Search (298 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016) 0.21
    0.20682058 = product of:
      0.27576077 = sum of:
        0.006476338 = weight(_text_:a in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006476338 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
        0.10723893 = weight(_text_:et in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10723893 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
        0.16204551 = sum of:
          0.10231097 = weight(_text_:al in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.10231097 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044089027 = queryNorm
              0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
          0.059734546 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.059734546 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044089027 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Type
    a
  2. Reasoning Web : Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures (2017) 0.16
    0.16058668 = product of:
      0.21411559 = sum of:
        0.004579463 = weight(_text_:a in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004579463 = score(doc=3934,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
        0.14186378 = weight(_text_:et in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14186378 = score(doc=3934,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.6857764 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
        0.06767235 = product of:
          0.1353447 = sum of:
            0.1353447 = weight(_text_:al in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1353447 = score(doc=3934,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.6698343 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Content
    Neumaier, Sebastian (et al.): Data Integration for Open Data on the Web - Stamou, Giorgos (et al.): Ontological Query Answering over Semantic Data - Calì, Andrea: Ontology Querying: Datalog Strikes Back - Sequeda, Juan F.: Integrating Relational Databases with the Semantic Web: A Reflection - Rousset, Marie-Christine (et al.): Datalog Revisited for Reasoning in Linked Data - Kaminski, Roland (et al.): A Tutorial on Hybrid Answer Set Solving with clingo - Eiter, Thomas (et al.): Answer Set Programming with External Source Access - Lukasiewicz, Thomas: Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web - Calvanese, Diego (et al.): OBDA for Log Extraction in Process Mining
    Editor
    Ianni, G. et al.
  3. Nilbe, S.: Semiautomatic merging of two universal thesauri : the case of Estonia (2011) 0.12
    0.12365307 = product of:
      0.16487075 = sum of:
        0.006476338 = weight(_text_:a in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006476338 = score(doc=3152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
        0.10723893 = weight(_text_:et in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10723893 = score(doc=3152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
        0.051155485 = product of:
          0.10231097 = sum of:
            0.10231097 = weight(_text_:al in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10231097 = score(doc=3152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
    Type
    a
  4. Balakrishnan, U,; Soergel, D.; Helfer, O.: Representing concepts through description logic expressions for knowledge organization system (KOS) mapping (2020) 0.12
    0.12365307 = product of:
      0.16487075 = sum of:
        0.006476338 = weight(_text_:a in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006476338 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
        0.10723893 = weight(_text_:et in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10723893 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.5183982 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
        0.051155485 = product of:
          0.10231097 = sum of:
            0.10231097 = weight(_text_:al in 144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10231097 = score(doc=144,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.5063471 = fieldWeight in 144, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=144)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge Organization at the Interface. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International ISKO Conference, 2020 Aalborg, Denmark. Ed.: M. Lykke et al
    Type
    a
  5. Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008) 0.11
    0.107850865 = product of:
      0.14380115 = sum of:
        0.009158926 = weight(_text_:a in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009158926 = score(doc=2649,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
        0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053619467 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
        0.081022754 = sum of:
          0.051155485 = weight(_text_:al in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051155485 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044089027 = queryNorm
              0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
          0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029867273 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044089027 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
    Type
    a
  6. Stamou, G.; Chortaras, A.: Ontological query answering over semantic data (2017) 0.10
    0.10053201 = product of:
      0.13404268 = sum of:
        0.007327141 = weight(_text_:a in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007327141 = score(doc=3926,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.08579115 = weight(_text_:et in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08579115 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.040924385 = product of:
          0.08184877 = sum of:
            0.08184877 = weight(_text_:al in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08184877 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Source
    Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al
    Type
    a
  7. Metadata and semantics research : 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings (2016) 0.09
    0.094249554 = product of:
      0.18849911 = sum of:
        0.07506725 = weight(_text_:et in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07506725 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
        0.113431856 = sum of:
          0.07161768 = weight(_text_:al in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07161768 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044089027 = queryNorm
              0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
          0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 3283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041814182 = score(doc=3283,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044089027 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3283, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3283)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Editor
    Garoufallou, E. et al.
  8. Posch, L.; Schaer, P.; Bleier, A.; Strohmaier, M.: ¬A system for probabilistic linking of thesauri and classification systems (2015) 0.09
    0.09148552 = product of:
      0.1219807 = sum of:
        0.011104607 = weight(_text_:a in 2515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011104607 = score(doc=2515,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2515, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2515)
        0.07506725 = weight(_text_:et in 2515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07506725 = score(doc=2515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 2515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2515)
        0.03580884 = product of:
          0.07161768 = sum of:
            0.07161768 = weight(_text_:al in 2515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07161768 = score(doc=2515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 2515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a system which creates and visualizes probabilistic semantic links between concepts in a thesaurus and classes in a classification system. For creating the links, we build on the Polylingual Labeled Topic Model (PLL-TM) (Posch et al., in KI 2015: advances in artificial intelligence, 2015). PLL-TM identifies probable thesaurus descriptors for each class in the classification system by using information from the natural language text of documents, their assigned thesaurus descriptors and their designated classes. The links are then presented to users of the system in an interactive visualization, providing them with an automatically generated overview of the relations between the thesaurus and the classification system.
    Type
    a
  9. Kristoffersen, K.A.: Mapping mot Dewey (2016) 0.09
    0.088381685 = product of:
      0.17676337 = sum of:
        0.0051810704 = weight(_text_:a in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051810704 = score(doc=1950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
        0.1715823 = weight(_text_:et in 1950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1715823 = score(doc=1950,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.82943714 = fieldWeight in 1950, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1950)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Mapping er en aktivitet hvor det etableres relasjoner mellom begreper i to ulike kontrollerte vokabularer. Man mapper fra et kildevokabular og finner korresponderende begreper i et målvokabular. Mapping brukes også til å benevne resultatet av en mappingaktivitet, dvs. relasjonen mellom et begrep i ett vokabular og en eller flere begreper i et annet vokabular.
    Type
    a
  10. Dunsire, G.: Enhancing information services using machine-to-machine terminology services (2011) 0.09
    0.0879655 = product of:
      0.11728734 = sum of:
        0.0064112484 = weight(_text_:a in 1805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0064112484 = score(doc=1805,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1805, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1805)
        0.07506725 = weight(_text_:et in 1805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07506725 = score(doc=1805,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.36287874 = fieldWeight in 1805, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1805)
        0.03580884 = product of:
          0.07161768 = sum of:
            0.07161768 = weight(_text_:al in 1805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07161768 = score(doc=1805,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.35444298 = fieldWeight in 1805, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1805)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes the basic concepts of terminology services and their role in information retrieval interfaces. Terminology services are consumed by other software applications using machine-to-machine protocols, rather than directly by end-users. An example of a terminology service is the pilot developed by the High Level Thesaurus (HILT) project which has successfully demonstrated its potential for enhancing subject retrieval in operational services. Examples of enhancements in three such services are given. The paper discusses the future development of terminology services in relation to the Semantic Web.
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
    Type
    a
  11. Khiat, A.; Benaissa, M.: Approach for instance-based ontology alignment : using argument and event structures of generative lexicon (2014) 0.08
    0.079520516 = product of:
      0.10602736 = sum of:
        0.010990711 = weight(_text_:a in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010990711 = score(doc=1577,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
        0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064343356 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
        0.03069329 = product of:
          0.06138658 = sum of:
            0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 1577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06138658 = score(doc=1577,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1577, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1577)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Ontology alignment became a very important problem to ensure semantic interoperability for different sources of information heterogeneous and distributed. Instance-based ontology alignment represents a very promising technique to find semantic correspondences between entities of different ontologies when they contain a lot of instances. In this paper, we describe a new approach to manage ontologies that do not share common instances.This approach extracts the argument and event structures from a set of instances of the concept of the source ontology and compared them with other semantic features extracted from a set of instances of the concept of the target ontology using Generative Lexicon Theory. We show that it is theoretically powerful because it is based on linguistic semantics and useful in practice. We present the experimental results obtained by running our approach on Biblio test of Benchmark series of OAEI 2011. The results show the good performance of our approach.
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
    Type
    a
  12. Manguinhas, H.; Charles, V.; Isaac, A.; Miles, T.; Lima, A.; Neroulidis, A.; Ginouves, V.; Atsidis, D.; Hildebrand, M.; Brinkerink, M.; Gordea, S.: Linking subject labels in cultural heritage metadata to MIMO vocabulary using CultuurLink (2016) 0.08
    0.07841616 = product of:
      0.104554884 = sum of:
        0.009518234 = weight(_text_:a in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009518234 = score(doc=3107,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
        0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064343356 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
        0.03069329 = product of:
          0.06138658 = sum of:
            0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 3107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06138658 = score(doc=3107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 3107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3107)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Europeana Sounds project aims to increase the amount of cultural audio content in Europeana. It also strongly focuses on enriching the metadata records that are aggregated by Europeana. To provide metadata to Europeana, Data Providers are asked to convert their records from the format and model they use internally to a specific profile of the Europeana Data Model (EDM) for sound resources. These metadata include subjects, which typically use a vocabulary internal to each partner.
