Search (1479 results, page 2 of 74)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. McTavish, J.: Everyday life classification processes and technologies (2014) 0.05
    0.045093596 = product of:
      0.09018719 = sum of:
        0.09018719 = sum of:
          0.04072461 = weight(_text_:j in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04072461 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.28085366 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
          0.049462583 = weight(_text_:22 in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049462583 = score(doc=1430,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Ratzek, W.: Problemlösung. Verifiziertes Faktum oder Illusion? (2013) 0.04
    0.04150323 = product of:
      0.08300646 = sum of:
        0.08300646 = sum of:
          0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030543458 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
          0.052462995 = weight(_text_:22 in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052462995 = score(doc=657,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2013.64.issue-1/iwp-2013-0006/iwp-2013-0006.xml?format=INT.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:05:39
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 64(2013) H.1, S.9-22
  3. Bertram, J.: Stand der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2013) 0.04
    0.04150323 = product of:
      0.08300646 = sum of:
        0.08300646 = sum of:
          0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030543458 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
          0.052462995 = weight(_text_:22 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.052462995 = score(doc=2658,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Dass eine erfolgreiche Suche nach im Unternehmen vorhandenen Informationen oftmals schwieriger zu bewerkstelligen ist als eine Suche im Internet, wird in der Privatwirtschaft zunehmend als Problem gesehen. Enterprise Search ist eine Strategie, diesem Problem zu begegnen. In einer Studie mit explorativem Charakter wurde der Frage nachgegangen, wie es um den Stand unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Unternehmen bestellt ist. m Rahmen einer Onlinebefragung wurden dazu im März / April 2009 469 Unternehmen befragt. Es beteiligten sich 104 Unternehmen. Das entspricht einem Rücklauf von 22 %. Dieser Beitrag gibt Auskunft über Status quo der unternehmensweiten Informationsorganisation und -suche in Österreich und benennt unternehmens- bzw. personengebundene Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Im einzelnen werden Ergebnisse zu folgenden Aspekten präsentiert: Regelung der Informationsorganisation; Anreicherung unstrukturierter Informationen mit Metadaten; Probleme bei der Suche nach unternehmensinternen Informationen; täglicher Zeitaufwand für die Suche; vorhandene, wünschenswerte und benötigte Suchfunktionalitäten; Zufriedenheit mit der Suche und der Informationsorganisation Unternehmen.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 19:00:02
  4. Hierl, S.; Bauer, L.; Böllers, N.; Herget, J.: Kollaborative Konzeption von Ontologien in der Hochschullehre : Theorie, Chancen und mögliche Umsetzung (2010) 0.04
    0.040145956 = product of:
      0.08029191 = sum of:
        0.08029191 = sum of:
          0.043194972 = weight(_text_:j in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043194972 = score(doc=3732,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
          0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037096936 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  5. ¬Die deutsche Zeitschrift für Dokumentation, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis von 1950 bis 2011 : eine vorläufige Bilanz in vier Abschnitten (2012) 0.04
    0.040145956 = product of:
      0.08029191 = sum of:
        0.08029191 = sum of:
          0.043194972 = weight(_text_:j in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043194972 = score(doc=402,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
          0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037096936 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2012.63.issue-3/iwp-2012-0037/iwp-2012-0037.xml?format=INT.
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:35:26
    Footnote
    Besteht aus 4 Teilen: Teil 1: Eden, D., A. Arndt, A. Hoffer, T. Raschke u. P. Schön: Die Nachrichten für Dokumentation in den Jahren 1950 bis 1962 (S.159-163). Teil 2: Brose, M., E. durst, D. Nitzsche, D. Veckenstedt u. R. Wein: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1963-1975 (S.164-170). Teil 3: Bösel, J., G. Ebert, P. Garz,, M. Iwanow u. B. Russ: Methoden und Ergebnisse einer statistischen Auswertung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) 1976 bis 1988 (S.171-174). Teil 4: Engelage, H., S. Jansen, R. Mertins, K. Redel u. S. Ring: Statistische Untersuchung der Fachzeitschrift "Nachrichten für Dokumentation" (NfD) / "Information. Wissenschaft & Praxis" (IWP) 1989-2011 (S.164-170).
  6. Frandsen, T.F.; Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The ripple effect : citation chain reactions of a nobel prize (2013) 0.04
    0.040145956 = product of:
      0.08029191 = sum of:
        0.08029191 = sum of:
          0.043194972 = weight(_text_:j in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043194972 = score(doc=654,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
          0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037096936 = score(doc=654,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 654, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper explores the possible citation chain reactions of a Nobel Prize using the mathematician Robert J. Aumann as a case example. The results show that the award of the Nobel Prize in 2005 affected not only the citations to his work, but also affected the citations to the references in his scientific oeuvre. The results indicate that the spillover effect is almost as powerful as the effect itself. We are consequently able to document a ripple effect in which the awarding of the Nobel Prize ignites a citation chain reaction to Aumann's scientific oeuvre and to the references in its nearest citation network. The effect is discussed using innovation decision process theory as a point of departure to identify the factors that created a bandwagon effect leading to the reported observations.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:21:09
  7. Huang, M.; Barbour, J.; Su, C.; Contractor, N.: Why do group members provide information to digital knowledge repositories? : a multilevel application of transactive memory theory (2013) 0.04
    0.040145956 = product of:
      0.08029191 = sum of:
        0.08029191 = sum of:
          0.043194972 = weight(_text_:j in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043194972 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2978903 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
          0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037096936 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The proliferation of digital knowledge repositories (DKRs) used for distributed and collocated work raises important questions about how to manage these technologies. This study investigates why individuals contribute information to DKRs by applying and extending transactive memory theory. Data from knowledge workers (N = 208) nested in work groups (J = 17) located in Europe and the United States revealed, consistent with transactive memory theory, that perceptions of experts' retrieval of information were positively related to the likelihood of information provision to DKRs. The relationship between experts' perceptions of retrieval and information provision varied from group to group, and cross-level interactions indicated that trust in how the information would be used and the interdependence of tasks within groups could explain that variation. Furthermore, information provision to DKRs was related to communication networks in ways consistent with theorizing regarding the formation of transactive memory systems. Implications for theory and practice are discussed, emphasizing the utility of multilevel approaches for conceptualizing and modeling why individuals provide information to DKRs.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:39:00
  8. Schaer, P.: Integration von Open-Access-Repositorien in Fachportale (2010) 0.04
    0.039456896 = product of:
      0.07891379 = sum of:
        0.07891379 = sum of:
          0.035634033 = weight(_text_:j in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035634033 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
          0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04327976 = score(doc=2320,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  9. Spinner, H.F.: Wissenspartizipation und Wissenschaftskommunikation in drei Wissensräumen : Entwurf einer integrierten Theorie (2010) 0.04
    0.039456896 = product of:
      0.07891379 = sum of:
        0.07891379 = sum of:
          0.035634033 = weight(_text_:j in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035634033 = score(doc=3725,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
          0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04327976 = score(doc=3725,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  10. Ohly, H.P.: Wissenskommunikation und -organisation : Quo vadis? (2010) 0.04
    0.039456896 = product of:
      0.07891379 = sum of:
        0.07891379 = sum of:
          0.035634033 = weight(_text_:j in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035634033 = score(doc=3727,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
          0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 3727) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04327976 = score(doc=3727,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3727, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3727)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  11. Petras, V.: Heterogenitätsbehandlung und Terminology Mapping durch Crosskonkordanzen : eine Fallstudie (2010) 0.04
    0.039456896 = product of:
      0.07891379 = sum of:
        0.07891379 = sum of:
          0.035634033 = weight(_text_:j in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035634033 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
          0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04327976 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  12. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.04
    0.039456896 = product of:
      0.07891379 = sum of:
        0.07891379 = sum of:
          0.035634033 = weight(_text_:j in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035634033 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04327976 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  13. Schlögl, C.: Internationale Sichtbarkeit der europäischen und insbesondere der deutschsprachigen Informationswissenschaft (2013) 0.04
    0.039456896 = product of:
      0.07891379 = sum of:
        0.07891379 = sum of:
          0.035634033 = weight(_text_:j in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035634033 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
          0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04327976 = score(doc=900,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 900, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=900)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Eine englische Version dieses Beitrags erscheint unter dem Titel "International visibility of European and in particular German language publications in library and information science" im Tagungsband des 13. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2013). Vgl.: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/iwp.2013.64.issue-1/iwp-2013-0001/iwp-2013-0001.xml?format=INT.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 14:04:09
  14. Mugridge, R.L.; Edmunds, J.: Batchloading MARC bibliographic records (2012) 0.04
    0.039456896 = product of:
      0.07891379 = sum of:
        0.07891379 = sum of:
          0.035634033 = weight(_text_:j in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035634033 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
          0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04327976 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Lueg, C.; Banks, B.; Michalek, M.; Dimsey, J.; Oswin, D.: Close encounters of the fifth kind : recognizing system-initiated engagement as interaction type (2019) 0.04
    0.039456896 = product of:
      0.07891379 = sum of:
        0.07891379 = sum of:
          0.035634033 = weight(_text_:j in 5252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035634033 = score(doc=5252,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.24574696 = fieldWeight in 5252, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5252)
          0.04327976 = weight(_text_:22 in 5252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04327976 = score(doc=5252,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5252, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5252)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    15. 5.2019 19:22:59
  16. Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014) 0.03
    0.03458602 = product of:
      0.06917204 = sum of:
        0.06917204 = sum of:
          0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02545288 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.043719158 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043719158 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
  17. Zhu, Q.; Kong, X.; Hong, S.; Li, J.; He, Z.: Global ontology research progress : a bibliometric analysis (2015) 0.03
    0.03458602 = product of:
      0.06917204 = sum of:
        0.06917204 = sum of:
          0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02545288 = score(doc=2590,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
          0.043719158 = weight(_text_:22 in 2590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043719158 = score(doc=2590,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2590, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    17. 9.2018 18:22:23
  18. Bertram, J.: Informationen verzweifelt gesucht : Enterprise Search in österreichischen Großunternehmen (2011) 0.03
    0.03458602 = product of:
      0.06917204 = sum of:
        0.06917204 = sum of:
          0.02545288 = weight(_text_:j in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02545288 = score(doc=2657,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
          0.043719158 = weight(_text_:22 in 2657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043719158 = score(doc=2657,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2657, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2657)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit geht dem Status quo der unternehmensweiten Suche in österreichischen Großunternehmen nach und beleuchtet Faktoren, die darauf Einfluss haben. Aus der Analyse des Ist-Zustands wird der Bedarf an Enterprise-Search-Software abgeleitet und es werden Rahmenbedingungen für deren erfolgreiche Einführung skizziert. Die Untersuchung stützt sich auf eine im Jahr 2009 durchgeführte Onlinebefragung von 469 österreichischen Großunternehmen (Rücklauf 22 %) und daran anschließende Leitfadeninterviews mit zwölf Teilnehmern der Onlinebefragung. Der theoretische Teil verortet die Arbeit im Kontext des Informations- und Wissensmanagements. Der Fokus liegt auf dem Ansatz der Enterprise Search, ihrer Abgrenzung gegenüber der Suche im Internet und ihrem Leistungsspektrum. Im empirischen Teil wird zunächst aufgezeigt, wie die Unternehmen ihre Informationen organisieren und welche Probleme dabei auftreten. Es folgt eine Analyse des Status quo der Informati-onssuche im Unternehmen. Abschließend werden Bekanntheit und Einsatz von Enterprise-Search-Software in der Zielgruppe untersucht sowie für die Einführung dieser Software nötige Rahmenbedingungen benannt. Defizite machen die Befragten insbesondere im Hinblick auf die übergreifende Suche im Unternehmen und die Suche nach Kompetenzträgern aus. Hier werden Lücken im Wissensmanagement offenbar. 29 % der Respondenten der Onlinebefragung geben zu-dem an, dass es in ihren Unternehmen gelegentlich bis häufig zu Fehlentscheidungen infolge defizitärer Informationslagen kommt. Enterprise-Search-Software kommt in 17 % der Unternehmen, die sich an der Onlinebefragung beteiligten, zum Einsatz. Die durch Enterprise-Search-Software bewirkten Veränderungen werden grundsätzlich posi-tiv beurteilt. Alles in allem zeigen die Ergebnisse, dass Enterprise-Search-Strategien nur Erfolg haben können, wenn man sie in umfassende Maßnahmen des Informations- und Wissensmanagements einbettet.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 20:40:31
  19. Hohmann, G.: ¬Die Anwendung des CIDOC-CRM für die semantische Wissensrepräsentation in den Kulturwissenschaften (2010) 0.03
    0.033820197 = product of:
      0.067640394 = sum of:
        0.067640394 = sum of:
          0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030543458 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
          0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 4011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037096936 = score(doc=4011,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4011, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4011)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  20. Semenova, E.: Ontologie als Begriffssystem : Theoretische Überlegungen und ihre praktische Umsetzung bei der Entwicklung einer Ontologie der Wissenschaftsdisziplinen (2010) 0.03
    0.033820197 = product of:
      0.067640394 = sum of:
        0.067640394 = sum of:
          0.030543458 = weight(_text_:j in 4095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030543458 = score(doc=4095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14500295 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 4095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4095)
          0.037096936 = weight(_text_:22 in 4095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037096936 = score(doc=4095,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15980367 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045634337 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4095, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly

Languages

  • e 1069
  • d 397
  • a 2
  • f 1
  • hu 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1303
  • el 148
  • m 107
  • s 36
  • x 17
  • r 7
  • b 5
  • i 2
  • p 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications