Search (59 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. ISO 999.4: Guidelines for the content, organization and presentation of indexes : Committee draft (1991) 0.12
    0.116841845 = product of:
      0.23368369 = sum of:
        0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 8088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17703809 = score(doc=8088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 8088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8088)
        0.056645606 = product of:
          0.11329121 = sum of:
            0.11329121 = weight(_text_:organization in 8088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11329121 = score(doc=8088,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.6302719 = fieldWeight in 8088, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Imprint
    Ottawa : Office of Library Standards, National Library of Canada
  2. Anderson, J.D.: Standards for indexing : revising the American National Standard guidelines Z39.4 (1994) 0.10
    0.103358164 = product of:
      0.20671633 = sum of:
        0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 8266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01699316 = score(doc=8266,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 8266, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8266)
        0.18972316 = weight(_text_:standards in 8266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18972316 = score(doc=8266,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.844339 = fieldWeight in 8266, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8266)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the nature of standards as tools to promote compatibiliy and improve practice, the role of research versus expert opinion in the creation of standards, the changing scope of standards for indexes in the face of the changing indexing environment, with the increasing use of automatic indexing, electronic displays, and electronic searching of non-displayed indexes. it describes the current draft of the NISO American Standards Guidelines for Indexes in Information Retrieval (Z39.4) in terms of three fundamental requirements: syntax, vocabulary management, and comprehensive planning and design. The article concludes with comments about the nebulous concept of good and accurate indexing and whether and how standards can be used advantageously
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.628-636
  3. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing standards : Are they possible? What good are they? Why bother? (1993) 0.10
    0.09509297 = product of:
      0.19018593 = sum of:
        0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 8087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01699316 = score(doc=8087,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 8087, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8087)
        0.17319277 = weight(_text_:standards in 8087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17319277 = score(doc=8087,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.7707726 = fieldWeight in 8087, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8087)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the nature of standards as tools to promote compatibility and improve practice, the role of research versus expert opinion in the creation of standards, the changing scope of standards for indexes in the face of the changing indexing environment, with the increasing use of automatic indexing, electronic displays, and electronic searching of non-displayed indexes. Describes the current draft of the NISO American Standard Guidelines for indexes in information retrieval (Z39.4) in terms of 3 fundamental requirements: syntax, vocabulary management and comprehensive planning and design. Concludes with comments about the nebulous concept of good and accurate indexing and whether and how standards can be used advantageously
    Source
    Indexing, providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany
  4. Shuter, J.: Indexing standards : where do they come from and what use are they? (1993) 0.08
    0.07668869 = product of:
      0.15337738 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 8091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=8091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 8091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8091)
        0.13277857 = weight(_text_:standards in 8091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13277857 = score(doc=8091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.59091425 = fieldWeight in 8091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8091)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Indexing, providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany
  5. Bakewell, K.G.B.; Rowland, G.: Indexing and abstracting (1993) 0.05
    0.051125795 = product of:
      0.10225159 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 5540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=5540,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 5540, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5540)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of UK developments in indexing and abstracting druing the period 1986-1990 covering: bibliographies of indexing and abstracting; British standards (including the revised British Standard on indexing, BS 3700); Wheatley Medal and Carey Award; a list of indexes published during this period; the role of the computer and automatic indexing; hypermedia; PRECIS; POPSI, relational indexing; thesauri; education and training; the indexing process, newspaper indexing; fiction indexes; the indexing profession; and a review of abstracting and indexing services
    Source
    British librarianship and information work 1986-1990. Ed. by D. Bromley and A.M. Allott
  6. Indexing: providing access to information : looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers, Alexandria, VA, May 1993 (1993) 0.05
    0.04655322 = product of:
      0.09310644 = sum of:
        0.014865918 = weight(_text_:information in 8077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014865918 = score(doc=8077,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 8077, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8077)
        0.07824052 = weight(_text_:standards in 8077) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07824052 = score(doc=8077,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.34819958 = fieldWeight in 8077, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=8077)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ZAFRAN, E.L. u. C. MacKAY: Keeping up with the times (& the deadlines): indexing at BNA (Bureau of National Affairs); PRESCHEL, B.M.: Delivering database information to the user: technology, media, content; MULHOLLAND, S.: Indexing and the challenge of change at PsycINFO; LOCKE, C.: Weaving the social fabric; WEINBERG, B.H.: Computer-assisted database indexing; HODGE, G.M.: Computer-assisted database indexing: the state of the art; HUMPHREY, S.M.: The MedIndEx prototype for computer-assisted MEDLINE database indexing; KOLL, M.B.: Automatic relevance ranking: a searcher's complement to indexing; ANDERSON, J.D.: Indexing standards: are they possible? What good are they? Why bother?; SHUTER, J.: Standards for indexes: where do the come from and what use are they?; COUSINS, G.: Professional indexing in Australia: first steps towards accreditation; McFADDEN, T.G.: I wonder who's indexing the Internet now?; WALLIS, E.: Indexing training and accreditation in UK; BELL, H.K.: Vive la difference! The survival of the softest; LIDDY, E.D. u. C.L. JÖRGENSEN: Reality check: book index characteristics that ficilitate information sccess; KLEINBERG, I.: Making the case for professional indexers: where is the proof?
  7. Diodato, V.: User preferences for features in back of the book indexes (1994) 0.04
    0.04473507 = product of:
      0.08947014 = sum of:
        0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 7762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012015978 = score(doc=7762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 7762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7762)
        0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 7762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077454165 = score(doc=7762,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 7762, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7762)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    A survey of 255 librarians and college professors obtained their opinions of 3 elements of back of book indexes. Both groups overwhelmingly preferred line-by-line subheadings to the run-on arrangement, even though many books use the latter format. Almost all librarians preferred word-by-word alphabetization to the letter-by-letter method, but only about two thirds of the professors shared this preference. Strongest disagreement between the two groups occured when most of the librarians preferred see references to duplicate entries, while most professors selected duplicate entires instead of see references. Indexers and developers of indexing standards should consider the preferences of index users
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.7, S.529-536
  8. Bell, H.K.: Indexing biographies, and other stories of human lives (1992) 0.04
    0.041733973 = product of:
      0.16693589 = sum of:
        0.16693589 = sum of:
          0.08496841 = weight(_text_:organization in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08496841 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.47270393 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
          0.08196748 = weight(_text_:22 in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08196748 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.1, S.46-47 (R. Fugmann)
  9. Bakewell, K.G.B.: Indexing after the millennium 6 : standards and good practice (1999) 0.04
    0.038727082 = product of:
      0.15490833 = sum of:
        0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 6310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15490833 = score(doc=6310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 6310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6310)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Wellisch, H.H.: Book and periodical indexing (1994) 0.04
    0.038344346 = product of:
      0.07668869 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 8265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=8265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 8265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8265)
        0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 8265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066389285 = score(doc=8265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 8265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8265)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The indexing of both books and periodicals must fulfill certain basic functions, prescribed by national and international standards. Regarding the requirements of their indexing, verbal texts in the form of books and periodicals form a continuum ranging from books written by a single author (or a small team), books written by multiple authors, encyclopedias, periodical volumes, and articles in periodicals. Problems of indexing policy, indexing language, depth of indexing, author's names, titles, the physical form of indexes, and indexes to single volumes of periodicals and cumulative indexes are discussed. Large bibliographic databases do not use fully automatic indexing systems, which are incapable of fulfilling all basic indexing functions. Rather, they employ teams of indexers supported by automated indexing aids for the execution of clerical tasks, vocabulary control, and other assistance for the intellectual tasks performed by indexers. Electronic journals are unlikely to be indexed because of the instability of their texts. The principal features of verbal texts and their indexes are displayed schematically
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.620-627
  11. Calvert, D.: Deconstructing indexing standards (1996) 0.03
    0.03129621 = product of:
      0.12518483 = sum of:
        0.12518483 = weight(_text_:standards in 3731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12518483 = score(doc=3731,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5571193 = fieldWeight in 3731, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3731)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the differences between to indexing standards: BS 3700 and ISO 999, and discusses their relevance and practicality. Topics covered include: terminology, quality, consistency, singular or plural terms, personal names, elided numbers, filing rules, arrangement of subheadings, presentation of indexes, cross-references, and the layout of set out and run-on subheadings
  12. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.03
    0.030791279 = product of:
      0.061582558 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
        0.04098374 = product of:
          0.08196748 = sum of:
            0.08196748 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08196748 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today / American Society of Indexers
  13. Bradshaw, S.; Hammond, K.: Constructing indices from citations in collections of research papers (1999) 0.03
    0.027107734 = product of:
      0.05421547 = sum of:
        0.029433014 = weight(_text_:information in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029433014 = score(doc=6682,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
        0.024782453 = product of:
          0.049564905 = sum of:
            0.049564905 = weight(_text_:organization in 6682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049564905 = score(doc=6682,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 6682, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6682)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    We describe Rosetta, an indexing and retrieval system for collections of research papers. Rosetta indexes papers in a collection based on the way they have been described when referenced by other papers in the collection. With this technique, indices for papers describe information provided in the same way a query describes information needed. Using Rosetta, simple natural language queries retrieve high-precision results in which descriptions based on citations clearly summarize retrieved papers; allowing users to quickly determine which papers most closely meet their information needs
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
    Series
    Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol.36
    Source
    Knowledge: creation, organization and use. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: L. Woods
  14. Anderson, J.D.: Guidelines for indexes and related information retrieval devices (1997) 0.02
    0.023545908 = product of:
      0.047091816 = sum of:
        0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01029941 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.036792405 = product of:
          0.07358481 = sum of:
            0.07358481 = weight(_text_:organization in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07358481 = score(doc=3807,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This technical report provides guidelines for the content, organization, and presentation of indexes used for the retrieval of documents and parts of documents. It deals with the principles of indexing, regardless of the type of material indexed, the indexing method used (intellectual analysis, machine algorithm, or both), the medium of the index, or the method of presentation for searching. It emphasizes 4 processes essential for all indexes: comprehensive design, vocabulary management, and the provision of systax. It includes definitions of indexes and of their parts, attributes, and aspects; a uniform vocabulary; treatment of the nature and variety of indexes; and recommendations regarding the design, organization, and presentation of indexes. It does not suggest guidelines for every detail or technique of indexing. These can be determined for each index on the basis of factors covered in the technical report
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 25(1998) no.3, S.118-119 (R. Fugmann)
  15. Dixon, Y.: Indexing for children (1996) 0.02
    0.022129761 = product of:
      0.088519044 = sum of:
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 6937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=6937,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 6937, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6937)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In a survey of children's informative books only 58% were found to have indexes. Describes work carried out to produce indexes for a set of primary school books. Reports the views of librarians' and publishers' on children's indexes. A worksheet was devised for investigating children's use of indexes. Reports children's reactions to this. Sets ot standards in the UK National Curriculum relating to indexing. Outlines principles for indexing for children
  16. Ramesh Babu, B.: ¬An investigation into the treatment of personal names in book indexes (1991) 0.02
    0.022129761 = product of:
      0.088519044 = sum of:
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 1160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=1160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 1160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1160)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of the study was to examnine the current practices in the indexing of personal names in philosophical books published in India, UK and USA; and to study and compare various standards on indexing and the treatment of personal names with notes on typographical distinctions used in these indexes
  17. ISO 999:1996: Guidelines for the content, organization and presentation of indexes (1996) 0.02
    0.021462236 = product of:
      0.08584894 = sum of:
        0.08584894 = product of:
          0.17169788 = sum of:
            0.17169788 = weight(_text_:organization in 868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17169788 = score(doc=868,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.95520514 = fieldWeight in 868, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Editor
    International Organization for Standardization
    Imprint
    Geneva : International Organization of Standardization
  18. Weinberg, B.H.: Can you recommend a good book on indexing? (1998) 0.02
    0.021027675 = product of:
      0.04205535 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 7142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=7142,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 7142, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7142)
        0.028322803 = product of:
          0.056645606 = sum of:
            0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 7142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056645606 = score(doc=7142,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 7142, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7142)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 26(1999) no.2, S.107-109 (R. Fugmann); Indexer 21(1999) no.3, S.147-148 ( M. Piggott)
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Information Today
  19. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.02
    0.02052752 = product of:
      0.04105504 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
  20. Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992) 0.02
    0.020450171 = product of:
      0.040900342 = sum of:
        0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01699316 = score(doc=7288,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
        0.023907183 = product of:
          0.047814365 = sum of:
            0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047814365 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
    Imprint
    Philadelphia, PA : National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services