Search (250 results, page 2 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.01 
    0.01365917 = product of:
  0.02731834 = sum of:
    0.0064112484 = weight(_text_:a in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0064112484 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.020907091 = product of:
      0.041814182 = sum of:
        0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041814182 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The growth of interest in the electronic library concept and increasing reliance on multimedia materials has increased the demand for image databases as functional parts of digital libraries. Discusses the requirements for these emerging information systems and presents query methods and data models suitable for such systems. Presents selected practical examples of approaches that provide a preview of how digital libraries may operate in the near future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Type
    a
  2. ¬Das papierlose Archiv : Abspecken mit digitaler Speicherverwaltung (1995) 0.01 
    0.0127202645 = product of:
  0.025440529 = sum of:
    0.004533437 = weight(_text_:a in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004533437 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
    0.020907091 = product of:
      0.041814182 = sum of:
        0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 1788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041814182 = score(doc=1788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1788)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Facts: Testmagazin für die Büro- & Kommunikationswelt. 1995, H.5, S.22-34
    Type
    a
  3. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.01 
    0.0127202645 = product of:
  0.025440529 = sum of:
    0.004533437 = weight(_text_:a in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004533437 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.020907091 = product of:
      0.041814182 = sum of:
        0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041814182 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Type
    a
  4. Modelle und Konzepte der Beitragsdokumentation und Filmarchivierung im Lokalfernsehsender Hamburg I : Endbericht (1996) 0.01 
    0.011946909 = product of:
  0.047787637 = sum of:
    0.047787637 = product of:
      0.09557527 = sum of:
        0.09557527 = weight(_text_:22 in 7383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09557527 = score(doc=7383,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7383, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7383)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 2.1997 19:46:30
  5. Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014) 0.01 
    0.010271155 = product of:
  0.02054231 = sum of:
    0.005608674 = weight(_text_:a in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005608674 = score(doc=1632,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
    0.014933636 = product of:
      0.029867273 = sum of:
        0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867273 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Type
    a
  6. Hesselbarth, A.: What you see is all you get? : Konzept zur Optimierung des Bildmanagements am Beispiel der jump Fotoagentur (2008) 0.01 
    0.009085903 = product of:
  0.018171806 = sum of:
    0.003238169 = weight(_text_:a in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003238169 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
    0.014933636 = product of:
      0.029867273 = sum of:
        0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867273 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:34:12
  7. Toebak, P.: ¬Das Dossier nicht die Klassifikation als Herzstück des Records Management (2009) 0.01 
    0.009085903 = product of:
  0.018171806 = sum of:
    0.003238169 = weight(_text_:a in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003238169 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
    0.014933636 = product of:
      0.029867273 = sum of:
        0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 3220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867273 = score(doc=3220,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3220, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3220)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    6.12.2009 17:22:17
    Type
    a
  8. Electronic recordkeeping issues and perspectives (1994) 0.01 
    0.008960181 = product of:
  0.035840724 = sum of:
    0.035840724 = product of:
      0.07168145 = sum of:
        0.07168145 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07168145 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.14-135
  9. Peters, G.; Gaese, V.: ¬Das DocCat-System in der Textdokumentation von G+J (2003) 0.01 
    0.008216924 = product of:
  0.016433848 = sum of:
    0.004486939 = weight(_text_:a in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004486939 = score(doc=1507,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
    0.011946909 = product of:
      0.023893818 = sum of:
        0.023893818 = weight(_text_:22 in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023893818 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Wir werden einmal die Grundlagen des Text-Mining-Systems bei IBM darstellen, dann werden wir das Projekt etwas umfangreicher und deutlicher darstellen, da kennen wir uns aus. Von daher haben wir zwei Teile, einmal Heidelberg, einmal Hamburg. Noch einmal zur Technologie. Text-Mining ist eine von IBM entwickelte Technologie, die in einer besonderen Ausformung und Programmierung für uns zusammengestellt wurde. Das Projekt hieß bei uns lange Zeit DocText Miner und heißt seit einiger Zeit auf Vorschlag von IBM DocCat, das soll eine Abkürzung für Document-Categoriser sein, sie ist ja auch nett und anschaulich. Wir fangen an mit Text-Mining, das bei IBM in Heidelberg entwickelt wurde. Die verstehen darunter das automatische Indexieren als eine Instanz, also einen Teil von Text-Mining. Probleme werden dabei gezeigt, und das Text-Mining ist eben eine Methode zur Strukturierung von und der Suche in großen Dokumentenmengen, die Extraktion von Informationen und, das ist der hohe Anspruch, von impliziten Zusammenhängen. Das letztere sei dahingestellt. IBM macht das quantitativ, empirisch, approximativ und schnell. das muss man wirklich sagen. Das Ziel, und das ist ganz wichtig für unser Projekt gewesen, ist nicht, den Text zu verstehen, sondern das Ergebnis dieser Verfahren ist, was sie auf Neudeutsch a bundle of words, a bag of words nennen, also eine Menge von bedeutungstragenden Begriffen aus einem Text zu extrahieren, aufgrund von Algorithmen, also im Wesentlichen aufgrund von Rechenoperationen. Es gibt eine ganze Menge von linguistischen Vorstudien, ein wenig Linguistik ist auch dabei, aber nicht die Grundlage der ganzen Geschichte. Was sie für uns gemacht haben, ist also die Annotierung von Pressetexten für unsere Pressedatenbank. Für diejenigen, die es noch nicht kennen: Gruner + Jahr führt eine Textdokumentation, die eine Datenbank führt, seit Anfang der 70er Jahre, da sind z.Z. etwa 6,5 Millionen Dokumente darin, davon etwas über 1 Million Volltexte ab 1993. Das Prinzip war lange Zeit, dass wir die Dokumente, die in der Datenbank gespeichert waren und sind, verschlagworten und dieses Prinzip haben wir auch dann, als der Volltext eingeführt wurde, in abgespeckter Form weitergeführt. Zu diesen 6,5 Millionen Dokumenten gehören dann eben auch ungefähr 10 Millionen Faksimileseiten, weil wir die Faksimiles auch noch standardmäßig aufheben.
    Date
    22. 4.2003 11:45:36
    Type
    a
  10. Dahmen, E.: Klassifikation als Ordnundssystem im elektronischen Pressearchiv (2003) 0.01 
    0.008216924 = product of:
  0.016433848 = sum of:
    0.004486939 = weight(_text_:a in 1513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004486939 = score(doc=1513,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.088261776 = fieldWeight in 1513, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1513)
    0.011946909 = product of:
      0.023893818 = sum of:
        0.023893818 = weight(_text_:22 in 1513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023893818 = score(doc=1513,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1513, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1513)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die bis heute gültige Grundkonzeption einer Klassifikation für die elektronische Pressedatenbank im WDR wurde seit 1989 von Klaus Leesch und Mitarbeitern entwickelt. Die inhaltliche Ausgestaltung und Strukturierung erfolgte durch verschiedene Mitarbeiter des Pressearchivs. Mit Beginn der Digitalisierung 1993 kam die erste Klassifikation ("PARIS-Klassifikation") zum Einsatz, sie wurde in den folgenden Jahren von Dr. Bernhard Brandhofer mehrmals überarbeitet und hin zu einer archivübergreifenden Klassifikation ("D&A-Klassifikation") erweitert. Seit August 1999 ist diese Klassifikation die Grundlage der inhaltlichen Erschließung für die kooperierenden ARD-Pressearchive. Die letzte Überarbeitung fand 2000/2001 in der AG Erschließung des PAN (Presse-Archiv-Netzwerk der ARD) in Zusammenarbeit von Mitarbeitern des NDR, SWR und WDR statt und kommt ab Mai 2001 zum Einsatz (PAN-Klassifikation).
    Date
    28. 4.2003 13:35:22
    Object
    D&A-Klassifikation
    Type
    a
  11. Großmann, K.; Schaaf, T.: Datenbankbasiertes Dokumentenmanagementsystem im Versuchswesen (2001) 0.01 
    0.00780524 = product of:
  0.01561048 = sum of:
    0.0036635704 = weight(_text_:a in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036635704 = score(doc=5868,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.072065435 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
    0.011946909 = product of:
      0.023893818 = sum of:
        0.023893818 = weight(_text_:22 in 5868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023893818 = score(doc=5868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5868)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Agrarproduktion wird in sehr komplexer Weise durch einen steten Wandel ihrer ökono-mischen und ökologischen Rahmenbedingungen beeinflusst. Aus diesem Prozess resultieren ständig neue Anforderungen an die Agrarforschung. Bei den Forschungs- und Untersuchungsarbeiten in der Pflanzen- und Tierproduktion, im Gartenbau und im Forstwesen nimmt dabei das Experiment eine zentrale Stelle ein. Der derzeitige Stand der Dokumentation und Präsentation von Ergebnissen der Versuchstätigkeit ist gekennzeichnet durch: - Die Existenz einer Vielzahl dezentraler Pools von Versuchsberichten, - hohe Aufwendungen für deren Publizierung, in der Regel im Selbstverlag, - steigende Versandkosten, - relativ kleiner Adressatenkreis, - nur punktuell webbasierte, statische Präsentationen, - kein umfassender Austausch und damit transparente Präsentation von Versuchsresultaten, - keine strukturiert unterstützte (Datenbank-)Recherche nach bestimmten Berichten/Dokumenten/Einrichtungen/Versuchskategorien usw. Das Projekt >Versuchsberichte im Internet< (VIP) soll für Einrichtungen der Beratung, Forschung, Lehre, Praxis und Verwaltung im Agrarbereich helfen, diese Mängel zu mindern und so einen Rationalisierungseffekt auslösen. Dieses Ziel soll im Einzelnen wie folgt realisiert werden: - Input der als verteilte Informationspools in Bund und Ländern vorliegenden Versuchsberichte in eine zentrale Dokumentendatenbank bei uneingeschränkter Verfügungsgewalt und vollen Urheberrechten der beteiligten Einrichtungen; - Bereitstellung einer Online-Lösung im Internet; - Integration eines Moduls für den internetgestützten Online-Input von Dokumenten; - Gewährleistung von Datenschutz; - Unterstützung des Versuchswesens in Bund und Ländern mit dem Ziel, Rationalisierungseffekte z. B. hinsichtlich der Versuchsplanung, Dokumentations- und Kommunikationsaufwendungen, Öffentlichkeitsarbeit, e-commerce zu erreichen. Über diese Funktionen hinaus werden in das Projekt weitere Informationspools, wie Adressen, bibliographische und wissenschaftliche Informationen, Diskussionslisten, Maps u. a. integriert. Entsprechend der föderalen Struktur der Bundesrepublik steht eine Beteiligung am Projekt allen interessierten Einrichtungen in Bund und Ländern offen
    Date
    16. 5.2001 12:22:23
    Type
    a
  12. Wandeler, J.: Comprenez-vous only Bahnhof? : Mehrsprachigkeit in der Mediendokumentation (2003) 0.01 
    0.007268722 = product of:
  0.014537444 = sum of:
    0.0025905352 = weight(_text_:a in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0025905352 = score(doc=1512,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
    0.011946909 = product of:
      0.023893818 = sum of:
        0.023893818 = weight(_text_:22 in 1512) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023893818 = score(doc=1512,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1512, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1512)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 4.2003 12:09:10
    Type
    a
