Farrow, J.: All in the mind : concept analysis in indexing (1995)
0.00
0.0017751341 = product of:
0.009763237 = sum of:
0.0069856085 = weight(_text_:a in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0069856085 = score(doc=2926,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=2926,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2926, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2926)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- The indexing process consists of the comprehension of the document to be indexed, followed by the production of a set of index terms. Differences between academic indexing and back-of-the-book indexing are discussed. Text comprehension is a branch of human information processing, and it is argued that the model of text comprehension and production debeloped by van Dijk and Kintsch can form the basis for a cognitive process model of indexing. Strategies for testing such a model are suggested
- Source
- Indexer. 19(1995) no.4, S.243-247
- Type
- a
