Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Schneider, J.W."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: Introduction to bibliometrics for construction and maintenance of thesauri : methodical considerations (2004) 0.01
    0.009198101 = product of:
      0.036792405 = sum of:
        0.036792405 = product of:
          0.07358481 = sum of:
            0.07358481 = weight(_text_:organization in 4423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07358481 = score(doc=4423,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 4423, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4423)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper introduces bibliometrics to the research area of knowledge organization - more precisely in relation to construction and maintenance of thesauri. As such, the paper reviews related work that has been of inspiration for the assembly of a semi-automatic, bibliometric-based, approach for construction and maintenance. Similarly, the paper discusses the methodical considerations behind the approach. Eventually, the semi-automatic approach is used to verify the applicability of bibliometric methods as a supplement to construction and maintenance of thesauri. In the context of knowledge organization, the paper outlines two fundamental approaches to knowledge organization, that is, the manual intellectual approach and the automatic algorithmic approach. Bibliometric methods belong to the automatic algorithmic approach, though bibliometrics do have special characteristics that are substantially different from other methods within this approach.
  2. Schneider, J.W.; Costas, R.: Identifying potential "breakthrough" publications using refined citation analyses : three related explorative approaches (2017) 0.00
    0.0021457102 = product of:
      0.008582841 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 3436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=3436,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3436, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3436)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.3, S.709-723
  3. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: Matrix comparison, part 2 : measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results by use of the mantel and procrustes statistics (2007) 0.00
    0.0017165683 = product of:
      0.006866273 = sum of:
        0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006866273 = score(doc=582,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 582, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=582)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.11, S.1596-1609
  4. Schneider, J.W.; Borlund, P.: Matrix comparison, part 1 : motivation and important issues for measuring the resemblance between proximity measures or ordination results (2007) 0.00
    0.0017165683 = product of:
      0.006866273 = sum of:
        0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006866273 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.11, S.1586-1595