Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Szostak, R."
  • × type_ss:"m"
  1. Szostak, R.; Gnoli, C.; López-Huertas, M.: Interdisciplinary knowledge organization 0.02 
    0.017119322 = product of:
  0.034238644 = sum of:
    0.009710376 = weight(_text_:information in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009710376 = score(doc=3804,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
    0.024528269 = product of:
      0.049056537 = sum of:
        0.049056537 = weight(_text_:organization in 3804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049056537 = score(doc=3804,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27291575 = fieldWeight in 3804, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3804)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This book proposes a novel approach to classification, discusses its myriad advantages, and outlines how such an approach to classification can best be pursued. It encourages a collaborative effort toward the detailed development of such a classification. This book is motivated by the increased importance of interdisciplinary scholarship in the academy, and the widely perceived shortcomings of existing knowledge organization schemes in serving interdisciplinary scholarship. It is designed for scholars of classification research, knowledge organization, the digital environment, and interdisciplinarity itself. The approach recommended blends a general classification with domain-specific classification practices. The book reaches a set of very strong conclusions:
    LCSH
    Information technology / Management
    Subject
    Information technology / Management
  2. Szostak, R.: ¬A schema for unifying human science : interdisciplinary perspectives on culture (2003) 0.01 
    0.0053105257 = product of:
  0.021242103 = sum of:
    0.021242103 = product of:
      0.042484205 = sum of:
        0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042484205 = score(doc=803,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 803, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=803)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 39(2012) no.4, S.300-303 (M.J. Fox) Vgl. auch: Szostak, R.: Speaking truth to power in classification: response to Fox's review of my work; KO 39:4, 300. In: Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.76-77.
  3. Szostak, R.: Classifying science : phenomena, data, theory, method, practice (2004) 0.00 
    0.0018206956 = product of:
  0.0072827823 = sum of:
    0.0072827823 = weight(_text_:information in 325) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0072827823 = score(doc=325,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.08228803 = fieldWeight in 325, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=325)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Despite its methodological flaws and lack of empirical foundation, the book could potentially bring new ideas to current discussions within the practices of curriculum development and knowledge management as weIl as design of information systems, an classification schemes as tools for knowledge sharing, decision-making and knowledge exploration. I hesitate to recommend the book to students, except to students at advanced levels of study, because of its biased presentation of the new ideas and its basis an secondary literature."
    Series
    Information Science & Knowledge Management ; 7

Authors

Subjects

Classifications