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
    Type
    a
  13. Widhalm, R.; Mueck, T.A.: Merging topics in well-formed XML topic maps (2003) 0.08
    0.07710619 = product of:
      0.10280825 = sum of:
        0.007771606 = weight(_text_:a in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007771606 = score(doc=2186,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
        0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064343356 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
        0.03069329 = product of:
          0.06138658 = sum of:
            0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06138658 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Topic Maps are a standardized modelling approach for the semantic annotation and description of WWW resources. They enable an improved search and navigational access on information objects stored in semi-structured information spaces like the WWW. However, the according standards ISO 13250 and XTM (XML Topic Maps) lack formal semantics, several questions concerning e.g. subclassing, inheritance or merging of topics are left open. The proposed TMUML meta model, directly derived from the well known UML meta model, is a meta model for Topic Maps which enables semantic constraints to be formulated in OCL (object constraint language) in order to answer such open questions and overcome possible inconsistencies in Topic Map repositories. We will examine the XTM merging conditions and show, in several examples, how the TMUML meta model enables semantic constraints for Topic Map merging to be formulated in OCL. Finally, we will show how the TM validation process, i.e., checking if a Topic Map is well formed, includes our merging conditions.
    Source
    The Semantic Web - ISWC 2003. Eds. D. Fensel et al
    Type
    a
  14. Amarger, F.; Chanet, J.-P.; Haemmerlé, O.; Hernandez, N.; Roussey, C.: SKOS sources transformations for ontology engineering : agronomical taxonomy use case (2014) 0.08
    0.07632529 = product of:
      0.101767056 = sum of:
        0.0067304084 = weight(_text_:a in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067304084 = score(doc=1593,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
        0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064343356 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
        0.03069329 = product of:
          0.06138658 = sum of:
            0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 1593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06138658 = score(doc=1593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Sources like thesauri or taxonomies are already used as input in ontology development process. Some of them are also published on the LOD using the SKOS format. Reusing this type of sources to build an ontology is not an easy task. The ontology developer has to face different syntax and different modelling goals. We propose in this paper a new methodology to transform several non-ontological sources into a single ontology. We take into account: the redundancy of the knowledge extracted from sources in order to discover the consensual knowledge and Ontology Design Patterns (ODPs) to guide the transformation process. We have evaluated our methodology by creating an ontology on wheat taxonomy from three sources: Agrovoc thesaurus, TaxRef taxonomy, NCBI taxonomy.
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
    Type
    a
  15. Jahns, Y.: 20 years SWD : German subject authority data prepared for the future (2011) 0.08
    0.075399004 = product of:
      0.100532 = sum of:
        0.0054953555 = weight(_text_:a in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0054953555 = score(doc=1802,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
        0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064343356 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
        0.03069329 = product of:
          0.06138658 = sum of:
            0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 1802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06138658 = score(doc=1802,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1802, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1802)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The German subject headings authority file - SWD - provides a terminologically controlled vocabulary, covering all fields of knowledge. The subject headings are determined by the German Rules for the Subject Catalogue. The authority file is produced and updated daily by participating libraries from around Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Over the last twenty years, it grew to an online-accessible database with about 550.000 headings. They are linked to other thesauri, also to French and English equivalents and with notations of the Dewey Decimal Classification. Thus, it allows multilingual access and searching in dispersed, heterogeneously indexed catalogues. The vocabulary is not only used for cataloguing library materials, but also web-resources and objects in archives and museums.
    Source
    Subject access: preparing for the future. Conference on August 20 - 21, 2009 in Florence, the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section sponsored an IFLA satellite conference entitled "Looking at the Past and Preparing for the Future". Eds.: P. Landry et al
    Type
    a
  16. Ioannou, E.; Nejdl, W.; Niederée, C.; Velegrakis, Y.: Embracing uncertainty in entity linking (2012) 0.07
    0.06534681 = product of:
      0.08712907 = sum of:
        0.007931862 = weight(_text_:a in 433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007931862 = score(doc=433,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 433, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=433)
        0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053619467 = score(doc=433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=433)
        0.025577743 = product of:
          0.051155485 = sum of:
            0.051155485 = weight(_text_:al in 433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051155485 = score(doc=433,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 433, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=433)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The modern Web has grown from a publishing place of well-structured data and HTML pages for companies and experienced users into a vivid publishing and data exchange community in which everyone can participate, both as a data consumer and as a data producer. Unavoidably, the data available on the Web became highly heterogeneous, ranging from highly structured and semistructured to highly unstructured user-generated content, reflecting different perspectives and structuring principles. The full potential of such data can only be realized by combining information from multiple sources. For instance, the knowledge that is typically embedded in monolithic applications can be outsourced and, thus, used also in other applications. Numerous systems nowadays are already actively utilizing existing content from various sources such as WordNet or Wikipedia. Some well-known examples of such systems include DBpedia, Freebase, Spock, and DBLife. A major challenge during combining and querying information from multiple heterogeneous sources is entity linkage, i.e., the ability to detect whether two pieces of information correspond to the same real-world object. This chapter introduces a novel approach for addressing the entity linkage problem for heterogeneous, uncertain, and volatile data.
    Source
    Semantic search over the Web. Eds.: R. De Virgilio, et al
  17. Gödert, W.; Hubrich, J.; Boteram, F.: Thematische Recherche und Interoperabilität : Wege zur Optimierung des Zugriffs auf heterogen erschlossene Dokumente (2009) 0.06
    0.064924106 = product of:
      0.08656548 = sum of:
        0.06839367 = product of:
          0.27357468 = sum of:
            0.27357468 = weight(_text_:2c in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27357468 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.46726763 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.003238169 = weight(_text_:a in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003238169 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
        0.014933636 = product of:
          0.029867273 = sum of:
            0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029867273 = score(doc=193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Source
    https://opus4.kobv.de/opus4-bib-info/frontdoor/index/index/searchtype/authorsearch/author/%22Hubrich%2C+Jessica%22/docId/703/start/0/rows/20
    Type
    a
  18. Suchowolec, K.; Lang, C.; Schneider, R.: Re-designing online terminology resources for German grammar (2016) 0.06
    0.06425516 = product of:
      0.08567355 = sum of:
        0.006476338 = weight(_text_:a in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006476338 = score(doc=3108,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
        0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053619467 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
        0.025577743 = product of:
          0.051155485 = sum of:
            0.051155485 = weight(_text_:al in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051155485 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The compilation of terminological vocabularies plays a central role in the organization and retrieval of scientific texts. Both simple keyword lists as well as sophisticated modellings of relationships between terminological concepts can make a most valuable contribution to the analysis, classification, and finding of appropriate digital documents, either on the Web or within local repositories. This seems especially true for long-established scientific fields with various theoretical and historical branches, such as linguistics, where the use of terminology within documents from different origins is sometimes far from being consistent. In this short paper, we report on the early stages of a project that aims at the re-design of an existing domain-specific KOS for grammatical content grammis. In particular, we deal with the terminological part of grammis and present the state-of-the-art of this online resource as well as the key re-design principles. Further, we propose questions regarding ramifications of the Linked Open Data and Semantic Web approaches for our re-design decisions.
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
    Type
    a
  19. Steeg, F.; Pohl, A.: ¬Ein Protokoll für den Datenabgleich im Web am Beispiel von OpenRefine und der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) (2021) 0.06
    0.062832505 = product of:
      0.08377667 = sum of:
        0.004579463 = weight(_text_:a in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004579463 = score(doc=367,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053619467 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.025577743 = product of:
          0.051155485 = sum of:
            0.051155485 = weight(_text_:al in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051155485 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Normdaten spielen speziell im Hinblick auf die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung bibliografischer und archivalischer Ressourcen eine wichtige Rolle. Ein konkretes Ziel der Inhaltserschließung ist z. B., dass alle Werke über Hermann Hesse einheitlich zu finden sind. Hier bieten Normdaten eine Lösung, indem z. B. bei der Erschließung einheitlich die GND-Nummer 11855042X für Hermann Hesse verwendet wird. Das Ergebnis ist eine höhere Qualität der Inhaltserschließung vor allem im Sinne von Einheitlichkeit und Eindeutigkeit und, daraus resultierend, eine bessere Auffindbarkeit. Werden solche Entitäten miteinander verknüpft, z. B. Hermann Hesse mit einem seiner Werke, entsteht ein Knowledge Graph, wie ihn etwa Google bei der Inhaltserschließung des Web verwendet (Singhal 2012). Die Entwicklung des Google Knowledge Graph und das hier vorgestellte Protokoll sind historisch miteinander verbunden: OpenRefine wurde ursprünglich als Google Refine entwickelt, und die Funktionalität zum Abgleich mit externen Datenquellen (Reconciliation) wurde ursprünglich zur Einbindung von Freebase entwickelt, einer der Datenquellen des Google Knowledge Graph. Freebase wurde später in Wikidata integriert. Schon Google Refine wurde zum Abgleich mit Normdaten verwendet, etwa den Library of Congress Subject Headings (Hooland et al. 2013).
    Type
    a
  20. Neumaier, S.: Data integration for open data on the Web (2017) 0.06
    0.061826535 = product of:
      0.08243538 = sum of:
        0.003238169 = weight(_text_:a in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003238169 = score(doc=3923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
        0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053619467 = score(doc=3923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
        0.025577743 = product of:
          0.051155485 = sum of:
            0.051155485 = weight(_text_:al in 3923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051155485 = score(doc=3923,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 3923, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3923)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Source
    Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al
    Type
    a

Years

Languages

  • e 226
  • d 67
  • no 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 219
  • el 87
  • m 15
  • s 7
  • x 6
  • r 5
  • p 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects