Search (281 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchoberflächen"
  1. Troll, D.A.: Designing the gateway interface : tips and techniques from Carnegie Mellon's experience (1994) 0.05 
    0.049133226 = product of:
  0.09826645 = sum of:
    0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 2730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020812286 = score(doc=2730,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2730, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2730)
    0.077454165 = weight(_text_:standards in 2730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077454165 = score(doc=2730,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.34469998 = fieldWeight in 2730, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2730)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Electronic libraries will depend on distributed computing, storage and retrieval standards that enable multiple user interfaces to multiple information stores. Examines the lessons in interface design learned by Carnegie Mellon University Libraries in building their library system. User interface design is difficult and time-consuming. Distributed retrieval has implications for user interface design. User interface design specifications save time and aggravation, user interfaces need to be tested and revised. Politics and egos can disrupt user interface design
    Imprint
    Illinois : University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Emerging communities: integrating networked information into library services. Proceedings of the Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, 4-6 April 1993. Ed.: A.P. Bishop
  2. Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001) 0.05 
    0.048590284 = product of:
  0.064787045 = sum of:
    0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006866273 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
    0.044259522 = weight(_text_:standards in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044259522 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19697142 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
    0.013661247 = product of:
      0.027322493 = sum of:
        0.027322493 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027322493 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    The effect that content and layout of bibliographic displays had on the ability of end-users to process catalog information was tested using a 2 x 2 factorial experimental design. Participants were asked to perform two related tasks during the course of the experiment. In the first task, they were asked to select a set of items that they would examine further for a hypothetical paper they must write, using a simulated online catalog to make their assessments of relevance. In the second task, they were asked to examine 20 bibliographic records, decide whether they would choose to examine these items further on the shelf, and identify the data elements that they used to formulate their relevance decision. One group viewed bibliographic records on an interface similar to current online catalogs, one that used data labels and contained data elements commonly found. A second group viewed these records on an interface in which the labels had been removed, but the data elements were the same as those in the first. The third group viewed these records on a labeled display that included enhanced data elements on the brief record display. The final group viewed these records with the same brief record data elements as the third group, but with the labels removed, using ISBD and AACR2 punctuation standards. For the first task, participants using enhanced brief screen interfaces viewed more brief screens and fewer full screens than their counterparts. Screen durations for the second 10 screens were found to have dropped from those of the first 10 screens. Statistical analyses comparing demographic variables to the screen frequencies uncovered many significant differences. Participants using the enhanced-content interfaces made fewer selections from index and full screens, and more selections from brief screens. For the second task, participants who used enhanced-content interfaces were able to make some sort of relevance judgment more frequently than those who used standard-content interfaces.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  3. Ensor, P.: Do we need standards for OPAC interfaces (1993) 0.05 
    0.047912344 = product of:
  0.19164938 = sum of:
    0.19164938 = weight(_text_:standards in 7444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19164938 = score(doc=7444,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.85291135 = fieldWeight in 7444, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7444)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Considers whether standards are needed for OPAC interfaces. Examines issues surrounding calls for standards for OPAC interfaces. It is unlikely that one interface will be accepted by vendors. The role of the OPAC is changing so rapidly there is little chance of standardization
  4. Yee, M.M.: System design and cataloging meet the user : user interfaces to online public access catalogs (1991) 0.04 
    0.038344346 = product of:
