Search (216 results, page 11 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Helmbrecht-Schaar, A.: Entwicklung eines Verfahrens der automatischen Klassifizierung für Textdokumente aus dem Fachbereich Informatik mithilfe eines fachspezifischen Klassifikationssystems (2007) 0.00 
    8.047755E-4 = product of:
  0.004426265 = sum of:
    0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0023430442 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Pages
    62 S
  2. Godby, C. J.; Stuler, J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification as a knowledge base for automatic subject categorization (2001) 0.00 
    6.956682E-4 = product of:
  0.0076523502 = sum of:
    0.0076523502 = weight(_text_:a in 1567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0076523502 = score(doc=1567,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 1567, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1567)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Abstract
    This paper describes a set of experiments in adapting a subset of the Library of Congress Classification for use as a database for automatic classification. A high degree of concept integrity was obtained when subject headings were mapped from OCLC's WorldCat database and filtered using the log-likelihood statistic
    Footnote
    Paper, IFLA Preconference "Subject Retrieval in a Networked Environment", Dublin, OH, August 2001.
  3. Sebastiani, F.: ¬A tutorial an automated text categorisation (1999) 0.00 
    6.390121E-4 = product of:
  0.0070291325 = sum of:
    0.0070291325 = weight(_text_:a in 3390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0070291325 = score(doc=3390,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 3390, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3390)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Abstract
    The automated categorisation (or classification) of texts into topical categories has a long history, dating back at least to 1960. Until the late '80s, the dominant approach to the problem involved knowledge-engineering automatic categorisers, i.e. manually building a set of rules encoding expert knowledge an how to classify documents. In the '90s, with the booming production and availability of on-line documents, automated text categorisation has witnessed an increased and renewed interest. A newer paradigm based an machine learning has superseded the previous approach. Within this paradigm, a general inductive process automatically builds a classifier by "learning", from a set of previously classified documents, the characteristics of one or more categories; the advantages are a very good effectiveness, a considerable savings in terms of expert manpower, and domain independence. In this tutorial we look at the main approaches that have been taken towards automatic text categorisation within the general machine learning paradigm. Issues of document indexing, classifier construction, and classifier evaluation, will be touched upon.
  4. Koch, T.; Ardö, A.; Noodén, L.: ¬The construction of a robot-generated subject index : DESIRE II D3.6a, Working Paper 1 (1999) 0.00 
    5.217511E-4 = product of:
  0.0057392623 = sum of:
    0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 1668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057392623 = score(doc=1668,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1668, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1668)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Abstract
    This working paper describes the creation of a test database to carry out the automatic classification tasks of the DESIRE II work package D3.6a on. It is an improved version of NetLab's existing "All" Engineering database created after a comparative study of the outcome of two different approaches to collecting the documents. These two methods were selected from seven different general methodologies to build robot-generated subject indices, presented in this paper. We found a surprisingly low overlap between the Engineering link collections we used as seed pages for the robot and subsequently an even more surprisingly low overlap between the resources collected by the two different approaches. That inspite of using basically the same services to start the harvesting process from. A intellectual evaluation of the contents of both databases showed almost exactly the same percentage of relevant documents (77%), indicating that the main difference between those aproaches was the coverage of the resulting database.
  5. Shafer, K.E.: Evaluating Scorpion results (1998) 0.00 
    5.0205534E-4 = product of:
  0.0055226083 = sum of:
    0.0055226083 = weight(_text_:a in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0055226083 = score(doc=1569,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Abstract
    Scorpion is a research project at OCLC that builds tools for automatic subject assignment by combining library science and information retrieval techniques. A thesis of Scorpion is that the Dewey Decimal Classification (Dewey) can be used to perform automatic subject assignment for electronic items.
  6. Koch, T.; Ardö, A.: Automatic classification of full-text HTML-documents from one specific subject area : DESIRE II D3.6a, Working Paper 2 (2000) 0.00 
    4.919117E-4 = product of:
  0.005411029 = sum of:
    0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 1667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005411029 = score(doc=1667,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1667, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1667)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Content
    1 Introduction / 2 Method overview / 3 Ei thesaurus preprocessing / 4 Automatic classification process: 4.1 Matching -- 4.2 Weighting -- 4.3 Preparation for display / 5 Results of the classification process / 6 Evaluations / 7 Software / 8 Other applications / 9 Experiments with universal classification systems / References / Appendix A: Ei classification service: Software / Appendix B: Use of the classification software as subject filter in a WWW harvester.
  7. Adams, K.C.: Word wranglers : Automatic classification tools transform enterprise documents from "bags of words" into knowledge resources (2003) 0.00 
    3.9690957E-4 = product of:
  0.0043660053 = sum of:
    0.0043660053 = weight(_text_:a in 1665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0043660053 = score(doc=1665,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 1665, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1665)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Abstract
    Taxonomies are an important part of any knowledge management (KM) system, and automatic classification software is emerging as a "killer app" for consumer and enterprise portals. A number of companies such as Inxight Software , Mohomine, Metacode, and others claim to interpret the semantic content of any textual document and automatically classify text on the fly. The promise that software could automatically produce a Yahoo-style directory is a siren call not many IT managers are able to resist. KM needs have grown more complex due to the increasing amount of digital information, the declining effectiveness of keyword searching, and heterogeneous document formats in corporate databases. This environment requires innovative KM tools, and automatic classification technology is an example of this new kind of software. These products can be divided into three categories according to their underlying technology - rules-based, catalog-by-example, and statistical clustering. Evolving trends in this market include framing classification as a cyborg (computer- and human-based) activity and the increasing use of extensible markup language (XML) and support vector machine (SVM) technology. In this article, we'll survey the rapidly changing automatic classification software market and examine the features and capabilities of leading classification products.
