Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

0.01213797 = product of:
  0.04855188 = sum of:
    0.04855188 = weight(_text_:information in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04855188 = score(doc=1333,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.54858685 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Information

0.010831055 = product of:
  0.04332422 = sum of:
    0.04332422 = weight(_text_:information in 560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04332422 = score(doc=560,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.4895196 = fieldWeight in 560, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=560)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The focus of this thesis is information use. Although a key concept in information behaviour, information use has received little attention from information science researchers. Studies of other key concepts such as information need and information seeking are dominant in information behaviour research. Information use is an area of interest to information professionals who rely on research outcomes to shape their practice. There are few empirical studies of how people actually use information that might guide and refine the development of information systems, products and services.

Theme

Information

0.00849658 = product of:
  0.03398632 = sum of:
    0.03398632 = weight(_text_:information in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03398632 = score(doc=182,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Thema der Untersuchung ist die meta-wissenschaftliche Betrachtung von Informationen in den Wissenschaften. ... Der grundlegende Term "Information" wird so allgemein definiert, daß alle bis heute bekannten Definitionsvarianten (die oftmasl disziplinspezifisch ausgerichtet sind) aus diesem Term ableitbar sind. "Information" wird dabei als das Gesamt von "Signal" (materieller Aspekt) und "Informen" (ideeller Aspekt) betrachtet.

RSWK

Information und Dokumentation (GBV)
Information und Dokumentation / Theorie (BVB)

Subject

Information und Dokumentation (GBV)
Information und Dokumentation / Theorie (BVB)

Theme

Information

0.005428266 = product of:
  0.021713063 = sum of:
    0.021713063 = weight(_text_:information in 5985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021713063 = score(doc=5985,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.2453355 = fieldWeight in 5985, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5985)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This research explores, using a Grounded Theory approach, the question of how a particular group of undergraduate university students differentiates the values of retrieved information in a contemporary research process. Specifically it attempts to isolate and label those specific techniques, processes, formulae-both objective and subjective-that the students use to identify, prioritize, and successfully incorporate the most useful and valuable information into their research project. The research reviews the relevant literature covering the areas of: epistemology, knowledge acquisition, and cognitive learning theory; early relevance research; the movement from relevance models to information seeking in context; and the proximate recent research. A research methodology is articulated using a Grounded Theory approach, and the research process and research participants are fully explained and described. The findings of the research are set forth using three Thematic Sets- Traditional Relevance Measures; Structural Frames; and Metaphors: General and Ecological-using the actual discourse of the study participants, and a theoretical construct is advanced. Based on that construct, it can be theorized that identification and analysis of the metaphorical language that the particular students in this study used, both by way of general and ecological metaphors-their stories-about how they found, handled, and evaluated information, can be a very useful tool in understanding how the students identified, prioritized, and successfully incorporated the most useful and relevant information into their research projects. It also is argued that this type of metaphorical analysis could be useful in providing a bridging mechanism for a broader understanding of the relationships between traditional user relevance studies and the concepts of frame theory and sense-making. Finally, a corollary to Whitmire's original epistemological hypothesis is posited: Students who were more adept at using metaphors-either general or ecological-appeared more comfortable with handling contradictory information sources, and better able to articulate their valuing decisions. The research concludes with a discussion of the implications for both future research in the Library and Information Science field, and for the practice of both Library professionals and classroom instructors involved in assisting students involved in information valuing decision-making in a research process.

Theme

Information

0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 4653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=4653,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4653, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4653)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der Informationsbegriff als zentraler Gegenstand von Informationskompetenz wird in der bibliothekarischen Diskussion in der Regel nicht explizit thematisiert, sondern lässt sich aus Fachliteratur und Bibliothekspraxis nur implizit erschließen. Eine theoretische Beschäftigung mit dem Informationsbegriff ist jedoch unabdingbar, soll das Konzept "Informationskompetenz" auch außerhalb des bibliothekarischen Kontextes verständlich und nutzbar gemacht werden. Im vorliegenden Text, der sich als Beitrag zu einer Theorie der Informationskompetenz versteht, werden zunächst verschiedene Informationstypologien und -begriffe vorgestellt und diskutiert, die im Zusammenhang mit Informationskompetenz als relevant erachtet werden. Anschließend wird das Verhältnis von Informations- und Wissensbegriff näher beleuchtet. Ergebnis dieser Begriffsanalyse ist die These, dass einem Konzept von Informationskompetenz, das auch außerhalb von Bildungswesen und Wissenschaft eingesetzt werden können soll, ein Informationsbegriff zugrunde gelegt werden muss, der über das klassische bibliotheks- und informationswissenschaftliche Verständnis von Information als medial kommuniziertes, in Dokumenten repräsentiertes bzw. in Informationssystemen gespeichertes Wissen hinausgeht und weitere Dimensionen dessen, was "Information" sein kann, umfasst.

Theme

Information

0.004855188 = product of:
  0.019420752 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 3709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=3709,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3709, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3709)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint

Hamburg : Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, FB Bibliothek und Information

Theme

Information

0.004855188 = product of:
  0.019420752 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 3711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=3711,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3711, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3711)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint

Hamburg : Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, FB Bibliothek und Information

Theme

Information

0.0036413912 = product of:
  0.014565565 = sum of:
    0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 3268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014565565 = score(doc=3268,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 3268, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3268)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Die Informationswissenschaft beruht auf einer positivistisch-ontologischen Sichtweise, welche eine Realität als beschreib- und erfassbar darstellt. In dieser Arbeit werden die Grundbegriffe und exemplarische Kernprozesse der Informationswissenschaft aus Sicht des Radikalen Konstruktivismus betrachtet, einer Erkenntnistheorie, welche besagt, dass der Mensch seine Wirklichkeit nicht passiv erfährt, sondern aktiv konstruiert. Nach einer kurzen Beschreibung der Informationswissenschaft wird zum Radikalen Konstruktivismus übergeleitet und die daraus folgenden Konsequenzen für Verständigung und Wirklichkeit erläutert. Der konventionellen Anschauung von Daten, Information, Wissen, etc. wird dann diese neue Sichtweise entgegengestellt. Darauf aufbauend werden Informationsverhalten, -pathologien und -prozesse vom radikal-konstruktivistischen Standpunkt aus dargestellt. So sollen der Informationswissenschaft ein breiteres Verständnis für ihren Gegenstandsbereich und zusätzliche Kompetenzen vermittelt werden.

Theme

Information

0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 3984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=3984,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3984, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3984)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Information