Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Tennis, J.T."
  1. Tennis, J.T.: Function, purpose, predication, and context of information organization frameworks (2006) 0.02
    0.017270919 = product of:
      0.047495026 = sum of:
        0.0040582716 = weight(_text_:a in 2520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0040582716 = score(doc=2520,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2520, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2520)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=2520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2520)
        0.018895645 = weight(_text_:u in 2520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018895645 = score(doc=2520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2520)
        0.022457888 = weight(_text_:k in 2520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022457888 = score(doc=2520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2520)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the purposes, predications, functions, and contexts of information organization frameworks; including: bibliographic control, information retrieval, resource discovery, resource description, open access scholarly indexing, personal information management protocols, and social tagging in order to compare and contrast those purposes, predications, functions, and contexts. Information organization frameworks, for the purpose of this paper, consist of information organization systems (classification schemes, taxonomies, ontologies, bibliographic descriptions, etc.), methods of conceiving of and creating the systems, and the work processes involved in maintaining these systems. The paper first outlines the theoretical literature of these information organization frameworks. In conclusion, this paper establishes the first part of an evaluation rubric for a function, predication, purpose, and context analysis.
    Pages
    S.303-309
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
    Type
    a
  2. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.02
    0.0170172 = product of:
      0.046797298 = sum of:
        0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044180867 = score(doc=826,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
        0.014407388 = product of:
          0.028814776 = sum of:
            0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028814776 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
    Pages
    S.58-62
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
    Type
    a
  3. Tennis, J.T.: Never facets alone : the evolving thought and persistent problems in Ranganathan's theories of classification (2017) 0.01
    0.009744577 = product of:
      0.026797585 = sum of:
        0.004532476 = product of:
          0.009064952 = sum of:
            0.009064952 = weight(_text_:h in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009064952 = score(doc=5800,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.004782719 = weight(_text_:a in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004782719 = score(doc=5800,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=5800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
        0.015746372 = weight(_text_:u in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015746372 = score(doc=5800,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan's theory of classification spans a number of works over a number of decades. And while he was devoted to solving many problems in the practice of librarianship, and is known as the father of library science in India (Garfield, 1984), his work in classification revolves around one central concern. His classification research addressed the problems that arose from introducing new ideas into a scheme for classification, while maintaining a meaningful hierarchical and systematically arranged order of classes. This is because hierarchical and systematically arranged classes are the defining characteristic of useful classification. To lose this order is to through the addition of new classes is to introduce confusion, if not chaos, and to move toward a useless classification - or at least one that requires complete revision. In the following chapter, I outline the stages, and the elements of those stages, in Ranganathan's thought on classification from 1926-1972, as well as posthumous work that continues his agenda. And while facets figure prominently in all of these stages; but for Ranganathan to achieve his goal, he must continually add to this central feature of his theory of classification. I will close this chapter with an outline of persistent problems that represent research fronts for the field. Chief among these are what to do about scheme change and the open question about the rigor of information modeling in light of semantic web developments.
    Pages
    S.31-38
    Source
    Dimensions of knowledge: facets for knowledge organization. Eds.: R.P. Smiraglia, u. H.-L. Lee
    Type
    a
  4. Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Tennis, J.T.: Constant pioneers : the citation frontiers of indexing theory in the ISKO international proceedings (2012) 0.01
    0.009104414 = product of:
      0.03338285 = sum of:
        0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005411029 = score(doc=818,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=818,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a citation analysis of indexing research in the ISKO Proceedings. Understanding that there are different traditions of research into indexing, we look for evidence of this in the citing and cited authors. Three areas of cited and citing authors surface, after applying Price's elitism analysis, each roughly corresponding to geographic distributions.
    Pages
    S.39-43
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
    Type
    a
  5. Salaba, A.; Tennis, J.T.: Solid foundations and some secondary assumptions in the design of bibliographic metadata : toward a typology of complementary uses of metadata (2018) 0.01
    0.009104414 = product of:
      0.03338285 = sum of:
        0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 4779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005411029 = score(doc=4779,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4779, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4779)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=4779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4779)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 4779) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=4779,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4779, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4779)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Pages
    S.450-459
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  6. Araújo, P.C. de; Tennis, J.T.: Influence of metatheoretical research in knowledge organization (2018) 0.01
    0.008480695 = product of:
      0.031095881 = sum of:
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 4749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=4749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4749)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Pages
    S.273-281
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  7. Tennis, J.T.: Intellectual history, history of ideas, and subject ontogeny (2018) 0.01
    0.008480695 = product of:
      0.031095881 = sum of:
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 4751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=4751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4751)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=4751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4751)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 4751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=4751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4751)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Pages
    S.308-313
    Source
    Challenges and opportunities for knowledge organization in the digital age: proceedings of the Fifteenth International ISKO Conference, 9-11 July 2018, Porto, Portugal / organized by: International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO Spain and Portugal Chapter, University of Porto - Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Research Centre in Communication, Information and Digital Culture (CIC.digital) - Porto. Eds.: F. Ribeiro u. M.E. Cerveira
    Type
    a
  8. Tennis, J.T.: Ethos and ideology of knowledge organization : toward precepts for an engaged knowledge organization (2013) 0.01
    0.0063908547 = product of:
      0.023433134 = sum of:
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=637,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
        0.014407388 = product of:
          0.028814776 = sum of:
            0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028814776 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper provides rationale for considering precepts for an engaged knowledge organization based on a Buddhist conception of intentional action. Casting knowledge organization work as craft, this paper employs Zizek's conception of violence in language as a call to action. The paper closes with a listing of precepts for an engaged knowledge organization.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:54:49
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.1, S.42-49
    Type
    a
  9. Tennis, J.T.: Load Bearing or Levittown? : the edifice metaphor in conceptualizing the ethos of classification work (2014) 0.01
    0.0051552863 = product of:
      0.018902715 = sum of:
        0.003865826 = weight(_text_:a in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003865826 = score(doc=1426,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=1426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
        0.012606464 = product of:
          0.025212929 = sum of:
            0.025212929 = weight(_text_:22 in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025212929 = score(doc=1426,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper introduces the edifice metaphor. This metaphor accounts for the context of time and place when comparing the similarities and differences that obtain between classification schemes. It is argued that this metaphor helps call into question whether or not the contemporary received assumption that all classification is a universal constant.
    Pages
    S.222-227
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
    Type
    a
  10. Tennis, J.T.: Scheme versioning in the Semantic Web (2006) 0.00
    0.0017751341 = product of:
      0.009763237 = sum of:
        0.0069856085 = weight(_text_:a in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069856085 = score(doc=4939,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a conceptual framework and methodology for managing scheme versioning for the Semantic Web. The first part of the paper introduces the concept of vocabulary encoding schemes, distinguished from metadata schemas, and discusses the characteristics of changes in schemes. The paper then presents a proposal to use a value record-similar to a term record in thesaurus management techniques-to manage scheme versioning challenges for the Semantic Web. The conclusion identifies future research directions.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 43(2006) nos.3/4, S.85-104
    Type
    a
  11. Tennis, J.T.: Epistemology, theory, and methodology in knowledge organization : toward a classification, metatheory, and research framework (2008) 0.00
    0.0017751341 = product of:
      0.009763237 = sum of:
        0.0069856085 = weight(_text_:a in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069856085 = score(doc=2132,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes a preliminary classification of knowledge organization research, divided among epistemology, theory, and methodology plus three sphere of research: design, study, and critique. This work is situated in a metatheoretical framework, drawn from sociological thought. Example works are presented along with preliminary classification. The classification is then briefly described as a comparison tool which can be used to demonstrate overlap and divergence in cognate discourses of knowledge organization (such as ontology engineering).
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 35(2008) nos.2/3, S.102-112
    Type
    a
  12. Tennis, J.T.: ¬The strange case of eugenics : a subject's ontogeny in a long-lived classification scheme and the question of collocative integrity (2012) 0.00
    0.0017751341 = product of:
      0.009763237 = sum of:
        0.0069856085 = weight(_text_:a in 275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069856085 = score(doc=275,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 275, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=275)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=275)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    This article introduces the problem of collocative integrity present in long-lived classification schemes that undergo several changes. A case study of the subject "eugenics" in the Dewey Decimal Classification is presented to illustrate this phenomenon. Eugenics is strange because of the kinds of changes it undergoes. The article closes with a discussion of subject ontogeny as the name for this phenomenon and describes implications for information searching and browsing.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.7, S.1350-1359
    Type
    a
  13. Tennis, J.T.; Jacob, E.K.: Toward a theory of structure in information organization frameworks (2008) 0.00
    0.0016593148 = product of:
      0.009126231 = sum of:
        0.006695806 = weight(_text_:a in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006695806 = score(doc=2251,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=2251,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2251, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2251)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Content
    This paper outlines a formal and systematic approach to explication of the role of structure in information organization. It presents a preliminary set of constructs that are useful for understanding the similarities and differences that obtain across information organization systems. This work seeks to provide necessary groundwork for development of a theory of structure that can serve as a lens through which to observe patterns across systems of information organization.
    Pages
    S.262-268
    Type
    a
  14. Tennis, J.T.: 6th Annual Open Forum on Metadata Registries : Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Jan 20-24, 2003 (2002) 0.00
    0.001609551 = product of:
      0.00885253 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
        0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041664424 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) nos.3/4, S.234-235
    Type
    a
  15. Tennis, J.T.: ¬A convenient verisimilitude or oppressive internalization? : characterizing the ethical augments surrounding hierarchical structures in knowledge organization systems (2012) 0.00
    0.0015532422 = product of:
      0.008542832 = sum of:
        0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006112407 = score(doc=627,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 627, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=627)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=627,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 627, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=627)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper considers the ethical concerns that surface around hierarchy as structure in knowledge organization systems. In order to do this, I consider the relationship between semantics and structure and argue for a separation of the two in design and critique of knowledge organization systems. The paper closes with an argument that agency and intention, as ethical concerns in knowledge organization, lead us to argue for a neutral stance on hierarchy.
    Content
    Beitrag aus einem Themenheft zu den Proceedings of the 2nd Milwaukee Conference on Ethics in Information Organization, June 15-16, 2012, School of Information Studies, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Hope A. Olson, Conference Chair. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_5_l.pdf.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.5, S.394-397
    Type
    a
  16. Tennis, J.T.: Is there a new bbliography? (2011) 0.00
    0.0014888468 = product of:
      0.008188657 = sum of:
        0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005411029 = score(doc=1888,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=1888,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1888, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1888)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the position claiming that the contemporary technological, socio-political, and socio-economic environment gives us pause to consider the core theory and practices of bibliography, combining bibliography of the work (in library and information science), bibliography of the text (in textual studies and scholarly editing), and bibliography of the artifact (in book history and now digital forensics), and calls for collaborative multidisciplinary research at the intersection of these fields to ask, is there a new bibliography?
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 49(2011) no.2, S.121-126
    Type
    a
  17. Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016) 0.00
    0.0014888468 = product of:
      0.008188657 = sum of:
        0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005411029 = score(doc=4889,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Pages
    S.84-87
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
    Type
    a
  18. Adler, M.; Tennis, J.T.: Toward a taxonomy of harm in knowledge organization systems (2013) 0.00
    0.0014222699 = product of:
      0.007822484 = sum of:
        0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 1068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0057392623 = score(doc=1068,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1068, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1068)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=1068,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1068, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1068)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    A starting point for contributing to the greater good is to examine and interrogate existing knowledge organization practices that do harm, whether that harm is intentional or accidental, or an inherent and unavoidable evil. As part of the transition movement, the authors propose to inventory the manifestations and implications of the production of suffering by knowledge organization systems through constructing a taxonomy of harm. Theoretical underpinnings guide ontological commitment, as well as the recognition of the problem of harm in knowledge organization systems. The taxonomy of harm will be organized around three main questions: what happens?, who participates?, and who is affected and how? The aim is to heighten awareness of the violence that classifications and naming practices carry, to unearth some of the social conditions and motivations that contribute to and are reinforced by knowledge organization systems, and to advocate for intentional and ethical knowledge organization practices to achieve a minimal level of harm.
    Footnote
    Part of a section: "Papers from the Fourth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, sponsored by ISKO-Canada, United States, 13-14 June, 2013, Milwaukee, Wisconsin"
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 40(2013) no.4, S.266-272
    Type
    a
  19. Tennis, J.T.: URIS and intertextuality : incumbent philosophical commitments in the development of the semantic web (2004) 0.00
    0.0013083118 = product of:
      0.007195715 = sum of:
        0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044180867 = score(doc=2638,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=2638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2638)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Examines two commitments inherent in Resource Description Framework (RDF): intertextuality and rationalism. After introducing how rationalism has been studied in knowledge organization, this paper then introduces the concept of bracketed-rationalism. This paper closes with a discussion of ramifications of intertextuality and bracketed rationalism an evaluation of RDF.
    Pages
    S.103-108
    Type
    a
  20. Tennis, J.T.: Two axes of domains for domain analysis (2003) 0.00
    0.0013083118 = product of:
      0.007195715 = sum of:
        0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 3010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044180867 = score(doc=3010,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3010, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3010)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3010) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=3010,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3010, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3010)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper adds two analytical devices to domain analysis, claiming that for domain analysis to work cumulatively transferable definitions of domains must be written. To establish this definition the author provides two axes to consider: Areas of Modulation and Degrees of Specialization. These axes may serve as analytical devices for the domain analyst to delineate what is being studied and what is not being studied in a domain analysis.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 30(2003) nos.3/4, S.191-195
    Type
    a