-
Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009)
0.02
0.020866986 = product of:
0.083467945 = sum of:
0.083467945 = sum of:
0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042484205 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04098374 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9. 1.2010 14:22:20
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 36(2009) no.2/3, S.146-149
-
Silva, C.M.A. da; Ortega, C.D.: Proposals that preceded the call number : shelf arrangement in the Francofone manuals of librarianship from the mid-nineteenth century to 1930 (2017)
0.02
0.019621588 = product of:
0.039243177 = sum of:
0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008582841 = score(doc=4138,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
0.030660335 = product of:
0.06132067 = sum of:
0.06132067 = weight(_text_:organization in 4138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06132067 = score(doc=4138,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.34114468 = fieldWeight in 4138, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4138)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Shelf arrangement, from a bibliographic perspective, constitutes a reading proposal of the collection to the users as well as a resource for management and access to the documents. However, the centrality of the call number testifies the near forgetfulness of the different proposals that came before it and the role of the collection of documents and the target audience in the elaboration of the organization, in addition to the overlapping of the bibliographic classification to shelf arrangement. This work is justified by the need to restore shelf arrangement, seeking to understand its fundamental aspects from the literature in which the activity was systematized. Thus, this paper aims at contributing to reorient the shelf arrangement as an activity of information organization, exploring its conformation in the Francophone literature, from the midnineteenth century up to the 1930s. As for the methodology, this is an exploratory research made possible through the historical-conceptual investigation of shelf arrangement found in the Francophone manuals of librarianship of that period. This study concludes that the activity was placed by that line since the nineteenth century, when its own terminology was developed under the consideration of the intervention of the contexts, using methods and guided by the diversity of proposals.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.8, S.605-614
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.; Olson, H.A.: ¬The use of BISAC in libraries as new cases of Reader-Interest Classifications (2014)
0.02
0.019363541 = product of:
0.077454165 = sum of:
0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077454165 = score(doc=1973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In the recent years, several libraries in the United States have been experimenting with Book Industry Standards and Communications (BISAC), the classification system of the book industry, as an alternative to the Dewey Decimal Classification. Although rarely discussed, these cases of implementation of BISAC arguably resemble other past cases of replacement of traditional classifications that received the name of reader-interest classifications. In this article, a comparison of the BISAC cases to the previous cases of reader-interest classifications is taken in order to determine if the current application of BISAC to libraries is susceptible to the same problems, dangers, and ends as occurred in the past.
-
De Gaetano, M.A.: Looking at the library, seeing philosophy (Trieste, Italy) (2009)
0.02
0.01680845 = product of:
0.0336169 = sum of:
0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 3272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008582841 = score(doc=3272,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 3272, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3272)
0.025034059 = product of:
0.050068118 = sum of:
0.050068118 = weight(_text_:organization in 3272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050068118 = score(doc=3272,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.27854347 = fieldWeight in 3272, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3272)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the job undertaken between 2003 and 2004 in order to plan a new location arrangement for the Philosophy collection of one of the libraries at the University of Trieste. The paper describes the basic needs which played a fundamental role in the planning phase. Furthermore, it examines in detail how the most widely known classification systems - particularly the DDC- did not seem the best answer to the specific needs in this context. The solution was to develop an original classification system in order to answer the specific needs. The paper describes its development and the basis upon which it was built: the classification schemes used were those of the most authoritative periodical bibliographies in this field. Among them, the International Philosophical Bibliography system seemed to be closer to the continental tradition of the organization of knowledge in the discipline. Conclusions deal with the management of the transition from the old to the new system giving some information about the possible evaluation of the work that has been carried out.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 36(2009) no.2/3, S.160-168
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.: Reader interest classifications : an alternative arrangement for libraries (2017)
0.01
0.007510218 = product of:
0.030040871 = sum of:
0.030040871 = product of:
0.060081743 = sum of:
0.060081743 = weight(_text_:organization in 3626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060081743 = score(doc=3626,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 3626, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The concept of reader-interest classifications and its related terminology have shown a well-established presence and common characteristics in the knowledge organization literature for more than half a century. During the period 1952-1995, it was not unusual to find works, projects and discourses using a common core of characteristics and terms to refer to a recognizable type of projects involving alternative classifications to the DDC and other traditional practices in libraries. The use of reader-interest classification related terms and references drastically declined since 1995, although similar projects and characteristics are being used until the present day such as those of implementation of BISAC in American public libraries. The present paper attempts to overview the concept and terminology of reader-interest classifications in a historical perspective emphasizing the transformation of the concept and its remaining characteristics in time.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.3, S.234-246
-
Boll, J.J.: Shelf browsing, open access and storage capacity in research libraries (1985)
0.01
0.006866273 = product of:
0.027465092 = sum of:
0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027465092 = score(doc=3326,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Imprint
- Champaign, Ill. : Univ. of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
-
Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992)
0.01
0.0068306234 = product of:
0.027322493 = sum of:
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
-
Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996)
0.01
0.0068306234 = product of:
0.027322493 = sum of:
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
-
Booth, P.F.: Together or apart : the problems of stock integration (1991)
0.01
0.006068985 = product of:
0.02427594 = sum of:
0.02427594 = weight(_text_:information in 4898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02427594 = score(doc=4898,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4898, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4898)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Examines decisions made about the arrangement of stock in libraries and warns against rigid rules. Every library should have its own policy, taking into account the types of users and their particular information needs, and the kinds of information materials held and their particular characteristics
-
Maarek, Y.S.; Wecker, A.J.: ¬The librarian's assistent : automatically organizing books into dynamic bookshelves (1994)
0.01
0.006007989 = product of:
0.024031956 = sum of:
0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 6801) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024031956 = score(doc=6801,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 6801, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6801)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Intelligent multimedia information retrieval systems and management: RIAO'94 Conference Proceedings. Vol.1
-
Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992)
0.01
0.0059767957 = product of:
0.023907183 = sum of:
0.023907183 = product of:
0.047814365 = sum of:
0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047814365 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
-
Martínez-Ávila, D.; San Segundo, R.: Reader-Interest Classification : concept and terminology historical overview (2013)
0.01
0.0053105257 = product of:
0.021242103 = sum of:
0.021242103 = product of:
0.042484205 = sum of:
0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042484205 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.2, S.102-114
-
Chen, K.-n.: Dynamic subject numbers replace traditional classification numbers (2013)
0.01
0.0053105257 = product of:
0.021242103 = sum of:
0.021242103 = product of:
0.042484205 = sum of:
0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042484205 = score(doc=787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.3, S.160-168
-
Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005)
0.01
0.0051229675 = product of:
0.02049187 = sum of:
0.02049187 = product of:
0.04098374 = sum of:
0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04098374 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Frigerio, L.: From disorder to order : a challenge for the philosopher and the librarian (Milan, Italy) (2009)
0.00
0.004425438 = product of:
0.017701752 = sum of:
0.017701752 = product of:
0.035403505 = sum of:
0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 3270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035403505 = score(doc=3270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 3270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 36(2009) no.2/3, S.150-159
-
Lazinger, S.S.: LC Classification of a library and information science library for maximum shelf retrieval (1984)
0.00
0.00424829 = product of:
0.01699316 = sum of:
0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01699316 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In reclassifying a Library and Information Science library from DDC to LC, an attempt was made to concentrate books with related subject headings on the shelf for maximum shelf retrieval even in cases where the Subject Authorities or C.I.P. assign them varying numbers. Most of the shelf concentration was achieved either by selecting a single number for a given heading and then classifying all books with the heading in that number or by replacing the standard LC number for a heading with one which placed it together with related books on the shelf.
-
Bettella, C.; Capodaglio, C.; Ramous, C.; Vettore, M.C.: Declassifying the Library of Congress Classification : the case of the Department of Philosophy Library at the University of Padova (Padua, Italy) (2009)
0.00
0.0035403504 = product of:
0.014161401 = sum of:
0.014161401 = product of:
0.028322803 = sum of:
0.028322803 = weight(_text_:organization in 3271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028322803 = score(doc=3271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.15756798 = fieldWeight in 3271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 36(2009) no.2/3, S.130-140
-
Giampietro, R.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part A (2009)
0.00
0.0035403504 = product of:
0.014161401 = sum of:
0.014161401 = product of:
0.028322803 = sum of:
0.028322803 = weight(_text_:organization in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028322803 = score(doc=3274,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.15756798 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 36(2009) no.2/3, S.141-145
-
Egghe, L.: ¬The amount of actions needed for shelving and reshelving (1996)
0.00
0.0034331365 = product of:
0.013732546 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 4394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=4394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4394)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the number of actions (or time) needed to organize library shelves. Studies 2 types pf problem: organizing a library shelf out of an unordered pile of books, and putting an existing shelf of books in the rough order. Uses results from information theory as well as from rank order statistics (runs). Draws conclusions about the advised frequency with which these actions should be undertaken
-
Thornton, G.A.: Physical access to periodical literature : the dilemma revisited and a brief look at the future (1991)
0.00
0.0034331365 = product of:
0.013732546 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=2851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The debate over how periodical collections are best organised has simmered since the 1940s. Describes Univ. of North Texas Libraries' review of its alphabetically arranged periodical collections and a proposal to classify them. A literature search revealed little information concerning implications or cost of a classification project and few alternate solutions. The topic was developed into a 1990 NASIG workshop, with a participant survey concerning serials organisation. Briefly looks at current developments for improving access to periodical literature
