Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"DeHart, F.E."
  • × theme_ss:"Preserved Context Index System (PRECIS)"
  1. DeHart, F.E.; Glazier, J.: Computer searching on PRECIS : an exploration of measuring comparative retrieval effectiveness (1984) 0.00
    0.001302741 = product of:
      0.0071650753 = sum of:
        0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047346503 = score(doc=828,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 828) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=828,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 828, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=828)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Designing research on the retrieval effectiveness of computer searches on PRECIS compared with retrieval effectiveness of searches on other types of subject analysis used in computer-based information sources is a complex process. This paper explores the complexity of measuring comparative retrieval effectiveness through a comparison of the subject analysis provided by the PRECIS system for fifty articles with the subject analysis provided for the same articles by three computer-based information sources: ERIC/CIJE, LLBA/Online and PsycINFO. Objectives are: (1) to discover factors that should be taken into account when designing this type of research; and (2) to identify extraneous variables that work against internal validity in research design .
    Source
    International classification. 11(1984), S.3-8
    Type
    a