-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.; Leuven, K.U.: Erratum (2012)
0.03
0.02630602 = product of:
0.072341554 = sum of:
0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039050733 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.045517046 = weight(_text_:r in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045517046 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.5172279 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.0049101994 = weight(_text_:s in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049101994 = score(doc=4992,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.018009236 = product of:
0.036018472 = sum of:
0.036018472 = weight(_text_:22 in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036018472 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Date
- 14. 2.2012 12:53:22
- Footnote
- This article corrects: Thoughts on uncitedness: Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies in: JASIST 62(2011) no,8, S.1637-1644.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429
- Type
- a
-
Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Simulating growth of the h-index (2009)
0.02
0.020991677 = product of:
0.05772711 = sum of:
0.0155431535 = product of:
0.031086307 = sum of:
0.031086307 = weight(_text_:h in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031086307 = score(doc=2717,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.47066164 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006112407 = score(doc=2717,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.03186193 = weight(_text_:r in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03186193 = score(doc=2717,freq=4.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.3620595 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.0042096195 = weight(_text_:s in 2717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0042096195 = score(doc=2717,freq=6.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14564252 = fieldWeight in 2717, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2717)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Temporal growth of the h-index in a diachronous cumulative time series is predicted to be linear by Hirsch (2005), whereas other models predict a concave increase. Actual data generally yield a linear growth or S-shaped growth. We study the h-index's growth in computer simulations of the publication-citation process. In most simulations the h-index grows linearly in time. Only occasionally does an S-shape occur, while in our simulations a concave increase is very rare. The latter is often signalled by the occurrence of plateaus - periods of h-index stagnation. Several parameters and their influence on the h-index's growth are determined and discussed.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.2, S.410-417
- Type
- a
-
Rousseau, R.; Ye, F.Y.: ¬A proposal for a dynamic h-type index (2008)
0.02
0.019052431 = product of:
0.05239418 = sum of:
0.016215878 = product of:
0.032431755 = sum of:
0.032431755 = weight(_text_:h in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032431755 = score(doc=2351,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0076523502 = weight(_text_:a in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0076523502 = score(doc=2351,freq=12.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=2351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=2351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- A time-dependent h-type indicator is proposed. This indicator depends on the size of the h-core, the number of citations received, and recent change in the value of the h-index. As such, it tries to combine in a dynamic way older information about the source (e.g., a scientist or research institute that is evaluated) with recent information.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1853-1855
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬An h-index weighted by citation impact (2008)
0.02
0.018541802 = product of:
0.050989952 = sum of:
0.016215878 = product of:
0.032431755 = sum of:
0.032431755 = weight(_text_:h in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032431755 = score(doc=695,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=695,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- An h-type index is proposed which depends on the obtained citations of articles belonging to the h-core. This weighted h-index, denoted as hw, is presented in a continuous setting and in a discrete one. It is shown that in a continuous setting the new index enjoys many good properties. In the discrete setting some small deviations from the ideal may occur.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.770-780
- Type
- a
-
Rousseau, R.: ¬A table for estimating the exponent in Lotka's law (1993)
0.02
0.017969478 = product of:
0.065888084 = sum of:
0.008836173 = weight(_text_:a in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008836173 = score(doc=5653,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
0.051496655 = weight(_text_:r in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051496655 = score(doc=5653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055552567 = score(doc=5653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 49(1993) no.4, S.409-412
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics : quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science (1990)
0.02
0.016912865 = product of:
0.062013835 = sum of:
0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022529786 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=1515,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.037053622 = weight(_text_:k in 1515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037053622 = score(doc=1515,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.39044446 = fieldWeight in 1515, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1515)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Classification
- BCGS (FH K)
- GHBS
- BCGS (FH K)
- Pages
- XI,450 S
-
Rousseau, R.; Jin, B.: ¬The age-dependent h-type AR**2-index : basic properties and a case study (2008)
0.02
0.016731145 = product of:
0.046010647 = sum of:
0.010877941 = product of:
0.021755882 = sum of:
0.021755882 = weight(_text_:h in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021755882 = score(doc=2638,freq=8.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0057392623 = score(doc=2638,freq=12.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.027310224 = weight(_text_:r in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027310224 = score(doc=2638,freq=4.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Hirsch-type indices are studied with special attention to the AR**2-index introduced by Jin. The article consists of two parts: a theoretical part and a practical illustration. In the theoretical part, we recall the definition of the AR**2-index and show that an alternative definition, the so-called AR**2,1, does not have the properties expected for this type of index. A practical example shows the existence of some of these mathematical properties and illustrates the difference between different h-type indices. Clearly the h-index itself is the most robust of all. It is shown that excluding so-called non-WoS source articles may have a significant influence on the R-and, especially, the g-index.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.14, S.2305-2311
