Search (103 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Integrating multiple overlapping metadata standards (1999) 0.11
    0.10796266 = product of:
      0.21592532 = sum of:
        0.02427594 = weight(_text_:information in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02427594 = score(doc=4052,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
        0.19164938 = weight(_text_:standards in 4052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19164938 = score(doc=4052,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.85291135 = fieldWeight in 4052, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4052)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This special issue of JASIS addresses different applications of metadata standards in geospatial collections, education, historical costume collection, data management, and information retrieval, end explores the future thinking of metadata standards for digital libraries
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1164-1223
  2. Steele, C.: Organization of knowledge on the Internet (1996) 0.11
    0.10547048 = product of:
      0.14062731 = sum of:
        0.023785468 = weight(_text_:information in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023785468 = score(doc=6437,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
        0.028322803 = product of:
          0.056645606 = sum of:
            0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056645606 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses how information will be found in digital libraries of the future. Suggests that a metadata approach to cataloguing will prevail, whereby the content of the data will be analysed at source, rather than on receipt by an intermediary, altering the role of the cataloguer, who will be required to evaluate as well as classify and index. Web site administrators may have to provide site metadata for use by global indexers; provides some examples of projects aimed at developing standards and assisting information providers in creating descriptive metadata
    Source
    Information management report. 1996, Sep., S.1-6
  3. Stubley, P.: Cataloguing standards and metadata for e-commerce (1999) 0.09
    0.09444732 = product of:
      0.18889464 = sum of:
        0.03398632 = weight(_text_:information in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03398632 = score(doc=1915,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
        0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15490833 = score(doc=1915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1999, Dec., S.16-18
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  4. Burnett, K.; Ng, K.B.; Park, S.: ¬A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development (1999) 0.08
    0.0832468 = product of:
      0.110995725 = sum of:
        0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014565565 = score(doc=4056,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
        0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066389285 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
        0.030040871 = product of:
          0.060081743 = sum of:
            0.060081743 = weight(_text_:organization in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060081743 = score(doc=4056,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata has taken on a more significant role than ever before in the emerging digital library context because the effective organization of networked information clearly depends on the effective management and organization of metadata. The issue of metadata has been approached variously by different intellectual communities. The 2 main approaches may be characterized as: (1) the bibliographic control approach (origins and major proponents in library science); and (2) data management approach (origins and major proponents in computer science). This article examines the different conceptual foundations and orientations of the 2 major approaches contributing to the metadata discussion. An examination of the on-going efforts to establish metadata standards, and comparison of different metadata formats, supports a proposal for an integrated concept of metadata to facilitate the merging of the 2 approaches
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1209-1217
  5. Waugh, A.: Specifying metadata standards for metadata tool configuration (1998) 0.08
    0.07625367 = product of:
      0.15250733 = sum of:
        0.12518483 = weight(_text_:standards in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12518483 = score(doc=3596,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5571193 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=3596,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3596, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3596)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a metadata specification designed to support dynamic configuration of metadata software by capturing features of metadata standards. The specification comprises 3 components: the classification of the metadata standard, the metadata schema, and the metadata expression
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  6. Kent, R.E.: Organizing conceptual knowledge online : metadata interoperability and faceted classification (1998) 0.06
    0.06496286 = product of:
      0.12992571 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
        0.11790973 = sum of:
          0.07009536 = weight(_text_:organization in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07009536 = score(doc=57,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.38996086 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047814365 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Conceptual Knowledge Markup Language (CKML), an application of XML, is a new standard being promoted for the specification of online conceptual knowledge (Kent and Shrivastava, 1998). CKML follows the philosophy of Conceptual Knowledge Processing (Wille, 1982), a principled approach to knowledge representation and data analysis, which advocates the development of methodologies and techniques to support people in their rational thinking, judgement and actions. CKML was developed and is being used in the WAVE networked information discovery and retrieval system (Kent and Neuss, 1994) as a standard for the specification of conceptual knowledge
    Date
    30.12.2001 16:22:41
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  7. Schaefer, M.T.: Demystifying metadata : initiatives for web document description (1998) 0.06
    0.06326494 = product of:
      0.12652989 = sum of:
        0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01699316 = score(doc=4635,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
        0.10953673 = weight(_text_:standards in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10953673 = score(doc=4635,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.4874794 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines international efforts to promote metadata as a common, interactive resource description tool for the Internet. These efforts centre on the Dublin Core Element Set, but include qualifiers such as those promoted by the Canberra Qualifiers. The LoC Network Development and MARC Standards Office maintains the Dublin Core / MARC / GILS (Government Information Location Standards) crosswalk which maps the common and correlative elements of each system. Describes current international initiatives and issues. Describes the Nordic metadata project which is aiming to create the basic elements of a metadata production and utilization system based on the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set. Describes the WWW consortium efforts in this area
    Source
    Information retrieval and library automation. 33(1998) no.11, S.1-5
  8. Wool, G.: ¬A mediation on metadata (1998) 0.05
    0.053969897 = product of:
      0.107939795 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 2210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=2210,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2210, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2210)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 2210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=2210,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 2210, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2210)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata, or 'data about data', have been created and used for centuries in the print environment, though the term has its origins in the world of electronic information management. Presents the close relationship between traditional library cataloguing and the documentation of electronic data files (known as 'metadata'), showing that cataloguing is changing under the influence of information technology, but also that metadata provision is essentially an extension of traditional cataloguing processes
    Footnote
    Contribution to an issue devoted to e-serials: publishers, libraries, users, and standards, part 1
  9. Siripan, P.: Metadata and trends of cataloging in Thai libraries (1999) 0.05
    0.053969897 = product of:
      0.107939795 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=4183,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 4183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=4183,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 4183, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4183)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A status of cataloging in Thailand shows a movement toward the use of information technology. The international standards for cataloging are being used and modified to effectively organize the information resources. An expanded scope of resources needed cataloging now covers cataloging the Web resources. The paper mentions Thailand's participation in the international working group on the use of metadata for libraries
  10. Weibel, S.; Miller, E.: Cataloging syntax and public policy meet in PICS (1997) 0.05
    0.051125795 = product of:
      0.10225159 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 1561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=1561,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 1561, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1561)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    The PICS, an initiative of W3C, is a technology that supports the association of descriptive labels with Web resources. By providing a single common transport syntax for metadata, PICS will support the growth of metadata systems (including library cataloguing) that are interoperable and widely supported in Web information systems. Within the PICS framework, a great diversity of resource description models can be implemented, from simple rating schemes to complex data content standards
  11. Dempsey, L.; Heery, R.: Metadata: a current view of practice and issues (1998) 0.05
    0.051125795 = product of:
      0.10225159 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 2302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=2302,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 2302, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2302)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes emerging metadata practice and standards. It gives an overview of the environments in which metatdata is used, before focusing on metadata for information resources. It outlines an approximate typology of approaches and explores different strands of metadata activity. It discusses trends in format development, metadata management, and use of search and retrieve protocols. It concludes by discussing some features of future deploament of metadata in support of network resource discovery
  12. Thonely, J.: ¬The road to meta : the implementation of Dublin Core metadata in the State Library of Queensland website (1998) 0.05
    0.051125795 = product of:
      0.10225159 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 2585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=2585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2585)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 2585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=2585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 2585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2585)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The goal of the State Library of Queensland's Metadata Project is the deployment of metadata using the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set in the State Library' WWW Web pages. The deployment of metadata is expected to improve resource discovery by Internet users, through provision of index information (metadata) in State Library Web pages which is then available to search engines for indexing. The project is also an initial attempt to set standards for metadata deployment in queensland libraries Web pages
  13. Jizba, L.: Reflections on summarizing and abstracting : implications for Internet Web documents, and standardized library cataloging databases (1997) 0.05
    0.049133226 = product of:
      0.09826645 = sum of:
        0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020812286 = score(doc=701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077454165 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Comments on the value of abstracts or summary notes to information available online via the Internet and WWW and concludes that automated abstracting techniques would be highly useful if routinely applied to cataloguing or metadata for Internet documents and documents in other databases. Information seekers need external summary information to assess content and value of retrieved documents. Examines traditional models for writers, in library audiovisual cataloguing, periodical databases and archival work, along with innovative new model databases featuring robust cataloguing summaries. Notes recent developments in automated techniques, computational research, and machine summarization of digital images. Recommendations are made for future designers of cataloguing and metadata standards
  14. ISO 11179: Specification and standardization of data elements (1999) 0.04
    0.044259522 = product of:
      0.17703809 = sum of:
        0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 3893) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17703809 = score(doc=3893,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 3893, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3893)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    London : International Standards Organisation
  15. Darnard, D.T.; Ide, N.M.: ¬The Text Encoding Initiative : flexible and extensible document encoding (1997) 0.04
    0.040477425 = product of:
      0.08095485 = sum of:
        0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014565565 = score(doc=388,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 388, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=388)
        0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066389285 = score(doc=388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=388)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special topic issue devoted to structured information / standards for document architecture
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.7, S.622-628
  16. Rusch-Feja, D.: Dublin Core Metadata : Auf dem Weg zur Entwicklung eines Internet-Standards - 4. Dublin Core Metadata Workshop in Canberra (1997) 0.04
    0.038727082 = product of:
      0.15490833 = sum of:
        0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 7214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15490833 = score(doc=7214,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 7214, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7214)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. St. Pierre, M.; LaPlante, B.: We used to call it publishing : issues in crosswalking content metadata standards (1999) 0.04
    0.038727082 = product of:
      0.15490833 = sum of:
        0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15490833 = score(doc=341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=341)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  18. Thornely, J.: ¬The how of metadata : metadata creation and standards (1999) 0.04
    0.038727082 = product of:
      0.15490833 = sum of:
        0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15490833 = score(doc=514,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 514, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=514)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  19. Smits, J.: Spatial metadata : an international survey on clearinghouses and infrastructures (1999) 0.04
    0.038727082 = product of:
      0.15490833 = sum of:
        0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 5334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15490833 = score(doc=5334,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 5334, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5334)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Consistency and interoperability are objectives when creating standards for spatial metadata. Besides FGDC-metadata standards some other international standards are in use or will be in use soon. The use of these standards forms the basis for geospatial data infrastructures (GDI) and clearinghouses. Though most GDIs and clearinghouses are in the planning stage, the contours of regional and a global geospatial data infrastructure (GGDI) are slowly emerging. Maps should be part of the interfaces, which provide access to the GDIs and clearinghouses.
  20. MacLennan, A.: Interesting times (1998) 0.04
    0.038344346 = product of:
      0.07668869 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
        0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066389285 = score(doc=770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=770)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    It is apparent that, despite the common reference to the World Wide Web as a "digital library", it lacks any of the organising features which would be expected from a library. The rate of growth of Web resources is such that they have grown, and continue to grow, beyond the ability of human intervention to catalogue them or control access to them. The software tools which have so far emerged to assist searching are inadequate for the task, but it is hoped that a development in standards will lead to documents being created with the "hooks" in place, which will facilitate their retrieval by tools yet to be developed. Dublin Core metadata appears to be the optimum such emergent standard, and its use is to be encouraged among Web authors.
    Footnote
    Festschrift article to mark the retirement of Douglas Anderson from 24 years at the School of Information and Media, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland

Languages

Types

  • a 99
  • el 6
  • s 2
  • n 1
  • More… Less…