Search (143 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.11 
    0.10518817 = product of:
  0.14025089 = sum of:
    0.005608674 = weight(_text_:a in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005608674 = score(doc=2337,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
    0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053619467 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
    0.081022754 = sum of:
      0.051155485 = weight(_text_:al in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.051155485 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044089027 = queryNorm
          0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029867273 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044089027 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
    Type
    a
  2. Connell, T.H.: Subject cataloging (1996) 0.10 
    0.10280825 = product of:
  0.13707767 = sum of:
    0.010362141 = weight(_text_:a in 4459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010362141 = score(doc=4459,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4459, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4459)
    0.08579115 = weight(_text_:et in 4459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08579115 = score(doc=4459,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 4459, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4459)
    0.040924385 = product of:
      0.08184877 = sum of:
        0.08184877 = weight(_text_:al in 4459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08184877 = score(doc=4459,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 4459, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4459)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Source
    Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
    Type
    a
  3. Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not? (1995) 0.10 
    0.101767056 = product of:
  0.13568941 = sum of:
    0.008973878 = weight(_text_:a in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008973878 = score(doc=3606,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
    0.08579115 = weight(_text_:et in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08579115 = score(doc=3606,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
    0.040924385 = product of:
      0.08184877 = sum of:
        0.08184877 = weight(_text_:al in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08184877 = score(doc=3606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Content
    Vgl. auch: Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not?: a new view of the old question. In: Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.5, S.817-833.
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
    Type
    a
  4. McIlwaine, I.C.: Subject control : the British viewpoint (1995) 0.10 
    0.09892245 = product of:
  0.1318966 = sum of:
    0.0051810704 = weight(_text_:a in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051810704 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
    0.08579115 = weight(_text_:et in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08579115 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
    0.040924385 = product of:
      0.08184877 = sum of:
        0.08184877 = weight(_text_:al in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08184877 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
    Type
    a
  5. Chan, L.M.: Subject access systems in the USA (1995) 0.10 
    0.09892245 = product of:
  0.1318966 = sum of:
    0.0051810704 = weight(_text_:a in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051810704 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
    0.08579115 = weight(_text_:et in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08579115 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
    0.040924385 = product of:
      0.08184877 = sum of:
        0.08184877 = weight(_text_:al in 1633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08184877 = score(doc=1633,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 1633, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1633)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Source
    Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
    Type
    a
  6. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.07 
    0.07419184 = product of:
  0.098922454 = sum of:
    0.003885803 = weight(_text_:a in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003885803 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
    0.03069329 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = weight(_text_:al in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138658 = score(doc=1643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30380827 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Footnote
    Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
    Type
    a
  7. Frommeyer, J.: Chronological terms and period subdivisions in LCSH, RAMEAU, and RSWK : development of an integrative model for time retrieval across various online catalogs (2004) 0.07 
    0.06752649 = product of:
  0.09003532 = sum of:
    0.007771606 = weight(_text_:a in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007771606 = score(doc=131,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
    0.064343356 = weight(_text_:et in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064343356 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
    0.017920362 = product of:
      0.035840724 = sum of:
        0.035840724 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035840724 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    After a fundamental examination of the phenomenon of time, this paper presents the history, authority, and structure of period subdivisions and chronological terms in the three subject heading languages LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), RAMEAU (Répertoire d'Autorité Matière Encyclopédique et Alphabétique Unifié), and RSWK (Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog). Their usefulness in online searching is demonstrated using the online catalogs of the Library of Congress, the Bibliothèque nationale de France, and the Deutsche Bibliothek and is compared to the search options in selected digital encyclopedias (Encyclopaedia Britannica, Encarta, Brockhaus-Enzyklopädie). The author develops a model for common time retrieval across all three online catalogs, outlines the conditions for that model (time period code, chronological code, and chronology authority file), and proposes a search interface.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  8. Broughton, V.: Structural, linguistic and mathematical elements in indexing languages and search engines : implications for the use of index languages in electronic and non-LIS environments (2000) 0.07 
    0.06534681 = product of:
  0.08712907 = sum of:
    0.007931862 = weight(_text_:a in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007931862 = score(doc=96,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
    0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053619467 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
    0.025577743 = product of:
      0.051155485 = sum of:
        0.051155485 = weight(_text_:al in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051155485 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.25317356 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    The paper looks at ways in which traditional classification and indexing tools have dealt with the relationships between constituent terms; variations in these are examined and compared with the methods used in machine searching, particularly of the Internet and World Wide Web. Apparent correspondences with features of index languages are identified, and further methods of applying classification and indexing theory to machine retrieval are proposed. There are various ways in which indexing and retrieval systems, both conventional and electronic, deal with the problem of searching for documents on a subject basis, and various approaches to the analysis and processing of a query. There appear to be three basic models; the taxonomic or structural system, in which the user is offered a map of the `universe of knowledge'; the language based system, which offers a vocabulary of the subject and a grammar for dealing with compound statements; and the mathematical model using the language of symbolic logic or the algebra of set theory
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
    Type
    a
  9. Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI): Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung : Thesenpapier (2021) 0.06 
    0.063254036 = product of:
  0.12650807 = sum of:
    0.0051810704 = weight(_text_:a in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0051810704 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
    0.121327005 = weight(_text_:et in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121327005 = score(doc=364,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.58650064 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In der Folge eines Arbeitsauftrags des Standardisierungsausschusses wurde im Herbst 2017 das Expertenteam RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) eingerichtet. Dieses ist der Fachgruppe Erschließung zugeordnet und beschäftigt sich seither mit der Weiterentwicklung der verbalen Inhaltserschließung.
    Type
    a
  10. Wiesenmüller, H.: Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen : Überlegungen zur Qualität (2021) 0.05 
    0.053843454 = product of:
  0.07179127 = sum of:
    0.003238169 = weight(_text_:a in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003238169 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
    0.053619467 = weight(_text_:et in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053619467 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
    0.014933636 = product of:
      0.029867273 = sum of:
        0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867273 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Beschäftigt man sich mit Inhaltserschließung, so sind zunächst zwei Dimensionen zu unterscheiden - die Wissensorganisationssysteme selbst (z. B. Normdateien, Thesauri, Schlagwortsprachen, Klassifikationen und Ontologien) und die Metadaten für Dokumente, die mit diesen Wissensorganisationssystemen erschlossen sind. Beides steht in einer Wechselwirkung zueinander: Die Wissensorganisationssysteme sind die Werkzeuge für die Erschließungsarbeit und bilden die Grundlage für die Erstellung konkreter Erschließungsmetadaten. Die praktische Anwendung der Wissensorganisationssysteme in der Erschließung wiederum ist die Basis für deren Pflege und Weiterentwicklung. Zugleich haben Wissensorganisationssysteme auch einen Eigenwert unabhängig von den Erschließungsmetadaten für einzelne Dokumente, indem sie bestimmte Bereiche von Welt- oder Fachwissen modellartig abbilden. Will man nun Aussagen über die Qualität von inhaltlicher Erschließung treffen, so genügt es nicht, den Input - also die Wissensorganisationssysteme und die damit generierten Metadaten - zu betrachten. Man muss auch den Output betrachten, also das, was die Recherchewerkzeuge daraus machen und was folglich bei den Nutzer:innen konkret ankommt. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden Überlegungen zur Qualität von Recherchewerkzeugen in diesem Bereich angestellt - gewissermaßen als Fortsetzung und Vertiefung der dazu im Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) gegebenen Hinweise. Im Zentrum steht die verbale Erschließung nach den Regeln für die Schlagwortkatalogisierung (RSWK), wie sie sich in Bibliothekskatalogen manifestiert - gleich, ob es sich dabei um herkömmliche Kataloge oder um Resource-Discovery-Systeme (RDS) handelt.
    Date
    24. 9.2021 12:22:02
    Type
    a
  11. Geißelmann, F. (Hrsg.): Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen (1994) 0.04 
    0.042370938 = product of:
  0.084741876 = sum of:
    0.004533437 = weight(_text_:a in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004533437 = score(doc=4360,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
    0.080208436 = sum of:
      0.050641347 = weight(_text_:al in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050641347 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044089027 = queryNorm
          0.25062904 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
      0.02956709 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02956709 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.044089027 = queryNorm
          0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    ASB
    Al
    Classification
    Bib A 291 / OPAC
    Bib A 389 OPAC
    Al
    Date
    15. 7.2018 16:22:16
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .
    SBB
    Bib A 291 / OPAC
    Bib A 389 OPAC
  12. Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung (2021) 0.02 
    0.023279572 = product of:
  0.046559144 = sum of:
    0.0036635704 = weight(_text_:a in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036635704 = score(doc=753,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.072065435 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
    0.042895574 = weight(_text_:et in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042895574 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Inhalt: Editorial - Michael Franke-Maier, Anna Kasprzik, Andreas Ledl und Hans Schürmann Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung - Ein Überblick aus 50 Jahren (1970-2020) - Andreas Ledl Fit for Purpose - Standardisierung von inhaltserschließenden Informationen durch Richtlinien für Metadaten - Joachim Laczny Neue Wege und Qualitäten - Die Inhaltserschließungspolitik der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek - Ulrike Junger und Frank Scholze Wissensbasen für die automatische Erschließung und ihre Qualität am Beispiel von Wikidata - Lydia Pintscher, Peter Bourgonje, Julián Moreno Schneider, Malte Ostendorff und Georg Rehm Qualitätssicherung in der GND - Esther Scheven Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung - Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) Coli-conc - Eine Infrastruktur zur Nutzung und Erstellung von Konkordanzen - Uma Balakrishnan, Stefan Peters und Jakob Voß Methoden und Metriken zur Messung von OCR-Qualität für die Kuratierung von Daten und Metadaten - Clemens Neudecker, Karolina Zaczynska, Konstantin Baierer, Georg Rehm, Mike Gerber und Julián Moreno Schneider Datenqualität als Grundlage qualitativer Inhaltserschließung - Jakob Voß Bemerkungen zu der Qualitätsbewertung von MARC-21-Datensätzen - Rudolf Ungváry und Péter Király Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND - Das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten - Sina Menzel, Hannes Schnaitter, Josefine Zinck, Vivien Petras, Clemens Neudecker, Kai Labusch, Elena Leitner und Georg Rehm Ein Protokoll für den Datenabgleich im Web am Beispiel von OpenRefine und der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) - Fabian Steeg und Adrian Pohl Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen - Überlegungen zur Qualität - Heidrun Wiesenmüller Inhaltserschließung für Discovery-Systeme gestalten - Jan Frederik Maas Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext des Information Retrievals - Christian Wartena und Koraljka Golub Die Qualität der Fremddatenanreicherung FRED - Cyrus Beck Quantität als Qualität - Was die Verbünde zur Verbesserung der Inhaltserschließung beitragen können - Rita Albrecht, Barbara Block, Mathias Kratzer und Peter Thiessen Hybride Künstliche Intelligenz in der automatisierten Inhaltserschließung - Harald Sack
    Editor
    Franke-Maier, M., A. Kasprzik, A. Ledl u. H. Schürmann
  13. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.02 
    0.01561048 = product of:
  0.03122096 = sum of:
    0.007327141 = weight(_text_:a in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007327141 = score(doc=3734,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
    0.023893818 = product of:
      0.047787637 = sum of:
        0.047787637 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047787637 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Most indexed databases now include their thesauri and/or coding in their bibliographic files, searchable at the databases' online connect rates. Assesses the searchability of these on the different hosts. Thesauri and classifications are also available as diskette or CD-ROM products. Describes a number of these, highlighting the diskette thesaurus from IFI/Plenum Data for its flexible databases, the CLAIMS Uniterm and Comprehensive indexes to US chemical patents
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
    Type
    a
  14. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.01 
    0.013719298 = product of:
  0.027438596 = sum of:
    0.009518234 = weight(_text_:a in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009518234 = score(doc=5920,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
    0.017920362 = product of:
      0.035840724 = sum of:
        0.035840724 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035840724 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
    Type
    a
  15. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.01 
    0.012845984 = product of:
  0.025691967 = sum of:
    0.007771606 = weight(_text_:a in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007771606 = score(doc=3837,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
    0.017920362 = product of:
      0.035840724 = sum of:
        0.035840724 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035840724 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LSCH), which celebrated its 100th birthday in 1998, is the largest cataloging and indexing language in the world for the indication of the topics and formats of books and similar publications. It consists of a controlled list of main headings, many with subdivisions, with a rich system of cross references. It is supported by the U.S. government, and undergoes systematic revision. In recent decades its managers have begun to confront challenges such as biased terminology, complicated syntax (how terms are put together to form headings), and effective displays in electronic media. Many suggestions have been made for its improvement, including moving to a fully faceted system.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
    Type
    a
  16. Stone, A.T.: Up-ending Cutter's pyramid : the case for making subject references to broader terms (1996) 0.01 
    0.0127202645 = product of:
  0.025440529 = sum of:
    0.004533437 = weight(_text_:a in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.004533437 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
    0.020907091 = product of:
      0.041814182 = sum of:
        0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041814182 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 4.1997 20:43:23
    Type
    a
  17. Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010) 0.01 
    0.010903083 = product of:
  0.021806166 = sum of:
    0.003885803 = weight(_text_:a in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003885803 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
    0.017920362 = product of:
      0.035840724 = sum of:
        0.035840724 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035840724 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
    Type
    a
  18. Nuovo soggettario : guida al sistema italiano di indicizzazione per soggetto, prototipo del thesaurus (2007) 0.01 
    0.008721421 = product of:
  0.017442841 = sum of:
    0.0072117453 = weight(_text_:a in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0072117453 = score(doc=664,freq=62.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.14186095 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
          7.8740077 = tf(freq=62.0), with freq of:
            62.0 = termFreq=62.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
    0.010231096 = product of:
      0.020462193 = sum of:
        0.020462193 = weight(_text_:al in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020462193 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.101269424 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 34(2007) no.1, S.58-60 (P. Buizza): "This Nuovo soggettario is the first sign of subject indexing renewal in Italy. Italian subject indexing has been based until now on Soggettario per i cataloghi delle biblioteche italiane (Firenze, 1956), a list of preferred terms and see references, with suitable hierarchical subdivisions and cross references, derived from the subject catalogue of the National Library in Florence (BNCF). New headings later used in Bibliografia nazionale italiana (BNI) were added without references, nor indeed with any real maintenance. Systematic instructions on how to combine the terms are lacking: the indexer using this instrument is obliged to infer the order of terms absent from the lists by consulting analogous entries. Italian libraries are suffering from the limits of this subject catalogue: vocabulary is inadequate, obsolete and inconsistent, the syndetic structure incomplete and inaccurate, and the syntax ill-defined, poorly explained and unable to reflect complex subjects. In the nineties, the Subject Indexing Research Group (Gruppo di ricerca sull'indicizzazione per soggetto, GRIS) of the AIB (Italian Library Association) developed the indexing theory and some principles of PRECIS and drew up guidelines based on consistent principles for vocabulary, semantic relationships and subject string construction, the latter according to role syntax (Guida 1997). In overhauling the Soggettario, the National Library in Florence aimed at a comprehensive indexing system. (A report on the method and evolution of the work has been published in Knowledge Organization (Lucarelli 2005), while the feasibility study is available in Italian (Per un nuovo Soggettario 2002). Any usable terms from the old Soggettario will be transferred to the new system, while taking into consideration international norms and interlinguistic compatibility, as well as applications outside the immediate library context. The terms will be accessible via a suitable OPAC operating on the most advanced software.
    The guide Nuovo soggettario was presented on February 8' 2007 at a one-day seminar in the Palazzo Vecchio, Florence, in front of some 500 spellbound people. The Nuovo soggettario comes in two parts: the guide in book-form and an accompanying CD-ROM, by way of which a prototype of the thesaurus may be accessed on the Internet. In the former, rules are stated; the latter contains a pdf version of the guide and the first installment of the controlled vocabulary, which is to be further enriched and refined. Syntactic instructions (general application guidelines, as well as special annotations of particular terms) and the compiled subject strings file have yet to be added. The essentials of the new system are: 1) an analytic-synthetic approach, 2) use of terms (units of controlled vocabulary) and subject strings (which represent subjects by combining terms in linear order to form syntactic relationships), instead of main headings and subdivisions, 3) specificity of terms and strings, with a view to the co-extension of subject string and subject matter and 4) a clear distinction between semantic and syntactic relationships, with full control of them both. Basic features of the vocabulary include the uniformity and univocality of terms and thesaural management of a priori (semantic) relationships. Starting from its definition, each term can be categorially analyzed: four macro-categories are represented (agents, action, things, time), for which there are subcategories called facets (e.g., for actions: activities, disciplines, processes), which in turn have sub-facets. Morphological instructions conform to national and international standards, including BS 8723, ANSI/ NISO Z39.19 and the IFLA draft of Guidelines for multilingual thesauri, even for syntactic factorization. Different kinds of semantic relationships are represented thoroughly, and particular attention is paid to poly-hierarchies, which are used only in moderation: both top terms must actually be relevant. Node labels are used to specify the principle of division applied. Instance relationships are also used.
    An entry is structured so as to present all the essential elements of the indexing system. For each term are given: category, facet, related terms, Dewey interdisciplinary class number and, if necessary; definition or scope notes. Sources used are referenced (an appendix in the book lists those used in the current work). Historical notes indicate whenever a change of term has occurred, thus smoothing the transition from the old lists. In chapter 5, the longest one, detailed instructions with practical examples show how to create entries and how to relate terms; upper relationships must always be complete, right up to the top term, whereas hierarchies of related terms not yet fully developed may remain unfinished. Subject string construction consists in a double operation: analysis and synthesis. The former is the analysis of logical functions performed by single concepts in the definition of the subject (e.g., transitive actions, object, agent, etc.) or in syntactic relationships (transitive relationships and belonging relationship), so that each term for those concepts is assigned its role (e.g., key concept, transitive element, agent, instrument, etc.) in the subject string, where the core is distinct from the complementary roles (e.g., place, time, form, etc.). Synthesis is based on a scheme of nuclear and complementary roles, and citation order follows agreed-upon principles of one-to-one relationships and logical dependence. There is no standard citation order based on facets, in a categorial logic, but a flexible one, although thorough. For example, it is possible for a time term (subdivision) to precede an action term, when the former is related to the latter as the object of action: "Arazzi - Sec. 16.-17. - Restauro" [Tapestry - 16th-17th century - Restoration] (p. 126). So, even with more complex subjects, it is possible to produce perfectly readable strings covering the whole of the subject matter without splitting it into two incomplete and complementary headings. To this end, some unusual connectives are adopted, giving the strings a more discursive style.
    Thesaurus software is based on AgroVoc (http:// www.fao.org/aims/ag_intro.htm) provided by the FAO, but in modified form. Many searching options and contextualization within the full hierarchies are possible, so that the choice of morphology and syntax of terms and strings is made easier by the complete overview of semantic relationships. New controlled terms will be available soon, thanks to the work in progress - there are now 13,000 terms, of which 40 percent are non-preferred. In three months, free Internet access by CD-ROM will cease and a subscription will be needed. The digital version of old Soggettario and the corresponding unstructured lists of headings adopted in 1956-1985 are accessible together with the thesaurus, so that the whole vocabulary, old and new, will be at the fingertips of the indexer, who is forced to work with both tools during this transition period. In the future, it will be possible to integrate the thesaurus into library OPACs. The two parts form a very consistent and detailed resource. The guide is filled with examples; the accurate, clearly-expressed and consistent instructions are further enhanced by good use of fonts and type size, facilitating reading. The thesaurus is simple and quick to use, very rich, albeit only a prototype; see, for instance, a list of DDC numbers and related terms with their category and facet, and then entries, hierarchies and so on, and the capacity of the structure to show organized knowledge. The excellent outcome of a demanding experimentation, the intended guide welcomes in a new era of subject indexing in Italy and is highly recommended. The new method has been designed to be easily teachable to new and experimented indexers.
    Now BNI is beginning to use the new language, pointing the way for the adoption of Nuovo soggettario in Italian libraries: a difficult challenge whose success is not assured. To name only one issue: including all fields of study requires particular care in treating terms with different specialized meanings; cooperation of other libraries and institutions is foreseen. At the same time, efforts are being made to assure the system's interoperability outside the library world. It is clear that a great commitment is required. "Too complex a system!" say the naysayers. "Only at the beginning," the proponents reply. The new system goes against the mainstream, compared with the imitation of the easy way offered by search engines - but we know that they must enrich their devices to improve quality, just repeating the work on semantic and syntactic relationships that leads formal expressions to the meanings they are intended to communicate - and also compared with research to create automated devices supporting human work, for the need to simplify cataloguing. Here AI is not involved, but automation is widely used to facilitate and to support the conscious work of indexers guided by rules as clear as possible. The advantage of Nuovo soggettario is its combination of a thesaurus (a much-appreciated tool used across the world) with the equally widespread technique of subject-string construction, which is to say: the rational and predictable combination of the terms used. The appearance of this original, unparalleled working model may well be a great occasion in the international development of indexing, as, on one hand, the Nuovo soggettario uses a recognized tool (the thesaurus) and, on the other, by permitting both pre-coordination and post-coordination, it attempts to overcome the fragmentation of increasingly complex and specialized subjects into isolated, single-term descriptors. This is a serious proposition that merits consideration from both theoretical and practical points of view - and outside Italy, too."
  19. Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access in the online catalog (1982) 0.00 
    0.0036635704 = product of:
  0.014654282 = sum of:
    0.014654282 = weight(_text_:a in 2898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014654282 = score(doc=2898,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 2898, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2898)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Research libraries in OCLC: a quarterly. 5(1982), S.1-7
    Type
    a
  20. Dikovich, W.; Labner, J.; Schmidt, A.: Schlagwortketten-Recherche für den BIBOS-OPAC (1993) 0.00 
    0.0033652042 = product of:
  0.013460817 = sum of:
    0.013460817 = weight(_text_:a in 4690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013460817 = score(doc=4690,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044089027 = queryNorm
        0.26478532 = fieldWeight in 4690, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4690)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Location
    A
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 112
  • d 26
  • nl 2
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 122
  • m 10
  • el 9
  • s 6
  • d 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications