-
ueda, K.: Simplified plan for a new maintenance system for three tools : Basic subject Headings, Nippon Decimal classification, and Nippon Cataloguing Rules (2000)
0.02
0.015193459 = product of:
0.055709347 = sum of:
0.0066271294 = weight(_text_:a in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066271294 = score(doc=748,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041664424 = score(doc=748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
0.044915777 = weight(_text_:k in 748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044915777 = score(doc=748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=748)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Toshokan-Kai. 52(2000) no.1, S.2-11
- Type
- a
-
Kawamura, K.; Kita, K.; Shiba, M.: Prospects for the Japanese version of the Broad System of Ordering : the design and uses of machine-readable form (1996)
0.01
0.014010749 = product of:
0.051372744 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=516,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
0.042347 = weight(_text_:k in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042347 = score(doc=516,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Describes the ongoing project for the creation of a Japanese version of the BSO. Translation of the original English BSO into Japanese was completed in April 1995. BSO-mrJ has 3 components: a standardized MARC format for data exchange; an object-oriented database; and a device for human-recognizable classification output
- Source
- TP & D forum series. 1996, no.5, S.36-48
- Type
- a
-
Oshiro, Z.; Kaji, K.: ¬A survey of Japanese Internet OPACs (1997)
0.01
0.010628072 = product of:
0.038969595 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 1773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=1773,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1773, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1773)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=1773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1773)
0.02994385 = weight(_text_:k in 1773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02994385 = score(doc=1773,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 1773, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1773)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Reports a survey conducted in April 1997 of 136 Japanese WWW and Telnet OPACs from the persepctive of their functions and user interfaces. These included: types of searchable files; access points; kinds of displays; login commands; search methods; Boolean operation; help functions; search history; and browsing of indexed terms. Results indicate a sharp rise in the number of WWW OPACs and problems with the provision of functions and user interfaces by Japanese WWW OPACs
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.3, S.103-116
- Type
- a
-
Fukuda, M.; Kageura, K.: Research into 'see also' references in the dictionary of terminology : using semantic relations between entries (1993)
0.01
0.010399775 = product of:
0.038132507 = sum of:
0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005411029 = score(doc=1050,freq=6.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.02994385 = weight(_text_:k in 1050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02994385 = score(doc=1050,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 1050, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1050)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Reports a study to clarify the nature and functions of 'see also' references in the dictionaly of terminology by surveying 3 such dictionaries, using semantic relations between referring entries and referred entries as a key. The following points were clarified: major types of semantic relations between referring and referred entries and their quantitative tendencies; correlations between the general nature of dictionaries and overall tendencies of 'see also' references; some tendencies concerning the directions of references under some semantic relations; and correlations between the nature of dictionaries and the directions of 'see also' references
- Source
- Library and information science. 1993, no.31, S.1-23
- Type
- a
-
Hosono, K.: Information retrieval functions in digital libraries (1996)
0.01
0.010128972 = product of:
0.037139565 = sum of:
0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 5722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044180867 = score(doc=5722,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5722, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5722)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 5722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=5722,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 5722, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5722)
0.02994385 = weight(_text_:k in 5722) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02994385 = score(doc=5722,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 5722, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5722)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Information retrieval functions in digital libraries have a different context from those which apply to searching commercial databases or OPACs. Different methods of browsing in this context are described, but the retrieval function should also include ordinary Boolean searching. Conversion of printed materials to electronic format using OCR can result in errors, which may cause problems for keyword searching. The n-gram method of approximate or fuzzy matching to reduce this problem is described
- Source
- Pharmaceutical library bulletin [=Yakugaku Toshokan]. 41(1996) no.2, S.91-99
- Type
- a
-
Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997)
0.01
0.009318431 = product of:
0.03416758 = sum of:
0.008200655 = weight(_text_:a in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008200655 = score(doc=91,freq=18.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.26752928 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022529786 = score(doc=91,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00343714 = score(doc=91,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.1, S.1-18
- Type
- a
-
Voshida, K.: ¬A study on improving subject access to the OPAC : a survey of catalogue use comparing an OPAC and a card catalogue in a private university library (1994)
0.01
0.008610066 = product of:
0.03157024 = sum of:
