Gemberling, T.: FRSAD, Semiotics, and FRBR-LRM (2016)
0.00
0.0015532422 = product of:
0.008542832 = sum of:
0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006112407 = score(doc=5118,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- Philosophy grapples with the deepest and most difficult questions in human life. In a 2012 article, Jonathan Furner raises questions about the "Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data" (FRSAD) model. Can the FRSAD framers really avoid tackling philosophical questions as they attempt to do-the long-running dispute between nominalists and realists, in particular? This article attempts to flesh out a realist position while showing some implications for the new Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records-Library Reference Model. It is not clear that FRSAD really takes a realist view, as Furner claims, and a position on the nominalist-realist debate is not necessary for information professionals.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.2, S.136-144
- Type
- a