  8. Search Engines and Beyond : Developing efficient knowledge management systems, April 19-20 1999, Boston, Mass (1999) 0.00 
    2.8400533E-4 = product of:
  0.0031240587 = sum of:
    0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031240587 = score(doc=2596,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Content
    Ramana Rao (Inxight, Palo Alto, CA) 7 ± 2 Insights on achieving Effective Information Access Session One: Updates and a twelve month perspective Danny Sullivan (Search Engine Watch, US / England) Portalization and other search trends Carol Tenopir (University of Tennessee) Search realities faced by end users and professional searchers Session Two: Today's search engines and beyond Daniel Hoogterp (Retrieval Technologies, McLean, VA) Effective presentation and utilization of search techniques Rick Kenny (Fulcrum Technologies, Ontario, Canada) Beyond document clustering: The knowledge impact statement Gary Stock (Ingenius, Kalamazoo, MI) Automated change monitoring Gary Culliss (Direct Hit, Wellesley Hills, MA) User popularity ranked search engines Byron Dom (IBM, CA) Automatically finding the best pages on the World Wide Web (CLEVER) Peter Tomassi (LookSmart, San Francisco, CA) Adding human intellect to search technology Session Three: Panel discussion: Human v automated categorization and editing Ev Brenner (New York, NY)- Chairman James Callan (University of Massachusetts, MA) Marc Krellenstein (Northern Light Technology, Cambridge, MA) Dan Miller (Ask Jeeves, Berkeley, CA) Session Four: Updates and a twelve month perspective Steve Arnold (AIT, Harrods Creek, KY) Review: The leading edge in search and retrieval software Ellen Voorhees (NIST, Gaithersburg, MD) TREC update Session Five: Search engines now and beyond Intelligent Agents John Snyder (Muscat, Cambridge, England) Practical issues behind intelligent agents Text summarization Therese Firmin, (Dept of Defense, Ft George G. Meade, MD) The TIPSTER/SUMMAC evaluation of automatic text summarization systems Cross language searching Elizabeth Liddy (TextWise, Syracuse, NY) A conceptual interlingua approach to cross-language retrieval. Video search and retrieval Armon Amir (IBM, Almaden, CA) CueVideo: Modular system for automatic indexing and browsing of video/audio Speech recognition Michael Witbrock (Lycos, Waltham, MA) Retrieval of spoken documents Visualization James A. Wise (Integral Visuals, Richland, WA) Information visualization in the new millennium: Emerging science or passing fashion? Text mining David Evans (Claritech, Pittsburgh, PA) Text mining - towards decision support
  9. Zhang, X: Rough set theory based automatic text categorization (2005) 0.00 
    2.5251167E-4 = product of:
  0.0027776284 = sum of:
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=2822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Pages
    200 S
  10. Jersek, T.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung mit Lingo : Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse (2012) 0.00 
    2.5251167E-4 = product of:
  0.0027776284 = sum of:
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Pages
    V. 56 S
  11. Koch, T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Automatic classification and content navigation support for Web services : DESIRE II cooperates with OCLC (1998) 0.00 
    2.485047E-4 = product of:
  0.0027335514 = sum of:
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 1568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=1568,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 1568, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1568)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Abstract
    Emerging standards in knowledge representation and organization are preparing the way for distributed vocabulary support in Internet search services. NetLab researchers are exploring several innovative solutions for searching and browsing in the subject-based Internet gateway, Electronic Engineering Library, Sweden (EELS). The implementation of the EELS service is described, specifically, the generation of the robot-gathered database 'All' engineering and the automated application of the Ei thesaurus and classification scheme. NetLab and OCLC researchers are collaborating to investigate advanced solutions to automated classification in the DESIRE II context. A plan for furthering the development of distributed vocabulary support in Internet search services is offered.
  12. Wille, J.: Automatisches Klassifizieren bibliographischer Beschreibungsdaten : Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse (2006) 0.00 
    2.2094771E-4 = product of:
  0.0024304248 = sum of:
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Pages
    40 S
  13. Koch, T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: DDC and knowledge organization in the digital library : Research and development. Demonstration pages (1999) 0.00 
    2.1300402E-4 = product of:
  0.0023430442 = sum of:
    0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0023430442 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Content
    1. Increased Importance of Knowledge Organization in Internet Services - 2. Quality Subject Service and the role of classification - 3. Developing the DDC into a knowledge organization instrument for the digital library. OCLC site - 4. DESIRE's Barefoot Solutions of Automatic Classification - 5. Advanced Classification Solutions in DESIRE and CORC - 6. Future directions of research and development - 7. General references
  14. Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen anhand von bibliografischen Daten mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2007) 0.00 
    1.8938375E-4 = product of:
  0.0020832212 = sum of:
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=558,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Pages
    35 S
  15. Sommer, M.: Automatische Generierung von DDC-Notationen für Hochschulveröffentlichungen (2012) 0.00 
    1.8938375E-4 = product of:
  0.0020832212 = sum of:
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Pages
    V, 67 S
  16. Krüger, C.: Evaluation des WWW-Suchdienstes GERHARD unter besonderer Beachtung automatischer Indexierung (1999) 0.00 
    1.578198E-4 = product of:
  0.0017360178 = sum of:
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 1777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=1777,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1777, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1777)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Pages
    I,46,III S

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 170
  • d 43
  • a 1
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 178
  • el 29
  • x 9
  • m 5
  • r 4
  • s 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects