-
Olson, H.A.; Ward, D.B.: Mundane standards, everyday technologies, equitable access (2003)
0.11
0.108470224 = product of:
0.21694045 = sum of:
0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012015978 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
0.20492446 = weight(_text_:standards in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20492446 = score(doc=3959,freq=14.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.91199046 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The problem of access to marginalized knowledge using general subject access standards is well-established, but few successful solutions have been developed. This paper surveys four different approaches to ameliorating bias: revision of general standards, adaptation of general standards, specialized standards for particular knowledge domains and specialized standards for particular situations. lt then examines their technological alternatives and institutional barriers to solutions. The analysis of standards, technologies and barriers is addressed through Ursula Franklin's interpretation of the real world of technology.
- Source
- Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007)
0.10
0.1048102 = product of:
0.13974693 = sum of:
0.014865918 = weight(_text_:information in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014865918 = score(doc=5588,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.0553244 = weight(_text_:standards in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0553244 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.24621427 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.06955662 = sum of:
0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035403505 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.03415312 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03415312 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'Gender Issues in Information Needs and Services'.
- Date
- 11.12.2019 19:00:22
-
Olson, H.A.: Wind and rain and dark of night : classification in scientific discourse communities (2008)
0.06
0.06196475 = product of:
0.1239295 = sum of:
0.093888626 = weight(_text_:standards in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.093888626 = score(doc=2270,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.41783947 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
0.030040871 = product of:
0.060081743 = sum of:
0.060081743 = weight(_text_:organization in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060081743 = score(doc=2270,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Classifications of natural phenomena demonstrate the applicability of discourse analysis in finding the importance of concepts such as warrant for categorization and classification. Temperature scales provide a body of official literature for close consideration. Official documents of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) reveal the reasoning behind choices affecting these standards. A more cursory scrutiny of the Saffir-Simpson Scale through scholarly publications and documentation from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (KIST) indicates the potential of this form of analysis. The same holds true for an examination of the definition of what is a planet as determined by the International Astronomical Union. As Sayers, Richardson, and Bliss have indicated, there seem to be principles and a reliance on context that bridge the differences between natural and artificial, scientific and bibliographic classifications.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.11
- Source
- Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
-
Olson, H.A.: ¬The power to name : locating the limits of subject representation in libraries (2002)
0.05
0.045189247 = product of:
0.09037849 = sum of:
0.01213797 = weight(_text_:information in 2573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01213797 = score(doc=2573,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2573, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2573)
0.07824052 = weight(_text_:standards in 2573) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07824052 = score(doc=2573,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.34819958 = fieldWeight in 2573, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2573)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The names we give things colour the ways we perceive them. Those in a position to name hold the power to construct others' perceptions and realities. This book looks at the pervasive naming of information that libraries undertake as a matter of course through representation of subjects. It examines the 19th century foundations, current standards, and canonical application of internationally used classification (Melvil Dewey and his decimal scheme) and subject headings (Charles Cutter and the Library of Congress Subject Headings). A feminist poststructural critique is used to reveal the presumption that these standards are universally applicable even though their marginalizations and exclusions are well-documented. The book will be of interest to librarians, information scholars and professionals, researchers interested in representation and the construction of meaning, and anyone who uses a library. TOC: Preface.- 1. Naming is Power.- 2. Armies, Railroads and Procrustean Beds.- 3. The Iterability of the Public and Efficiency.- 4. The Authority to Name.- 5. Ite/Arating Women.- 6. Toward Eccentric Techniques.- Notes.- Index.
