Search (14 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Wiesenmüller, H."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Wiesenmüller, H.: Informationsaufbereitung I : Formale Erfassung (2004) 0.02
    0.021850968 = product of:
      0.048072126 = sum of:
        0.0054389704 = product of:
          0.010877941 = sum of:
            0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010877941 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023430442 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
        0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019311246 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
        0.018895645 = weight(_text_:u in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018895645 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Pages
    S.167-177
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
    Type
    a
  2. Wiesenmüller, H.: AACR und kein Ende? : Ein kritischer Rück- und Ausblick auf die Regelwerksdiskussion (2005) 0.01
    0.014226066 = product of:
      0.031297345 = sum of:
        0.007251961 = product of:
          0.014503922 = sum of:
            0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 3426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014503922 = score(doc=3426,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3426, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3426)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0015620294 = weight(_text_:a in 3426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0015620294 = score(doc=3426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 3426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3426)
        0.012874164 = weight(_text_:r in 3426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012874164 = score(doc=3426,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3426, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3426)
        0.002405497 = weight(_text_:s in 3426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002405497 = score(doc=3426,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 3426, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3426)
        0.007203694 = product of:
          0.014407388 = sum of:
            0.014407388 = weight(_text_:22 in 3426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014407388 = score(doc=3426,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3426, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3426)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
    
    Content
    Nachtrag in BuB 57(2005) H.5, S.324: "AACR und kein Ende? Heidrun Wiesenmüllers kritischer Rück- und Ausblick auf die Regelwerksdiskussion, »AACR und kein Ende?«, ist in BuB Heft 3/2005 (Seite 198 bis 204) wegen einer technischen Panne ohne die zugehörigen Fußnoten publiziert worden. Die vollständige Fassung ist online verfügbar unter <www.bibliothek.uni-augsburg.de/kfe/mat/Wiesenmueller_BuB_57_3.pdf>."
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:39:44
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Gömpel, R.: Ein Silberstreif am Horizont: Die Internationalisierung der deutschen Standards. In: BuB. 57(2005) H.4, S.288-291.
    Source
    BuB. 57(2005) H.3, S.198-204
    Type
    a
  3. Wiesenmüller, H.: Sacherschließung im Bachelorstudiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement an der Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart : ein Erfahrungsbericht (2008) 0.01
    0.010824044 = product of:
      0.02976612 = sum of:
        0.004532476 = product of:
          0.009064952 = sum of:
            0.009064952 = weight(_text_:h in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009064952 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.004782719 = weight(_text_:a in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004782719 = score(doc=2203,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15602624 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
        0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 2203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018714907 = score(doc=2203,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2203, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2203)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    The article describes the experiences and personal impressions of a young lecturer in teaching indexing and classification in the Bachelor programme »Library and Information Management« at the Stuttgart Media University (Hochschule der Medien, HdM). Although, in Germany, subject cataloguing is traditionally seen as the business of senior-level librarians, it still plays a major role in the education of upper-level librarians at the HdM. A sound knowledge of indexing and classification seems especially important as they bear the brunt of work at the reference desk, where questions on searching by subject abound. The courses aim at a healthy balance between theory and practice. Practical exercises (which unfortunately tend to be somewhat artificial) and field trips are part of the lectures. Optional courses can also involve project work. It is important to note that students are not only on the receiving end: They can also do valuable research for the library community, especially in their Bachelor theses. Contacts and communication between students and faculty of the HdM on the one hand and working librarians on the other should be upheld and even intensified, which makes networking a very useful skill for teaching staff.
