Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  • × theme_ss:"Rechtsfragen"
  1. Eskens, S.: ¬The personal information sphere : an integral approach to privacy and related information and communication rights (2020) 0.01 
    0.007432959 = product of:
  0.029731836 = sum of:
    0.029731836 = weight(_text_:information in 5941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029731836 = score(doc=5941,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 5941, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5941)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Data protection laws, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, regulate aspects of online personalization. However, the data protection lens is too narrow to analyze personalization. To define conditions for personalization, we should understand data protection in its larger fundamental rights context, starting with the closely connected right to privacy. If the right to privacy is considered along with other European fundamental rights that protect information and communication flows, namely, communications confidentiality; the right to receive information; and freedom of expression, opinion, and thought, these rights are observed to enable what I call a "personal information sphere" for each person. This notion highlights how privacy interferences affect other fundamental rights. The personal information sphere is grounded in European case law and is thus not just an academic affair. The essence of the personal information sphere is control, yet with a different meaning than mere control as guaranteed by data protection law. The personal information sphere is about people controlling how they situate themselves in information and communication networks. It follows that, to respect privacy and related rights, online personalization providers should actively involve users in the personalization process and enable them to use personalization for personal goals.
    Series
    Special issue: Information privacy in the digital age
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(2020) no.9, S.1116-1128
    Theme
    Information
  2. Brettschneider, P.: Urheberrecht (2023) 0.00 
    0.0030039945 = product of:
  0.012015978 = sum of:
    0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012015978 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In einer digitalen Wissensgesellschaft kommt dem Urheberrecht eine herausragende Bedeutung zu. Es ist - wie auch das Datenschutzrecht (s. Kapitel F 4 Informationelle Selbstbestimmung und Informationsfreiheit) - Kernbestandteil eines Kommunikationsrechts, das die Weitergabe und Nutzung von Informationen regelt. Daher mag es paradox klingen, dass das Urheberrecht Informationen - wie auch Ideen oder (wissenschaftliche) Theorien - überhaupt nicht schützt.1 Vielmehr greift sein Schutz erst, wenn sich Information z. B. in Form eines gedruckten oder digitalen Textes oder auch einer Rede manifestiert. Dieser richtet sich dann aber nicht auf den Informationsgehalt an sich, sondern seine Verkörperung in Form eines originellen und individuellen Werkes (s. Abschnitt 2 und 3).
  3. Ciesielska, M.; Jemielniak, D.: Fairness in digital sharing legal professional attitudes toward digital piracy and digital commons (2022) 0.00 
    0.0025748524 = product of:
  0.01029941 = sum of:
    0.01029941 = weight(_text_:information in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01029941 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.7, S.899-912

Authors

Languages