Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

Strzalkowski, T.; Sparck Jones, K.: NLP track at TREC-5 (1997) 0.03

0.033194643 = product of:
  0.13277857 = sum of:
    0.13277857 = weight(_text_:standards in 3098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13277857 = score(doc=3098,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.59091425 = fieldWeight in 3098, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3098)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint: Gaithersburgh, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology

Sparck Jones, K.: Reflections on TREC (1997) 0.02

0.019540602 = product of:
  0.039081205 = sum of:
    0.017839102 = weight(_text_:information in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017839102 = score(doc=580,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
    0.021242103 = product of:
      0.042484205 = sum of:
        0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042484205 = score(doc=580,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 580, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=580)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract: This paper discusses the Text REtrieval Conferences (TREC) programme as a major enterprise in information retrieval research. It reviews its structure as an evaluation exercise, characterises the methods of indexing and retrieval being tested within its terms of the approaches to system performance factors these represent; analyses the test results for solid, overall conclusions that can be drawn from them; and, in the light of the particular features of the test data, assesses TREC both for generally applicable findings that emerge from it and for directions it offers for future research
Footnote: Wiederabdruck aus: Information processing and management 31(1995) no.3, S.192-314
Imprint: The Hague : International Federation for Information and Documentation (FID)
Source: From classification to 'knowledge organization': Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997). Ed.: A. Gilchrist

Sparck Jones, K.: Retrieval system tests 1958-1978 (1981) 0.01

0.006866273 = product of:
  0.027465092 = sum of:
    0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 3156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027465092 = score(doc=3156,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3156, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3156)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Information retrieval experiment. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones

Sparck Jones, K.: ¬The Cranfield tests (1981) 0.01

0.006866273 = product of:
  0.027465092 = sum of:
    0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 3157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027465092 = score(doc=3157,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3157, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3157)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: Information retrieval experiments. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones

Sparck Jones, K.: Metareflections on TREC (2005) 0.01

0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source: TREC: experiment and evaluation in information retrieval. Ed.: E.M. Voorhees, u. D.K. Harman

Sparck Jones, K.: Reflections on TREC : TREC-2 (1995) 0.00
```
0.004855188 = product of:
  0.019420752 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 1916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=1916,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 1916, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1916)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

Discusses the TREC programme as a major enterprise in information retrieval research. It reviews its structure as an evaluation exercise, characterises the methods of indexing and retrieval being tested within it in terms of the approaches to system performance factors these represent; analyses the test results for solid, overall conclusions that can be drawn from them; and, in the light of the particular features of the test data, assesses TREC both for generally applicable findings that emerge from it and for directions it offers for future research

Source

Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.3, S.291-314
Robertson, S.E.; Sparck Jones, K.: Simple, proven approaches to text retrieval (1997) 0.00
```
0.0030344925 = product of:
  0.01213797 = sum of:
    0.01213797 = weight(_text_:information in 4532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01213797 = score(doc=4532,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 4532, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4532)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
```
Abstract

This technical note describes straightforward techniques for document indexing and retrieval that have been solidly established through extensive testing and are easy to apply. They are useful for many different types of text material, are viable for very large files, and have the advantage that they do not require special skills or training for searching, but are easy for end users. The document and text retrieval methods described here have a sound theoretical basis, are well established by extensive testing, and the ideas involved are now implemented in some commercial retrieval systems. Testing in the last few years has, in particular, shown that the methods presented here work very well with full texts, not only title and abstracts, and with large files of texts containing three quarters of a million documents. These tests, the TREC Tests (see Harman 1993 - 1997; IP&M 1995), have been rigorous comparative evaluations involving many different approaches to information retrieval. These techniques depend an the use of simple terms for indexing both request and document texts; an term weighting exploiting statistical information about term occurrences; an scoring for request-document matching, using these weights, to obtain a ranked search output; and an relevance feedback to modify request weights or term sets in iterative searching. The normal implementation is via an inverted file organisation using a term list with linked document identifiers, plus counting data, and pointers to the actual texts. The user's request can be a word list, phrases, sentences or extended text.

Sparck Jones, K.; Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Progress in documentation : Information retrieval test collection (1976) 0.00

0.0030039945 = product of:
  0.012015978 = sum of:
    0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 4161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012015978 = score(doc=4161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4161)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types