  0.07668869 = sum of:
    0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01029941 = score(doc=2782,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
    0.066389285 = weight(_text_:standards in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066389285 = score(doc=2782,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.29545712 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Current research on user interfaces to online public access catalogs is reviewed in an attempt to identify research methods and findings applicable to the design of effective user interfaces to online public access catalogs. A broad definition of user interface is employed which includes data structures, in addition to searching and indexing software. The following features of online public access catalogs are discussed: the demonstration of relationships between records, the provision of entry vocabularies, the arrangement of multiple entries on the screen, the provision of access points, the display of single records, and the division of the catalog into separate files or indexes. For each feature, user studies and other research on online public access catalogs are reviewed and those findings summarized which provide insight into user needs concerning that particular feature; issues are identified and directions for further research are suggested. Implications for cataloging codes and standards and system design are discussed
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.78-98
  5. Grudin, J.: Human-computer interaction (2011) 0.04 
    0.03592316 = product of:
  0.07184632 = sum of:
    0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024031956 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
    0.047814365 = product of:
      0.09562873 = sum of:
        0.09562873 = weight(_text_:22 in 1601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09562873 = score(doc=1601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    27.12.2014 18:54:22
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 45(2011) no.1, S.367-430
  6. Barrierefreies E-Government : Leitfaden für Entscheidungsträger, Grafiker und Programmierer (2005) 0.03 
    0.034729347 = product of:
  0.06945869 = sum of:
    0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006866273 = score(doc=4881,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
    0.06259242 = weight(_text_:standards in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06259242 = score(doc=4881,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27855965 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 56(2005) H.8, S.459 (W. Schweibenz): "Der Leitfaden ist Teil des Handbuchs für sicheres E-Govemment, das vom Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik herausgegeben wird und als Nachschlagewerk und zentrale Informationsbörse mit Empfehlungscharakter konzipiert ist. Die Publikation stellt in sechs Abschnitten alle wichtigen Aspekte für ein barrierefreies EGovernment dar, die inhaltlich auch auf private Web-Angebote übertragen werden können. Ein besonderes Anliegen des Leitfadens ist es, den Entscheidungsträgern die Notwendigkeit eines barrierefreien Internets zu erklären. Dies geschieht im ersten Abschnitt, in dem ausgehend von der mangelhafte Benutzungsfreundlichkeit des Internets im Allgemeinen die Bedürfnisse behinderter Menschen im Besonderen beschrieben werden. In anschaulicher Weise mit Beispielen und Bildern werden die Probleme folgender Benutzergruppen dargestellt: - sehbehinderte und blinde Menschen, - hörgeschädigte und gehörlose Menschen, - kognitiv eingeschränkte und konzentrationsschwache Menschen, - Menschen mit Epilepsie, - manuell-motorisch eingeschränkte Menschen. Dies kann Lesern helfen, sich die Probleme von Menschen mit Behinderungen zu vergegenwärtigen, bevor sie im zweiten Abschnitt auf zehn Seiten mit dem deutschen Gesetze und Richtlinien konfrontiert werden. Der Abschnitt 3 Anleitung zur Gestaltung barrierefreier Internet-Seiten gibt Programmierern und Designem konkrete Hinweise welche Techniken in HTML und CSS wie eingesetzt werden müssen, um Barrierefreiheit zu erreichen. Dies reicht von Fragen der Wahmehmbarkeit (Textäquivalente für Audio- und visuelle Inhalte, Schrift und Farbe) über generelle Aspekte der Bedienbarkeit (Orientierung und Navigation, Frames, eingebettete Benutzerschnittstellen, Formulare) und der allgemeinen Verständlichkeit (Sprache, Abkürzungen, Akronyme) bis zur Einhaltung von Standards (W3C unterstützte Formate, Einhaltung von Markup-Standards, Rückwärtskompatibilität, Geräteunabhängigkeit, Kompatibilität mit assistiven Technologien). Im Abschnitt 4 wird die Kommunikation im Internet betrachtet, wobei vor allem auf Fragen des E-Mail-Verkehrs und der Sicherheit eingegangen wird, Aspekte die für alle Internet-Benutzer interessant sind. Im Abschnitt 5 wird dargestellt, wie Internet-Seiten auf Barrierefreiheit geprüft werden können. Neben Testmethoden technischer Art (Evaluierung durch verschiedene Browser und Prüfprogramme) und mit behinderten Benutzern wird auch auf die Frage der Oualitätssiegel für Barrierefreiheit eingegangen und existierende Testsymbole werden vorgestellt. Ein sechster Abschnitt mit Links und Literatur rundet den Leitfaden ab und verweist interessierte Leser weiter."
  7. Stewart, M.R.: Users, standards, and access : in search of the standard user (1992) 0.03 
    0.03353864 = product of:
  0.13415456 = sum of:
    0.13415456 = weight(_text_:standards in 2725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13415456 = score(doc=2725,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.5970379 = fieldWeight in 2725, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2725)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Standards for user interfaces for access to bibliographic data bases cannot be developed without more complete understanding of the current user, user attitude and capabilities. Gives 3 means of achieving this based on observing the user. 45% of access points in subject searches results in no retrievals. Errors in searching on-line catalogues occur with a 40% no hit title search rate and a 51% no hit author search rate when those records were on the data base. Stresses the importance of fundamental user interface components contained in the IBM staff publication systems guide. Concludes that although there is no such thing as a standard user it is still vital to develop user standards
  8. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.03 
    0.03273274 = product of:
  0.06546548 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
    0.0482998 = product of:
      0.0965996 = sum of:
        0.0965996 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0965996 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
  9. Fidel, R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Cleal, B.; Bruce, H.: ¬A multidimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction : a case study of collaborative information retrieval (2004) 0.03 
    0.029586 = product of:
  0.059172 = sum of:
    0.02913113 = weight(_text_:information in 2997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02913113 = score(doc=2997,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 2997, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2997)
    0.030040871 = product of:
      0.060081743 = sum of:
        0.060081743 = weight(_text_:organization in 2997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060081743 = score(doc=2997,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 2997, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    While most research in the area of human-information behavior has focused an a single dimension-either the psychological or the social-this case study demonstrated the importance of a multidimensional approach. The Cognitive Work Analysis framework guided this field study of one event of collaborative information retrieval (CIR) carried out by design engineers at Microsoft, including observations and interviews. Various dimensions explained the motives for this CIR event and the challenges the participants encountered: the cognitive dimension, the specific task and decision, the organization of the teamwork, and the organizational culture. Even though it is difficult at times to separate one dimension from another, and all are interdependent, the analysis uncovered several reasons for design engineers to engage in CIR, such as when they are new to the organization or the team, when the information lends itself to various interpretations, or when most of the needed information is not documented. Similar multidimensional studies will enhance our understanding of human-information behavior.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.11, S.939-953
  10. Mandl, T.; Stempfhuber, M.: Softwareergonomische Gestaltung von Wirtschaftsinformationssystemen am Beispiel von ELVIRA (1998) 0.03 
    0.02921453 = product of:
  0.05842906 = sum of:
    0.02427594 = weight(_text_:information in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02427594 = score(doc=4154,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
    0.03415312 = product of:
      0.06830624 = sum of:
        0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06830624 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  11. Angegon, M.; Herrero Solana, V.; Guerrero-Bote, V.: Virtual reality interface for accessing electronic information (1998) 0.03 
    0.027849235 = product of:
  0.05569847 = sum of:
    0.03179129 = weight(_text_:information in 3534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03179129 = score(doc=3534,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 3534, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3534)
    0.023907183 = product of:
      0.047814365 = sum of:
        0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 3534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047814365 = score(doc=3534,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3534, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3534)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Presents a research project funded by the Spanish government and conducted by professors and students of library and information science, principally from the University of Granada, in collaboration with 2 organizations specializing in electronic information. The research group, 'Virtual reality interface for accessing electronic information', aims to define and develop a new interface for access to electronic information, with particular emphasis on the need for a 3-dimensional metaphor designed specially to improve inter-user communication and to facilitate browsing among great volumes of electronic information
    Source
    Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.34-39
  12. Kreichgauer, U.: Ergonomische Gestaltung von Benutzungsoberflächen : welche Hilfen bieten Standards? (1992) 0.03 
    0.0276622 = product of:
  0.1106488 = sum of:
    0.1106488 = weight(_text_:standards in 8245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1106488 = score(doc=8245,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.49242854 = fieldWeight in 8245, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8245)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.03 
    0.027311075 = product of:
  0.05462215 = sum of:
    0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020812286 = score(doc=5295,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
    0.033809863 = product of:
      0.067619726 = sum of:
        0.067619726 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.067619726 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.792-796
  14. Callahan, E.: Interface design and culture (2004) 0.03 
    0.026984949 = product of:
  0.053969897 = sum of:
    0.009710376 = weight(_text_:information in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009710376 = score(doc=4281,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
    0.044259522 = weight(_text_:standards in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044259522 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19697142 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    It is common knowledge that computer interfaces in different cultures vary. Interface designers present information in different languages, use different iconography to designate concepts, and employ different standards for dates, time, and numbers. These manifest differences beg the question of how easily an interface designed in one country can be used in and transferred to another country. Are the challenges involved in adaptation merely cosmetic or are they shaped by more profound forces? Do all cultures respond to interfaces in similar ways, or does culture itself shape user comprehension? If culture is a factor in explaining varied user reactions to comparable interfaces, what specific cultural dimensions are responsible for the divergences? Do differences reside mainly at the level of national cultures, or do they depend an other variables such as class, gender, age, education, and expertise with technology? In the face of a potentially large number of explanatory variables, how do we delimit a workable concept of culture and yet remain cognizant of other factors that might shape the results of culture and interface research? Questions such as these have been asked in the ergonomics community since the early 1970s, when the industrialization of developing countries created a need for more research an cultural differences (Honold, 1999), resulting in an increased interest in the universal applicability of ergonomic principles. This trend continued after the reunification of Germany and the emergence of market economies in Eastern Europe (Nielsen, 1990). In the mid-1990s, as markets outside the U.S. rapidly expanded, it became necessary to develop appropriate user interfaces for non-Western cultures in order to facilitate international cooperation. This fresh impetus for research led to the development of practical guidelines and a body of Gase studies and examples of possible solutions. Most recently we have seen attempts to provide a theoretical foundation for cross-cultural usability engineering and experimental comparison studies (Honold, 1999).
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 39(2005), S.257-310
  15. Wenzel, A.: MIMOSA - eine einheitliche Benutzeroberfläche für CD-ROM Serien in der Patentinformation (1998) 0.03 
    0.025659401 = product of:
  0.051318802 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 4146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=4146,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4146, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4146)
    0.03415312 = product of:
      0.06830624 = sum of:
        0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 4146) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06830624 = score(doc=4146,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4146, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4146)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  16. Vaughan, M.W.; Resnick, M.L.: Search user interfaces : best practices and future visions (2006) 0.03 
    0.025659401 = product of:
  0.051318802 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
    0.03415312 = product of:
      0.06830624 = sum of:
        0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06830624 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:37:31
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.777-780
  17. Barrierefreies Webdesign : Praxishandbuch für Webgestaltung und grafische Programmoberflächen (2005) 0.03 
    0.025562897 = product of:
  0.051125795 = sum of:
    0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 4882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006866273 = score(doc=4882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 4882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4882)
    0.044259522 = weight(_text_:standards in 4882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044259522 = score(doc=4882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19697142 = fieldWeight in 4882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4882)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 56(2005) H.8, S.459 (W. Schweibenz): "Das Buch behandelt in sechs Kapiteln und einem umfangreichen Anhang die barrierefreie Zugänglichkeit von Web-Anwendungen. Es wurde von einem vierzehn Personen umfassenden Autorenteam geschrieben und kann inzwischen als eines der deutschsprachigen Standardwerke zu diesem Thema gelten. Die erste Auflage war nach ihrem Erscheinen im Oktober 2004 binnen weniger Wochen ausverkauft, bereits im Dezember 2004 wurde die zweite Auflage herausgebracht. Das erste Kapitel erläutert Grundlagen und Notwendigkeit der barrierefreien Informationstechnik. Dabei erhalten die Leser Einblick in die Schwierigkeiten, die sich für Menschen mit Behinderungen bei der Computerbenutzung ergeben und mit welchen Hilfsmitteln diese Probleme gelöst oder zumindest reduziert werden können. Weiterhin wird auch auf die gesetzlichen Vorgaben in der BRD und die Umsetzungsrichtlinien der Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) eingegangen, wobei sich diese Ausführungen allgemein gehalten sind und nur den Bereich des Bundes behandeln; die rechtlichen Gegebenheiten auf Länderebene dagegen werden nicht dargestellt. Die folgenden Kapitel des Buches richten sich überwiegend an Leser mit technischen Interessen bzw. Kenntnissen und vermitteln eine praxisnahe Anleitung zur technischen Umsetzung von Barrierefreiheit, die sich an den inhaltlich orientierten Anforderungen der Barrierefreie Informationstechnik-Verordnung (BITV) orientiert. Behandelt werden Web-Standards wie (X)HTML und CSS, wobei ausführlich auf Fragen der Geräteunabhängigkeit und Validierung eingegangen wird, aber auch auf Anwendungen wie JavaScript und multimediale Anwendungen wie Macromedia Flash oder druckähnliche Ausgabeformate wie PDF (Portable Document Format), das entgegen verbreiteter Annahmen nicht per se barrierefrei ist. Ein eigenes Kapitel zur barrierefreien Gestaltung von grafischen Programmoberflächen gibt Einblick in die IBM-Leitlinien zur Barrierefreiheit. Der Praxisteil mit Tipps zum Testen von Barrierefreiheit und zur Projektdurchführung rundet das Buch ab. Der Anhang enthält den Text der BITV sowie ein Glossar technischer Begriffe. Die CD-ROM - selbstverständlich barrierefrei gestaltet - zeigt zahlreiche Medien-Clips sowie Beispiele, Anleitungen und Demonstrationen. Für technisch orientierte Leser bietet das Buch eine umfassende Einführung in die wichtigsten Fragen zur Barrierefreiheit im Web. Dies reicht von der Fragestellung,was unter Barrierefreiheit zu verstehen ist, über rechtliche Fragen sowie Richtlinien bis zur praktischen Umsetzung. Für die Zielgruppe, die mit Web-Entwickler, Web-Designer, Web-Programmierern und Online-Redakteuren angegeben wird, bietet das Buch eine vollständige und gut nachvollziehbare Handreichung, die sich durch ihren hohen Praxisbezug auszeichnet."
  18. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.03 
    0.02555398 = product of:
  0.05110796 = sum of:
    0.023785468 = weight(_text_:information in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023785468 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
    0.027322493 = product of:
      0.054644987 = sum of:
        0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054644987 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  19. Ju, B.; Gluck, M.: User-Process Model Approach to Improve User Interface Usability (2005) 0.03 
    0.025134712 = product of:
  0.050269425 = sum of:
    0.014865918 = weight(_text_:information in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014865918 = score(doc=3262,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
    0.035403505 = product of:
      0.07080701 = sum of:
        0.07080701 = weight(_text_:organization in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07080701 = score(doc=3262,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Our purpose in this study is to inductively reorganize software interface menu items based an a user's process model. The proposed menu interface in this study used direct users' input, such as goals and strategies for solving their information needs, to reorganize and re-label menus. To assess its effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction with actual users, we implemented and compared this new menu version to the original interface that was based upon a traditional categorical menu organization. The significance of this study is that it incorporates user process modeling into the design of the user interface, providing insights into the impact of such modeling an the usability of an information system. Results from the usability testing do indicate that the proposed menu and the traditional menu are similarly effective for users in terms of task completion time and accuracy. User preferences and debriefing comments from usability testing also indicate users preferred the user-process based arrangement of menu items as displayed. However, the types of tasks (different problem type) suggest significant differences for results in task completion time and in accuracy, sometimes favoring the new version. In other words, usable and effective menu organization depends more an the types of tasks and the domain of knowledge than mere menu organization, although menu organization is a factor in the process.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.10, S.1098-1112
  20. Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006) 0.02 
    0.024811499 = product of:
  0.049622998 = sum of:
    0.02913113 = weight(_text_:information in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02913113 = score(doc=5298,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
    0.02049187 = product of:
      0.04098374 = sum of:
        0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04098374 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The authors describe user interface tools based on search histories to support legal information seekers. The design of the tools was informed by the results of a user study (Komlodi, 2002a) that examined the use of human memory, external memory aids, and search histories in legal information seeking and derived interface design recommendations for information storage and retrieval systems. The data collected were analyzed to identify potential task areas where search histories can support information seeking and use. The results show that many information-seeking tasks can take advantage of automatically and manually recorded history information. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools building on search history information: direct search history displays, history-enabled scratchpad facilities, and organized results collection tools.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:04:19
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.803-897

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 246
  • m 23
  • s 9
  • el 2
  • p 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications