Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Objektdokumentation"
  1. O'Keefe, E.; Oldal, M.: Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO) (2009) 0.09
    0.0940726 = product of:
      0.12543014 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=3759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
        0.093888626 = weight(_text_:standards in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093888626 = score(doc=3759,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.41783947 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
        0.021242103 = product of:
          0.042484205 = sum of:
            0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042484205 = score(doc=3759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    The entry provides an overview of the data content standard, Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO), developed by the Visual Resources Association (VRA), and published in 2006 by the American Library Association (ALA). CCO fills a gap in the array of descriptive standards by providing guidelines for visual resources curators, museum documentation specialists, archivists, librarians, or anyone engaged in the documentation of works of art and architecture, objects of material culture, and their images. The entry begins by placing CCO within the context of object and visual image cataloging and the broader framework of data content standards. Following the organization of the guide, which is divided into three parts, General Guidelines, Elements, and Authorities, it summarizes the main features of CCO. Finally, it evaluates CCO in terms of its suitability for use by the metadata communities that form its intended audience, and its sustainability.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  2. Cataloging cultural objects: . Chicago: American Library Association, 396 p. ISBN 978-0-8389-3564-4 (pbk.) : a guide to describing cultural work and their images (2006) 0.06
    0.064302266 = product of:
      0.12860453 = sum of:
        0.008919551 = weight(_text_:information in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008919551 = score(doc=1464,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.10078184 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
        0.11968498 = weight(_text_:standards in 1464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11968498 = score(doc=1464,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5326429 = fieldWeight in 1464, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1464)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    For the first time, under the leadership of the Visual Resources Association, a cross section of five visual and cultural heritage experts, along with scores of reviewers from varied institutions, have created a new data content standard focused on cultural materials. This cutting-edge reference offers practical resources for cataloging and flexibility to meet the needs of a wide range of institutions - from libraries to museums to archives to visual collections. Consistently following these guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate metadata elements in cultural materials' catalog records: promotes good descriptive cataloging and reduces redundancy; builds a foundation of shared documentation; creates data sharing opportunities; and, complements existing standards
    BK
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 34(2007) no.4, S. 264-265 (L.C. Howarth): "At a time when cataloguing code revision is continuing apace with the consolidation of the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD), the drafting of RDA: Resource Description and Access, and the development of common principles for an international cataloguing code (International Meeting of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code [IME ICC]), the publication of a guide for cataloguing cultural objects is timely and purposeful. Compiling this data content standard on behalf of the Visual Resources Association, the five editors - with oversight from an advisory board - have divided the guide into three parts. Following a brief introduction outlining the purpose, intended audience, and scope and methodology for the publication, Part One, General Guidelines, explains both what the Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO) guide is "a broad document that includes rules for formatting data, suggestions for required information, controlled vocabulary requirements, and display issues" (p. I) and is not "not a metadata element set per se" (p. 1). Part Two, Elements, is further divided into nine chapters dealing with one or more metadata elements, and describing the relationships between and among each element. Part Three, Authorities, discusses what elements to include in building authority records. A Selected Bibliography, Glossary, and Index, respectively, round out the guide.
    As the editors note in their introduction, "Standards that guide data structure, data values, and data content form the basis for a set of tools that can lead to good descriptive cataloging, consistent documentation, shared records, and increased end-user access" (p. xi). The VRA Core Categories, for example, represent a set of metadata elements expressed within an XML structure (data structure). Likewise, the Art Architecture Thesaurus contains sets of terms and relationships, or defined data values. While much effort has been expended on developing both data structures and values, the editors argue, the third leg of the stool, data content, has received less attention. Unlike the library community with its Anglo-American Cataloging Rules [sic though RDA is referenced in the Selected Bibliography], or its archival equivalent, Describing Archives: A Content Standard (DACS), those in the domain of cultural heritage responsible for describing and documenting works of art, architecture, cultural artifacts, and their respective images, have not had the benefit of such data content standards. CCO is intended to address (or redress) that gap, emphasizing the exercise of good judgment and cataloguer discretion over the application of "rigid rules" [p. xii], and building on existing standards. ... Overall, Cataloging Cultural Objects with its attending guidelines for descriptive metadata and authority control for "one-of-a-kind cultural objects" should merit a place among the "well-established" data content standards of the library and archival communities that CCO references with obvious regard."
    LCSH
    Cultural property / Documentation / Standards
    Antiquities / Documentation / Standards
    Architecture / Documentation / Standards
    Art / Documentation / Standards
    Subject
    Cultural property / Documentation / Standards
    Antiquities / Documentation / Standards
    Architecture / Documentation / Standards
    Art / Documentation / Standards
  3. Lanzi, E.: ¬The REACH and VIVION projects : improving access to art information (1998) 0.05
    0.053969897 = product of:
      0.107939795 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=2600,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 2600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=2600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 2600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2600)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Strategies for sharing, managing and accessing cultural heritage information centred around objects, images and related data are being tested currently through a variety of initiatives and resources. These fall into 3 categories: data sharing projects; image data banks; and rights management. Describes 2 data sharing projects, the Research Libraries Group' REACH and VISIION projects, focusing on core categories, standards and interoperability, metadata, and what might be accomplished through REACH and VISIION
  4. Küster-Heise, K.; Mitschke, S.: Terminologie in der Museumsarbeit unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Aspekts der Textilterminologie (2009) 0.04
    0.038344346 = product of:
      0.07668869 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 2827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=2827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2827)
        0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 2827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066389285 = score(doc=2827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 2827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2827)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die wissenschaftliche Erschließung der Sammlungsbestände stellt neben dem Sammeln, Bewahren und Ausstellen eine Kernkompetenz musealer Arbeit dar und ist daher auch Teil der gemeinsam festgelegten Richtlinien des Internationalen Museumsverbandes "Standards für Museen". Seit einigen Jahren wird entsprechend auch in diesem Bereich eine Diskussion zu Fachterminologien geführt, weil die Inventare für eine schnellere Erschließung auch EDV-gestützt erfasst werden. Hierbei wird es als allgemein wünschenswert erachtet, sich auf einheitliche Thesauri im deutschsprachigen Raum, vor allem in den Bereichen Objektbezeichnung, Material und Technik zu verständigen. Erste Ansätze sind sowohl in der Fachgruppe Dokumentation des Deutschen Museumsbundes in Berlin als auch von den Arbeitsgruppen des MusIs-Projektes beim Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ) in Konstanz gemacht worden. Basierend auf Erfahrungen bei der Konzeption und dem Aufbau von Thesauri in diesen Bereichen, die Eingang fanden in den Objektbezeichnungsthesaurus des BSZ sollen hier einige Aspekte und Überlegungen vorgestellt werden.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.3, S.159-161
  5. Marty, P.F.: Museum informatics (2009) 0.03
    0.031390157 = product of:
      0.06278031 = sum of:
        0.03799786 = weight(_text_:information in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03799786 = score(doc=5000,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.42933714 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
        0.024782453 = product of:
          0.049564905 = sum of:
            0.049564905 = weight(_text_:organization in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049564905 = score(doc=5000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Museum informatics is the study of the sociotechnical interactions that take place at the intersection of people, information, and technology in museums. This entry presents an overview of museum informatics, covering such topics as information representation, information organization and access, information management, information technology, information interactions, and information professionals in museums. It explores the impact of information science and technology on museums, museum professionals, and museum visitors, and argues that museum researchers must take a sociotechnical approach to studying the use of information resources and technologies in museums.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  6. Meyer, U.: Entwurf und Realisierung eines Hypermediasystems : vernetzte Informationen zu ausgewählten Bauplastiken in Hannover (1993) 0.03
    0.030791279 = product of:
      0.061582558 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
        0.04098374 = product of:
          0.08196748 = sum of:
            0.08196748 = weight(_text_:22 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08196748 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  7. Ménard, E.; Mas, S.; Alberts, I.: Faceted classification for museum artefacts : a methodology to support web site development of large cultural organizations (2010) 0.03
    0.029210461 = product of:
      0.058420923 = sum of:
        0.044259522 = weight(_text_:standards in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044259522 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19697142 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
        0.014161401 = product of:
          0.028322803 = sum of:
            0.028322803 = weight(_text_:organization in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028322803 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.15756798 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This research project aims to provide a new visual representation of the Artefacts Canada digital collection, as well as a means for users to browse this content. Artefacts Canada Humanities is a database containing approximately 3.5 million records describing the different collections of Canadian museums. Design/methodology/approach - A four-step methodology was adopted for the development of the faceted taxonomy model. First, a best practice review consisting of an extensive analysis of existing terminology standards in museum communities and public web interfaces of large cultural organizations was performed. The second step of the methodology entailed a domain analysis; this involved extracting and comparing relevant concepts from terminological authoritative sources. The third step proceeded to term clustering and entity listing,which involved the breaking-up of the taxonomy domains into potential facets. An incremental user testing was also realized in order to validate and refine the taxonomy components (facets, values, and relationships). Findings - The project resulted in a bilingual and expandable vocabulary structure that will further be used to describe the Artefacts Canada database records. The new taxonomy simplifies the representation of complex content by grouping objects into similar facets to classify all records of the Artefacts Canada database. The user-friendly bilingual taxonomy provides worldwide visitors with the means to better access Canadian virtual museum collections. Originality/value - Few methodological tools are available for museums which wish to adopt a faceted approach in the development of their web sites. For practitioners, the methodology developed within this project is a direct contribution to support web site development of large cultural organizations.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Content architecture: exploiting and managing diverse resources: proceedings of the first national conference of the United Kingdom chapter of the International Society for Knowedge Organization (ISKO)
  8. Schweibenz, W.: Museumsinformation im Internet am Beispiel der Webseiten zweier Kunstmuseen in den USA (1998) 0.03
    0.025659401 = product of:
      0.051318802 = sum of:
        0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017165681 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
        0.03415312 = product of:
          0.06830624 = sum of:
            0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06830624 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  9. Smiraglia, R.P.: Knowledge sharing and content genealogy : extensing the "works" model as a metaphor for non-documentary artefacts with case studies of Etruscan artefacts (2004) 0.02
    0.01569727 = product of:
      0.03139454 = sum of:
        0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006866273 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
        0.024528269 = product of:
          0.049056537 = sum of:
            0.049056537 = weight(_text_:organization in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049056537 = score(doc=2671,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.27291575 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The harmonization and extension of a taxonomy of works from the documentary to the artefactual domain represents an attempt to further knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. The uses and users of works, both documentary and artefactual, are global-the need for this advance in the organization of knowledge is therefore also global. Works are the formal records of knowledge, the essential records of human accomplishment. Works are a global phenomenon despite potential cultural variations in their creation and instantiation, and the need to organize works for retrieval is likewise a global phenomenon. Artefacts (sculptures, paintings, realia, documents, books, scores, recordings, etc.) are the physical media collected by repositories of culture (libraries, archives, museums, etc.), and are the means by which works are communicated. Works mutate and derive across time and culture in response to their entrance into a canon of cultural meaning. In the present paper, we review the characteristics of documentary works. Then we extend the metaphor from the documentary environment to the artefactual environment. To carry the metaphor from the documentary domain to the artefactual domain we alter the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. an epistemological architecture of content-genealogy is presented, demonstrating the potential for mutation and derivation of the representations of artefacts. Case studies of Etruscan artefacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in nondocumentary artefacts. An outline of a meta-theory of "works" is presented that harmonizes the documentary and artefactual domains.
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  10. Blummer, T.: Objektverwalter : Objektdatenbanken - High Tech Spielzeuge oder Zukunftsmodell? (1997) 0.01
    0.013661247 = product of:
      0.054644987 = sum of:
        0.054644987 = product of:
          0.109289974 = sum of:
            0.109289974 = weight(_text_:22 in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.109289974 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    5. 3.1999 17:40:22
  11. Wunderlich, B.: ¬Die wissenschaftliche Erschließung von Bekleidung mit systematischen Ordnungssystemen im musealen Kontext : Wie bekommt man Hemd und Hose in die Datenbank? (2005) 0.01
    0.0072827823 = product of:
      0.02913113 = sum of:
        0.02913113 = weight(_text_:information in 4173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02913113 = score(doc=4173,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4173, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4173)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Abschlussarbeit am Institut für Information und Dokumentation an der Fachhochschule Potsdam
    Imprint
    Potsdam : Institut für Information und Dokumentation
  12. Wolters, C.: Object databases and thesauri for small museums (1991) 0.01
    0.0070807007 = product of:
      0.028322803 = sum of:
        0.028322803 = product of:
          0.056645606 = sum of:
            0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056645606 = score(doc=6100,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization: models and methods with applications. Proc. of the 14th annual conf. of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Univ. of Marburg, 12.-14.3.1990. Ed.: H.-H. Bock u. P. Ihm
  13. Hübner, M.: Integrierte und vielschichtige Dokumentation von Kunstwerken (1991) 0.01
    0.006866273 = product of:
      0.027465092 = sum of:
        0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027465092 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Imprint
    Darmstadt : Fachhochschule, FB Information und Dokumentation
  14. Regimbeau, G.: Acces thématiques aux oeuvres d'art contemporaines dans les banques de données (1998) 0.01
    0.0068306234 = product of:
      0.027322493 = sum of:
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  15. Düro, M.; Schweibenz, W.: Metadaten für Museen (2002) 0.01
    0.006007989 = product of:
      0.024031956 = sum of:
        0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 1334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024031956 = score(doc=1334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1334)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.6, S.339-346
  16. Orna, E.; Pettitt, C.: Information management in museums (1998) 0.01
    0.005255895 = product of:
      0.02102358 = sum of:
        0.02102358 = weight(_text_:information in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02102358 = score(doc=4986,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Museums are under pressure to deliver effective management and presentation of their collections, outreach to their public, cost effective use of all of their resources and the generation of maximum income. This book addresses such topics as what information means in the museum context, who uses it and what they need to do with it, developing a strategy for using information to benefit the museum, making the best use of the knowledge and skills of the museum staff, and acquiring the right mix of technology and managing it to support co-operation between people. Basic principles and practical advice is presented for integrated management of a whole range of information which museums need for productive use of human resources and for choosing and using technology effectively. The needs of small museums are given special attention and case studies show how a range of institutions have responded to the challenge.
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Museums
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Museums
  17. Wolters, C.: Fragen der Terminologie bei der EDV-gestützten Bestandserschließung im Museum (1991) 0.01
    0.005149705 = product of:
      0.02059882 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 6102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=6102,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6102, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6102)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Wissenschaftliche Information im europäischen Rahmen: 23. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB / Sektion 5 im DBV, 13.-16.3.1991 in München
  18. Wolters, C.: Objektdokumentation im Museum (1990) 0.01
    0.005149705 = product of:
      0.02059882 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 4317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=4317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4317)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
  19. When museum informatics meets the World Wide Web (2000) 0.01
    0.005149705 = product of:
      0.02059882 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=4286,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.1-49
  20. Paolini, P.; Barbieri, T.; Loiudice, P.; Alonzo, F.; Zanti, M.; Gaia, G.: Visiting a museum together : how to share a visit to a virtual world (2000) 0.01
    0.005149705 = product of:
      0.02059882 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.33-38

Languages

  • e 19
  • d 14
  • f 1

Types

  • a 28
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…