-
Given, L.M.; Olson, H.A.: Knowledge organization in research : a conceptual model for organizing data (2003)
0.04
0.036798432 = product of:
0.073596865 = sum of:
0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024031956 = score(doc=4693,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
0.049564905 = product of:
0.09912981 = sum of:
0.09912981 = weight(_text_:organization in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09912981 = score(doc=4693,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.5514879 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Library and information science research. 25(2003) no.2, S.157-176
-
Olson, H.A.; Schlegl, R.: Standardization, objectivity, and user focus : a meta-analysis of subject access critiques (2001)
0.03
0.028747404 = product of:
0.114989616 = sum of:
0.114989616 = weight(_text_:standards in 5428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114989616 = score(doc=5428,freq=6.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.51174676 = fieldWeight in 5428, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5428)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Critiques of subject access standards in LIS literature have addressed biases of gender, sexuality, race, age, ability, ethnicity, language and religion as limits to the representation of diversity and to effective library service for diverse populations. The current study identifies and analyzes this literature as a basis for ameliorating systemic bias and to gather the existing literature for wider accessibility. The study analyzes five quantitative variables: standards discussed, categories of problems, marginalized groups and topics discussed, date, and basis of conclusions (research or experience). Textual analysis reveals that basic tenets of subject access-user-focused cataloguing, objectivity, and standardization-are problematized in the literature and may be the best starting point for future research. In practice, librarians can work to counteract systemic problems in the careful and equitable application of standards and their adaptation to local contexts.
-
Lee, H.-L.; Olson, H.A.: Hierarchical navigation : an exploration of Yahoo! directories (2005)
0.03
0.025319844 = product of:
0.05063969 = sum of:
0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02059882 = score(doc=3991,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
0.030040871 = product of:
0.060081743 = sum of:
0.060081743 = weight(_text_:organization in 3991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060081743 = score(doc=3991,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 3991, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3991)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Although researchers have theorized the critical importance of classification in the organization of information, the classification approach seems to have given way to the alphabetical subject approach in retrieval tools widely used in libraries, and research an how users utilize classification or classification-like arrangements in information seeking has been scant. To better understand whether searchers consider classificatory structures a viable alternative to information retrieval, this article reports an a study of how 24 library and information science students used Yahoo! directories, a popular search service resembling classification, in completing an assigned simple task. Several issues emerged from the students' reporting of their search process and a comparison between hierarchical navigation and keyword searching: citation order of facets, precision vs. recall, and other factors influencing searchers' successes and preferences. The latter included search expertise, knowledge of the discipline, and time required to complete the search. Without a definitive conclusion, we suggest a number of directoons for further research.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 32(2005) no.1, S.10-24
-
Olson, H.A.: Diversity in knowledge organization : Editorial (2001)
0.02
0.020027246 = product of:
0.080108985 = sum of:
0.080108985 = product of:
0.16021797 = sum of:
0.16021797 = weight(_text_:organization in 621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16021797 = score(doc=621,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.8913391 = fieldWeight in 621, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=621)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 28(2001) no.2, S.63-64
-
Olson, H.A.: Classification or organization : what's the difference (2001)
0.02
0.020027246 = product of:
0.080108985 = sum of:
0.080108985 = product of:
0.16021797 = sum of:
0.16021797 = weight(_text_:organization in 4525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16021797 = score(doc=4525,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.8913391 = fieldWeight in 4525, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4525)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 28(2001) no.1, S.1-3
-
Kublik, A.; Clevette, V.; Ward, D.; Olson, H.A.: Adapting dominant classifications to particular contexts (2003)
0.02
0.015770756 = product of:
0.03154151 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.021242103 = product of:
0.042484205 = sum of:
0.042484205 = weight(_text_:organization in 5516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042484205 = score(doc=5516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23635197 = fieldWeight in 5516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5516)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization and classification in international information retrieval"
-
Olson, H.A.: Transgressive deconstructions : feminist/postcolonial methodology for research in knowledge organization (2003)
0.01
0.012517029 = product of:
0.050068118 = sum of:
0.050068118 = product of:
0.100136235 = sum of:
0.100136235 = weight(_text_:organization in 3551) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.100136235 = score(doc=3551,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.55708694 = fieldWeight in 3551, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3551)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
-
Olson, H.A.; Boll, J.J.: Subject analysis in online catalogs (2001)
0.01
0.006195613 = product of:
0.024782453 = sum of:
0.024782453 = product of:
0.049564905 = sum of:
0.049564905 = weight(_text_:organization in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049564905 = score(doc=6113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.27574396 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.4, S.206-208 (C. Arsenault):"Overall, this is an excellent work, on an ever increasingly pertinent topic. This long-awaited second edition provides a thorough and comprehensive update of an already important text. I very highly recommend it to professionals and academics alike ; both neophytes and veterans will find it valuable. It is a fundamental work that cannot be ignored in the field of subject analysis and retrieval for all bibliographic systems, including online catalogs."
-
Olson, H.A.: Sameness and difference : a cultural foundation of classification (2001)
0.01
0.0059767957 = product of:
0.023907183 = sum of:
0.023907183 = product of:
0.047814365 = sum of:
0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047814365 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Olson, H.A.: ¬The ubiquitous hierarchy : an army to overcome the threat of a mob (2004)
0.00
0.004855188 = product of:
0.019420752 = sum of:
0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019420752 = score(doc=833,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 833, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=833)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- This article explores the connections between Melvil Dewey and Hegelianism and Charles Cutter and the Scottish Common Sense philosophers. It traces the practice of hierarchy from these philosophical influences to Dewey and Cutter and their legacy to today's Dewey Decimal Classification and Library of Congress Subject Headings. The ubiquity of hierarchy is linked to Dewey's and Cutter's metaphor of organizing the mob of information into an orderly army using the tool of logic.
- Footnote
- Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information
-
Olson, H.A.; Wolfram, D.: Syntagmatic relationships and indexing consistency on a larger scale (2008)
0.00
0.0030344925 = product of:
0.01213797 = sum of:
0.01213797 = weight(_text_:information in 2214) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01213797 = score(doc=2214,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2214, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2214)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this article is to examine interindexer consistency on a larger scale than other studies have done to determine if group consensus is reached by larger numbers of indexers and what, if any, relationships emerge between assigned terms. Design/methodology/approach - In total, 64 MLIS students were recruited to assign up to five terms to a document. The authors applied basic data modeling and the exploratory statistical techniques of multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) and hierarchical cluster analysis to determine whether relationships exist in indexing consistency and the coocurrence of assigned terms. Findings - Consistency in the assignment of indexing terms to a document follows an inverse shape, although it is not strictly power law-based unlike many other social phenomena. The exploratory techniques revealed that groups of terms clustered together. The resulting term cooccurrence relationships were largely syntagmatic. Research limitations/implications - The results are based on the indexing of one article by non-expert indexers and are, thus, not generalizable. Based on the study findings, along with the growing popularity of folksonomies and the apparent authority of communally developed information resources, communally developed indexes based on group consensus may have merit. Originality/value - Consistency in the assignment of indexing terms has been studied primarily on a small scale. Few studies have examined indexing on a larger scale with more than a handful of indexers. Recognition of the differences in indexing assignment has implications for the development of public information systems, especially those that do not use a controlled vocabulary and those tagged by end-users. In such cases, multiple access points that accommodate the different ways that users interpret content are needed so that searchers may be guided to relevant content despite using different terminology.
-
Olson, H.A.: Difference, culture and change : the untrapped potential of LCSH (2000)
0.00
0.0030039945 = product of:
0.012015978 = sum of:
0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 5610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012015978 = score(doc=5610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5610)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Library of Congress Subject Headings have traditionally attempted to reflect reality neutrally. The result is bias in representing cultural margins. While neutrality is one of the ethical stances espoused by librarianship, another is universal and equitable access to information for the betterment of humanity. This paper views LCSH as a potential tool for cultural change using Homi Bhabha's postcolonial concept of a Third Space as a model. LCSH functions as a Third Space where the meanings of documents are constructed and enunciated for library users. Therefore, it is in LCSH that there is potential for instigating change
-
Olson, H.A.: Cultural discourse of classification : indigeous alternatives to the tradition of Aristotle, Durkheim, and Foucault (2001)
0.00
0.0030039945 = product of:
0.012015978 = sum of:
0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 1594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012015978 = score(doc=1594,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1594, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1594)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Imprint
- Medford, NJ : Information Today
-
Wolfram, D.; Olson, H.A.; Bloom, R.: Measuring consistency for multiple taggers using vector space modeling (2009)
0.00
0.0025748524 = product of:
0.01029941 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 3113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=3113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3113)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.10, S.1995-2003
