-
Thomas, D.H.: ¬The effect of interface design on item selection in an online catalog (2001)
0.05
0.048590284 = product of:
0.064787045 = sum of:
0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006866273 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
0.044259522 = weight(_text_:standards in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044259522 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.19697142 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
0.013661247 = product of:
0.027322493 = sum of:
0.027322493 = weight(_text_:22 in 168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027322493 = score(doc=168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=168)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.75 = coord(3/4)
- Abstract
- The effect that content and layout of bibliographic displays had on the ability of end-users to process catalog information was tested using a 2 x 2 factorial experimental design. Participants were asked to perform two related tasks during the course of the experiment. In the first task, they were asked to select a set of items that they would examine further for a hypothetical paper they must write, using a simulated online catalog to make their assessments of relevance. In the second task, they were asked to examine 20 bibliographic records, decide whether they would choose to examine these items further on the shelf, and identify the data elements that they used to formulate their relevance decision. One group viewed bibliographic records on an interface similar to current online catalogs, one that used data labels and contained data elements commonly found. A second group viewed these records on an interface in which the labels had been removed, but the data elements were the same as those in the first. The third group viewed these records on a labeled display that included enhanced data elements on the brief record display. The final group viewed these records with the same brief record data elements as the third group, but with the labels removed, using ISBD and AACR2 punctuation standards. For the first task, participants using enhanced brief screen interfaces viewed more brief screens and fewer full screens than their counterparts. Screen durations for the second 10 screens were found to have dropped from those of the first 10 screens. Statistical analyses comparing demographic variables to the screen frequencies uncovered many significant differences. Participants using the enhanced-content interfaces made fewer selections from index and full screens, and more selections from brief screens. For the second task, participants who used enhanced-content interfaces were able to make some sort of relevance judgment more frequently than those who used standard-content interfaces.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Barrierefreies E-Government : Leitfaden für Entscheidungsträger, Grafiker und Programmierer (2005)
0.03
0.034729347 = product of:
0.06945869 = sum of:
0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006866273 = score(doc=4881,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.06259242 = weight(_text_:standards in 4881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06259242 = score(doc=4881,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.27855965 = fieldWeight in 4881, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4881)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 56(2005) H.8, S.459 (W. Schweibenz): "Der Leitfaden ist Teil des Handbuchs für sicheres E-Govemment, das vom Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der Informationstechnik herausgegeben wird und als Nachschlagewerk und zentrale Informationsbörse mit Empfehlungscharakter konzipiert ist. Die Publikation stellt in sechs Abschnitten alle wichtigen Aspekte für ein barrierefreies EGovernment dar, die inhaltlich auch auf private Web-Angebote übertragen werden können. Ein besonderes Anliegen des Leitfadens ist es, den Entscheidungsträgern die Notwendigkeit eines barrierefreien Internets zu erklären. Dies geschieht im ersten Abschnitt, in dem ausgehend von der mangelhafte Benutzungsfreundlichkeit des Internets im Allgemeinen die Bedürfnisse behinderter Menschen im Besonderen beschrieben werden. In anschaulicher Weise mit Beispielen und Bildern werden die Probleme folgender Benutzergruppen dargestellt: - sehbehinderte und blinde Menschen, - hörgeschädigte und gehörlose Menschen, - kognitiv eingeschränkte und konzentrationsschwache Menschen, - Menschen mit Epilepsie, - manuell-motorisch eingeschränkte Menschen. Dies kann Lesern helfen, sich die Probleme von Menschen mit Behinderungen zu vergegenwärtigen, bevor sie im zweiten Abschnitt auf zehn Seiten mit dem deutschen Gesetze und Richtlinien konfrontiert werden. Der Abschnitt 3 Anleitung zur Gestaltung barrierefreier Internet-Seiten gibt Programmierern und Designem konkrete Hinweise welche Techniken in HTML und CSS wie eingesetzt werden müssen, um Barrierefreiheit zu erreichen. Dies reicht von Fragen der Wahmehmbarkeit (Textäquivalente für Audio- und visuelle Inhalte, Schrift und Farbe) über generelle Aspekte der Bedienbarkeit (Orientierung und Navigation, Frames, eingebettete Benutzerschnittstellen, Formulare) und der allgemeinen Verständlichkeit (Sprache, Abkürzungen, Akronyme) bis zur Einhaltung von Standards (W3C unterstützte Formate, Einhaltung von Markup-Standards, Rückwärtskompatibilität, Geräteunabhängigkeit, Kompatibilität mit assistiven Technologien). Im Abschnitt 4 wird die Kommunikation im Internet betrachtet, wobei vor allem auf Fragen des E-Mail-Verkehrs und der Sicherheit eingegangen wird, Aspekte die für alle Internet-Benutzer interessant sind. Im Abschnitt 5 wird dargestellt, wie Internet-Seiten auf Barrierefreiheit geprüft werden können. Neben Testmethoden technischer Art (Evaluierung durch verschiedene Browser und Prüfprogramme) und mit behinderten Benutzern wird auch auf die Frage der Oualitätssiegel für Barrierefreiheit eingegangen und existierende Testsymbole werden vorgestellt. Ein sechster Abschnitt mit Links und Literatur rundet den Leitfaden ab und verweist interessierte Leser weiter."
-
Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002)
0.03
0.03273274 = product of:
0.06546548 = sum of:
0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017165681 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.0482998 = product of:
0.0965996 = sum of:
0.0965996 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0965996 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:17:40
-
Fidel, R.; Pejtersen, A.M.; Cleal, B.; Bruce, H.: ¬A multidimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction : a case study of collaborative information retrieval (2004)
0.03
0.029586 = product of:
0.059172 = sum of:
0.02913113 = weight(_text_:information in 2997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02913113 = score(doc=2997,freq=16.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 2997, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2997)
0.030040871 = product of:
0.060081743 = sum of:
0.060081743 = weight(_text_:organization in 2997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060081743 = score(doc=2997,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.33425218 = fieldWeight in 2997, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2997)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- While most research in the area of human-information behavior has focused an a single dimension-either the psychological or the social-this case study demonstrated the importance of a multidimensional approach. The Cognitive Work Analysis framework guided this field study of one event of collaborative information retrieval (CIR) carried out by design engineers at Microsoft, including observations and interviews. Various dimensions explained the motives for this CIR event and the challenges the participants encountered: the cognitive dimension, the specific task and decision, the organization of the teamwork, and the organizational culture. Even though it is difficult at times to separate one dimension from another, and all are interdependent, the analysis uncovered several reasons for design engineers to engage in CIR, such as when they are new to the organization or the team, when the information lends itself to various interpretations, or when most of the needed information is not documented. Similar multidimensional studies will enhance our understanding of human-information behavior.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2004) no.11, S.939-953
-
Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006)
0.03
0.027311075 = product of:
0.05462215 = sum of:
0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020812286 = score(doc=5295,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.033809863 = product of:
0.067619726 = sum of:
0.067619726 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067619726 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:56:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.792-796
-
Callahan, E.: Interface design and culture (2004)
0.03
0.026984949 = product of:
0.053969897 = sum of:
0.009710376 = weight(_text_:information in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009710376 = score(doc=4281,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
0.044259522 = weight(_text_:standards in 4281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044259522 = score(doc=4281,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.19697142 = fieldWeight in 4281, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4281)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- It is common knowledge that computer interfaces in different cultures vary. Interface designers present information in different languages, use different iconography to designate concepts, and employ different standards for dates, time, and numbers. These manifest differences beg the question of how easily an interface designed in one country can be used in and transferred to another country. Are the challenges involved in adaptation merely cosmetic or are they shaped by more profound forces? Do all cultures respond to interfaces in similar ways, or does culture itself shape user comprehension? If culture is a factor in explaining varied user reactions to comparable interfaces, what specific cultural dimensions are responsible for the divergences? Do differences reside mainly at the level of national cultures, or do they depend an other variables such as class, gender, age, education, and expertise with technology? In the face of a potentially large number of explanatory variables, how do we delimit a workable concept of culture and yet remain cognizant of other factors that might shape the results of culture and interface research? Questions such as these have been asked in the ergonomics community since the early 1970s, when the industrialization of developing countries created a need for more research an cultural differences (Honold, 1999), resulting in an increased interest in the universal applicability of ergonomic principles. This trend continued after the reunification of Germany and the emergence of market economies in Eastern Europe (Nielsen, 1990). In the mid-1990s, as markets outside the U.S. rapidly expanded, it became necessary to develop appropriate user interfaces for non-Western cultures in order to facilitate international cooperation. This fresh impetus for research led to the development of practical guidelines and a body of Gase studies and examples of possible solutions. Most recently we have seen attempts to provide a theoretical foundation for cross-cultural usability engineering and experimental comparison studies (Honold, 1999).