0.0070291325 = weight(_text_:a in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070291325 = score(doc=753,freq=18.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
0.022457888 = weight(_text_:k in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022457888 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- Describes a study conducted to compare the use of a new OPAC with that of the card catalogue looking primarily at the area of subject access. Library science students at a private university were asked to respond to questions concerning: the number of subject searches and searches for specific items that they carried out on the OPAC and on the card catalogue; the success rate of the catalogue searches; how the search was carried out (classification number or keywords); librarian assistance required; and knowledge of the Nippon Decimal Classification. Results revealed that while there was an increase in the number of users as a result of the introduction of OPAC facilities, there were certain aspects which required attention such as the area of subject searches
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 40(1994) no.2, S.71-82
- Type
- a
-
Klein, R.D.: ¬The problem of cataloguing world literature using the Nippon Decimal Classification (1994)
0.01
0.0058917557 = product of:
0.021603104 = sum of:
0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044180867 = score(doc=867,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
0.014407388 = product of:
0.028814776 = sum of:
0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 867) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028814776 = score(doc=867,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 867, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=867)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- The Nippon Decimal Classification (NDC) system, extensively used in Japanese libraries, was devised in 1929. It is difficult to use NDC to classify world literature, such as fiction in English by non American, non British writers. This is not necessarily straightforward in other classification schemes but a survey of 40 Japanese university libraries, of which 24 responded, showed remarkable inconsistencies in the treatment of 22 world literature authors. NDC clearly needs updating to deal with this problem
- Source
- Toshokan-kai. 46(1994) no.1, S.24-31
- Type
- a
-
Anzai, H.; Yamamoto, T.; Ishizuka, H.: Experimental service of cataloguing database through WWW (1996)
0.00
0.004777275 = product of:
0.017516674 = sum of:
0.008973843 = product of:
0.017947687 = sum of:
0.017947687 = weight(_text_:h in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017947687 = score(doc=509,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.27173662 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006112407 = score(doc=509,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=509)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Abstract
- An information retrieval system for a cataloguing database through the WWW is developed, and experimentally served to Japan MARC and ULIS (Univeristy of Library and Information Science) OPAC data. Since Japanese words are not separated by obvious delimiters, ensuring the same segmentation between the query and the database is a problem. The present system solves the problem by using the multiple hash screening technique for processing both book titles and query strings, based on the same dictionary and using similar algorithms. Database management is handled by ADABAS, reducing management chores and and response time. The effectiveness of the multiple hash screening technique for a Japanese text based information system is examined, and the limitation of the Web's hypertext environment for a bibliographic information retrieval service is discussed
- Source
- ULIS. 15(1996) no.2, S.1-16
- Type
- a
-
Ishiyama, H.: Outline of the Nippon Decimal Classification, 9th edition : study committee (1992)
0.00
0.0044841985 = product of:
0.01644206 = sum of:
0.009064952 = product of:
0.018129904 = sum of:
0.018129904 = weight(_text_:h in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018129904 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039050733 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034720355 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Toshokan Zasshi / Library journal. 86(1992) no.11, S.809-810
- Type
- a
-
Matsushita, A.: Science Citation Index on CD-ROM (1992)
0.00
0.0026166236 = product of:
0.01439143 = sum of:
0.008836173 = weight(_text_:a in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008836173 = score(doc=5723,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055552567 = score(doc=5723,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5723, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5723)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Pharmaceutical library bulletin. 37(1992) no.4, S.270-282
- Type
- a
-
Ueda, S.: Problems with title and author searching in WWW OPAC (1999)
0.00
0.0022438879 = product of:
0.012341383 = sum of:
0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005467103 = score(doc=6437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
0.00687428 = weight(_text_:s in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00687428 = score(doc=6437,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23783323 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Library and information science. 1999, no.41, S.1-15
- Type
- a
-
Kobayashi, Y.: Area tables of Dewey 18 as compared with Nippon Decimal Classification (1976)
0.00
0.002146068 = product of:
0.011803374 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 6166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=6166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 6166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6166)
0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 6166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055552567 = score(doc=6166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 6166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6166)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Library and information science. 1976, no.14, S.55-69
- Type
- a
-
Agata, T.: ¬A measure for evaluating search engines on the World Wide Web : retrieval test with ESL (Expected Search Length) (1997)
0.00
0.0019624678 = product of:
0.010793572 = sum of:
0.0066271294 = weight(_text_:a in 3892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0066271294 = score(doc=3892,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 3892, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3892)
0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 3892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041664424 = score(doc=3892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3892)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Library and information science. 1997, no.37, S.1-11
- Type
- a
-
Watanabe, T.: ¬A new tide in the user studies : focusing on C.C. Kuhlthau's cognitive user model (1997)
0.00
0.0016593148 = product of:
0.009126231 = sum of:
0.006695806 = weight(_text_:a in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006695806 = score(doc=74,freq=12.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=74,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- Reviews a series of studies conducted by C.C, Kuhlthau who investigated users' information seeking behaviour in libraries over a 10 year period. In her study she constructed and Information Search Process (ISP) Model which represents aspects of user activities as a whole including feelings, thoughts and actions or behaviour. Argues that, while the ISP model sheds new light on user studies, it has problems in the following areas: problem solving processes; the understanding of 'feelings'; and the method of investigating users' information seeking behaviour. Recommends that the ISP model be reconstructed from different perspectives and verified in areas other than libraries. This may lead to the development of a new model of information seeking
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.1, S.19-37
- Type
- a
-
Takano, M.: OPACs in university libraries (1994)
0.00
0.0016353898 = product of:
0.008994644 = sum of:
0.0055226083 = weight(_text_:a in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055226083 = score(doc=871,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034720355 = score(doc=871,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 871, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=871)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- In 1991 60,4% of Japanese university libraries had introduced computerized systems and 57,5% of these had computerized catalogues. In this context, discusses the following: subject searching in computerized catalogues; standardisation of OPACs, particularly as these are now available to a wide range of external users; and access to journal articles, especially in view of increasing journal purchase relative to books
- Source
- Toshokan Zasshi. 88(1994) no.3, S.158-160
- Type
- a
-
Midorikawa, N.: Is the synthetic expression method of the Dewey Decimal Classification an effective device for treating complex subjects? (1997)
0.00
0.0016353898 = product of:
0.008994644 = sum of:
0.0055226083 = weight(_text_:a in 6335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055226083 = score(doc=6335,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 6335, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6335)
0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 6335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034720355 = score(doc=6335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 6335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6335)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- Consideres enumeration as a more effective device than the synthetic method of the DDC
- Source
- Library and information science. 1997, no.38, S.1-21
- Type
- a
-
Taniguchi, S.: ¬An analysis of the oriented-ness in cataloguing rules (1997)
0.00
0.0016027769 = product of:
0.008815273 = sum of:
0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039050733 = score(doc=6343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
0.0049101994 = weight(_text_:s in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0049101994 = score(doc=6343,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 43(1997) no.3, S.129-139
- Type
- a
-
Ito, J.: Bibliographic structure : a frame of reference for bibliographic relationships (1994)
0.00
0.0015532422 = product of:
0.008542832 = sum of:
0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006112407 = score(doc=3085,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 3085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=3085,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3085, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3085)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- Attempts to provide a theoretical rationale for the taxonomy of bibliographic relationships between a given work and its related bibliographic entities. Examines the bibliographic structure of the document carrying the messages in terms of their bibliographic functions of use and preservation, since the most common bibliographic relationships are normally revealed within the document itself. Defines the bibliographic characteristics of the document from the perspective of an analysis of the pattern of their structural elements. Presents 4 dimensions of the bibliographic structure as a frame of reference for the categorisation of bibliographic relationships, together with their subordinate types of equivalent relationships, focusing on common structural patterns revealed with in each entity itself
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 40(1994) no.4, S.160-172
- Type
- a
-
Ueda, S.: Online public access catalogues (OPACs) of university libraries in Japan (1995)
0.00
0.0015174994 = product of:
0.008346247 = sum of:
0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 3342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044180867 = score(doc=3342,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3342, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3342)
0.00392816 = weight(_text_:s in 3342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00392816 = score(doc=3342,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 3342, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3342)
0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a postal survey of the use of OPACs in Japanese university libraries based upon an 84.9% return rate. These revealed that 60.4% of university libraries used OPACs, that most libraries were linked to the automated circulation system, but that only 6.5% had Internet connection
- Source
- Annals of Japan Society of Library Science. 41(1995) no.2, S.81-88
- Type
- a