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model (2009)
0.02
0.016642686 = product of:
0.045767386 = sum of:
0.010255822 = product of:
0.020511644 = sum of:
0.020511644 = weight(_text_:h in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020511644 = score(doc=6759,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0069856085 = weight(_text_:a in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0069856085 = score(doc=6759,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 6759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=6759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 6759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6759)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Using a power-law model, the two best-known topics in citation analysis, namely the impact factor and the Hirsch index, are unified into one relation (not a function). The validity of our model is, at least in a qualitative way, confirmed by real data.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2362-2365
- Type
- a
-
Shi, D.; Rousseau, R.; Yang, L.; Li, J.: ¬A journal's impact factor is influenced by changes in publication delays of citing journals (2017)
0.02
0.016556118 = product of:
0.04552932 = sum of:
0.0052392064 = weight(_text_:a in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052392064 = score(doc=3441,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
0.018895645 = weight(_text_:u in 3441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018895645 = score(doc=3441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 3441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3441)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- In this article we describe another problem with journal impact factors by showing that one journal's impact factor is dependent on other journals' publication delays. The proposed theoretical model predicts a monotonically decreasing function of the impact factor as a function of publication delay, on condition that the citation curve of the journal is monotone increasing during the publication window used in the calculation of the journal impact factor; otherwise, this function has a reversed U shape. Our findings based on simulations are verified by examining three journals in the information sciences: the Journal of Informetrics, Scientometrics, and the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.3, S.780-789
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: ¬The Hirsch index of a shifted Lotka function and its relation with the impact factor (2012)
0.02
0.01613425 = product of:
0.04436919 = sum of:
0.0155431535 = product of:
0.031086307 = sum of:
0.031086307 = weight(_text_:h in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031086307 = score(doc=243,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.47066164 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.003865826 = weight(_text_:a in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003865826 = score(doc=243,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022529786 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Based on earlier results about the shifted Lotka function, we prove an implicit functional relation between the Hirsch index (h-index) and the total number of sources (T). It is shown that the corresponding function, h(T), is concavely increasing. Next, we construct an implicit relation between the h-index and the impact factor IF (an average number of items per source). The corresponding function h(IF) is increasing and we show that if the parameter C in the numerator of the shifted Lotka function is high, then the relation between the h-index and the impact factor is almost linear.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.5, S.1048-1053
- Type
- a
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.02
0.01586198 = product of:
0.043620445 = sum of:
0.0034928042 = weight(_text_:a in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034928042 = score(doc=5171,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.11394546 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.031535134 = weight(_text_:r in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031535134 = score(doc=5171,freq=12.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.358346 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.0013888142 = weight(_text_:s in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0013888142 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.007203694 = product of:
0.014407388 = sum of:
0.014407388 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014407388 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
- Type
- a
-
Rousseau, S.; Rousseau, R.: Metric-wiseness (2015)
0.02
0.015654806 = product of:
0.057400957 = sum of:
0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005467103 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045059573 = score(doc=6069,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
0.00687428 = weight(_text_:s in 6069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00687428 = score(doc=6069,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 6069, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6069)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.11, S.2389
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Guns, R.; Rousseau, R.: Thoughts on uncitedness : Nobel laureates and Fields medalists as case studies (2011)
0.02
0.015503381 = product of:
0.042634297 = sum of:
0.0076918663 = product of:
0.0153837325 = sum of:
0.0153837325 = weight(_text_:h in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0153837325 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046860883 = score(doc=4994,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.027310224 = weight(_text_:r in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027310224 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.3103367 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 4994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00294612 = score(doc=4994,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 4994, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4994)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Contrary to what one might expect, Nobel laureates and Fields medalists have a rather large fraction (10% or more) of uncited publications. This is the case for (in total) 75 examined researchers from the fields of mathematics (Fields medalists), physics, chemistry, and physiology or medicine (Nobel laureates). We study several indicators for these researchers, including the h-index, total number of publications, average number of citations per publication, the number (and fraction) of uncited publications, and their interrelations. The most remarkable result is a positive correlation between the h-index and the number of uncited articles. We also present a Lotkaian model, which partially explains the empirically found regularities.
- Footnote
- Vgl.: Erratum. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.2, S.429.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1637-1644
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Liang, L.; Rousseau, R.: Fundamental properties of rhythm sequences (2008)
0.01
0.014618838 = product of:
0.053602405 = sum of:
0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006112407 = score(doc=1965,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045059573 = score(doc=1965,freq=8.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=1965,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1965, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1965)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Fundamental mathematical properties of rhythm sequences are studied. In particular, a set of three axioms for valid rhythm indicators is proposed, and it is shown that the R-indicator satisfies only two out of three but that the R-indicator satisfies all three. This fills a critical, logical gap in the study of these indicator sequences. Matrices leading to a constant R-sequence are called baseline matrices. They are characterized as matrices with constant w-year diachronous impact factors. The relation with classical impact factors is clarified. Using regression analysis matrices with a rhythm sequence that is on average equal to 1 (smaller than 1, larger than 1) are characterized.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1469-1478
- Type
- a
-
Egghe, L.; Rousseau, R.: Averaging and globalising quotients of informetric and scientometric data (1996)
0.01
0.014265142 = product of:
0.03922914 = sum of:
0.0070291325 = weight(_text_:a in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070291325 = score(doc=7659,freq=18.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.010805541 = product of:
0.021611081 = sum of:
0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 7659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021611081 = score(doc=7659,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7659, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7659)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- It is possible, using ISI's Journal Citation Report (JCR), to calculate average impact factors (AIF) for LCR's subject categories but it can be more useful to know the global Impact Factor (GIF) of a subject category and compare the 2 values. Reports results of a study to compare the relationships between AIFs and GIFs of subjects, based on the particular case of the average impact factor of a subfield versus the impact factor of this subfield as a whole, the difference being studied between an average of quotients, denoted as AQ, and a global average, obtained as a quotient of averages, and denoted as GQ. In the case of impact factors, AQ becomes the average impact factor of a field, and GQ becomes its global impact factor. Discusses a number of applications of this technique in the context of informetrics and scientometrics
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.3, S.165-170
- Type
- a
-
Rousseau, R.: Bradford curves (1994)
0.01
0.014225758 = product of:
0.05216111 = sum of:
0.009372177 = weight(_text_:a in 7304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009372177 = score(doc=7304,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.30574775 = fieldWeight in 7304, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7304)
0.03862249 = weight(_text_:r in 7304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03862249 = score(doc=7304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 7304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7304)
0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 7304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041664424 = score(doc=7304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 7304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7304)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- It is shown that generalized Leimkuhler functions give proper fits to a large variety of Bradford curves, including those exhibited a so-called Groos droop or a rising tail
- Source
- Information processing and management. 30(1994) no.2, S.267-277
- Type
- a
-
Rousseau, R.: Use of an existing thesaurus in a knowledge based indexing and retrieval system (1991)
0.01
0.013883312 = product of:
0.050905477 = sum of:
0.008116543 = weight(_text_:a in 3007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008116543 = score(doc=3007,freq=6.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.26478532 = fieldWeight in 3007, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3007)
0.03862249 = weight(_text_:r in 3007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03862249 = score(doc=3007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 3007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3007)
0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 3007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041664424 = score(doc=3007,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3007, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3007)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- A simple heuristic method is proposed to use an existing thesaurus for weighted indexing
- Source
- Annals of library science and documentation. 38(1991) no.4, S.127-130
- Type
- a
-
Rousseau, R.: Egghe's g-index is not a proper concentration measure (2015)
0.01
0.013477108 = product of:
0.04941606 = sum of:
0.0066271294 = weight(_text_:a in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066271294 = score(doc=1864,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
0.03862249 = weight(_text_:r in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03862249 = score(doc=1864,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 1864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041664424 = score(doc=1864,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1864, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1864)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1518-1519
- Type
- a
-
Asonuma, A.; Fang, Y.; Rousseau, R.: Reflections on the age distribution of Japanese scientists (2006)
0.01
0.013413127 = product of:
0.036886096 = sum of:
0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046860883 = score(doc=5270,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.010805541 = product of:
0.021611081 = sum of:
0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021611081 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- The age distribution of a country's scientists is an important element in the study of its research capacity. In this article we investigate the age distribution of Japanese scientists in order to find out whether major events such as World War II had an appreciable effect on its features. Data have been obtained from population censuses taken in Japan from 1970 to 1995. A comparison with the situation in China and the United States has been made. We find that the group of scientific researchers outside academia is dominated by the young: those younger than age 35. The personnel group in higher education, on the other hand, is dominated by the baby boomers: those who were born after World War II. Contrary to the Chinese situation we could not find any influence of major nondemographic events. The only influence we found was the increase in enrollment of university students after World War II caused by the reform of the Japanese university system. Female participation in the scientific and university systems in Japan, though still low, is increasing.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:26:24
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.342-346
- Type
- a
-
Kretschmer, H.; Rousseau, R.: Author inflation leads to a breakdown of Lotka's law : in and out of context (2001)
0.01
0.012011836 = product of:
0.033032548 = sum of:
0.0054389704 = product of:
0.010877941 = sum of:
0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010877941 = score(doc=5205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0061991126 = weight(_text_:a in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0061991126 = score(doc=5205,freq=14.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20223314 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=5205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 5205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=5205,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 5205, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5205)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Fractional counting of authors of multi-authored papers has been shown to lead to a breakdown of Lotka's Law despite its robust character under most circumstances. Kretschmer and Rousseau use the normal count method of full credit for each author on two five-year bibliographies from each of 13 Dutch physics institutes where high co-authorship is a common occurrence. Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were preformed to see if the Lotka distribution fit the data. All bibliographies up to 40 authors fit acceptably; no bibliography with a paper with over 100 authors fits the distribution. The underlying traditional "success breeds success" mechanism assumes new items on a one by one basis, but Egghe's generalized model would still account for the process. It seems unlikely that Lotka's Law will hold in a high co-authorship environment.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.8, S.610-614
- Type
- a