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 39(2005), S.257-310
-
Vaughan, M.W.; Resnick, M.L.: Search user interfaces : best practices and future visions (2006)
0.03
0.025659401 = product of:
0.051318802 = sum of:
0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017165681 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
0.03415312 = product of:
0.06830624 = sum of:
0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 5191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06830624 = score(doc=5191,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5191, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5191)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:37:31
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.777-780
-
Barrierefreies Webdesign : Praxishandbuch für Webgestaltung und grafische Programmoberflächen (2005)
0.03
0.025562897 = product of:
0.051125795 = sum of:
0.006866273 = weight(_text_:information in 4882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006866273 = score(doc=4882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 4882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4882)
0.044259522 = weight(_text_:standards in 4882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044259522 = score(doc=4882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.19697142 = fieldWeight in 4882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4882)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 56(2005) H.8, S.459 (W. Schweibenz): "Das Buch behandelt in sechs Kapiteln und einem umfangreichen Anhang die barrierefreie Zugänglichkeit von Web-Anwendungen. Es wurde von einem vierzehn Personen umfassenden Autorenteam geschrieben und kann inzwischen als eines der deutschsprachigen Standardwerke zu diesem Thema gelten. Die erste Auflage war nach ihrem Erscheinen im Oktober 2004 binnen weniger Wochen ausverkauft, bereits im Dezember 2004 wurde die zweite Auflage herausgebracht. Das erste Kapitel erläutert Grundlagen und Notwendigkeit der barrierefreien Informationstechnik. Dabei erhalten die Leser Einblick in die Schwierigkeiten, die sich für Menschen mit Behinderungen bei der Computerbenutzung ergeben und mit welchen Hilfsmitteln diese Probleme gelöst oder zumindest reduziert werden können. Weiterhin wird auch auf die gesetzlichen Vorgaben in der BRD und die Umsetzungsrichtlinien der Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) eingegangen, wobei sich diese Ausführungen allgemein gehalten sind und nur den Bereich des Bundes behandeln; die rechtlichen Gegebenheiten auf Länderebene dagegen werden nicht dargestellt. Die folgenden Kapitel des Buches richten sich überwiegend an Leser mit technischen Interessen bzw. Kenntnissen und vermitteln eine praxisnahe Anleitung zur technischen Umsetzung von Barrierefreiheit, die sich an den inhaltlich orientierten Anforderungen der Barrierefreie Informationstechnik-Verordnung (BITV) orientiert. Behandelt werden Web-Standards wie (X)HTML und CSS, wobei ausführlich auf Fragen der Geräteunabhängigkeit und Validierung eingegangen wird, aber auch auf Anwendungen wie JavaScript und multimediale Anwendungen wie Macromedia Flash oder druckähnliche Ausgabeformate wie PDF (Portable Document Format), das entgegen verbreiteter Annahmen nicht per se barrierefrei ist. Ein eigenes Kapitel zur barrierefreien Gestaltung von grafischen Programmoberflächen gibt Einblick in die IBM-Leitlinien zur Barrierefreiheit. Der Praxisteil mit Tipps zum Testen von Barrierefreiheit und zur Projektdurchführung rundet das Buch ab. Der Anhang enthält den Text der BITV sowie ein Glossar technischer Begriffe. Die CD-ROM - selbstverständlich barrierefrei gestaltet - zeigt zahlreiche Medien-Clips sowie Beispiele, Anleitungen und Demonstrationen. Für technisch orientierte Leser bietet das Buch eine umfassende Einführung in die wichtigsten Fragen zur Barrierefreiheit im Web. Dies reicht von der Fragestellung,was unter Barrierefreiheit zu verstehen ist, über rechtliche Fragen sowie Richtlinien bis zur praktischen Umsetzung. Für die Zielgruppe, die mit Web-Entwickler, Web-Designer, Web-Programmierern und Online-Redakteuren angegeben wird, bietet das Buch eine vollständige und gut nachvollziehbare Handreichung, die sich durch ihren hohen Praxisbezug auszeichnet."
