Search (417 results, page 1 of 21)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Eden, B.L.: Metadata and librarianship : will MARC survive? (2004) 0.22
    0.22022277 = product of:
      0.29363036 = sum of:
        0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020812286 = score(doc=4750,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
        0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15490833 = score(doc=4750,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
        0.11790973 = sum of:
          0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07009536 = score(doc=4750,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
          0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 4750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047814365 = score(doc=4750,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4750, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4750)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata schema and standards are now a part of the information landscape. Librarianship has slowly realized that MARC is only one of a proliferation of metadata standards, and that MARC has many pros and cons related to its age, original conception, and biases. Should librarianship continue to promote the MARC standard? Are there better metadata standards out there that are more robust, user-friendly, and dynamic in the organization and presentation of information? This special issue examines current initiatives that are actively incorporating MARC standards and concepts into new metadata schemata, while also predicting a future where MARC may not be the metadata schema of choice for the organization and description of information.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.6-7
  2. Understanding metadata (2004) 0.19
    0.19192213 = product of:
      0.25589618 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=2686,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
        0.12518483 = weight(_text_:standards in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12518483 = score(doc=2686,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5571193 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
        0.11129059 = sum of:
          0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056645606 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
          0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054644987 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful
    Date
    10. 9.2004 10:22:40
    Imprint
    Washington, DC : National Information Standards Organization
    Source
    http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf
  3. ¬The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (2007) 0.16
    0.16212037 = product of:
      0.21616049 = sum of:
        0.02427594 = weight(_text_:information in 3395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02427594 = score(doc=3395,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 3395, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3395)
        0.15648104 = weight(_text_:standards in 3395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15648104 = score(doc=3395,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.69639915 = fieldWeight in 3395, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3395)
        0.035403505 = product of:
          0.07080701 = sum of:
            0.07080701 = weight(_text_:organization in 3395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07080701 = score(doc=3395,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 3395, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3395)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Defines fifteen metadata elements for resource description in a cross-disciplinary information environment
    Editor
    National Information Standards Organization
    Source
    http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39-85-2007.pdf
  4. Gardner, T.; Iannella, R.: Architecture and software solutions (2000) 0.13
    0.13221961 = product of:
      0.1762928 = sum of:
        0.023785468 = weight(_text_:information in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023785468 = score(doc=4867,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
        0.12518483 = weight(_text_:standards in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12518483 = score(doc=4867,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5571193 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=4867,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4867, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4867)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The current subject gateways have evolved over time when the discipline of Internet resource discovery was in its infancy. This is reflected by the lack of well-established, light-weight, deployable, easy-to-use, standards for metadata and information retrieval. We provide an introduction to the architecture, standards and software solutions in use by subject gateways, and to the issues that must be addressed to support future subject gateways
    Date
    22. 6.2002 19:38:24
    Source
    Online information review. 24(2000) no.1, S.35-39
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  5. ¬The Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (2012) 0.13
    0.12774618 = product of:
      0.17032824 = sum of:
        0.02427594 = weight(_text_:information in 4790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02427594 = score(doc=4790,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4790, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4790)
        0.1106488 = weight(_text_:standards in 4790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1106488 = score(doc=4790,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.49242854 = fieldWeight in 4790, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4790)
        0.035403505 = product of:
          0.07080701 = sum of:
            0.07080701 = weight(_text_:organization in 4790) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07080701 = score(doc=4790,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 4790, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4790)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Defines fifteen metadata elements for resource description in a cross-disciplinary information environment.
    Editor
    National Information Standards Organization
  6. Riley, J.: Understanding metadata : what is metadata, and what is it for? (2017) 0.12
    0.12241349 = product of:
      0.16321799 = sum of:
        0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017165681 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
        0.1106488 = weight(_text_:standards in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1106488 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.49242854 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
        0.035403505 = product of:
          0.07080701 = sum of:
            0.07080701 = weight(_text_:organization in 2005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07080701 = score(doc=2005,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 2005, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2005)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Imprint
    Baltimore : National Information Standards Organization
  7. ISO 15836:2003 The Dublin Core metadata element set. (2003) 0.12
    0.122152194 = product of:
      0.16286959 = sum of:
        0.017839102 = weight(_text_:information in 2079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017839102 = score(doc=2079,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2079, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2079)
        0.114989616 = weight(_text_:standards in 2079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114989616 = score(doc=2079,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.51174676 = fieldWeight in 2079, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2079)
        0.030040871 = product of:
          0.060081743 = sum of:
            0.060081743 = weight(_text_:organization in 2079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060081743 = score(doc=2079,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 2079, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2079)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core metadata standard provides a core set of 15 metadata elements for cross-domain information resource sharing. Since the original workshop, held in March 1995 in Dublin, Ohio - thus the name Dublin Core - this core set of metadata elements has gained worldwide recognition and use, with translations in over 20 languages. The issuance of the ISO standard provides the official international endorsement for use of theDublin Core metadata. Under NISO's leadership this standard was fast-tracked in ISO Technical Committee 45 (Information and documentation) Subcommittee 4 (Technical Interoperability) through the ISO approval process using a version identical to ANSI/NISO Z39.85-2001
    Footnote
    ISO 15836 is available for purchase in electronic or paper formats, in English and French, from ISO <http://www.iso.ch/>. A free downloadable pdf file of the ANSI/NISO version is available from the National Information Standards Organization (NISO) website: <http:www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39-85.pdf>
    Imprint
    London : International Standards Organization
  8. Furner, J.: Definitions of "metadata" : a brief survey of international standards (2020) 0.11
    0.10989834 = product of:
      0.14653112 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 5912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=5912,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5912, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5912)
        0.114989616 = weight(_text_:standards in 5912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.114989616 = score(doc=5912,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.51174676 = fieldWeight in 5912, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5912)
        0.021242103 = product of:
          0.042484205 = sum of:
            0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 5912) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042484205 = score(doc=5912,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 5912, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5912)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    A search on the term "metadata" in the International Organization for Standardization's Online Browsing Platform (ISO OBP) reveals that there are 96 separate ISO standards that provide definitions of the term. Between them, these standards supply 46 different definitions-a lack of standardization that we might not have expected, given the context. In fact, if we make creative use of Simpson's index of concentration (originally devised as a measure of ecological diversity) to measure the degree of standardization of definition in this case, we arrive at a value of 0.05, on a scale of zero to one. It is suggested, however, that the situation is not as problematic as it might seem: that low cross-domain levels of standardization of definition should not be cause for concern.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.6, S.E33-E42
  9. Jizba, L.; Hillmann, D.I.: Insights from Ithaca : an interview with Diane Hillmann on metadata, Dublin Core, the National Science Digital Library, and more (2004/05) 0.11
    0.10909492 = product of:
      0.14545989 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
        0.10953673 = weight(_text_:standards in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10953673 = score(doc=637,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.4874794 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
        0.023907183 = product of:
          0.047814365 = sum of:
            0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047814365 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    In an interview, Diane I. Hillmann, an expert in metadata for digital libraries and currently co-principal investigator for the National Science Digital Library Registry based at Cornell University, discusses her education and career, and provides overviews and insights on metadata initiatives, including standards and models such as the widely adopted Dublin Core schema. She shares her professional interests from the early part of her career with communications, cataloging, and database production services; highlights key issues; and provides ideas and resources for managing changes in metadata standards and digital projects.
    Date
    2.12.2007 19:35:22
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Profiles in digital information"
  10. Integrating multiple overlapping metadata standards (1999) 0.11
    0.10796266 = product of:
      0.21592532 = sum of:
        0.02427594 = weight(_text_:information in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02427594 = score(doc=4052,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
        0.19164938 = weight(_text_:standards in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19164938 = score(doc=4052,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.85291135 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This special issue of JASIS addresses different applications of metadata standards in geospatial collections, education, historical costume collection, data management, and information retrieval, end explores the future thinking of metadata standards for digital libraries
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1164-1223
  11. Steele, C.: Organization of knowledge on the Internet (1996) 0.11
    0.10547048 = product of:
      0.14062731 = sum of:
        0.023785468 = weight(_text_:information in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023785468 = score(doc=6437,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
        0.028322803 = product of:
          0.056645606 = sum of:
            0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056645606 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses how information will be found in digital libraries of the future. Suggests that a metadata approach to cataloguing will prevail, whereby the content of the data will be analysed at source, rather than on receipt by an intermediary, altering the role of the cataloguer, who will be required to evaluate as well as classify and index. Web site administrators may have to provide site metadata for use by global indexers; provides some examples of projects aimed at developing standards and assisting information providers in creating descriptive metadata
    Source
    Information management report. 1996, Sep., S.1-6
  12. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.10
    0.09718057 = product of:
      0.12957409 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Stubley, P.: Cataloguing standards and metadata for e-commerce (1999) 0.09
    0.09444732 = product of:
      0.18889464 = sum of:
        0.03398632 = weight(_text_:information in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03398632 = score(doc=1915,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
        0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15490833 = score(doc=1915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1999, Dec., S.16-18
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  14. Hider, P.: ¬A survey of the coverage and methodologies of schemas and vocabularies used to describe information resources (2015) 0.09
    0.09424831 = product of:
      0.12566441 = sum of:
        0.01213797 = weight(_text_:information in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01213797 = score(doc=2195,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
        0.09582469 = weight(_text_:standards in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09582469 = score(doc=2195,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.42645568 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
        0.017701752 = product of:
          0.035403505 = sum of:
            0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035403505 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Riley's survey (2010) of metadata standards for cultural heritage collections represents a rare attempt to classify such standards, in this case according to their domain, community, function and purpose. This paper reports on a survey of metadata standards with particular functions, i.e. those of schemas and vocabularies, but that have been published online for any domain or community (and not just those of the cultural heritage sector). In total, 53 schemas and 328 vocabularies were identified as within scope, and were classified according to their subject coverage and the type of warrant used in their reported development, i.e. resource, expert or user warrant, or a combination of these types. There was found to be a general correlation between the coverage of the schemas and vocabularies. Areas of underrepresentation would appear to be the humanities and the fine arts, and, in the case of schemas, also law, engineering, manufacturing and sport. Schemas would appear to be constructed more by consulting experts and considering endusers' search behaviour; vocabularies, on the other hand, are developed more by considering the information resources themselves, or by combining a range of methods.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 42(2015) no.3, S.154-163
  15. Alves dos Santos, E.; Mucheroni, M.L.: VIAF and OpenCitations : cooperative work as a strategy for information organization in the linked data era (2018) 0.09
    0.09367848 = product of:
      0.18735696 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=4826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
        0.1679362 = sum of:
          0.11329121 = weight(_text_:organization in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11329121 = score(doc=4826,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
          0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054644987 = score(doc=4826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    18. 1.2019 19:13:22
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.16
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
  16. Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003) 0.09
    0.09350993 = product of:
      0.1246799 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
        0.093888626 = weight(_text_:standards in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093888626 = score(doc=2556,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.41783947 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
        0.02049187 = product of:
          0.04098374 = sum of:
            0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04098374 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
    Date
    30.12.2008 18:22:46
    Source
    Online information review. 27(2003) no.2, S.94-101
  17. Metadata practices on the cutting edge (2004) 0.09
    0.08568945 = product of:
      0.1142526 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
        0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077454165 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
        0.024782453 = product of:
          0.049564905 = sum of:
            0.049564905 = weight(_text_:organization in 2335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049564905 = score(doc=2335,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 2335, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2335)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Imprint
    Washington, DC : National Information Standards Organization
  18. Cordeiro, M.I.: From library authority control to network authoritative metadata sources (2003) 0.08
    0.08483097 = product of:
      0.11310796 = sum of:
        0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017165681 = score(doc=3083,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
        0.07824052 = weight(_text_:standards in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07824052 = score(doc=3083,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.34819958 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
        0.017701752 = product of:
          0.035403505 = sum of:
            0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 3083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035403505 = score(doc=3083,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 3083, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3083)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control is a quite recent term in the long history of cataloguing, although the underlying principle is among the very early principles of bibliographic control. Bibliographic control is a Field in transformation by the rapid expansion of the WWW, which has brought new problems to infonnation discovery and retrieval, creating new challenges and requirements in information management. In a comprehensive approach, authority control is presented as one of the most promising library activities in this respect. The evolution of work methods and standards for the sharing of authority files is reviewed, showing the imbalance in developments and practical achievements between name and subject authority, in an international perspective. The need to improve the network availability and usability of authority information assets in more effective and holistic ways is underlyned; and a new philosophy and scope is proposed for library authority work, based an the primacy of the linking function of authority data, and by expanding the finding, relating and informing functions of authority records. Some of these aspects are being addressed in several projects dealing with knowledge organization systems, notably to cope with multilingual needs and to enable semantic interoperability among different systems. Library practice itself should evolve in the same direction, thereby providing practical experience to inform new or improved principles and standards for authority work, while contributing to enhance local information services and to promote their involvement in the WWW environment.
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  19. Tosaka, Y.; Park, J.-r.: RDA: Resource description & access : a survey of the current state of the art (2013) 0.08
    0.08483097 = product of:
      0.11310796 = sum of:
        0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017165681 = score(doc=677,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
        0.07824052 = weight(_text_:standards in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07824052 = score(doc=677,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.34819958 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
        0.017701752 = product of:
          0.035403505 = sum of:
            0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035403505 = score(doc=677,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 677, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=677)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Resource Description & Access (RDA) is intended to provide a flexible and extensible framework that can accommodate all types of content and media within rapidly evolving digital environments while also maintaining compatibility with the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition (AACR2). The cataloging community is grappling with practical issues in navigating the transition from AACR2 to RDA; there is a definite need to evaluate major subject areas and broader themes in information organization under the new RDA paradigm. This article aims to accomplish this task through a thorough and critical review of the emerging RDA literature published from 2005 to 2011. The review mostly concerns key areas of difference between RDA and AACR2, the relationship of the new cataloging code to metadata standards, the impact on encoding standards such as Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC), end user considerations, and practitioners' views on RDA implementation and training. Future research will require more in-depth studies of RDA's expected benefits and the manner in which the new cataloging code will improve resource retrieval and bibliographic control for users and catalogers alike over AACR2. The question as to how the cataloging community can best move forward to the post-AACR2/MARC environment must be addressed carefully so as to chart the future of bibliographic control in the evolving environment of information production, management, and use.
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.4, S.651-662
  20. Sutton, S.A.; Golder, D.: Achievement Standards Network (ASN) : an application profile for mapping K-12 educational resources to achievement (2008) 0.08
    0.08447141 = product of:
      0.16894282 = sum of:
        0.14845096 = weight(_text_:standards in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14845096 = score(doc=2636,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.66066223 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
        0.02049187 = product of:
          0.04098374 = sum of:
            0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 2636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04098374 = score(doc=2636,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2636, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2636)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes metadata development of an application profile for the National Science Digital Library (NSDL) Achievement Standards Network (ASN) in the United States. The ASN is a national repository of machine-readable achievement standards modeled in RDF that shape teaching and learning in the various states. We describe the nature of the ASN metadata and the various uses to which that metadata is applied including the alignment of the standards of one state to those of another and the correlation of those standards to educational resources in support of resource discovery and retrieval.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 364
  • el 52
  • m 24
  • s 17
  • n 6
  • b 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects