-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Library classification on the march (1961)
0.17
0.1731143 = product of:
0.23081906 = sum of:
0.009066874 = weight(_text_:a in 2001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009066874 = score(doc=2001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2001)
0.1501345 = weight(_text_:et in 2001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1501345 = score(doc=2001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.7257575 = fieldWeight in 2001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2001)
0.07161768 = product of:
0.14323536 = sum of:
0.14323536 = weight(_text_:al in 2001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14323536 = score(doc=2001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.70888597 = fieldWeight in 2001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2001)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Source
- Essays in librarianship in memory of William Charles Berwick Sayers: The Sayers memorial volume. Ed.: D.J. Foskett et al
- Type
- a
-
LaBarre, K.: Bliss and Ranganathan : synthesis, synchronicity our sour grapes? (2000)
0.08
0.07779418 = product of:
0.10372557 = sum of:
0.00868892 = weight(_text_:a in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00868892 = score(doc=88,freq=10.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064343356 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.03069329 = product of:
0.06138658 = sum of:
0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 88) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06138658 = score(doc=88,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 88, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=88)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- The concerns of the past century follow us into the next. Despite continuing technological advancement we find ourselves overwhelmed by a virtual tidal wave of information. Instead of reinventing seemingly novel solutions, it is appropriate to reexamine the successes and failures of the past. In light of the increasing focus on faceted classification as a potential approach to the problems of organizing conceptual space, it is appropriate to direct critical attention to the convoluted nature of the interaction between Henry Evelyn Bliss and S. R. Ranganathan. Drawing upon the methods of historiography, this is a review of original documents and an analysis of primary examples drawn from the correspondence between Ranganathan and Bliss currently in possession of the Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Columbia University and Archives and Special Collections at the Morris Raphael Cohen Library, City College of New York. This analysis will serve as a springboard to further exploration of the synthetic nature of faceted classification
- Source
- Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
- Type
- a
-
Sukiasyan, E.: Classification systems in their historical development : problems of typology and terminology (1998)
0.08
0.07632529 = product of:
0.101767056 = sum of:
0.0067304084 = weight(_text_:a in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067304084 = score(doc=80,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064343356 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.03069329 = product of:
0.06138658 = sum of:
0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 80) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06138658 = score(doc=80,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 80, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=80)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- The history of structural development of classification systems (CS) is typologically divided into three main stages. Enumerative CS developed from ordinal towards hierarchical. In combinational CS, combinatory techniques evolved from division by analogy towards a fully-fledged system of typical subdivisions of general and special use. Syntactic designations were employed to combine notational symbols within wide limits. The invention of categorial analysis facilitated the development of faceted or analytical-synthetic CS. The system types under consideration are functioning simultaneously in the indexing practice. Clearly defined continuity can be observed. Each higher-ranking type comprises structural elements of its predecessor. Otherwise stated, each combinational classification contains elements of an enumerative one, while each faceted or analytical-synthetic CS includes elements of a combinational system
- Source
- Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
- Type
- a
-
Sa'ari, C.Z.: Classification of sciences : a comparative study of Ihya'ulum al-din and al=Risalah al-laduniyyah (1999)
0.07
0.06843398 = product of:
0.13686796 = sum of:
0.012822497 = weight(_text_:a in 6280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012822497 = score(doc=6280,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 6280, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6280)
0.12404546 = product of:
0.24809092 = sum of:
0.24809092 = weight(_text_:al in 6280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24809092 = score(doc=6280,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
1.2278266 = fieldWeight in 6280, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6280)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Type
- a
-
Kaiser, J.O.: Systematic indexing (1985)
0.06
0.055043153 = product of:
0.07339087 = sum of:
0.010033101 = weight(_text_:a in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010033101 = score(doc=571,freq=30.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.19735932 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
0.042895574 = weight(_text_:et in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042895574 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
0.020462193 = product of:
0.040924385 = sum of:
0.040924385 = weight(_text_:al in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040924385 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- A native of Germany and a former teacher of languages and music, Julius Otto Kaiser (1868-1927) came to the Philadelphia Commercial Museum to be its librarian in 1896. Faced with the problem of making "information" accessible, he developed a method of indexing he called systematic indexing. The first draft of his scheme, published in 1896-97, was an important landmark in the history of subject analysis. R. K. Olding credits Kaiser with making the greatest single advance in indexing theory since Charles A. Cutter and John Metcalfe eulogizes him by observing that "in sheer capacity for really scientific and logical thinking, Kaiser's was probably the best mind that has ever applied itself to subject indexing." Kaiser was an admirer of "system." By systematic indexing he meant indicating information not with natural language expressions as, for instance, Cutter had advocated, but with artificial expressions constructed according to formulas. Kaiser grudged natural language its approximateness, its vagaries, and its ambiguities. The formulas he introduced were to provide a "machinery for regularising or standardising language" (paragraph 67). Kaiser recognized three categories or "facets" of index terms: (1) terms of concretes, representing things, real or imaginary (e.g., money, machines); (2) terms of processes, representing either conditions attaching to things or their actions (e.g., trade, manufacture); and (3) terms of localities, representing, for the most part, countries (e.g., France, South Africa). Expressions in Kaiser's index language were called statements. Statements consisted of sequences of terms, the syntax of which was prescribed by formula. These formulas specified sequences of terms by reference to category types. Only three citation orders were permitted: a term in the concrete category followed by one in the process category (e.g., Wool-Scouring); (2) a country term followed by a process term (e.g., Brazil - Education); and (3) a concrete term followed by a country term, followed by a process term (e.g., Nitrate-Chile-Trade). Kaiser's system was a precursor of two of the most significant developments in twentieth-century approaches to subject access-the special purpose use of language for indexing, thus the concept of index language, which was to emerge as a generative idea at the time of the second Cranfield experiment (1966) and the use of facets to categorize subject indicators, which was to become the characterizing feature of analytico-synthetic indexing methods such as the Colon classification. In addition to its visionary quality, Kaiser's work is notable for its meticulousness and honesty, as can be seen, for instance, in his observations about the difficulties in facet definition.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
- Type
- a
-
Bliss, H.E.: ¬A bibliographic classification : principles and definitions (1985)
0.05
0.054787997 = product of:
0.07305066 = sum of:
0.009692895 = weight(_text_:a in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009692895 = score(doc=3621,freq=28.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.19066721 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
28.0 = termFreq=28.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.042895574 = weight(_text_:et in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042895574 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.020462193 = product of:
0.040924385 = sum of:
0.040924385 = weight(_text_:al in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040924385 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Henry Evelyn Bliss (1870-1955) devoted several decades of his life to the study of classification and the development of the Bibliographic Classification scheme while serving as a librarian in the College of the City of New York. In the course of the development of the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss developed a body of classification theory published in a number of articles and books, among which the best known are The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences (1929), Organization of Knowledge in Libraries and the Subject Approach to Books (1933; 2nd ed., 1939), and the lengthy preface to A Bibliographic Classification (Volumes 1-2, 1940; 2nd ed., 1952). In developing the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss carefully established its philosophical and theoretical basis, more so than was attempted by the makers of other classification schemes, with the possible exception of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.) and his Colon Classification. The basic principles established by Bliss for the Bibliographic Classification are: consensus, collocation of related subjects, subordination of special to general and gradation in specialty, and the relativity of classes and of classification (hence alternative location and alternative treatment). In the preface to the schedules of A Bibliographic Classification, Bliss spells out the general principles of classification as weIl as principles specifically related to his scheme. The first volume of the schedules appeared in 1940. In 1952, he issued a second edition of the volume with a rewritten preface, from which the following excerpt is taken, and with the addition of a "Concise Synopsis," which is also included here to illustrate the principles of classificatory structure. In the excerpt reprinted below, Bliss discusses the correlation between classes, concepts, and terms, as weIl as the hierarchical structure basic to his classification scheme. In his discussion of cross-classification, Bliss recognizes the "polydimensional" nature of classification and the difficulties inherent in the two-dimensional approach which is characteristic of linear classification. This is one of the earliest works in which the multidimensional nature of classification is recognized. The Bibliographic Classification did not meet with great success in the United States because the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification were already weIl ensconced in American libraries by then. Nonetheless, it attracted considerable attention in the British Commonwealth and elsewhere in the world. A committee was formed in Britain which later became the Bliss Classification Association. A faceted edition of the scheme has been in preparation under the direction of J. Mills and V. Broughton. Several parts of this new edition, entitled Bliss Bibliographic Classification, have been published.
- Footnote
- Original in: Bliss, H.E.: A bibliographic classification extended by systematic auxuliary schedules for composite specification and notation. vols 1-2. 2nd ed. New York: Wilson 1952. S.3-11.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
- Type
- a
-
Hopwood, H.V.: Dewey expanded (1985)
0.05
0.0539622 = product of:
0.0719496 = sum of:
0.008591834 = weight(_text_:a in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008591834 = score(doc=3629,freq=22.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.16900843 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
0.042895574 = weight(_text_:et in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042895574 = score(doc=3629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
0.020462193 = product of:
0.040924385 = sum of:
0.040924385 = weight(_text_:al in 3629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040924385 = score(doc=3629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Toward the end of the nineteenth century, Paul Otlet and Henri LaFontaine of Belgium initiated the compilation of an index to all recorded knowledge. Instead of an alphabetical file, they decided to adopt a classified arrangement. For the basis of such an arrangement, they turned to the Dewey Decimal Classification, a system which was gaining wide acceptance in American libraries. With permission secured from Melvil Dewey to expand the system to include details required for an indexing tool, Otlet and LaFontaine began developing what was to become the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC). Following the establishment of the Institut International de Bibliographie (IIB), later the Fédération Internationale de Documentation (FID), in 1895, work an the universal index and the classification scheme proceeded under its aegis. In 1905, the classification scheme was published as the Manuel du Répertoire bibliographique universel. While the initial, ambitious project of the universal index was abandoned, the classification scheme itself was widely adopted, particularly in special libraries in Europe. A second edition was published in 1927-1933 under the title Classification décimale universelle. The development and maintanance of the scheme continued with the support of the FID. In the course of its development, the UDC moved further and further away from its prototype, the Dewey Decimal Classification. One of the major differences between the two systems is the use of relators in UDC. The notation adopted by Melvil Dewey for his scheme is a hierarchical one; in other words, the notation reflects the hierarchical relationships among subjects. However, it does not display the relationships among the facets, or aspects, of a particular subject. Furthermore, the use of auxiliaries in the Dewey Decimal Classification, beginning with the form subdivisions and gradually expanding to include geographic subdivisions and finally other auxiliaries in the most recent editions, has been relatively restricted. As an indexing tool, Otlet and LaFontaine felt that their system needed commonly applicable auxiliaries which they called "determinatives."` To this end, a series of special symbols were introduced into the system for the purpose of combining related subjects and indicating different facets or aspects of the main subject. The use of these symbols, called relators, with the auxiliaries has rendered the Universal Decimal Classification a synthetic scheme. In this respect, the UDC has moved much more rapidly than the Dewey Decimal Classification toward becoming a faceted classification. In the following paper, Henry V. Hopwood, a Senior Assistant at the British Patent Office Library during the 1900s, explains the use and rationale of relators, or "marks," as he calls them, in the Universal Decimal Classification.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
- Type
- a
-
Martel, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice (1985)
0.05
0.053013682 = product of:
0.07068491 = sum of:
0.007327141 = weight(_text_:a in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007327141 = score(doc=3623,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
0.042895574 = weight(_text_:et in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042895574 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
0.020462193 = product of:
0.040924385 = sum of:
0.040924385 = weight(_text_:al in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040924385 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- It has been generally recognized that the Library of Congress Classification, developed at the turn of the century, has been based an practical rather than theoreti cal or philosophical considerations. Unlike most of the other library classification systems, which originated from individual minds, the Library of Congress Classification system was the result of corporate efforts. Nonetheless, there were a number of individuals who, in the early stages of its development, provided guidance regarding the general framework and direction of the scheme. The most important among these was Charles Martel (1860-1945) who was Chief Classifier at the Library of Congress when the system was first developed. In a paper read before the New Zealand Library Association in April 1911, from which the following excerpt has been taken, Martel gave his views concerning library classification in general and provided a glimpse of the rationale behind the Library of Congress Classification system in particular. In the following excerpt, Martel discusses the basis of the Library of Congress Classification system to be not "the scientific order of subjects ... [but] rather [a] convenient sequence of the various groups ... of books." This is the "literary warrant" an which the Library of Congress system has been based. With regard to the notation, Martel argues for brevity in preference to symmetry or mnemonics. Brevity of notation has since been recognized as one of the greatest advantages of the Library of Congress system as a device for shelf arrangement of books. Martel outlines seven groupings used in the system for subarranging books an the subject, first by form and then by subject subdivisions. This pattern, known as Martel's "seven points," has served as the general framework in individual classes and provided the most significant unifying factor for individual classes in the system, which contain many unique or disparate characteristics.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
- Type
- a
-
Hulme, E.W.: Principles of book classification (1985)
0.05
0.05265876 = product of:
0.07021168 = sum of:
0.0068539125 = weight(_text_:a in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0068539125 = score(doc=3626,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.13482209 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
0.042895574 = weight(_text_:et in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042895574 = score(doc=3626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
0.020462193 = product of:
0.040924385 = sum of:
0.040924385 = weight(_text_:al in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040924385 = score(doc=3626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- One of the earliest works on the theory of classification appeared in a series of six chapters an the "Principles of Book Classification" published between October 1911 and May 1912 in the Library Association Record. In this publication, the author, E. Wyndham Hulme (1859-1954) whose career included twenty-five years as Librarian of the British Patent Office, set forth the fundamentals of classification as manifested in both the classed and the alphabetical catalogs. The work and the ideas contained therein have largely been forgotten. However, one phrase stands out and has been used frequently in the discussions of classification and indexing, particularly in reference to systems such as Library of Congress Classification, Dewey Decimal Classification, and Library of Congress Subject Headings. That phrase is "literary warrant"-meaning that the basis for classification is to be found in the actual published literature rather than abstract philosophical ideas or concepts in the universe of knowledge or the "order of nature and system of the sciences." To the extent that classification and indexing systems should be based upon existing literature rather than the universe of human knowledge, the concept of "literary warrant" defines systems used in library and information services, as distinguished from a purely philosophical classification. Library classification attempts to classify library materials-the records of knowledge-rather than knowledge itself; the establishment of a class or a heading for a subject is based an existing literature treating that subject. The following excerpt contains Hulme's definition of "literary warrant." Hulme first rejects the notion of using "the nature of the subject matter to be divided" as the basis for establishing headings, then he proceeds to propose the use of "literary warrant," that is, "an accurate survey and measurement of classes in literature," as the determinant.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
- Type
- a
-
Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985)
0.05
0.052277446 = product of:
0.06970326 = sum of:
0.00634549 = weight(_text_:a in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00634549 = score(doc=3628,freq=12.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.12482099 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.042895574 = weight(_text_:et in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042895574 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.020462193 = product of:
0.040924385 = sum of:
0.040924385 = weight(_text_:al in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040924385 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20253885 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- To those outside the field of library science, the name Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) is virtually synonymous with library classification. To those in the field, Dewey has been recognized as the premier classification maker. His enormously successful system (i.e., successful in terms of the wide adoption of the system around the world for over one hundred years) has now undergone nineteen editions. The Dewey Decimal Classification has been translated into more than twenty languages and is the most widely adopted classification scheme in the world. Even in its earliest manifestations, the Dewey Decimal Classification contained features that anticipated modern classification theory. Among these are the use of mnemonics and the commonly applied standard subdivisions, later called "common isolates" by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.), which are the mainstays of facet analysis and synthesis. The device of standard subdivisions is an indication of the recognition of common aspects that pervade all subjects. The use of mnemonics, whereby recurring concepts in the scheme are represented by the same notation, for example, geographic concepts and language concepts, eased the transition of the Dewey Decimal Classification from a largely enumerative system to an increasingly faceted one. Another significant feature of the Dewey Decimal Classification is the use of the hierarchical notation based an the arabic numeral system. To a large extent, this feature accounts for the wide use and success of the system in the world across language barriers. With the prospect of increasing online information retrieval, the hierarchical notation will have a significant impact an the effectiveness of the Dewey Decimal Classification as an online retrieval tool. Because the notation is hierarchical, for example, with increasing digits in a number representing narrower subjects and decreasing digits indicating broader subjects, the Dewey Decimal Classification is particularly useful in generic searches for broadening or narrowing search results. In the preface to the second edition of his Decimal Classification Dewey explained the features of his "new" system. The excerpt below presents his ideas and theory concerning the rational basis of his classification, the standard subdivisions, the hierarchical notation based an decimal numbers, the use of mnemonics, the relative index, and relative location. It also reflects Dewey's lifelong interest in simplified spelling.
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
- Type
- a
-
Ranganathan, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories (1985)
0.05
0.04638697 = product of:
0.061849292 = sum of:
0.0064112484 = weight(_text_:a in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064112484 = score(doc=3631,freq=16.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.037533626 = weight(_text_:et in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037533626 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.18143937 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.01790442 = product of:
0.03580884 = sum of:
0.03580884 = weight(_text_:al in 3631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580884 = score(doc=3631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.17722149 = fieldWeight in 3631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- Among the theorists in the field of subject analysis in the twentieth century, none has been more influential than S. R. Ranganathan (1892-1972) of India, a mathematician by training who turned to librarianship and made some of the most far-reaching contributions to the theory of librarianship in general and subject analysis in particular. Dissatisfied with both the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Universal Decimal Classification, Ranganathan set out to develop his own system. His Colon Classification was first published in 1933 and went through six editions; the seventh edition was in progress when Ranganathan died in 1972. In the course of developing the Colon Classification, Ranganathan formulated a body of classification theory which was published in numerous writings, of which the best known are Elements of Library Classification (1945; 3rd ed., 1962) and Prolegomena to Library Classification (1967). Among the principles Ranganathan established, the most powerful and influential are those relating to facet analysis. Ranganathan demonstrated that facet analysis (breaking down subjects into their component parts) and synthesis (recombining these parts to fit the documents) provide the most viable approach to representing the contents of documents. Although the idea and use of facets, though not always called by that name, have been present for a long time (for instance, in the Dewey Decimal Classification and Charles A. Cutter's Expansive Classification), Ranganathan was the person who systematized the ideas and established principles for them. For his Colon Classification, Ranganathan identified five fundamental categories: Personality (P), Material (M), Energy (E), Space (S) and Time (T) and the citation order PMEST based an the idea of decreasing concreteness.
The Colon Classification has not been widely adopted; however, the theory of facet analysis and synthesis Ranganathan developed has proved to be most influential. Although many theorists of subject analysis do not totally agree with his fundamental categories or citation order, Ranganathan's concept of facet analysis and synthesis has provided a viable method and a framework for approaching subject analysis and has become the foundation of subject analysis in the twentieth century. In this sense, his theory laid the groundwork for later investigations and inquiries into the nature of subject and classificatory categories and citation order. His influence is felt in all modern classification schemes and indexing systems. This is attested to by the citations to his ideas and works in numerous papers included in this collection and by the fact that other modern classification systems such as the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification have become increasingly faceted in recent editions. The following chapter from Elements of Library Classification represents one of Ranganathan's many expositions of facet analysis and fundamental categories. It is chosen because of its clarity of expression and comprehensibility (many readers find the majority of his writings difficult to understand).
- Source
- Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
- Type
- a
-
Maltby, A.: Sayers' manual of classification for librarians (1978)
0.04
0.042220086 = product of:
0.08444017 = sum of:
0.012822497 = weight(_text_:a in 3427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012822497 = score(doc=3427,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 3427, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3427)
0.07161768 = product of:
0.14323536 = sum of:
0.14323536 = weight(_text_:al in 3427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14323536 = score(doc=3427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.70888597 = fieldWeight in 3427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Orig.: Sayers, W.C.B.: A manual of classification. 1926. - 2nd ed. 1944. - 3rd ed. 1955. - 4th ed. 1967
- Signature
- Al 12b Say
-
Rolland-Thomas, P.: Eassai sur la contribution de l'anthropologie culturelle aux fondements de la classification documentaire (1996)
0.04
0.0414597 = product of:
0.0829194 = sum of:
0.007852144 = weight(_text_:a in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007852144 = score(doc=5777,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.07506725 = weight(_text_:et in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07506725 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Classification is the natural response to a desire for order among objects and living things and classification systems have existed since time immemorial. Discusses culture and classification, and classification in a scientific and social sciences context, and states that the invention of writing has ensured that classification systems have been passed down through the generations. Discusses the role of cultural anthropology as developed by Dürkheim and Mauss and furthered byCclaude Levi-Strauss in shedding light on the phylogenetic dimension of classification
- Source
- Documentation et bibliothèques. 42(1996) no.1, S.7-18
- Type
- a
-
Béthery, A.: Liberté bien ordonnée : les classifications encyclopédiques revues et corrigées (1988)
0.03
0.034919355 = product of:
0.06983871 = sum of:
0.0054953555 = weight(_text_:a in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0054953555 = score(doc=2532,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 2532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064343356 = score(doc=2532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 2532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2532)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Type
- a
-
Charaf, I.: Conceptualisation and organization of knowledge between the 10th and 14th centuries in Arabic culture (2004)
0.03
0.032601483 = product of:
0.06520297 = sum of:
0.007327141 = weight(_text_:a in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007327141 = score(doc=3349,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
0.057875823 = product of:
0.11575165 = sum of:
0.11575165 = weight(_text_:al in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11575165 = score(doc=3349,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.5728664 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- I present a detailed philosophical study of three classification systems: Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali and Ibn Khaldun. The primary aim of this study is to formulate the underlying philosophical basis of each classification and to relate this basis to certain principles contained in the Islamic revelation. I also give analytical treatment of the following questions: the major distinguishing features of each classification and the attitude of each thinker towards the philosophical and religious sciences and how they envisaged the distinction between the two fields.
- Type
- a
-
Lorenz, B.: ¬Die DDC im Umfeld der Entwicklung dezimaler Klassifikationen (2008)
0.03
0.032418407 = product of:
0.064836815 = sum of:
0.011217348 = weight(_text_:a in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011217348 = score(doc=2152,freq=24.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053619467 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!
- Type
- a
-
Wellisch, H.H.: Organisatorische Neuordnung des DK-Systems (1971)
0.03
0.029074889 = product of:
0.058149777 = sum of:
0.010362141 = weight(_text_:a in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010362141 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
0.047787637 = product of:
0.09557527 = sum of:
0.09557527 = weight(_text_:22 in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09557527 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971), S.55-63
- Type
- a
-
Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990)
0.02
0.021806166 = product of:
0.04361233 = sum of:
0.007771606 = weight(_text_:a in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007771606 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
0.035840724 = product of:
0.07168145 = sum of:
0.07168145 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07168145 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 25.12.1995 22:28:43
- Type
- a
-
Lehnus, D.J.: Book numbers : history, principles and applications (1980)
0.02
0.020462193 = product of:
0.08184877 = sum of:
0.08184877 = product of:
0.16369754 = sum of:
0.16369754 = weight(_text_:al in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16369754 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.8101554 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Signature
- Al 12b Cut
-
Comaroni, J.P.: ¬The eighteen editions of the Dewey Decimal Classification (1976)
0.02
0.020462193 = product of:
0.08184877 = sum of:
0.08184877 = product of:
0.16369754 = sum of:
0.16369754 = weight(_text_:al in 3346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16369754 = score(doc=3346,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.044089027 = queryNorm
0.8101554 = fieldWeight in 3346, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3346)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Signature
- Al 12b Dew
