-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.03
0.02630602 = product of:
0.072341554 = sum of:
0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039050733 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.045517046 = weight(_text_:r in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045517046 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.5172279 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.0049101994 = weight(_text_:s in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049101994 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.018009236 = product of:
0.036018472 = sum of:
0.036018472 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036018472 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
- Footnote
- This article corrects: Thoughts on uncitedness: Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies in: JASIST 62(2011) no,8, S.1637-1644.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: ¬A universal method of information retrieval evaluation : the "missing" link M and the universal IR surface (2004)
0.02
0.018754918 = product of:
0.051576026 = sum of:
0.0052392064 = weight(_text_:a in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052392064 = score(doc=2558,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.03344806 = weight(_text_:r in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03344806 = score(doc=2558,freq=6.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.38008332 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.010805541 = product of:
0.021611081 = sum of:
0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021611081 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- The paper shows that the present evaluation methods in information retrieval (basically recall R and precision P and in some cases fallout F ) lack universal comparability in the sense that their values depend on the generality of the IR problem. A solution is given by using all "parts" of the database, including the non-relevant documents and also the not-retrieved documents. It turns out that the solution is given by introducing the measure M being the fraction of the not-retrieved documents that are relevant (hence the "miss" measure). We prove that - independent of the IR problem or of the IR action - the quadruple (P,R,F,M) belongs to a universal IR surface, being the same for all IR-activities. This universality is then exploited by defining a new measure for evaluation in IR allowing for unbiased comparisons of all IR results. We also show that only using one, two or even three measures from the set {P,R,F,M} necessary leads to evaluation measures that are non-universal and hence not capable of comparing different IR situations.
- Date
- 14. 8.2004 19:17:22
- Source
- Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.1, S.21-30
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬An h-index weighted by citation impact (2008)
0.02
0.018541802 = product of:
0.050989952 = sum of:
0.016215878 = product of:
0.032431755 = sum of:
0.032431755 = weight(_text_:h in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032431755 = score(doc=695,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=695,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- An h-type index is proposed which depends on the obtained citations of articles belonging to the h-core. This weighted h-index, denoted as hw, is presented in a continuous setting and in a discrete one. It is shown that in a continuous setting the new index enjoys many good properties. In the discrete setting some small deviations from the ideal may occur.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.770-780
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.02
0.016912865 = product of:
0.062013835 = sum of:
0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022529786 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.037053622 = weight(_text_:k in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037053622 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Classification
- BCGS (FH K)
- GHBS
- BCGS (FH K)
- Pages
- XI,450 S
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009)
0.02
0.016642686 = product of:
0.045767386 = sum of:
0.010255822 = product of:
0.020511644 = sum of:
0.020511644 = weight(_text_:h in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020511644 = score(doc=6759,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0069856085 = weight(_text_:a in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0069856085 = score(doc=6759,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Using a power-law model, the two best-known topics in citation analysis, namely the impact factor and the Hirsch index, are unified into one relation (not a function). The validity of our model is, at least in a qualitative way, confirmed by real data.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2362-2365
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012)
0.02
0.01613425 = product of:
0.04436919 = sum of:
0.0155431535 = product of:
0.031086307 = sum of:
0.031086307 = weight(_text_:h in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031086307 = score(doc=243,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.47066164 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.003865826 = weight(_text_:a in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003865826 = score(doc=243,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022529786 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Based on earlier results about the shifted Lotka function, we prove an implicit functional relation between the Hirsch index (h-index) and the total number of sources (T). It is shown that the corresponding function, h(T), is concavely increasing. Next, we construct an implicit relation between the h-index and the impact factor IF (an average number of items per source). The corresponding function h(IF) is increasing and we show that if the parameter C in the numerator of the shifted Lotka function is high, then the relation between the h-index and the impact factor is almost linear.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.1048-1053
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011)
0.02
0.015503381 = product of:
0.042634297 = sum of:
0.0076918663 = product of:
0.0153837325 = sum of:
0.0153837325 = weight(_text_:h in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0153837325 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046860883 = score(doc=4994,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.027310224 = weight(_text_:r in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027310224 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00294612 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Contrary to what one might expect, Nobel laureates and Fields medalists have a rather large fraction (10% or more) of uncited publications. This is the case for (in total) 75 examined researchers from the fields of mathematics (Fields medalists), physics, chemistry, and physiology or medicine (Nobel laureates). We study several indicators for these researchers, including the h-index, total number of publications, average number of citations per publication, the number (and fraction) of uncited publications, and their interrelations. The most remarkable result is a positive correlation between the h-index and the number of uncited articles. We also present a Lotkaian model, which partially explains the empirically found regularities.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008)
0.01
0.014618838 = product of:
0.053602405 = sum of:
0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006112407 = score(doc=1965,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045059573 = score(doc=1965,freq=8.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Fundamental mathematical properties of rhythm sequences are studied. In particular, a set of three axioms for valid rhythm indicators is proposed, and it is shown that the R-indicator satisfies only two out of three but that the R-indicator satisfies all three. This fills a critical, logical gap in the study of these indicator sequences. Matrices leading to a constant R-sequence are called baseline matrices. They are characterized as matrices with constant w-year diachronous impact factors. The relation with classical impact factors is clarified. Using regression analysis matrices with a rhythm sequence that is on average equal to 1 (smaller than 1, larger than 1) are characterized.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1469-1478