-
Ju, B.; Gluck, M.: User-Process Model Approach to Improve User Interface Usability (2005)
0.03
0.025134712 = product of:
0.050269425 = sum of:
0.014865918 = weight(_text_:information in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014865918 = score(doc=3262,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.035403505 = product of:
0.07080701 = sum of:
0.07080701 = weight(_text_:organization in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07080701 = score(doc=3262,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.39391994 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Our purpose in this study is to inductively reorganize software interface menu items based an a user's process model. The proposed menu interface in this study used direct users' input, such as goals and strategies for solving their information needs, to reorganize and re-label menus. To assess its effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction with actual users, we implemented and compared this new menu version to the original interface that was based upon a traditional categorical menu organization. The significance of this study is that it incorporates user process modeling into the design of the user interface, providing insights into the impact of such modeling an the usability of an information system. Results from the usability testing do indicate that the proposed menu and the traditional menu are similarly effective for users in terms of task completion time and accuracy. User preferences and debriefing comments from usability testing also indicate users preferred the user-process based arrangement of menu items as displayed. However, the types of tasks (different problem type) suggest significant differences for results in task completion time and in accuracy, sometimes favoring the new version. In other words, usable and effective menu organization depends more an the types of tasks and the domain of knowledge than mere menu organization, although menu organization is a factor in the process.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(2005) no.10, S.1098-1112
-
Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006)
0.02
0.024811499 = product of:
0.049622998 = sum of:
0.02913113 = weight(_text_:information in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02913113 = score(doc=5298,freq=16.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
0.02049187 = product of:
0.04098374 = sum of:
0.04098374 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04098374 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The authors describe user interface tools based on search histories to support legal information seekers. The design of the tools was informed by the results of a user study (Komlodi, 2002a) that examined the use of human memory, external memory aids, and search histories in legal information seeking and derived interface design recommendations for information storage and retrieval systems. The data collected were analyzed to identify potential task areas where search histories can support information seeking and use. The results show that many information-seeking tasks can take advantage of automatically and manually recorded history information. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools building on search history information: direct search history displays, history-enabled scratchpad facilities, and organized results collection tools.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:04:19
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.803-897
-
Rose, D.E.: Reconciling information-seeking behavior with search user interfaces for the Web (2006)
0.02
0.023969568 = product of:
0.047939137 = sum of:
0.024031956 = weight(_text_:information in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024031956 = score(doc=5296,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
0.023907183 = product of:
0.047814365 = sum of:
0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047814365 = score(doc=5296,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5296, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5296)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- User interfaces of Web search engines reflect attributes of the underlying tools used to create them, rather than what we know about how people look for information. In this article, the author examines several characteristics of user search behavior: the variety of information-seeking goals, the cultural and situational context of search, and the iterative nature of the search task. An analysis of these characteristics suggests ways that interfaces can be redesigned to make searching more effective for users.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:58:06
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.797-799
-
Binding, C.; Tudhope, D.: Integrating faceted structure into the search process (2004)
0.02
0.023545908 = product of:
0.047091816 = sum of:
0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01029941 = score(doc=2627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.036792405 = product of:
0.07358481 = sum of:
0.07358481 = weight(_text_:organization in 2627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07358481 = score(doc=2627,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.40937364 = fieldWeight in 2627, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The nature of search requirements is perceived to be changing, fuelled by a growing dissatisfaction with the marginal accuracy and often overwhelming quantity of results from simple keyword matching techniques. Traditional search interfaces fail to acknowledge and utilise the implicit underlying structure present within a typical keyword query. Faceted structure can (and should) perform a significant role in this area - acting as the basis for mediation between searcher and indexer, and guiding query formulation and reformulation by interactively educating the user about the native domain. This paper discusses the possible benefits of applying faceted knowledge organization systems to enhance query structure, query visualisation and the overall query process, drawing an the outcomes of a recently completed research project.
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
-
Hendry, D.G.: Workspaces for search (2006)
0.02
0.022359734 = product of:
0.04471947 = sum of:
0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 5297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020812286 = score(doc=5297,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5297, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5297)
0.023907183 = product of:
0.047814365 = sum of:
0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047814365 = score(doc=5297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Progress in search interfaces requires vigorous inquiry into how search features can be embedded into application environments such as those for decision-making, personal information collecting, and designing. Progress can be made by focusing on mid-level descriptions of how search components can draw upon and update workspace content and structure. The immediate goal is to advance our understanding of how to shape and exploit context in search. The long-term goal is to develop an interdisciplinary design resource that enables stakeholders in the computing, social, and information sciences to more richly impact each others' work.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:01:11
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.800-802
-
Crüger, I.: Farbentheorie und Farbgestaltung (2000)
0.02
0.02052752 = product of:
0.04105504 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 15.12.2000 20:22:37
- Source
- nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 51(2000) H.8, S.473-482
-
Davis, L.: Designing a search user interface for a digital library (2006)
0.02
0.02052752 = product of:
0.04105504 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=5294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=5294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5294)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 17:48:54
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.788-791
-
Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006)
0.02
0.02052752 = product of:
0.04105504 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:17:44
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.808-812
-
Roto, V.: Search on mobile phones. (2006)
0.02
0.02052752 = product of:
0.04105504 = sum of:
0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013732546 = score(doc=5304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.027322493 = product of:
0.054644987 = sum of:
0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054644987 = score(doc=5304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5304)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:35:39
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.834-837
-
Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006)
0.02
0.020450171 = product of:
0.040900342 = sum of:
0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01699316 = score(doc=5287,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.023907183 = product of:
0.047814365 = sum of:
0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047814365 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:37:49
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.838-842
-
Wildemuth, B.M.: Evidence-based practice in search interface design (2006)
0.02
0.020450171 = product of:
0.040900342 = sum of:
0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01699316 = score(doc=5302,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.023907183 = product of:
0.047814365 = sum of:
0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 5302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047814365 = score(doc=5302,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5302, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5302)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are best practices and incorporate them into future search interfaces.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:30:09
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.825-828
-
Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, G.G.: Using DDC to create a visual knowledge map as an aid to online information retrieval (2004)
0.02
0.020313032 = product of:
0.040626064 = sum of:
0.020598818 = weight(_text_:information in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020598818 = score(doc=2643,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.020027246 = product of:
0.040054493 = sum of:
0.040054493 = weight(_text_:organization in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040054493 = score(doc=2643,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.050415643 = queryNorm
0.22283478 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- 1. Introduction Web search engines and digital libraries usually expect the users to use search terms that most accurately represent their information needs. Finding the most appropriate search terms to represent an information need is an age old problem in information retrieval. Keyword or phrase search may produce good search results as long as the search terms or phrase(s) match those used by the authors and have been chosen for indexing by the concerned information retrieval system. Since this does not always happen, a large number of false drops are produced by information retrieval systems. The retrieval results become worse in very large systems that deal with millions of records, such as the Web search engines and digital libraries. Vocabulary control tools are used to improve the performance of text retrieval systems. Thesauri, the most common type of vocabulary control tool used in information retrieval, appeared in the late fifties, designed for use with the emerging post-coordinate indexing systems of that time. They are used to exert terminology control in indexing, and to aid in searching by allowing the searcher to select appropriate search terms. A large volume of literature exists describing the design features, and experiments with the use, of thesauri in various types of information retrieval systems (see for example, Furnas et.al., 1987; Bates, 1986, 1998; Milstead, 1997, and Shiri et al., 2002).
- Series
- Advances in knowledge organization; vol.9
- Source
- Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