  13. Schlenkrich, C.: Aspekte neuer Regelwerksarbeit : Multimediales Datenmodell für ARD und ZDF (2003) 0.01 
    0.007268722 = product of:
  0.014537444 = sum of:
    0.0025905352 = weight(_text_:a in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0025905352 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
    0.011946909 = product of:
      0.023893818 = sum of:
        0.023893818 = weight(_text_:22 in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023893818 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 4.2003 12:05:56
    Type
    a
  14. Bantin, P.: Electronic records management : a review of the work of a decade and a reflection on future directions (2002) 0.00 
    0.003885803 = product of:
  0.015543212 = sum of:
    0.015543212 = weight(_text_:a in 4255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015543212 = score(doc=4255,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.30574775 = fieldWeight in 4255, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4255)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    a
  15. Schiffer, A.: Multimediale Bild-Text-Verfilmung am Bild- und Tonarchiv des Steiermärkischen Landesmuseums Joanneum Graz (1993) 0.00 
    0.0033652042 = product of:
  0.013460817 = sum of:
    0.013460817 = weight(_text_:a in 2837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013460817 = score(doc=2837,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.26478532 = fieldWeight in 2837, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2837)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Location
    A
    Type
    a
  16. Schiffer-Ekhart, A.: Multimedia storage in the audiovisual department of the Landesmuseum Johanneum - Bild und Tonarchiv - in Graz (1995) 0.00 
    0.003238169 = product of:
  0.012952676 = sum of:
    0.012952676 = weight(_text_:a in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012952676 = score(doc=1563,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Analyses the characteristics of audiovisual media, and describes the photographic collection of the Landesmuseum, which comprises half a million items. Outlines the computerizes cataloguing system which allows the catalogue entries to be integrated with records of other media on a single database
    Type
    a
  17. Giguere, M.D.: Automatic electronic records management in a transactional environment : the Philadelphia story (1997) 0.00 
    0.0032056242 = product of:
  0.012822497 = sum of:
    0.012822497 = weight(_text_:a in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012822497 = score(doc=193,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    a
  18. Kowlowitz, A.; Kelly, K.: Models for action : developing practical approaches to electronic records management and preservation (1997) 0.00 
    0.0032056242 = product of:
  0.012822497 = sum of:
    0.012822497 = weight(_text_:a in 194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012822497 = score(doc=194,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 194, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=194)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    a
  19. Masiero, P.C.: Authoring and searching in dynamically growing hypertext databases (1994) 0.00 
    0.003172745 = product of:
  0.01269098 = sum of:
    0.01269098 = weight(_text_:a in 1575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01269098 = score(doc=1575,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 1575, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1575)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Shows how an application in office information systems can be modelled so that a dynamically growing database of hypertext documents is created and automatically extended, as well as easily searched. Proposes a method for analyzing office applications which relies on a model based on statecharts to record the flow of documents within the system. A prototype implementation is described of a hypertext system to support the creation, storage and retrieval of documents associated with formal face to face meetings. Special features to be incorporated into hypertext systems aimed at supporting the storage and retrieval of office documents are also identified
    Type
    a
  20. Krizak, J.D.: Hospital documentation planning : the concept and the context (1993) 0.00 
    0.003172745 = product of:
  0.01269098 = sum of:
    0.01269098 = weight(_text_:a in 2149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01269098 = score(doc=2149,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2149, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2149)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Documentation planning is defined as a process within an institution to select an appropriate documentary record for the institution. Describes the functions and component institutions of the US health care system, identifies the functions of hospitals within the system, offers an analysis of hospital activities and administrative organization, and presents a typology of hospitals. Provides the informational context within which a documentation plan can be developed for a practical hospital. A similar planning approach may also be applied to other types of institutions, organizations and corporations
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 150
  • d 92
  • f 4
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 232
  • m 11
  • s 4
  • el 2
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications