Search (29 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  1. Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996) 0.03
    0.027393792 = product of:
      0.054787584 = sum of:
        0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027465092 = score(doc=6599,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    With the onset of the information explosion arising from digital libraries and access to a wealth of information through the Internet, the need to efficiently determine the relevance of a document becomes even more urgent. Describes a text extraction system (TES), which retrieves a set of sentences from a document to form an indicative abstract. Such an automated process enables information to be filtered more quickly. Discusses the combination of various text extraction techniques. Compares results with manually produced abstracts
    Date
    26. 2.1997 10:22:43
    Source
    Microcomputers for information management. 13(1996) no.1, S.41-55
  2. Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996) 0.02
    0.023371622 = product of:
      0.046743244 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=6974,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
  3. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Neugebauer, E.: Professional summarizing : no cognitive simulation without observation (1998) 0.02
    0.021027675 = product of:
      0.04205535 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
        0.028322803 = product of:
          0.056645606 = sum of:
            0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 3243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056645606 = score(doc=3243,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 3243, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Develops a cognitive model of expert summarization, using 54 working processes of 6 experts recorded by thinking-alound protocols. It comprises up to 140 working steps. Components of the model are a toolbox of empirically founded strategies, principles of process organization, and interpreted working steps where the interaction of cognitive strategies can be investigated. In the computerized simulation the SimSum (Simulation of Summarizing) system, cognitive strategies are represented by object-oriented agents grouped around dedicated blckboards
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.6, S.486-506
  4. Advances in automatic text summarization (1999) 0.01
    0.008850876 = product of:
      0.035403505 = sum of:
        0.035403505 = product of:
          0.07080701 = sum of:
            0.07080701 = weight(_text_:organization in 6191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07080701 = score(doc=6191,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 6191, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6191)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 27(2000) no.3, S.178-180 (H. Saggion)
  5. Bateman, J.; Teich, E.: Selective information presentation in an integrated publication system : an application of genre-driven text generation (1995) 0.01
    0.00849658 = product of:
      0.03398632 = sum of:
        0.03398632 = weight(_text_:information in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03398632 = score(doc=2928,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.753-767
  6. McKeown, K.; Robin, J.; Kukich, K.: Generating concise natural language summaries (1995) 0.01
    0.007432959 = product of:
      0.029731836 = sum of:
        0.029731836 = weight(_text_:information in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029731836 = score(doc=2932,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Description of the problems for summary generation, the applications developed (for basket ball games - STREAK and for telephone network planning activity - PLANDOC), the linguistic constructions that the systems use to convey information concisely and the textual constraints that determine what information gets included
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.703-733
  7. Paice, C.D.: Automatic abstracting (1994) 0.01
    0.006866273 = product of:
      0.027465092 = sum of:
        0.027465092 = weight(_text_:information in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027465092 = score(doc=1255,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.53, [=Suppl.16]
  8. Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996) 0.01
    0.0068306234 = product of:
      0.027322493 = sum of:
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  9. Maybury, M.T.: Generating summaries from event data (1995) 0.01
    0.0063070743 = product of:
      0.025228297 = sum of:
        0.025228297 = weight(_text_:information in 2349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025228297 = score(doc=2349,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 2349, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2349)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Summarization entails analysis of source material, selection of key information, condensation of this, and generation of a compct summary form. While there habe been many investigations into the automatic summarization of text, relatively little attention has been given to the summarization of information from structured information sources such as data of knowledge bases, despite this being a desirable capability for a number of application areas including report generation from databases (e.g. weather, financial, medical) and simulation (e.g. military, manufacturing, aconomic). After a brief introduction indicating the main elements of summarization and referring to some illustrative approaches to it, considers pecific issues in the generation of text summaries of event data, describes a system, SumGen, which selects key information from an event database by reasoning about event frequencies, frequencies of relations between events, and domain specific importance measures. Describes how Sum Gen then aggregates similar information and plans a summary presentations tailored to stereotypical users
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.735-751
  10. Kuhlen, R.: Abstracts, abstracting : intellektuelle und maschinelle Verfahren (1990) 0.01
    0.006007989 = product of:
      0.024031956 = sum of:
        0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 2333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024031956 = score(doc=2333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2333)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
  11. Craven, T.C.: ¬An experiment in the use of tools for computer-assisted abstracting (1996) 0.01
    0.005149705 = product of:
      0.02059882 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 7426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=7426,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 7426, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7426)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Experimental subjects wrote abstracts of an article using a simplified version of the TEXNET abstracting assistance software. In addition to the fulltext, the 35 subjects were presented with either keywords or phrases extracted automatically. The resulting abstracts, and the times taken, were recorded automatically; some additional information was gathered by oral questionnaire. Results showed considerable variation among subjects, but 37% found the keywords or phrases quite or very useful in writing their abstracts. Statistical analysis failed to support deveral hypothesised relations; phrases were not viewed as significantly more helpful than keywords; and abstracting experience did not correlate with originality of wording, approximation of the author abstract, or greater conciseness. Results also suggested possible modifications to the software
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Information
    Source
    Global complexity: information, chaos and control. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, ASIS'96, Baltimore, Maryland, 21-24 Oct 1996. Ed.: S. Hardin
  12. Kuhlen, R.: Abstracts, abstracting : intellektuelle und maschinelle Verfahren (1997) 0.01
    0.005149705 = product of:
      0.02059882 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 7800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=7800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 7800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7800)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 4. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a
  13. Johnson, F.C.: ¬A critical view of system-centered to user-centered evaluation of automatic abstracting research (1999) 0.01
    0.005149705 = product of:
      0.02059882 = sum of:
        0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 2994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02059882 = score(doc=2994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 2994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2994)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    New review of information and library research. 5(1999), S.49-63
  14. Liu, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, L.: ¬A hybrid method for abstracting newspaper articles (1999) 0.00
    0.004855188 = product of:
      0.019420752 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 4059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=4059,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 4059, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4059)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper introduces a hybrid method for abstracting Chinese text. It integrates the statistical approach with language understanding. Some linguistics heuristics and segmentation are also incorporated into the abstracting process. The prototype system is of a multipurpose type catering for various users with different reqirements. Initial responses show that the proposed method contributes much to the flexibility and accuracy of the automatic Chinese abstracting system. In practice, the present work provides a path to developing an intelligent Chinese system for automating the information
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.13, S.1234-1245
  15. Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Summarizing information (1998) 0.00
    0.0044597755 = product of:
      0.017839102 = sum of:
        0.017839102 = weight(_text_:information in 688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017839102 = score(doc=688,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 688, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=688)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Summarizing is the process of reducing the large information size of something like a novel or a scientific paper to a short summary or abstract comprising only the most essential points. Summarizing is frequent in everyday communication, but it is also a professional skill for journalists and others. Automated summarizing functions are urgently needed by Internet users who wish to avoid being overwhelmed by information. This book presents the state of the art and surveys related research; it deals with everyday and professional summarizing as well as computerized approaches. The author focuses in detail on the cognitive pro-cess involved in summarizing and supports this with a multimedia simulation systems on the accompanying CD-ROM
  16. Johnson, F.C.; Paice, C.D.; Black, W.J.; Neal, A.P.: ¬The application of linguistic processing to automatic abstract generation (1993) 0.00
    0.0042914203 = product of:
      0.017165681 = sum of:
        0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017165681 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.538-552.
  17. Salton, G.; Allan, J.; Buckley, C.; Singhal, A.: Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machine readable texts (1994) 0.00
    0.0042914203 = product of:
      0.017165681 = sum of:
        0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017165681 = score(doc=1949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.478-483.
  18. Craven, T.C.: ¬A computer-aided abstracting tool kit (1993) 0.00
    0.0034331365 = product of:
      0.013732546 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 6506) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=6506,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6506, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6506)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 18(1993) no.2, S.20-31
  19. Brandow, R.; Mitze, K.; Rau, L.F.: Automatic condensation of electronic publications by sentence selection (1995) 0.00
    0.0034331365 = product of:
      0.013732546 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.675-685
  20. Sparck Jones, K.; Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Introduction: automatic summarizing (1995) 0.00
    0.0034331365 = product of:
      0.013732546 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.625-630