Search (15 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Ausbildung"
  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Das, S.; Bagchi, M.; Hussey, P.: How to teach domain ontology-based knowledge graph construction? : an Irish experiment (2023) 0.12
    0.119535774 = product of:
      0.15938103 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 1126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=1126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1126)
        0.0553244 = weight(_text_:standards in 1126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0553244 = score(doc=1126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 1126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1126)
        0.09547379 = sum of:
          0.06132067 = weight(_text_:organization in 1126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06132067 = score(doc=1126,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.34114468 = fieldWeight in 1126, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1126)
          0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03415312 = score(doc=1126,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1126, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1126)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Domains represent concepts which belong to specific parts of the world. The particularized meaning of words linguistically encoding such domain concepts are provided by domain specific resources. The explicit meaning of such words are increasingly captured computationally using domain-specific ontologies, which, even for the same reference domain, are most often than not semantically incompatible. As information systems that rely on domain ontologies expand, there is a growing need to not only design domain ontologies and domain ontology-grounded Knowl­edge Graphs (KGs) but also to align them to general standards and conventions for interoperability. This often presents an insurmountable challenge to domain experts who have to additionally learn the construction of domain ontologies and KGs. Until now, several research methodologies have been proposed by different research groups using different technical approaches and based on scenarios of different domains of application. However, no methodology has been proposed which not only facilitates designing conceptually well-founded ontologies, but is also, equally, grounded in the general pedagogical principles of knowl­edge organization and, thereby, flexible enough to teach, and reproduce vis-à-vis domain experts. The purpose of this paper is to provide such a general, pedagogically flexible semantic knowl­edge modelling methodology. We exemplify the methodology by examples and illustrations from a professional-level digital healthcare course, and conclude with an evaluation grounded in technological parameters as well as user experience design principles.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2023-3/ko-knowledge-organization-jahrgang-50-2023-heft-3.
    Date
    20.11.2023 17:19:22
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 50(2023) no.3, S.182 - 201
  2. Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023) 0.06
    0.056771483 = product of:
      0.11354297 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
        0.10496013 = sum of:
          0.07080701 = weight(_text_:organization in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07080701 = score(doc=1125,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
          0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03415312 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowl­edge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2023-3/ko-knowledge-organization-jahrgang-50-2023-heft-3.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 50(2023) no.3, S.227 - 241
  3. Hjoerland, B.: Education in knowledge organization (KO) (2023) 0.05
    0.05107942 = product of:
      0.10215884 = sum of:
        0.0553244 = weight(_text_:standards in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0553244 = score(doc=1124,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
        0.046834435 = product of:
          0.09366887 = sum of:
            0.09366887 = weight(_text_:organization in 1124) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09366887 = score(doc=1124,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.52110714 = fieldWeight in 1124, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1124)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article provides analyses, describes dilemmas, and suggests way forwards in the teaching of knowl­edge organization (KO). The general assumption of the article is that theoretical problems in KO must be the point of departure for teaching KO. Section 2 addresses the teaching of practical, applied and professional KO, focusing on learning about specific knowl­edge organization systems (KOS), specific standards, and specific methods for organizing knowl­edge, but provides arguments for not isolating these aspects from theoretical issues. Section 3 is about teaching theoretical and academic KO, in which the focus is on examining the bases on which KOSs and knowl­edge organization processes such as classifying and indexing are founded. This basically concerns concepts and conceptual relations and should not be based on prejudices about the superiority of either humans or computers for KO. Section 4 is about the study of education in KO, which is considered important because it is about how the field is monitoring itself and about how it should be shaping its own future. Section 5 is about the role of the ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowl­edge Organization in education of KO, emphasizing the need for an interdisciplinary source that may help improve the conceptual clarity in the field. The conclusion suggests some specific recommendations for curricula in KO based on the author's view of KO.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2023-3/ko-knowledge-organization-jahrgang-50-2023-heft-3.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 50(2023) no.3, S.160 - 181
  4. Zhang, L.: ¬The knowledge organization education within and beyond the master of library and information science (2023) 0.03
    0.029486202 = product of:
      0.058972403 = sum of:
        0.01213797 = weight(_text_:information in 1127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01213797 = score(doc=1127,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1127, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1127)
        0.046834435 = product of:
          0.09366887 = sum of:
            0.09366887 = weight(_text_:organization in 1127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09366887 = score(doc=1127,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.52110714 = fieldWeight in 1127, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    By analyzing 63 English-speaking institutions that offer ALA-accredited master's programs in library and information studies, this research aims to explore the education for knowl­edge organization (KO) at different levels and across fields. This research examines the KO courses that are the required courses and elective courses in the MLIS programs, that are offered in other master's programs and graduate certificate programs, that are adapted to the undergraduate degree and certificate programs, and that are particularly developed for programs other than MLIS. The findings indicate that the great majority of MLIS programs still have a focus on or a significant component of knowl­edge organization as their required course and include the knowl­edge organization elective courses, particularly library cataloging and classification, on their curriculum. However, there is a variety of the offerings of KO related courses across the programs in an institution or in the same program across the institutions. It shows a promising trend that the traditional and new KO courses play an important role in many other programs, at different levels and across fields. With the conventional, adapted, or innovative content, these courses demonstrate that the principles and skills of knowl­edge organization are applicable to a wide variety of settings, can be integrated with other disciplinary knowl­edge and emerging technologies, and meet the needs of different career pathways and groups of learners.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2023-3/ko-knowledge-organization-jahrgang-50-2023-heft-3.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 50(2023) no.3, S.202 - 213
  5. Hudon, M.: ¬The status of knowledge organization in library and information science master's programs (2021) 0.03
    0.026020419 = product of:
      0.052040838 = sum of:
        0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01699316 = score(doc=697,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
        0.03504768 = product of:
          0.07009536 = sum of:
            0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07009536 = score(doc=697,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 697, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The content of master's programs accredited by the American Library Association was examined to assess the status of knowledge organization (KO) as a subject in current training. Data collected show that KO remains very visible in a majority of programs, mainly in the form of required and electives courses focusing on descriptive cataloging, classification, and metadata. Observed tendencies include, however, the recent elimination of the required KO course in several programs, the reality that one third of KO electives listed in course catalogs have not been scheduled in the past three years, and the fact that two-thirds of those teaching KO specialize in other areas of information science.
  6. Ekstrand, M.D.; Wright, K.L.; Pera, M.S.: Enhancing classroom instruction with online news (2020) 0.02
    0.01989231 = product of:
      0.03978462 = sum of:
        0.022708062 = weight(_text_:information in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022708062 = score(doc=5844,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.256578 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
        0.01707656 = product of:
          0.03415312 = sum of:
            0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03415312 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose This paper investigates how school teachers look for informational texts for their classrooms. Access to current, varied and authentic informational texts improves learning outcomes for K-12 students, but many teachers lack resources to expand and update readings. The Web offers freely available resources, but finding suitable ones is time-consuming. This research lays the groundwork for building tools to ease that burden. Design/methodology/approach This paper reports qualitative findings from a study in two stages: (1) a set of semistructured interviews, based on the critical incident technique, eliciting teachers' information-seeking practices and challenges; and (2) observations of teachers using a prototype teaching-oriented news search tool under a think-aloud protocol. Findings Teachers articulated different objectives and ways of using readings in their classrooms, goals and self-reported practices varied by experience level. Teachers struggled to formulate queries that are likely to return readings on specific course topics, instead searching directly for abstract topics. Experience differences did not translate into observable differences in search skill or success in the lab study. Originality/value There is limited work on teachers' information-seeking practices, particularly on how teachers look for texts for classroom use. This paper describes how teachers look for information in this context, setting the stage for future development and research on how to support this use case. Understanding and supporting teachers looking for information is a rich area for future research, due to the complexity of the information need and the fact that teachers are not looking for information for themselves.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.5, S.725-744