    Pages
    S.303-312
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
    Type
    a
  4. Wiesenmüller, H.: Zehn Jahre 'Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records' (FRBR) : Vision, Theorie und praktische Anwendung (2008) 0.00
    0.0044065937 = product of:
      0.01615751 = sum of:
        0.010255822 = product of:
          0.020511644 = sum of:
            0.020511644 = weight(_text_:h in 4586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020511644 = score(doc=4586,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.31055614 = fieldWeight in 4586, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 4586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=4586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4586)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=4586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4586)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 32(2008) H.3, S.348-358
    Type
    a
  5. Wiesenmüller, H.: ¬Das Konzept der "Virtuellen Bibliothek" im deutschen Bibliothekswesen der 1990er Jahre (2000) 0.00
    0.00418911 = product of:
      0.023040103 = sum of:
        0.018129904 = product of:
          0.036259808 = sum of:
            0.036259808 = weight(_text_:h in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036259808 = score(doc=123,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.5489909 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0049101994 = weight(_text_:s in 123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0049101994 = score(doc=123,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 123, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=123)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ZfBB 49(2002) H.1, S.43-44 (H. Rösch)
    Pages
    139 S
    Series
    Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.26
  6. Syré, L.; Wiesenmüller, H.: ¬Die Virtuelle Deutsche Landesbibliographie : Metasuchmaschine für Landes- und Regionalbibliographien (2003) 0.00
    0.0038557693 = product of:
      0.01413782 = sum of:
        0.008973843 = product of:
          0.017947687 = sum of:
            0.017947687 = weight(_text_:h in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017947687 = score(doc=1928,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027335514 = score(doc=1928,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=1928,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 50(2003) H.5, S.251-259
    Type
    a
  7. Wiesenmüller, H.; Jendral, L.; Schäffler, H.; Schomburg, S.; Höck, C.; Kohlmann, M.: Auswahlkriterien für das Sammeln von Netzpublikationen im Rahmen des elektronischen Pflichtexemplars Empfehlungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Regionalbibliotheken (2004) 0.00
    0.003343122 = product of:
      0.012258114 = sum of:
        0.007850478 = product of:
          0.015700957 = sum of:
            0.015700957 = weight(_text_:h in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015700957 = score(doc=2983,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.23772003 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019525366 = score(doc=2983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
        0.0024550997 = weight(_text_:s in 2983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024550997 = score(doc=2983,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2983, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2983)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 38(2004) H.11, S.1423-1444
    Type
    a
  8. Wiesenmüller, H.: Von Fröschen und Strategen : Ein kleiner Leitfaden zur AACR2-Debatte (2002) 0.00
    0.003304945 = product of:
      0.012118132 = sum of:
        0.0076918663 = product of:
          0.0153837325 = sum of:
            0.0153837325 = weight(_text_:h in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0153837325 = score(doc=636,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.2329171 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0023430442 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=636,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 636, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=636)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    BuB. 54(2002) H.7/8, S.466-470
    Type
    a
  9. Wiesenmüller, H.: LCSH goes RSWK? : Überlegungen zur Diskussion um die "Library of Congress subject headings" (2009) 0.00
    0.0032866308 = product of:
      0.01205098 = sum of:
        0.0064098886 = product of:
          0.012819777 = sum of:
            0.012819777 = weight(_text_:h in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012819777 = score(doc=3039,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0039050733 = score(doc=3039,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=3039,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3039, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3039)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Im Jahr 1898 begann die Library of Congress mit der Arbeit an einem Schlagwortkatalog - die Geburtsstunde der 'Library of Congress subject headings' (LCSH). Heute stellen die LCSH das zentrale Werkzeug zur verbalen inhaltlichen Erschließung in der gesamten angloamerikanischen Welt dar. Auch die Kritik an diesem Erschließungssystem hat eine lange Geschichte: Sie lässt sich bis in die Mitte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts zurückverfolgen und betraf im Lauf der Zeit recht unterschiedliche Aspekte. Neu an der Debatte der letzten Jahre ist, dass die Struktur der LCSH ganz grundsätzlich in Frage gestellt wird. Eine Projektgruppe der Bibliothek der University of California etwa urteilte 2005: "LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control." In einer für die Library of Congress erstellten Expertise mit dem Titel 'On the record' von 2008 heißt es: "LCSH suffers (...) from a structure that is cumbersome from both administrative and automation points of view". Es wird empfohlen, die LCSH in ein flexibleres Werkzeug zu verwandeln: "Transform LCSH into a tool that provides a more flexible means to create and modify subject authority data." Dies beinhaltet zum einen ein "de-coupling of subject strings", also eine 'Entkoppelung' der fest zusammengefügten (präkombinierten) Eintragungen, und zum anderen die Möglichkeit, das LCSH-Vokabular für "faceted browsing and discovery" nutzbar zu machen . Besonders drastische Worte wurden 2006 im sogenannten 'Calhoun Report' gefunden - einem Papier, das mit seinen radikalen Thesen in der amerikanischen Bibliothekswelt viel Aufsehen erregte: Man müsse die Library of Congress dazu bringen, die LCSH zu 'zerschlagen' ("urge LC to dismantle LCSH") - ja, sie gar zu 'eliminieren' ("eliminate LCSH").
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 43(2009) H.7, S.716-747
    Type
    a
  10. Wiesenmüller, H.: Langzeitarchivierung von Online-Publikationen an Regionalbibliotheken : Das Projekt 'Baden-Württembergisches Online-Archiv' (BOA) (2004) 0.00
    0.002754121 = product of:
      0.010098443 = sum of:
        0.0064098886 = product of:
          0.012819777 = sum of:
            0.012819777 = weight(_text_:h in 2283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012819777 = score(doc=2283,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.1940976 = fieldWeight in 2283, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2283)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 2283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0019525366 = score(doc=2283,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 2283, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2283)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 2283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=2283,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2283, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2283)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 38(2004) H.4, S.471-479
    Type
    a
  11. Wiesenmüller, H.: Vier Thesen (2003) 0.00
    0.0025820644 = product of:
      0.009467569 = sum of:
        0.005127911 = product of:
          0.010255822 = sum of:
            0.010255822 = weight(_text_:h in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010255822 = score(doc=3362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0015620294 = weight(_text_:a in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0015620294 = score(doc=3362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=3362,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3362, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3362)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch die Kommentierung von E. Plassmann in einer Rezension in ZfBB 52(2005) H.2, S.99: Vieles wirkt erfrischend. Um das heftig umstrittene Thema RAK und AACR herauszugreifen,das imTagungsband ganz vorne steht: Auf die knappe, gleichwohl qualifizierte und nachdenkliche Einführung von Ulrich Hohoff folgen kurze, unbefangen kritische Statements von der Art, die man sich in der Fachdiskussion öfter wünschte - ohne die verbreitete, nicht selten pharisäische correctness. Bernhard Eversberg wird vielen Kolleginnen und Kollegen aus der Seele gesprochen haben, wenn er sagt: »Das Katalogisierungspersonal sollte frühzeitig die Möglichkeit zum Einblick in neue Texte und Entwürfe haben. Engagierte Mitarbeiterinnen wünschen sich Möglichkeiten, eigene Erfahrungen, Meinungen und Fragen einzubringen.« Oder, wenn er feststellt: »Technische Verbesserungen sind aber kein Ziel an sich. Wichtig ist zuallererst, die eigentlichen Ziele des Katalogisierens neu zu überdenken, zu erweitern oder zu modifizieren. Dies kann eine neue technische Grundlage nur unterstützen, nicht ersetzen. Zu den neuen Herausforderungen gehören vernetzte, internationalisierte Normdateien.« (beide Zitate S.75) - In eine etwas andere Richtung pointiert Heidrun Wiesenmüller das Thema: »Der Plan eines Umstiegs auf AACR2/MARC stellt nicht zuletzt den anachronistischen Versuch dar, eine heterogene Datenwelt durch Verordnung eines Standards von oben zu vereinheitlichen. Eine zeitgemäße Lösung kann jedoch nur darin bestehen, Tools und Informationssysteme auf Meta-Ebene zu entwickeln.« (S. 79) Dem ist zu diesem Thema nichts hinzuzufügen.
    Pages
    S.77-79
    Type
    a
  12. Wiesenmüller, H.: Versuch eines Fazits (2002) 0.00
    0.0022032969 = product of:
      0.008078755 = sum of:
        0.005127911 = product of:
          0.010255822 = sum of:
            0.010255822 = weight(_text_:h in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010255822 = score(doc=1100,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0015620294 = weight(_text_:a in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0015620294 = score(doc=1100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
        0.0013888142 = weight(_text_:s in 1100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0013888142 = score(doc=1100,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 1100, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1100)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 36(2002) H.10, S.1293-1295
    Type
    a
  13. Wiesenmüller, H.: Schlagwortketten in Online-Katalogen : Realität und Potenzial (2008) 0.00
    0.0022032969 = product of:
      0.008078755 = sum of:
        0.005127911 = product of:
          0.010255822 = sum of:
            0.010255822 = weight(_text_:h in 2410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010255822 = score(doc=2410,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 2410, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2410)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0015620294 = weight(_text_:a in 2410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0015620294 = score(doc=2410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 2410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2410)
        0.0013888142 = weight(_text_:s in 2410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0013888142 = score(doc=2410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2410)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 42(2008) H.10, S.1033-1059
    Type
    a
  14. Wiesenmüller, H.: Zehn Jahre 'Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records' (FRBR) : Vision, Theorie und praktische Anwendung (2008) 0.00
    9.432745E-4 = product of:
      0.0051880097 = sum of:
        0.0036259806 = product of:
          0.007251961 = sum of:
            0.007251961 = weight(_text_:h in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007251961 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0015620294 = weight(_text_:a in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0015620294 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Abstract
    Mithilfe der FRBR, an denen sich auch das neue Regelwerk RDA orientiert, sollen Katalognutzer auf neuar-tige Weise im 'bibliographischen Universum' navigieren können. Der Beitrag erläutert und diskutiert einer-seits die zentralen Elemente des theoretischen Modells, andererseits die Chancen und Probleme einer prakti-schen Umsetzung. Die in Deutschland vorhandenen Datenstrukturen bilden dafür eine vergleichsweise gute Ausgangsbasis. Denkbar ist aber auch eine virtuelle 'FRBRisierung' ohne Eingriff in den Datenbestand. Ein Jahrzehnt ist vergangen, seitdem der Abschlussbericht der 'Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records' von der IFLA veröffentlicht wurde; seit 2006 liegt auch eine deutsche Übersetzung vor. Entwickelt wurde das dort beschriebene und unter der Abkürzung FRBR (auf Englisch zumeist "för-bör" ausgesprochen) bekannt gewordene Modell zwischen 1992 und 1997; die erste Anregung ging auf ein Seminar in Stockholm im Jahr 1990 zurück. Zahllose Arbeiten - wenn auch nur sehr wenige davon auf Deutsch - sind über die FRBR geschrieben worden, und auch im neuen Regelwerk 'Resource Description and Access' (RDA) spielen FRBR-Konzepte eine große Rolle. Umso bemerkenswerter ist es, dass auch im Jahr 2008 viele Bibliothekare nur eine vage Vorstellung davon haben - übrigens nicht nur im deutschsprachigen Raum, sondern auch in den USA: Robert L. Maxwell resümierte jüngst, dass "many librarians even now do not know what to make of it". . . . Auf alle Fälle ist es nun - zehn Jahre nach der FRBR-Studie - auch für deutschsprachige Bibliothekare an der Zeit, sich verstärkt mit den FRBR auseinanderzusetzen. Die Erfahrungen aus der eigenen Katalogtradi-tion, die in mancherlei Hinsicht schon FRBR-Qualität besitzt, sollte man dabei selbstbewusst in die internationale Diskussion einbringen. Besonders wichtig ist es, möglichst bald den Schritt von der Theorie in die Praxis zu gehen und unsere Kataloge mit erweiterten FRBR-Funktionalitäten anzureichern. Auch wenn man bei der Umsetzung Augenmaß walten lässt, so bedeutet dies natürlich trotzdem zusätzlichen Aufwand, der sich schlecht in die vorhandenen Rahmenbedingungen zu fügen scheint. Aber es würde sich - wie Maxwell richtig bemerkt - dabei um "effort well spent" handeln, "particularly in a period when the search capabilities of our catalogs are increasingly under fire".