Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × author_ss:"Cronin, B."
  1. Cronin, B.; Overfeldt, K.; Fouchereaux, K.; Manzvanzvike, T.; Cha, M.; Sona, E.: ¬The Internet and competitive intelligence : a survey of current practice (1994) 0.01
    0.013782452 = product of:
      0.050535657 = sum of:
        0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005411029 = score(doc=529,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=529,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
        0.042347 = weight(_text_:k in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042347 = score(doc=529,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet has the potential to become a major strategic information tool for commercial enterprises. many companies, large and small, are already using the Internet to gain an edge in an increasingly competitive business environment, both domestically and internationally. It may well be that the Internet is the next major phase in the evolution of the competitive intelligence function in advanced organizations, especially as commercialization of the network intensifies. Describes an exploratory study of business use of the Internet for competitive intelligence purposes
    Source
    International journal of information management. 14(1994) no.3, S.204-222
    Type
    a
  2. Cronin, B.; Overfeldt, K.; Fouchereaux, K.; Manzvanzvike, T.; Cha, M.; Sona, E.: Internet-sourced competitive intelligence (1994) 0.01
    0.010658912 = product of:
      0.039082676 = sum of:
        0.0052392064 = weight(_text_:a in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0052392064 = score(doc=539,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
        0.03176025 = weight(_text_:k in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03176025 = score(doc=539,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.33466667 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Little research has been reported on how the Internet is being used to source corporate competitive intelligence. An exploratory study was conducted to explore current practice and future potential. A request for participants was posted to business-oriented listservs and Usenet newsgroups. Respondents were sent an open-ended survey which addressed three topics: a) the Internet as a source of competitive edge; b) ways in which the Internet could make their firm mor competitive, and c) security and other usage-related issues from the corporate perspective. Findings suggest that the Internet is being used as a tool for monitoring the external environment, locating distributed experts, engaging in informal know-how trading, and conducting market research. Respondents foresee greater use of the Internet in the context of the competitive intelligence function, and generally have few reservations about using the Internet
    Pages
    S.87-92
    Type
    a
  3. Cronin, B.: Vernacular and vehicular language (2009) 0.01
    0.009692967 = product of:
      0.03554088 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
        0.025212929 = product of:
          0.050425857 = sum of:
            0.050425857 = weight(_text_:22 in 7192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050425857 = score(doc=7192,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7192, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7192)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 11:44:11
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.3, S.433
    Type
    a
  4. Cronin, B.: Thinking about data (2013) 0.01
    0.009692967 = product of:
      0.03554088 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
        0.025212929 = product of:
          0.050425857 = sum of:
            0.050425857 = weight(_text_:22 in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050425857 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 16:18:36
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.3, S.435-436
    Type
    a
  5. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: ¬A cast of thousands : Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy (2003) 0.01
    0.009475556 = product of:
      0.034743704 = sum of:
        0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006112407 = score(doc=1731,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=1731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
        0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02620087 = score(doc=1731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th-century scholarship by analyzing and classifying more than 4,500 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that the intensity of acknowledgment varies by discipline, reflecting differences in prevailing sociocognitive structures and work practices. We demonstrate that the acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing, one that provides a revealing insight into the nature and extent of subauthorship collaboration. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of collaboration and the increasing division of labor in contemporary research and scholarship.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.9, S.855-871
    Type
    a
  6. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.; LaBarre, K.: Visible, Less Visible, and Invisible Work : Patterns of Collaboration in 20th Century Chemistry (2004) 0.01
    0.009475556 = product of:
      0.034743704 = sum of:
        0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006112407 = score(doc=2094,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
        0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 2094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02620087 = score(doc=2094,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2094, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2094)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    We chronicle the use of acknowledgments in 20th century chemistry by analyzing and classifying over 2,000 specimens covering a 100-year period. Our results show that acknowledgment has gradually established itself as a constitutive element of academic writing- one that provides a revealing insight into the structural nature of subauthorship collaboration in science. Complementary data an rates of coauthorship are also presented to highlight the growing importance of teamwork and the increasing division of labor in contemporary chemistry. The results of this study are compared with the findings of a parallel study of collaboration in both the social sciences and the humanities.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.2, S.160-168
    Type
    a
  7. Cronin, B.; Overfelt, K.: ¬The scholar's courtesy : a survey of acknowledgement behaviour (1994) 0.01
    0.009099804 = product of:
      0.033365946 = sum of:
        0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047346503 = score(doc=2461,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
        0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 2461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02620087 = score(doc=2461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 2461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2461)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Scholars in major US research universities were surveyed to explore the normative bases of acknowledgement behaviour. Measures of agreement and divergence were established in respect of five issue sets pertaining to acknowledgement practice: expectations, etiquette, ethics, equity and evaluation. The results confirm the substantive role played by acknowledgements in the primary communication process. Although few formal rules exist, it is clear that many scholars subscribe to the idea of a governing etiquette. The findings also suggest that acknowledgement data could be mined to lay bare the rules of engagement that define the dynamics of collaboration and interdependence among scholars
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 50(1994) no.3, S.165-196
    Type
    a
  8. Cronin, B.: ¬The writing on the wall (2015) 0.01
    0.008308258 = product of:
