Search (46 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.04
    0.040900342 = product of:
      0.081800684 = sum of:
        0.03398632 = weight(_text_:information in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03398632 = score(doc=7322,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
        0.047814365 = product of:
          0.09562873 = sum of:
            0.09562873 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09562873 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  2. Wormell, I.: Subject access redefinied : how new technology changes the conception of subject representation (1994) 0.02
    0.023531828 = product of:
      0.047063656 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=7741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
        0.03504768 = product of:
          0.07009536 = sum of:
            0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07009536 = score(doc=7741,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper examines the developmentss that have taken place during the last decade with respect to the provision of intellectual subject access in information databases storage. The principles of the SAP indexing methodology are outlined and exemplified, leading to a discussion of the consequences for the conception of the physical 'document' versus 'semantic entities' as the basic constructs for storage and multi-dimensional representation of subject matter. Finally, the paper analyzes the impact of very recent technologies which make achievable such access conceptions and mechanisms
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.4
    Source
    Knowledge organization and quality management: Proc. of the 3rd International ISKO Conference, 20-24 June 1994, Copenhagen, Denmark. Ed.: H. Albrechtsen et al
  3. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.02
    0.015395639 = product of:
      0.030791279 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
        0.02049187 = product of:
          0.04098374 = sum of:
            0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04098374 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
  4. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.02
    0.015240056 = product of:
      0.030480113 = sum of:
        0.016818866 = weight(_text_:information in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016818866 = score(doc=520,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19003606 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
        0.013661247 = product of:
          0.027322493 = sum of:
            0.027322493 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027322493 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  5. Rädler, K.: Kataloganreicherung mit digitalen Inhaltsverzeichnissen eröffnet neue Geschäftsfelder : Erfahrungen aus der Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (2008) 0.01
    0.014607265 = product of:
      0.02921453 = sum of:
        0.01213797 = weight(_text_:information in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01213797 = score(doc=1942,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
        0.01707656 = product of:
          0.03415312 = sum of:
            0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03415312 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Vom verflixten siebten Jahr kann man in Bregenz bisher nicht sprechen, im Gegenteil: Die Vorarlberger Landesbibliothek (VLB) hat kurz vor Ostern 2008 ihr 100.000. Inhaltsverzeichnis mit intelligentCAPTURE gescannt. Damit ist der Katalogeintrag von etwa 70 Prozent des betroffenen Freihandbestandes und sämtlicher Neuzugänge ab 2002 zusätzlich mit dem Inhaltsverzeichnis und zum Teil mit der Abbildung des Buchdeckels versehen. Die derzeitige Durchsatzrate beträgt pro Jahr 30.000 bibliographische Einheiten bei einem Personaleinsatz von 40 Stunden pro Woche. Die vollständige Erschließung des Buchbestandes in der Freihandaufstellung ist in Reichweite; ganz ohne Fördermittel im laufenden Betrieb; eine schlanke Lösung sowohl organisatorisch als auch finanziell. Da im Rahmen der Zusammenarbeit mit dandelon.com inzwischen weitere Bibliotheken in einem elegant gelösten Arbeitsablauf kooperativ erschließen, können wir bei Neuerscheinungen bereits die Hälfte als Fremddaten übernehmen. Die VLB hat mit der Digitalisierung, OCR-Konvertierung und maschinellen Indexierung von Inhaltsverzeichnissen und dem mehrsprachigen, semantischen Retrieval in der Suchmaschine dandelon.com zusammen mit der Firma AGI. Information Management Consultants Impulse im Bibliothekswesen gesetzt. Wer 2002 noch bezweifelte, dass dieser Ansatz erfolgreich sein wurde, wurde inzwischen eines Besseren belehrt. Zu offensichtlich ist der Mehrwert, den allein die Moglichkeit der entscheidend verbesserten Relevanzbeurteilung uber den OPAC bietet (http://vlb-katalog.vorarlberg.de). Er erfordert von einer zeitgemasen Bibliothek geradezu das Angebot solcher Zusatzinformationen. Aber die Anreicherung mit den Angaben aus den Inhaltsverzeichnissen bieten weit mehr, denn es entsteht durch die maschinelle Indexierung eine vollig neue Dimension an Retrievalmoglichkeiten. Die vollständige Erfassung unseres Bestandes war immer erklärtes Ziel unseres Projektes, weil wir gesehen haben, dass wir den Nutzern dadurch einen erheblichen Zusatznutzen bieten können, der in einem unbeschreiblich günstigen Verhältnis zum personellen und finanziellen Einsatz steht. Damit, dass wir dieses Ziel so schnell erreichen könnten, hatten wir nicht gerechnet.
    Date
    22. 6.2008 17:14:24
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.4, S.241-242
  6. Hauer, M.: Collaborative Catalog Enrichment : Digitalisierung und Information Retrieval (2011) 0.01
    0.0128297005 = product of:
      0.025659401 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
        0.01707656 = product of:
          0.03415312 = sum of:
            0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03415312 = score(doc=160,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 160, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=160)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  7. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01
    0.011953591 = product of:
      0.047814365 = sum of:
        0.047814365 = product of:
          0.09562873 = sum of:
            0.09562873 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09562873 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  8. Kantor, P.B.; Voorhees, E.: Information retrieval with scanned texts (2000) 0.01
    0.009710376 = product of:
      0.038841505 = sum of:
        0.038841505 = weight(_text_:information in 3901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038841505 = score(doc=3901,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 3901, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3901)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval. 2(2000), S.165-176
  9. Wormell, I.: SAP: a new way to produce subject description of books (1981) 0.01
    0.006866273 = product of:
      0.027465092 = sum of:
        0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027465092 = score(doc=389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=389)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 3(1981), S.39-43
  10. Wormell, I.: Factual data retrieval according to SAP-technique (1983) 0.01
    0.006866273 = product of:
      0.027465092 = sum of:
        0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027465092 = score(doc=845,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 845, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=845)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983), S.13-15
  11. Wormell, I.: Factual data retrieval according to SAP technique (1983) 0.01
    0.006866273 = product of:
      0.027465092 = sum of:
        0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 1399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027465092 = score(doc=1399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1399)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 8(1983) no.3, S.13-15
  12. Van Orden, R.: Content-enriched access to electronic information : summaries of selected research (1991) 0.01
    0.006866273 = product of:
      0.027465092 = sum of:
        0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027465092 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  13. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Means to improve subject access and representation in modern information retrieval (1988) 0.01
    0.006866273 = product of:
      0.027465092 = sum of:
        0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027465092 = score(doc=4430,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  14. Atherton, P.: Books are for use : Final report of the Subject Access Project to the Council of Library Resources (1978) 0.01
    0.006007989 = product of:
      0.024031956 = sum of:
        0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024031956 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    Syracuse, NY : Syracuse Univ., School of Information Studies
  15. Wormell, I.: Subject Access Project : the use of book indexes for subject retrieval systems in libraries (1981) 0.01
    0.006007989 = product of:
      0.024031956 = sum of:
        0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024031956 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 6(1981), S.24-28
  16. Peis, E.; Fernandez-Molina, J.C.: Enrichment of bibliographic records of online catalogs through ORC and SGML technology (1998) 0.01
    0.0052030715 = product of:
      0.020812286 = sum of:
        0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 3385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020812286 = score(doc=3385,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 3385, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3385)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of research into the feasibility of using OCR scanner technology to capture contents pages of collective monographs and to extract the bibliographic information of each individual work and process this using a standardized language, such as SGML, for tagging electronic documents. By this means, data can be used as electronic information or stored in OPACs, thus providing additional access points. Outlines a pilot system to test the initial hypotheses, show the feasibility of achieving the suggested goals and develop the tasks required for them to be carried out as automatically as possible
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 17(1998) no.3, S.161-172
  17. Weintraub, T.S.; Shimoguchi, W.: Catalog record contents enhancement (1993) 0.01
    0.0052030715 = product of:
      0.020812286 = sum of:
        0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020812286 = score(doc=4650,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Contents enhancement of catalog records may increase access to books in collections and aid in effective resource sharing by providing more detailed descriptions about library holdings in the catalog. A sample of monographs in San Diego State Univ. Library was studied to determine the extent to which information in books from parts of the collection could be represented better by content notes, and to determine how much of this information has subject or analytical applications. The study revealed that approximately 23% of the books contain discrete content information not already represented in catalog records that could be added. Of those, 52% would be citation-based enhancements and 48% would be subject-based. Nearly 65% would require fewer than 25 enhancements, with an average of 8.03 enhancements per book for the total population
  18. Intner, S.S.: Enhancing OPACs (1993) 0.01
    0.005149705 = product of:
      0.02059882 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 6583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=6583,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6583, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6583)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers characteristics of online catalogue records which have been inherited from card catalogue systems and which should be removed. Considers display style, abbreviations, brevity, and uniformity. Examines possible enhancements to online records. Covers: retrievability, added information, browsability and interactivity
  19. Hauer, M.; Diedrichs, R.: Kataloganreicherung in Europa : Bibliotheken als Information-Retrieval-Systeme in einer digitalen Welt (2010) 0.01
    0.005149705 = product of:
      0.02059882 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=3571,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliotheken sind nicht chaotische Sammlungen von Medien, sondern werden stets als Information-Retrieval-Systeme implementiert, denn das Wiederfinden bei exakten und vor allem bei vagen Anfragen ist von Anfang an das Sammlungsziel. Niemand kennt zum Zeitpunkt der Sammlung die Fragestellung, die einen zukünftigen Benutzer zu diesem Medium führen wird. Die Art der Sammlungsorganisation bestimmt in hohem Maße die zukünftig mögliche Antwortmenge und deren informatorische Qualität. Der Siegeszug der digitalen Information-Retrieval-Systeme im Internet hat in den letzten zehn Jahren Erwartungen und Märkte geschaffen, die weder Karteikarten, noch deren digitales Ebenbild, die heutigen Bibliotheksmanagement-Systeme befriedigen können. Es genügt nicht mehr, dass Google und andere kostenlos das aufsammeln und nachweisen, was im Internet frei zugänglich ist. Alte, noch »marktfähige« Inhalte werden neu aufbereitet, mit neuen Inhalten kombiniert, um neue Geschäftsfelder zu schaffen. Es geht um Verdrängung und Neuverteilung, und die älteren Inhalte der Bibliotheken sind meist noch hinreichend »marktfähig«.
    Series
    Lesesaal: Information digital
  20. Leissing, U.; Rädler, K.; Hauer, M.: Query-Expansion durch Fachthesauri : Erfahrungsbericht zu dandelon.com, Vorarlberger Parlamentsinformationssystem und vorarlberg.at (2010) 0.01
    0.0051229675 = product of:
      0.02049187 = sum of:
        0.02049187 = product of:
          0.04098374 = sum of:
            0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 3728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04098374 = score(doc=3728,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3728, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3728)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly