Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Prathap, G."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Prathap, G.: ¬The thermodynamics-bibliometrics consilience and the meaning of h-type indices (2012) 0.01 
    0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 4990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=4990,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4990, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4990)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.430
  2. Prathap, G.: ¬The inconsistency of the H-index (2012) 0.01 
    0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=287,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 287, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=287)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1466-1470
  3. Prathap, G.: Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators (2014) 0.01 
    0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 1178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=1178,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1178, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1178)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.1, S.214
  4. Prathap, G.: Measures for bibliometric size, impact, and concentration (2015) 0.01 
    0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 2046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=2046,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2046, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2046)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.8, S.1740-1741
  5. Prathap, G.: ¬The zynergy-index and the formula for the h-index (2014) 0.00 
    0.004855188 = product of:
  0.019420752 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=1207,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The h-index, as originally proposed (Hirsch, 2005), is a purely heuristic construction. Burrell (2013) showed that efforts to derive formulae from the mathematical framework of Lotkaian informetrics could lead to misleading results. On this note, we argue that a simple heuristic "thermodynamical" model can enable a better three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the information production process leading to what we call the zynergy-index.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.2, S.426-427
  6. Prathap, G.: ¬A three-class, three-dimensional bibliometric performance indicator (2014) 0.00 
    0.0042914203 = product of:
  0.017165681 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 1308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=1308,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1308, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1308)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.7, S.1506-1508
  7. Prathap, G.: ¬A thermodynamic explanation for the Glänzel-Schubert model for the h-index (2011) 0.00 
    0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 4453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=4453,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4453, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4453)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.5, S.992-994
  8. Prathap, G.: Fractionalized exergy for evaluating research performance (2011) 0.00 
    0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 4918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=4918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4918)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2294-2295
  9. Prathap, G.: Measures for impact, consistency, and the h- and g-indices (2014) 0.00 
    0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=1250,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.5, S.1076-1078