Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

Strzalkowski, T.; Sparck Jones, K.: NLP track at TREC-5 (1997) 0.03

0.033194643 = product of:
  0.13277857 = sum of:
    0.13277857 = weight(_text_:standards in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13277857 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.59091425 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint: Gaithersburgh, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology

Lewis, D.D.; Sparck Jones, K.: Natural language processing for information retrieval (1997) 0.02

0.023871778 = product of:
  0.047743555 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=575,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
    0.028322803 = product of:
      0.056645606 = sum of:
        0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056645606 = score(doc=575,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 575, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=575)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Imprint: The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
Source: From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist

Sparck Jones, K.: Reflections on TREC (1997) 0.02

0.019540602 = product of:
  0.039081205 = sum of:
    0.017839102 = weight(_text_:information in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017839102 = score(doc=580,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
    0.021242103 = product of:
      0.042484205 = sum of:
        0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042484205 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract: This paper discusses the Text REtrieval Conferences (TREC) programme as a major enterprise in information retrieval research. It reviews its structure as an evaluation exercise, characterises the methods of indexing and retrieval being tested within its terms of the approaches to system performance factors these represent; analyses the test results for solid, overall conclusions that can be drawn from them; and, in the light of the particular features of the test data, assesses TREC both for generally applicable findings that emerge from it and for directions it offers for future research
Footnote: Wiederabdruck aus: Information processing and management 31(1995) no.3, S.192-314
Imprint: The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
Source: From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist

Sparck Jones, K.; Jackson, D.M.: ¬The use of automatically obtained keyword classification for information retrieval (1970) 0.01

0.009710376 = product of:
  0.038841505 = sum of:
    0.038841505 = weight(_text_:information in 5177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038841505 = score(doc=5177,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5177, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5177)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Information storage and retrieval. 5(1970), S.175-201

Sparck Jones, K.: ¬The role of artificial intelligence in information retrieval (1991) 0.01
```
0.009083225 = product of:
  0.0363329 = sum of:
    0.0363329 = weight(_text_:information in 4811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0363329 = score(doc=4811,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.41052482 = fieldWeight in 4811, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4811)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Presents a view of the scope of artificial intelligence (AI) in information retrieval (IR). Considers potential roles of AI and IR, evaluating AI from a realistic point od view and within a wide information management potential, not just because AI is itself insufficiently developed, but because many information management tasks are properly shallow information processing ones. There is nevertheless an important place for specific applications of AI or AI-derived technology when particular constraints can be placed on the information management tasks involved

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991) no.8, S.558-565

Sparck Jones, K.: Automatic keyword classification for information retrieval (1971) 0.01

0.008582841 = product of:
  0.034331363 = sum of:
    0.034331363 = weight(_text_:information in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034331363 = score(doc=5176,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Sparck Jones, K.: Fashionable trends and feasible strategies in information management (1988) 0.01
```
0.0073582535 = product of:
  0.029433014 = sum of:
    0.029433014 = weight(_text_:information in 817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029433014 = score(doc=817,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 817, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=817)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

This article analyzes current trends in information management, considers the problems they involve, and suggests some strategies for tackling these problems. The current goal is integrated, personalized information systems, to be reached via artificial intelligence. The argument is that the extent to which this goal can be achieved is limited because these systems are intrinsically heterogeneous, are for access to information, and deal in linguistically expressed information; so the best strategy for building the systems that can be attained is via linguisticallay oriented knowledge and inference. Evaluating these systems also presents problems because each use is unique, but evaluation is much needed and large-sample strategies for performance study can be devised.

Source

Information processing and management. 24(1988), S.703-711

Sparck Jones, K.; Walker, S.; Robertson, S.E.: ¬A probabilistic model of information retrieval : development and comparative experiments - part 1 (2000) 0.01

0.0072827823 = product of:
  0.02913113 = sum of:
    0.02913113 = weight(_text_:information in 4181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02913113 = score(doc=4181,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4181, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4181)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.6, S.779-808

Sparck Jones, K.; Walker, S.; Robertson, S.E.: ¬A probabilistic model of information retrieval : development and comparative experiments - part 2 (2000) 0.01

0.0072827823 = product of:
  0.02913113 = sum of:
    0.02913113 = weight(_text_:information in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02913113 = score(doc=4286,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.6, S.809-840

Sparck Jones, K.: Search term relevance weighting given little relevance information (1979) 0.01

0.0072827823 = product of:
  0.02913113 = sum of:
    0.02913113 = weight(_text_:information in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02913113 = score(doc=1939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote: Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.329-338.

Sparck Jones, K.: Index term weighting (1973) 0.01

0.006866273 = product of:
  0.027465092 = sum of:
    0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 5491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027465092 = score(doc=5491,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5491, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5491)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Information storage and retrieval. 9(1973), S.619-633

Sparck Jones, K.: Retrieval system tests 1958-1978 (1981) 0.01

0.006866273 = product of:
  0.027465092 = sum of:
    0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 3156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027465092 = score(doc=3156,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3156, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3156)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Information retrieval experiment. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones

Sparck Jones, K.: ¬The Cranfield tests (1981) 0.01

0.006866273 = product of:
  0.027465092 = sum of:
    0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 3157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027465092 = score(doc=3157,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3157, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3157)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Information retrieval experiments. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones

Kay, M.; Sparck Jones, K.: Automated language processing (1971) 0.01

0.006866273 = product of:
  0.027465092 = sum of:
    0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027465092 = score(doc=250,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 250, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=250)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Annual review of information science and technology. 6(1971), S.141-166

Lewis, D.D.; Sparck Jones, K.: Natural language processing for information retrieval (1996) 0.01

0.006007989 = product of:
  0.024031956 = sum of:
    0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 4144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024031956 = score(doc=4144,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4144, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4144)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Relevance weighting of search terms (1976) 0.01
```
0.005946367 = product of:
  0.023785468 = sum of:
    0.023785468 = weight(_text_:information in 71) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023785468 = score(doc=71,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 71, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=71)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Examines statistical techniques for exploiting relevance information to weight search terms. These techniques are presented as a natural extension of weighting methods using information about the distribution of index terms in documents in general. A series of relevance weighting functions is derived and is justified by theoretical considerations. In particular, it is shown that specific weighted search methods are implied by a general probabilistic theory of retrieval. Different applications of relevance weighting are illustrated by experimental results for test collections

Source

Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 27(1976), S.129-146

Sparck Jones, K.: Metareflections on TREC (2005) 0.01

0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman

Sparck Jones, K.: Reflections on TREC : TREC-2 (1995) 0.00
```
0.004855188 = product of:
  0.019420752 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Discusses the TREC programme as a major enterprise in information retrieval research. It reviews its structure as an evaluation exercise, characterises the methods of indexing and retrieval being tested within it in terms of the approaches to system performance factors these represent; analyses the test results for solid, overall conclusions that can be drawn from them; and, in the light of the particular features of the test data, assesses TREC both for generally applicable findings that emerge from it and for directions it offers for future research

Source

Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.3, S.291-314

Sparck Jones, K.: Synonymy and semantic classification (1986) 0.00

0.0042914203 = product of:
  0.017165681 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 1304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=1304,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1304, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1304)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series: Edinburgh information technology series ; 1

Sparck Jones, K.; Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Introduction: automatic summarizing (1995) 0.00

0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.625-630

Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications