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033697568 = score(doc=4873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
    0.007237323 = weight(_text_:a in 4873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007237323 = score(doc=4873,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4873, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4873)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Pages
    S.365-391
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
    Type
    a
  3. Watters, C.; Nizam, N.: Knowledge organization on the Web : the emergent role of social classification (2012) 0.03 
    0.025015095 = product of:
  0.041691825 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
    0.029485371 = weight(_text_:u in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029485371 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
    0.00895573 = weight(_text_:a in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00895573 = score(doc=828,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    There are close to a billion websites on the Internet with approximately 400 million users worldwide [www.internetworldstats.com]. People go to websites for a wide variety of different information tasks, from finding a restaurant to serious research. Many of the difficulties with searching the Web, as it is structured currently, can be attributed to increases to scale. The content of the Web is now so large that we only have a rough estimate of the number of sites and the range of information is extremely diverse, from blogs and photos to research articles and news videos.
    Pages
    S.69-74
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
    Type
    a
  4. Spiteri, L.F.: Extending the scope of library discovery systems via hashtags (2018) 0.02 
    0.024954693 = product of:
  0.041591153 = sum of:
    0.003715115 = weight(_text_:s in 4798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003715115 = score(doc=4798,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4798, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4798)
    0.033697568 = weight(_text_:u in 4798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033697568 = score(doc=4798,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4798, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4798)
    0.00417847 = weight(_text_:a in 4798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00417847 = score(doc=4798,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4798, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4798)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Pages
    S.557-564
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  5. Hidderley, R.; Rafferty, P.: Flickr and democratic indexing : disciplining desire lines (2006) 0.02 
    0.024029054 = product of:
  0.04004842 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
    0.029485371 = weight(_text_:u in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029485371 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
    0.007312323 = weight(_text_:a in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007312323 = score(doc=119,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we consider three models of subject indexing, and compare and contrast two indexing approaches, the theoretically based democratic indexing project, and Flickr, a working system for describing photographs. We argue that, despite Shirky's (2005) claim of philosophical paradigm shifting for social tagging, there is a residing doubt amongst information professionals that self-organising systems can work without there being some element of control and some form of 'representative authority'.
    Pages
    S.405-411
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  6. Blumauer, A.; Hochmeister, M.: Tag-Recommender gestützte Annotation von Web-Dokumenten (2009) 0.02 
    0.023441253 = product of:
  0.039068755 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
    0.029485371 = weight(_text_:u in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029485371 = score(doc=4866,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
    0.0063326578 = weight(_text_:a in 4866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0063326578 = score(doc=4866,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 4866, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4866)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Pages
    S.227-243
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
    Type
    a
  7. Held, C.; Cress, U.: Social Tagging aus kognitionspsychologischer Sicht (2008) 0.02 
    0.021835355 = product of:
  0.036392257 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
    0.029485371 = weight(_text_:u in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029485371 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
    0.0036561615 = weight(_text_:a in 2885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036561615 = score(doc=2885,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2885, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2885)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Pages
    S.37-49
    Type
    a
  8. Fox, M.J.: Communities of practice, gender and social tagging (2012) 0.02 
    0.020596331 = product of:
  0.034327216 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
    0.025273174 = weight(_text_:u in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025273174 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
    0.0062677055 = weight(_text_:a in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062677055 = score(doc=873,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Social or collaborative tagging enables users to organize and label resources on the web. Libraries and other information environments hope that tagging can complement professional subject access with user-created terms. But who are the taggers, and does their language represent that of the user population? Some language theorists believe that inherent variables, such as gender or race, can be responsible for language use, whereas other researchers endorse more multiply-influenced practice-based approaches, where interactions with others affect language use more than a single variable. To explore whether linguistic variation in tagging is influenced more by gender or context, in this exploratory study, I will analyze the content and quantity of tags used on LibraryThing. This study seeks to dismantle stereotypical views of women's language use and to suggest a community of practice-based approach to analyzing social tags.
    Pages
    S.352-358
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
    Type
    a
  9. Social tagging in a linked data environment. Edited by Diane Rasmussen Pennington and Louise F. Spiteri. London, UK: Facet Publishing, 2018. 240 pp. £74.95 (paperback). (ISBN 9781783303380) (2019) 0.02 
    0.018887797 = product of:
  0.03147966 = sum of:
    0.0040217303 = weight(_text_:s in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040217303 = score(doc=101,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.021060979 = weight(_text_:u in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021060979 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
    0.00639695 = weight(_text_:a in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00639695 = score(doc=101,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Social tagging, hashtags, and geotags are used across a variety of platforms (Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, WordPress, Instagram) in different countries and cultures. This book, representing researchers and practitioners across different information professions, explores how social tags can link content across a variety of environments. Most studies of social tagging have tended to focus on applications like library catalogs, blogs, and social bookmarking sites. This book, in setting out a theoretical background and the use of a series of case studies, explores the role of hashtags as a form of linked data?without the complex implementation of RDF and other Semantic Web technologies.
    Editor
    Rasmussen Pennington, D. u. L. Spiteri
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 72(2021) no.2, S.264-265 (Xuwei Pan).
    Pages
    XII, 212 S
    Type
    s
  10. Simon, J.: Interdisciplinary knowledge creation : using wikis in science (2006) 0.02 
    0.01716361 = product of:
  0.028606014 = sum of:
    0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002321947 = score(doc=2516,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
    0.021060979 = weight(_text_:u in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021060979 = score(doc=2516,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
    0.0052230875 = weight(_text_:a in 2516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052230875 = score(doc=2516,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2516, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2516)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    This article focuses on two aspects of knowledge generation. First, I want to explore how new knowledge is created in interdisciplinary discourses and, second, how this process might be mediated and promoted by the use of wikis. I suggest that it is the noise coming to life in (ex)changes of perspectives that enables the creation of new knowledge. In section 1-4, I am going to examine how the concepts of noise from the mathematical theory of communication (Shannon 1948) on the one hand and theories of organizational knowledge creation (cf. Nonaka 1994) on the other might help to understand the process of interdisciplinary knowledge creation. In section 5 I am going to explore the role wiki technologies can play in supporting interdisciplinary collaborations. This section is influenced by own experiences in a wiki-based interdisciplinary collaboration. It seems that even though certain features of wiki technology make it an excellent tool to externalize and combine individual knowledge leaving room for noise and at the same time documenting this process, the full benefit of wikis can only be obtained if they are embedded into a broader communication context.
    Pages
    S.123-130
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  11. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.02 
    0.016298195 = product of:
  0.027163656 = sum of:
    0.003715115 = weight(_text_:s in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003715115 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
    0.00417847 = weight(_text_:a in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00417847 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
    0.019270072 = product of:
      0.038540144 = sum of:
        0.038540144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038540144 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Pages
    S.15-22
    Type
    a
  12. Lüth, J.: Inhaltserschließung von Internetquellen durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer : Ergebnisse eines Tests mit Internetquellen der Virtuellen Fachbibliothek EconBiz (2009) 0.02 
    0.016245725 = product of:
  0.027076207 = sum of:
    0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002321947 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
    0.021060979 = weight(_text_:u in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021060979 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
    0.003693281 = weight(_text_:a in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003693281 = score(doc=2784,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    EconBiz, die Virtuelle Fachbibliothek Wirtschaftswissenschaften, wird gemeinsam von der Deutschen Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften (ZBW) und der Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln angeboten. Ein zentraler Bestandteil von EconBiz ist der Fachinformationsführer für Internetquellen, der derzeit über 16.000 Datensätze umfasst. Der Fachinformationsführer dient der Recherche nach Internetquellen und frei verfügbaren Volltexten. Die Erschließung dieser Quellen erfolgt arbeitsteilig durch bibliothekarisches und wissenschaftliches Personal im LinkShare System, einem System für die kooperative Erschließung und Verwaltung digitaler Netzobjekte. Nutzerinnen und Nutzer von EconBiz haben die Möglichkeit, Quellen für die Aufnahme in den Fachinformationsführer vorzuschlagen. Eine Beteiligung an der inhaltlichen Erschließung der Quellen erfolgt nicht. In Social-Bookmarking-Portalen wie "deLicio.us", "Furl" oder "Mister Wong" haben Nutzerinnen und Nutzer die Möglichkeit, eigene Listen mit Lesezeichen, englisch "Bookmarks", zu verwalten. Dazu bieten die verschiedenen Anbieter dieser Dienste allerhand nützliche Funktionen, u. a. mit folgenden Merkmalen: - Vergabe von Kategorien oder Schlagworten, so genannten "Tags", - Anlegen privater oder öffentlicher Bookmarks, - Abspeichern einer Version der Quelle. Derzeit üben diese Dienste eine sehr hohe Anziehungskraft auf Nutzerinnen und Nutzer aus, zum einen für die Verwaltung der eigenen Lesezeichen, zum anderen als Instrument für die Recherche nach relevanten Quellen. Mehr über das Potential und die Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Social-Bookmarking-Diensten möchte die ZBW im Rahmen eines Projekts "Inhaltserschließung durch Nutzerinnen und Nutzer" erfahren. Dafür wurde über einen begrenzten Zeitraum eine Teilmenge der im EconBiz-Fachinformationsführer enthaltenen Internetquellen in Social-Bookmarking-Webseiten angeboten. Ziel ist es, Erkenntnisse darüber zu gewinnen, in welchem Umfang diese von den Nutzerinnen und Nutzern der Socaial-Bookmarking-Dienste nachgenutzt und um eigene Schlagworte ergänzt werden.
    Pages
    S.231-241
    Type
    a
  13. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.02 
    0.015977478 = product of:
  0.026629128 = sum of:
    0.0045972206 = weight(_text_:s in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0045972206 = score(doc=2889,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
    0.0051705935 = weight(_text_:a in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051705935 = score(doc=2889,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
    0.016861314 = product of:
      0.033722628 = sum of:
        0.033722628 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033722628 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
    Pages
    S.97-105
    Type
    a
  14. Niemann, C.: Intelligenz im Chaos : erste Schritte zur Analyse des Kreativen Potenzials eines Tagging-Systems (2010) 0.02 
    0.015596683 = product of:
  0.02599447 = sum of:
    0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002321947 = score(doc=4375,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
    0.021060979 = weight(_text_:u in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021060979 = score(doc=4375,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.116430275 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
    0.0026115438 = weight(_text_:a in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0026115438 = score(doc=4375,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Pages
    S.220-225
    Source
    ¬The Ne(x)t generation: das Angebot der Bibliotheken; 30. Österreichischer Bibliothekartag, Graz, 15.-18.9.2009. Hrsg.: Ute Bergner u. Erhard Göbel
    Type
    a
  15. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.02 
    0.015116422 = product of:
  0.025194036 = sum of:
    0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002321947 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
    0.00583959 = weight(_text_:a in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00583959 = score(doc=2652,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
    0.017032498 = product of:
      0.034064997 = sum of:
        0.034064997 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034064997 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Folksonomy is the result of describing Web resources with tags created by Web users. Although it has become a popular application for the description of resources, in general terms Folksonomies are not being conveniently integrated in metadata. However, if the appropriate metadata elements are identified, then further work may be conducted to automatically assign tags to these elements (RDF properties) and use them in Semantic Web applications. This article presents research carried out to continue the project Kinds of Tags, which intends to identify elements required for metadata originating from folksonomies and to propose an application profile for DC Social Tagging. The work provides information that may be used by software applications to assign tags to metadata elements and, therefore, means for tags to be conveniently gathered by metadata interoperability tools. Despite the unquestionably high value of DC and the significance of the already existing properties in DC Terms, the pilot study show revealed a significant number of tags for which no corresponding properties yet existed. A need for new properties, such as Action, Depth, Rate, and Utility was determined. Those potential new properties will have to be validated in a later stage by the DC Social Tagging Community.
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
    Type
    a
  16. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.01 
    0.014103958 = product of:
  0.023506597 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
    0.0062677055 = weight(_text_:a in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062677055 = score(doc=3601,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Some members of the library community, including the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control, have suggested that libraries should open up their catalogs to allow users to add descriptive tags to the bibliographic data in catalog records. The web site LibraryThing currently permits its members to add such user tags to its records for books and therefore provides a useful resource to contrast with library bibliographic records. A comparison between the LibraryThing tags for a group of books and the library-supplied subject headings for the same books shows that users and catalogers approach these descriptors very differently. Because of these differences, user tags can enhance subject access to library materials, but they cannot entirely replace controlled vocabularies such as the Library of Congress subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 53(2009) no.3, S.174-184
    Type
    a
  17. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.01 
    0.013600131 = product of:
  0.022666883 = sum of:
    0.002786336 = weight(_text_:s in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002786336 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
    0.005427992 = weight(_text_:a in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005427992 = score(doc=3602,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
    0.014452554 = product of:
      0.028905109 = sum of:
        0.028905109 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028905109 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    This study is an examination of the overlap between author-assigned keywords and cataloger-assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) for a set of electronic theses and dissertations in Ohio State University's online catalog. The project is intended to contribute to the literature on the issue of keywords versus controlled vocabularies in the use of online catalogs and databases. Findings support previous studies' conclusions that both keywords and controlled vocabularies complement one another. Further, even in the presence of bibliographic record enhancements, such as abstracts or summaries, keywords and subject headings provided a significant number of unique terms that could affect the success of keyword searches. Implications for the maintenance of controlled vocabularies such as LCSH also are discussed in light of the patterns of matches and nonmatches found between the keywords and their corresponding subject headings.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 53(2009) no.4, S.243-250
    Type
    a
  18. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.01 
    0.013143071 = product of:
  0.021905117 = sum of:
    0.0040217303 = weight(_text_:s in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040217303 = score(doc=2650,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
    0.00583959 = weight(_text_:a in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00583959 = score(doc=2650,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
    0.012043796 = product of:
      0.024087591 = sum of:
        0.024087591 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024087591 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    There is a growing interest into how we represent and share tagging data in collaborative tagging systems. Conventional tags, meaning freely created tags that are not associated with a structured ontology, are not naturally suited for collaborative processes, due to linguistic and grammatical variations, as well as human typing errors. Additionally, tags reflect personal views of the world by individual users, and are not normalised for synonymy, morphology or any other mapping. Our view is that the conventional approach provides very limited semantic value for collaboration. Moreover, in cases where there is some semantic value, automatically sharing semantics via computer manipulations is extremely problematic. This paper explores these problems by discussing approaches for collaborative tagging activities at a semantic level, and presenting conceptual models for collaborative tagging activities and folksonomies. We present criteria for the comparison of existing tag ontologies and discuss their strengths and weaknesses in relation to these criteria.
    Pages
    S.128-137
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
    Type
    a
  19. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.01 
    0.013051384 = product of:
  0.021752305 = sum of:
    0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002321947 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
    0.007386562 = weight(_text_:a in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007386562 = score(doc=515,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
    0.012043796 = product of:
      0.024087591 = sum of:
        0.024087591 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024087591 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    A new collaborative approach in information organization and sharing has recently arisen, known as collaborative tagging or social indexing. A key element of collaborative tagging is the concept of collective intelligence (CI), which is a shared intelligence among all participants. This research investigates the phenomenon of social tagging in the context of CI with the aim to serve as a stepping-stone towards the mining of truly valuable social tags for web resources. This study focuses on assessing and evaluating the degree of CI embedded in social tagging over time in terms of two-parameter values, number of participants, and top frequency ranking window. Five different metrics were adopted and utilized for assessing the similarity between ranking lists: overlapList, overlapRank, Footrule, Fagin's measure, and the Inverse Rank measure. The result of this study demonstrates that a substantial degree of CI is most likely to be achieved when somewhere between the first 200 and 400 people have participated in tagging, and that a target degree of CI can be projected by controlling the two factors along with the selection of a similarity metric. The study also tests some experimental conditions for detecting social tags with high CI degree. The results of this study can be applicable to the study of filtering social tags based on CI; filtered social tags may be utilized for the metadata creation of tagged resources and possibly for the retrieval of tagged resources.
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.12, S.2488-2502
    Type
    a
  20. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.01 
    0.013051384 = product of:
  0.021752305 = sum of:
    0.002321947 = weight(_text_:s in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002321947 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
    0.007386562 = weight(_text_:a in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007386562 = score(doc=5492,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
    0.012043796 = product of:
      0.024087591 = sum of:
        0.024087591 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024087591 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124515474 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035557263 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.6 = coord(3/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose Online knowledge communities make great contributions to global knowledge sharing and innovation. Resource tagging approaches have been widely adopted in such communities to describe, annotate and organize knowledge resources mainly through users' participation. However, it is unclear what causes the adoption of a particular resource tagging approach. The purpose of this paper is to identify factors that drive users to use a hybrid social tagging approach. Design/methodology/approach Technology acceptance model and social cognitive theory are adopted to support an integrated model proposed in this paper. Zhihu, one of the most popular online knowledge communities in China, is taken as the survey context. A survey was conducted with a questionnaire and collected data were analyzed through structural equation model. Findings A new hybrid social resource tagging approach was refined and described. The empirical results revealed that self-efficacy, perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use exert positive effect on users' attitude. Moreover, social influence, PU and attitude impact significantly on users' intention to use a hybrid social resource tagging approach. Originality/value Theoretically, this study enriches the type of resource tagging approaches and recognizes factors influencing user adoption to use it. Regarding the practical parts, the results provide online information system providers and designers with referential strategies to improve the performance of the current tagging approaches and promote them.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 71(2019) no.2, S.155-175
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 105
  • d 40
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 127
  • el 13
  • m 9
  • s 3
  • b 2
  • x 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications