Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Notationen / Signaturen"
  1. Savic, D.: CUTT-x: an expert system for automatic assignment of Cutter numbers (1996) 0.03
    0.027822647 = product of:
      0.11129059 = sum of:
        0.11129059 = sum of:
          0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056645606 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
          0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 6582) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.054644987 = score(doc=6582,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6582, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6582)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Briefly describes the form and function of Cutter numbers in the classification of books and describes the CUTT-x expert system for the automatic assignment of Cutter numbers with particular reference to the 3 basic elements in the system: knowledge base; inference engine; and user interface. The system was designed, tested and implemented in the Library of the International Civil Aviation Organization and was developed using the MS Access relational database management system in a Windows environment
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.2, S.71-87
  2. Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999) 0.02
    0.020866986 = product of:
      0.083467945 = sum of:
        0.083467945 = sum of:
          0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042484205 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
          0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04098374 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10. 8.2001 13:22:14
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.3, S.140-148
  3. Starchan, D.: ¬A chance to make UDC notation more computer-friendly (2000) 0.01
    0.011953591 = product of:
      0.047814365 = sum of:
        0.047814365 = product of:
          0.09562873 = sum of:
            0.09562873 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09562873 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 22(2000), S.43-44
  4. Gnoli, C.: Notation (2018) 0.01
    0.009198101 = product of:
      0.036792405 = sum of:
        0.036792405 = product of:
          0.07358481 = sum of:
            0.07358481 = weight(_text_:organization in 4650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07358481 = score(doc=4650,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 4650, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Notations are systems of symbols that can be combined according to syntactical rules to represent meanings in a specialized domain. In knowledge organization, they are systems of numerals, letters and punctuation marks associated to a concept that mechanically produce helpful sequences of them for arranging books on shelves, browsing subjects in directories and displaying items in catalogues. Most bibliographic classification systems, like Dewey Decimal Classification, use a positional notation allowing for expression of increasingly specific subjects by additional digits. However, some notations like that of Bliss Bibliographic Classification are purely ordinal and do not reflect the hierarchical degree of a subject. Notations can also be expressive of the syntactical structure of compound subjects (common auxiliaries, facets etc.) in various ways. In the digital media, notation can be recorded and managed in databases and exploited to provide appropriate search and display functionalities.
    Series
    Reviews of concepts in knowledge organization
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.8, S.667-684
  5. Satija, M.P.: Book number and call number (1990) 0.01
    0.006866273 = product of:
      0.027465092 = sum of:
        0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027465092 = score(doc=118,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.45, [=Suppl.10]
  6. Körner, H.G.: Short and flexible generic codes for mechanized information retrieval (1965) 0.01
    0.006007989 = product of:
      0.024031956 = sum of:
        0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 1961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024031956 = score(doc=1961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1961)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Coates, E.J.: Notation in classification (1957) 0.01
    0.006007989 = product of:
      0.024031956 = sum of:
        0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024031956 = score(doc=567,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval, held at Beatrice Webb House, Dorking, England, 13.-17.5.1957
  8. Chen, K.-n.: Dynamic subject numbers replace traditional classification numbers (2013) 0.01
    0.0053105257 = product of:
      0.021242103 = sum of:
        0.021242103 = product of:
          0.042484205 = sum of:
            0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042484205 = score(doc=787,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.3, S.160-168
  9. Satija, M.P.: Book numbers in India with special reference to the author table for Indian names designed and used by the National Library of India (2007) 0.00
    0.004425438 = product of:
      0.017701752 = sum of:
        0.017701752 = product of:
          0.035403505 = sum of:
            0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035403505 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 34(2007) no.1, S.34-40
  10. Satija, M.P.; Comaroni, J.P.: Beyond classification: book numbers (1992) 0.00
    0.004425438 = product of:
      0.017701752 = sum of:
        0.017701752 = product of:
          0.035403505 = sum of:
            0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 1470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035403505 = score(doc=1470,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 1470, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1470)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 20(1993) no.3, S.169-170 (W. Bies)
  11. Sukhmaneva, E.G.: ¬The problems of notation and faceted classification 0.00
    0.0034331365 = product of:
      0.013732546 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    English version of a Russion paper first published in the series Sciebtific and Technical Information (Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsya), Series 2 No.11.
  12. Jansen, U.: ¬Die Herren der Striche sitzen in Köln : Seit 1974 vergibt GS 1 Kodes zur Erleichterung des Warenverkehrs (2005) 0.00
    0.0034153117 = product of:
      0.013661247 = sum of:
        0.013661247 = product of:
          0.027322493 = sum of:
            0.027322493 = weight(_text_:22 in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027322493 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    3. 5.1997 8:44:22
  13. Craven, T.C.: Salient node notation (1979) 0.00
    0.0030039945 = product of:
      0.012015978 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 1608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=1608,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1608, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1608)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 4(1979), S.115-123