Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Toepfer, M.; Seifert, C.: Content-based quality estimation for automatic subject indexing of short texts under precision and recall constraints 0.03
    0.03195362 = product of:
      0.06390724 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
        0.0553244 = weight(_text_:standards in 4309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0553244 = score(doc=4309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 4309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4309)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Semantic annotations have to satisfy quality constraints to be useful for digital libraries, which is particularly challenging on large and diverse datasets. Confidence scores of multi-label classification methods typically refer only to the relevance of particular subjects, disregarding indicators of insufficient content representation at the document-level. Therefore, we propose a novel approach that detects documents rather than concepts where quality criteria are met. Our approach uses a deep, multi-layered regression architecture, which comprises a variety of content-based indicators. We evaluated multiple configurations using text collections from law and economics, where the available content is restricted to very short texts. Notably, we demonstrate that the proposed quality estimation technique can determine subsets of the previously unseen data where considerable gains in document-level recall can be achieved, while upholding precision at the same time. Hence, the approach effectively performs a filtering that ensures high data quality standards in operative information retrieval systems.
  2. Mongin, L.; Fu, Y.Y.; Mostafa, J.: Open Archives data Service prototype and automated subject indexing using D-Lib archive content as a testbed (2003) 0.01
    0.005757545 = product of:
      0.02303018 = sum of:
        0.02303018 = weight(_text_:information in 1167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02303018 = score(doc=1167,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1167, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1167)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Indiana University School of Library and Information Science opened a new research laboratory in January 2003; The Indiana University School of Library and Information Science Information Processing Laboratory [IU IP Lab]. The purpose of the new laboratory is to facilitate collaboration between scientists in the department in the areas of information retrieval (IR) and information visualization (IV) research. The lab has several areas of focus. These include grid and cluster computing, and a standard Java-based software platform to support plug and play research datasets, a selection of standard IR modules and standard IV algorithms. Future development includes software to enable researchers to contribute datasets, IR algorithms, and visualization algorithms into the standard environment. We decided early on to use OAI-PMH as a resource discovery tool because it is consistent with our mission.
  3. Husevag, A.-S.R.: Named entities in indexing : a case study of TV subtitles and metadata records (2016) 0.00
    0.004425438 = product of:
      0.017701752 = sum of:
        0.017701752 = product of:
          0.035403505 = sum of:
            0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 3105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035403505 = score(doc=3105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 3105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3105)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the 15th European Networked Knowledge Organization Systems Workshop (NKOS 2016) co-located with the 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries 2016 (TPDL 2016), Hannover, Germany, September 9, 2016. Edi. by Philipp Mayr et al. [http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1676/=urn:nbn:de:0074-1676-5]
  4. Junger, U.; Schwens, U.: ¬Die inhaltliche Erschließung des schriftlichen kulturellen Erbes auf dem Weg in die Zukunft : Automatische Vergabe von Schlagwörtern in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (2017) 0.00
    0.00426914 = product of:
      0.01707656 = sum of:
        0.01707656 = product of:
          0.03415312 = sum of:
            0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03415312 = score(doc=3780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    19. 8.2017 9:24:22
  5. Mielke, B.: Wider einige gängige Ansichten zur juristischen Informationserschließung (2002) 0.00
    0.0036413912 = product of:
      0.014565565 = sum of:
        0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 2145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014565565 = score(doc=2145,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2145, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2145)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information und Mobilität: Optimierung und Vermeidung von Mobilität durch Information. Proceedings des 8. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2002), 7.-10.10.2002, Regensburg. Hrsg.: Rainer Hammwöhner, Christian Wolff, Christa Womser-Hacker
  6. Gödert, W.: Detecting multiword phrases in mathematical text corpora (2012) 0.00
    0.0034331365 = product of:
      0.013732546 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=466,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 466, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=466)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    We present an approach for detecting multiword phrases in mathematical text corpora. The method used is based on characteristic features of mathematical terminology. It makes use of a software tool named Lingo which allows to identify words by means of previously defined dictionaries for specific word classes as adjectives, personal names or nouns. The detection of multiword groups is done algorithmically. Possible advantages of the method for indexing and information retrieval and conclusions for applying dictionary-based methods of automatic indexing instead of stemming procedures are discussed.
  7. Pielmeier, S.; Voß, V.; Carstensen, H.; Kahl, B.: Online-Workshop "Computerunterstützte Inhaltserschließung" 2020 (2021) 0.00
    0.0025748524 = product of:
      0.01029941 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 4409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=4409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 4409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4409)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Zum ersten Mal in digitaler Form und mit 230 Teilnehmer*innen fand am 11. und 12. November 2020 der 4. Workshop "Computerunterstützte Inhaltserschließung" statt, organisiert von der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB), der Firma Eurospider Information Technology, der Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin - Preußischer Kulturbesitz (SBB), der UB Stuttgart und dem Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ). Im Mittelpunkt stand der "Digitale Assistent DA-3": In elf Vorträgen wurden Anwendungsszenarien und Erfahrungen mit dem System vorgestellt, das Bibliotheken und andere Wissenschafts- und Kultureinrichtungen bei der Inhaltserschließung unterstützen soll. Die Begrüßung und Einführung in die beiden Workshop-Tage übernahm Frank Scholze (Generaldirektor der DNB). Er sieht den DA-3 als Baustein für die Verzahnung der intellektuellen und der maschinellen Erschließung.
  8. Beckmann, R.; Hinrichs, I.; Janßen, M.; Milmeister, G.; Schäuble, P.: ¬Der Digitale Assistent DA-3 : Eine Plattform für die Inhaltserschließung (2019) 0.00
    0.0025748524 = product of:
      0.01029941 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 5408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=5408,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5408, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5408)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Der "Digitale Assistent" DA-3 ist ein webbasiertes Tool zur maschinellen Unterstützung der intellektuellen verbalen und klassifikatorischen Inhaltserschließung. Im Frühjahr 2016 wurde einer breiteren Fachöffentlichkeit die zunächst für den Einsatz im IBS|BW-Konsortium konzipierte Vorgängerversion DA-2 vorgestellt. Die Community nahm die Entwicklung vor dem Hintergrund der strategischen Diskussionen um zukunftsfähige Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung mit großem Interesse auf. Inzwischen wird das Tool in einem auf drei Jahre angelegten Kooperationsprojekt zwischen der Firma Eurospider Information Technology, dem IBS|BW-Konsortium, der Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin und den beiden Verbundzentralen VZG und BSZ zu einem zentralen und leistungsstarken Service weiterentwickelt. Die ersten Anwenderbibliotheken in SWB und GBV setzen den DA-3 während dieser Projektphase bereits erfolgreich ein, am Ende ist die Überführung in den Routinebetrieb vorgesehen. Der Beitrag beschreibt den derzeitigen Stand und Nutzen des Projekts im Kontext der aktuellen Rahmenbedingungen, stellt ausführlich die Funktionalitäten des DA-3 vor, gibt einen kleinen Einblick hinter die Kulissen der Projektpartner und einen Ausblick auf kommende Entwicklungsschritte.
  9. Search Engines and Beyond : Developing efficient knowledge management systems, April 19-20 1999, Boston, Mass (1999) 0.00
    0.002427594 = product of:
      0.009710376 = sum of:
        0.009710376 = weight(_text_:information in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009710376 = score(doc=2596,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Ramana Rao (Inxight, Palo Alto, CA) 7 ± 2 Insights on achieving Effective Information Access Session One: Updates and a twelve month perspective Danny Sullivan (Search Engine Watch, US / England) Portalization and other search trends Carol Tenopir (University of Tennessee) Search realities faced by end users and professional searchers Session Two: Today's search engines and beyond Daniel Hoogterp (Retrieval Technologies, McLean, VA) Effective presentation and utilization of search techniques Rick Kenny (Fulcrum Technologies, Ontario, Canada) Beyond document clustering: The knowledge impact statement Gary Stock (Ingenius, Kalamazoo, MI) Automated change monitoring Gary Culliss (Direct Hit, Wellesley Hills, MA) User popularity ranked search engines Byron Dom (IBM, CA) Automatically finding the best pages on the World Wide Web (CLEVER) Peter Tomassi (LookSmart, San Francisco, CA) Adding human intellect to search technology Session Three: Panel discussion: Human v automated categorization and editing Ev Brenner (New York, NY)- Chairman James Callan (University of Massachusetts, MA) Marc Krellenstein (Northern Light Technology, Cambridge, MA) Dan Miller (Ask Jeeves, Berkeley, CA) Session Four: Updates and a twelve month perspective Steve Arnold (AIT, Harrods Creek, KY) Review: The leading edge in search and retrieval software Ellen Voorhees (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD) TREC update Session Five: Search engines now and beyond Intelligent Agents John Snyder (Muscat, Cambridge, England) Practical issues behind intelligent agents Text summarization Therese Firmin, (Dept of Defense, Ft George G. Meade, MD) The TIPSTER/SUMMAC evaluation of automatic text summarization systems Cross language searching Elizabeth Liddy (TextWise, Syracuse, NY) A conceptual interlingua approach to cross-language retrieval. Video search and retrieval Armon Amir (IBM, Almaden, CA) CueVideo: Modular system for automatic indexing and browsing of video/audio Speech recognition Michael Witbrock (Lycos, Waltham, MA) Retrieval of spoken documents Visualization James A. Wise (Integral Visuals, Richland, WA) Information visualization in the new millennium: Emerging science or passing fashion? Text mining David Evans (Claritech, Pittsburgh, PA) Text mining - towards decision support
  10. Giesselbach, S.; Estler-Ziegler, T.: Dokumente schneller analysieren mit Künstlicher Intelligenz (2021) 0.00
    0.0021457102 = product of:
      0.008582841 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=128)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag im Rahmen des Berliner Arbeitskreis Information (BAK) am 25.02.2021.