  7. Tappenbeck, I.; Michel, A.; Wittich, A.; Werr, N.; Gäde, M.; Spree, U.; Gläser, C.; Griesbaum, J.; Mandl, T.; Keller-Loibl, K.; Stang, R.: Framework Informationskompetenz : Ein gemeinsamer Standard für die Qualifikation in den bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Studiengängen in Deutschland (2022) 0.02
    0.019363541 = product of:
      0.077454165 = sum of:
        0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077454165 = score(doc=540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=540)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Der Beitrag stellt Ergebnisse der Fachgruppe Informationskompetenz der KIBA vor, in der alle Lehrenden im Bereich der Vermittlung von Medien- und Informationskompetenz an bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftlichen Studiengängen in Deutschland zusammenarbeiten. Ausgangspunkt ist das "Framework Informationskompetenz", ein Anforderungsrahmen, der gemeinsame Standards in der Qualifikation von Studierenden der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft für das Aufgabenfeld der Förderung von Informationskompetenz sichern soll. Es wird aufgezeigt, wie die in diesem Rahmenmodell formulierten Qualifikationsstandards in den verschiedenen Studiengängen umgesetzt werden und wo es bedarfsbezogene Ausprägung und Gewichtung in den Qualifikationszielen gibt.
  8. Moreira dos Santos Macula, B.C.: ¬The Universal Decimal Classification in the organization of knowledge : representing the concept of ethics (2023) 0.01
    0.010840065 = product of:
      0.04336026 = sum of:
        0.04336026 = product of:
          0.08672052 = sum of:
            0.08672052 = weight(_text_:organization in 1128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08672052 = score(doc=1128,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.48245144 = fieldWeight in 1128, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1128)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Training in knowl­edge organization (KO) involves an understanding of theories for the construction, maintenance, use, and evaluation of logical documentary languages. Teaching these KO concepts in LIS programs are related basically to accessing documents and retrieving their intellectual content. This study focuses on access to documents and exploring the ethical theme in all its dimensions as applied to the teaching of an undergraduate discipline as part of a Bachelor of Library Science degree offered at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG). As a methodology, a Project-based Pedagogy strategy is used in the teaching of a discipline called "Classification Systems: UDC" for students to classify a documentary resource from a collection on ethics. The teaching of bibliographic classification requires students to learn how to use the mechanisms available to form a notation as well as to use a syntax schema (tables) appropriately. Students also learn to determine a place for the document in the collection, considering the knowl­edge represented in the collection as a whole. Altogether, such a practice can help students to understand the theory underlying a classification system. The results show that the students were able to understand the basic concepts of knowl­edge organization. The students were also able to observe that the elements of the different tables of a classification tool are essential mechanisms for the organization of knowl­edge in other contexts, especially for specific purposes.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2023-3/ko-knowledge-organization-jahrgang-50-2023-heft-3.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 50(2023) no.3, S.214 - 226
  9. Bertram, J.: ¬Ein Online-Lehrkonzept für die Inhaltserschließung (2021) 0.01
    0.006007989 = product of:
      0.024031956 = sum of:
        0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024031956 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 72(2021) H.2/3, S.119-127
  10. Krüger, N.; Pianos, T.: Lernmaterialien für junge Forschende in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften als Open Educational Resources (OER) (2021) 0.01
    0.0059767957 = product of:
      0.023907183 = sum of:
        0.023907183 = product of:
          0.047814365 = sum of:
            0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047814365 = score(doc=252,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 252, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=252)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  11. Wu, D.; Xu, H.; Sun, Y.; Lv, S.: What should we teach? : A human-centered data science graduate curriculum model design for iField schools (2023) 0.00
    0.0042914203 = product of:
      0.017165681 = sum of:
        0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017165681 = score(doc=961,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 961, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=961)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The information schools, also referred to as iField schools, are leaders in data science education. This study aims to develop a data science graduate curriculum model from an information science perspective to support iField schools in developing data science graduate education. In June 2020, information about 96 data science graduate programs from iField schools worldwide was collected and analyzed using a mixed research method based on inductive content analysis. A wide range of data science competencies and skills development and 12 knowledge topics covered by the curriculum were obtained. The humanistic model is further taken as the theoretical and methodological basis for course model construction, and 12 course knowledge topics are reconstructed into 4 course modules, including (a) data-driven methods and techniques; (b) domain knowledge; (c) legal, moral, and ethical aspects of data; and (d) shaping and developing personal traits, and human-centered data science graduate curriculum model is formed. At the end of the study, the wide application prospect of this model is discussed.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.6, S.623-640
  12. Zhang, Y.; Wu, D.; Hagen, L.; Song, I.-Y.; Mostafa, J.; Oh, S.; Anderson, T.; Shah, C.; Bishop, B.W.; Hopfgartner, F.; Eckert, K.; Federer, L.; Saltz, J.S.: Data science curriculum in the iField (2023) 0.00
    0.0030344925 = product of:
      0.01213797 = sum of:
        0.01213797 = weight(_text_:information in 964) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01213797 = score(doc=964,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 964, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=964)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Many disciplines, including the broad Field of Information (iField), offer Data Science (DS) programs. There have been significant efforts exploring an individual discipline's identity and unique contributions to the broader DS education landscape. To advance DS education in the iField, the iSchool Data Science Curriculum Committee (iDSCC) was formed and charged with building and recommending a DS education framework for iSchools. This paper reports on the research process and findings of a series of studies to address important questions: What is the iField identity in the multidisciplinary DS education landscape? What is the status of DS education in iField schools? What knowledge and skills should be included in the core curriculum for iField DS education? What are the jobs available for DS graduates from the iField? What are the differences between graduate-level and undergraduate-level DS education? Answers to these questions will not only distinguish an iField approach to DS education but also define critical components of DS curriculum. The results will inform individual DS programs in the iField to develop curriculum to support undergraduate and graduate DS education in their local context.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.6, S.641-662
  13. Hertenstein, L.: Current state of special collections and rare books cataloging education at LIS programs (2023) 0.00
    0.0030039945 = product of:
      0.012015978 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 1175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=1175,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1175, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1175)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    There is a need for highly trained special collections and rare books catalogers as found in recent job postings. Where will these catalogers learn the unique skills needed for them to succeed in their careers? This paper is an environmental survey of courses offered by the 68 Library and Information Science programs accredited by the American Library Association. It evaluates what course offerings in cataloging and special collections are available. These findings suggest LIS programs currently do not offer sufficient numbers of courses to train special collections and rare books catalogers. Additional skills, from extra languages to knowledge of DCRM(B), need to be acquired in other ways, before, during, and after traditional LIS degree work.
  14. Kyprianos, K.; Efthymiou, F.; Kouis, D.: Students' perceptions on cataloging course (2022) 0.00
    0.0021457102 = product of:
      0.008582841 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=623,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 623, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=623)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Cataloging and metadata description is one of the major competencies that a trainee cataloger must conquer. According to recent research results, library and information studies students experience difficulties understanding the theory, the terminology, and the tools necessary for cataloging. The experimental application of teaching models which derive from predominant learning theories, such as behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism, may help in detecting the difficulties of a cataloging course and in suggesting efficient solutions. This paper presents in detail three teaching models applied for a cataloging course and investigates their effectiveness, based on a survey of 126 first-year students. The survey employed the Kirkpatrick model aiming to record undergraduate students' perceptions and feelings about cataloging. The results revealed that, although a positive change in students' behavior towards cataloging has been achieved, they still do not feel very confident about the skills they have acquired. Moreover, students felt that practicing cataloging more frequently will eliminate their difficulties. Finally, they emphasized the need for face to face courses, as the survey took place in the coronavirus pandemic, during which the courses were held via distance learning.
  15. Urs, S.R.; Minhaj, M.: Evolution of data science and its education in iSchools : an impressionistic study using curriculum analysis (2023) 0.00
    0.0021457102 = product of:
      0.008582841 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=960)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 74(2023) no.6, S.606-622