      0.030463612 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
        0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041664424 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
        0.021611081 = product of:
          0.043222163 = sum of:
            0.043222163 = weight(_text_:22 in 7297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043222163 = score(doc=7297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 7297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Date
    26. 4.2015 19:27:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.5, S.873-875
    Type
    a
  9. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Knowledge management : Semantic drift or conceptual shift? (2000) 0.01
    0.0077569215 = product of:
      0.028442044 = sum of:
        0.0055226083 = weight(_text_:a in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055226083 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
        0.0049101994 = weight(_text_:s in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0049101994 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
        0.018009236 = product of:
          0.036018472 = sum of:
            0.036018472 = weight(_text_:22 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036018472 = score(doc=2277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2001 20:22:57
    Footnote
    Thematisierung der Verschiebung des Verständnisses von Wissensmanagement; vgl. auch: Day, R.E.: Totality and representation: a history of knowledge management ... in: JASIS 52(2001) no.9, S.725-735
    Source
    Journal of education for library and information science. 41(2000) no.?, S.294-306
    Type
    a
  10. Cronin, B.; Meho, L.I.: Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists (2006) 0.01
    0.0064171823 = product of:
      0.023529667 = sum of:
        0.014503922 = product of:
          0.029007845 = sum of:
            0.029007845 = weight(_text_:h in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029007845 = score(doc=196,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=196,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=196,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 196, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=196)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The authors apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information science. Faculty rankings based on raw citation counts are compared with those based on h-counts. There is a strong positive correlation between the two sets of rankings. It is shown how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar's research output over time in more nuanced fashion than straight citation counts.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1275-1278
    Type
    a
  11. Cronin, B.; Snyder, H.; Atkins, H.: Comparative citation rankings of authors in mongraphic and journal literature : a study of sociology (1997) 0.00
    0.004601283 = product of:
      0.01687137 = sum of:
        0.008973843 = product of:
          0.017947687 = sum of:
            0.017947687 = weight(_text_:h in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017947687 = score(doc=4709,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=4709,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 4709) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=4709,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4709, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4709)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a study which examined the scholarly literature of sociology. Tens of thousands of references from monographs and leading academic journals were analyzed. The relative rankings of authors who were highly cited in the monographic literature did not change in the journal literature of the same period. However, there was only a small overlap between the most highly cited authors based on the journal sample and those based on the monograph sample. The lack of correlation suggests that there may be 2 distinct populations of highly cited authors
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 53(1997) no.3, S.263-273
    Type
    a
  12. Cronin, B.; Snyder, H.W.; Rosembaum, H.; Martinson, A.; Callahan, E.: Invoked on the Web (1998) 0.00
    0.0039402754 = product of:
      0.014447676 = sum of:
        0.007251961 = product of:
          0.014503922 = sum of:
            0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014503922 = score(doc=2327,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044180867 = score(doc=2327,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=2327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2327)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.14, S.1319-1328
    Type
    a
  13. Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995) 0.00
    0.003329531 = product of:
      0.01220828 = sum of:
        0.0054389704 = product of:
          0.010877941 = sum of:
            0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010877941 = score(doc=1825,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=1825,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=1825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
    Source
    Journal of information science. 21(1995) no.2, S.75-85
    Type
    a
  14. Davenport, L.; Cronin, B.: What does hypertext offer the information scientist? (1989) 0.00
    0.002146068 = product of:
      0.011803374 = sum of:
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=5293,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5293, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5293)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 15(1989) no.6, S.369-372
    Type
    a
  15. Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: Social intelligence (1993) 0.00
    0.002146068 = product of:
      0.011803374 = sum of:
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 7239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=7239,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 7239, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7239)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 28(1993), S.1-44
    Type
    a
  16. Davenport, E.; Cronin, B.: Hypertext and the conduct of science (1990) 0.00
    0.002146068 = product of:
      0.011803374 = sum of:
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 5378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=5378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5378)
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=5378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5378)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 46(1990) no.3, S.175-192
    Type
    a
  17. Cronin, B.: Standing on ceremony (2013) 0.00
    0.0018778095 = product of:
      0.010327952 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.7, S.1309-1310
    Type
    a
  18. Cronin, B.: Peer review (2011) 0.00
    0.0018778095 = product of:
      0.010327952 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=1922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 1922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=1922,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1922, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1922)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.7, S.1215
    Type
    a
  19. Cronin, B.: Meta-life (2014) 0.00
    0.0018778095 = product of:
      0.010327952 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 2207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=2207,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2207, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2207)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.3, S.431-432
    Type
    a
  20. Cronin, B.: ¬The evolving indicator space (iSpace) (2013) 0.00
    0.0018778095 = product of:
      0.010327952 = sum of:
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 4128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=4128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4128)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1523-1525
    Type
    a