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Mathematical study of h-index sequences (2009)
0.01
0.014278857 = product of:
0.039266855 = sum of:
0.012819777 = product of:
0.025639554 = sum of:
0.025639554 = weight(_text_:h in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025639554 = score(doc=4217,freq=16.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0019525366 = score(doc=4217,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
0.022758523 = weight(_text_:r in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022758523 = score(doc=4217,freq=4.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 4217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=4217,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4217, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4217)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- This paper studies mathematical properties of h-index sequences as developed by Liang [Liang, L. (2006). h-Index sequence and h-index matrix: Constructions and applications. Scientometrics, 69(1), 153-159]. For practical reasons, Liming studies such sequences where the time goes backwards while it is more logical to use the time going forward (real career periods). Both type of h-index sequences are studied here and their interrelations are revealed. We show cases where these sequences are convex, linear and concave. We also show that, when one of the sequences is convex then the other one is concave, showing that the reverse-time sequence, in general, cannot be used to derive similar properties of the (difficult to obtain) forward time sequence. We show that both sequences are the same if and only if the author produces the same number of papers per year. If the author produces an increasing number of papers per year, then Liang's h-sequences are above the "normal" ones. All these results are also valid for g- and R-sequences. The results are confirmed by the h-, g- and R-sequences (forward and reverse time) of the author.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Information processing and management. 45(2009) no.2, S.288-297
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.01
0.014265142 = product of:
0.03922914 = sum of:
0.0070291325 = weight(_text_:a in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070291325 = score(doc=7659,freq=18.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.010805541 = product of:
0.021611081 = sum of:
0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021611081 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- It is possible, using ISI's Journal Citation Report (JCR), to calculate average impact factors (AIF) for LCR's subject categories but it can be more useful to know the global Impact Factor (GIF) of a subject category and compare the 2 values. Reports results of a study to compare the relationships between AIFs and GIFs of subjects, based on the particular case of the average impact factor of a subfield versus the impact factor of this subfield as a whole, the difference being studied between an average of quotients, denoted as AQ, and a global average, obtained as a quotient of averages, and denoted as GQ. In the case of impact factors, AQ becomes the average impact factor of a field, and GQ becomes its global impact factor. Discusses a number of applications of this technique in the context of informetrics and scientometrics
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Influence of adding or deleting items and sources on the h-index (2010)
0.01
0.013829358 = product of:
0.038030732 = sum of:
0.013322704 = product of:
0.026645407 = sum of:
0.026645407 = weight(_text_:h in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026645407 = score(doc=3336,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.40342426 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033135647 = score(doc=3336,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 3336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=3336,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3336, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3336)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Adding or deleting items such as self-citations has an influence on the h-index of an author. This influence will be proved mathematically in this article. We hereby prove the experimental finding in E. Gianoli and M.A. Molina-Montenegro ([2009]) that the influence of adding or deleting self-citations on the h-index is greater for low values of the h-index. Why this is logical also is shown by a simple theoretical example. Adding or deleting sources such as adding or deleting minor contributions of an author also has an influence on the h-index of this author; this influence is modeled in this article. This model explains some practical examples found in X. Hu, R. Rousseau, and J. Chen (in press).
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.370-373
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Existence theorem of the quadruple (P, R, F, M) : precision, recall, fallout and miss (2007)
0.01
0.013622882 = product of:
0.049950566 = sum of:
0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046860883 = score(doc=2011,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
0.04318126 = weight(_text_:r in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04318126 = score(doc=2011,freq=10.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.49068546 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2011) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=2011,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2011, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2011)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- In an earlier paper [Egghe, L. (2004). A universal method of information retrieval evaluation: the "missing" link M and the universal IR surface. Information Processing and Management, 40, 21-30] we showed that, given an IR system, and if P denotes precision, R recall, F fallout and M miss (re-introduced in the paper mentioned above), we have the following relationship between P, R, F and M: P/(1-P)*(1-R)/R*F/(1-F)*(1-M)/M = 1. In this paper we prove the (more difficult) converse: given any four rational numbers in the interval ]0, 1[ satisfying the above equation, then there exists an IR system such that these four numbers (in any order) are the precision, recall, fallout and miss of this IR system. As a consequence we show that any three rational numbers in ]0, 1[ represent any three measures taken from precision, recall, fallout and miss of a certain IR system. We also show that this result is also true for two numbers instead of three.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 43(2007) no.1, S.265-272
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature (2000)
0.01
0.009483838 = product of:
0.034774072 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=4385,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4385) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=4385,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4385, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4385)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Observed aging curves are influenced by publication delays. In this article, we show how the 'undisturbed' aging function and the publication delay combine to give the observed aging function. This combination is performed by a mathematical operation known as convolution. Examples are given, such as the convolution of 2 Poisson distributions, 2 exponential distributions, a 2 lognormal distributions. A paradox is observed between theory and real data
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.2, S.158-165
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A theoretical study of recall and precision using a topological approach to information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.0092555415 = product of:
0.033936985 = sum of:
0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005411029 = score(doc=3267,freq=6.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=3267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3267) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=3267,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3267, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3267)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 34(1998) nos.2/3, S.191-218
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Topological aspects of information retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.008779775 = product of:
0.03219251 = sum of:
0.0072322977 = weight(_text_:a in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0072322977 = score(doc=2157,freq=14.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022529786 = score(doc=2157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=2157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2157)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Let (DS, DQ, sim) be a retrieval system consisting of a document space DS, a query space QS, and a function sim, expressing the similarity between a document and a query. Following D.M. Everett and S.C. Cater (1992), we introduce topologies on the document space. These topologies are generated by the similarity function sim and the query space QS. 3 topologies will be studied: the retrieval topology, the similarity topology and the (pseudo-)metric one. It is shown that the retrieval topology is the coarsest of the three, while the (pseudo-)metric is the strongest. These 3 topologies are generally different, reflecting distinct topological aspects of information retrieval. We present necessary and sufficient conditions for these topological aspects to be equal
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.13, S.1144-1160
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Duality in information retrieval and the hypegeometric distribution (1997)
0.01
0.008631823 = product of:
0.031650014 = sum of:
0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031240587 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 53(1997) no.5, S.499-496
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.; Rousseau, S.: TOP-curves (2007)
0.01
0.008572917 = product of:
0.03143403 = sum of:
0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005467103 = score(doc=50,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022529786 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00343714 = score(doc=50,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Several characteristics of classical Lorenz curves make them unsuitable for the study of a group of topperformers. TOP-curves, defined as a kind of mirror image of TIP-curves used in poverty studies, are shown to possess the properties necessary for adequate empirical ranking of various data arrays, based on the properties of the highest performers (i.e., the core). TOP-curves and essential TOP-curves, also introduced in this article, simultaneously represent the incidence, intensity, and inequality among the top. It is shown that TOPdominance partial order, introduced in this article, is stronger than Lorenz dominance order. In this way, this article contributes to the study of cores, a central issue in applied informetrics.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.6, S.777-785
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.: Remarks on the paper by A. De Visscher, "what does the g-index really measure?" (2012)
0.01
0.00847435 = product of:
0.031072617 = sum of:
0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006112407 = score(doc=463,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022529786 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=463)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- The author presents a different view on properties of impact measures than given in the paper of De Visscher (2011). He argues that a good impact measure works better when citations are concentrated rather than spread out over articles. The author also presents theoretical evidence that the g-index and the R-index can be close to the square root of the total number of citations, whereas this is not the case for the A-index. Here the author confirms an assertion of De Visscher.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2118-2121
- Type
- a
-
Rousseau, R.; Egghe, L.; Guns, R.: Becoming metric-wise : a bibliometric guide for researchers (2018)
0.01
0.0077987774 = product of:
0.028595516 = sum of:
0.0033818933 = weight(_text_:a in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033818933 = score(doc=5226,freq=6.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.11032722 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
0.022758523 = weight(_text_:r in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022758523 = score(doc=5226,freq=4.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
0.0024550997 = weight(_text_:s in 5226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024550997 = score(doc=5226,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 5226, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5226)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Aims to inform researchers about metrics so that they become aware of the evaluative techniques being applied to their scientific output. Understanding these concepts will help them during their funding initiatives, and in hiring and tenure. The book not only describes what indicators do (or are designed to do, which is not always the same thing), but also gives precise mathematical formulae so that indicators can be properly understood and evaluated. Metrics have become a critical issue in science, with widespread international discussion taking place on the subject across scientific journals and organizations. As researchers should know the publication-citation context, the mathematical formulae of indicators being used by evaluating committees and their consequences, and how such indicators might be misused, this book provides an ideal tome on the topic. Provides researchers with a detailed understanding of bibliometric indicators and their applications. Empowers researchers looking to understand the indicators relevant to their work and careers. Presents an informed and rounded picture of bibliometrics, including the strengths and shortcomings of particular indicators. Supplies the mathematics behind bibliometric indicators so they can be properly understood. Written by authors with longstanding expertise who are considered global leaders in the field of bibliometrics
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIST 70(2019) no.5, S.530-532 (I. Dorsch)
- Pages
- xv, 385 S
-
Egghe, L.: Dynamic h-index : the Hirsch index in function of time (2007)
0.01
0.007267052 = product of:
0.026645856 = sum of:
0.016215878 = product of:
0.032431755 = sum of:
0.032431755 = weight(_text_:h in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032431755 = score(doc=147,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0076523502 = weight(_text_:a in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0076523502 = score(doc=147,freq=12.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=147,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 147, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=147)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- When there are a group of articles and the present time is fixed we can determine the unique number h being the number of articles that received h or more citations while the other articles received a number of citations which is not larger than h. In this article, the time dependence of the h-index is determined. This is important to describe the expected career evolution of a scientist's work or of a journal's production in a fixed year.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.3, S.452-454
- Type
- a
