Search (409 results, page 21 of 21)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Maxwell, R.L.: Bibliographic control (2009) 0.00 
    3.0123317E-4 = product of:
  0.0033135647 = sum of:
    0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 3750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0033135647 = score(doc=3750,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 3750, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3750)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic control is the process of creation, exchange, preservation, and use of data about information resources. Formal bibliographic control has been practiced for millennia, but modern techniques began to be developed and implemented in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. A series of cataloging codes characterized this period. These codes governed the creation of library catalogs, first in book form, then on cards, and finally in electronic formats, including MAchine-Readable Cataloging (MARC). The period was also characterized by the rise of shared cataloging programs, allowing the development of resource-saving copy cataloging procedures. Such programs were assisted by the development of cataloging networks such as OCLC and RLG. The twentieth century saw progress in the theory of bibliographic control, including the 1961 Paris Principles, culminating with the early twenty-first century Statement of International Cataloguing Principles and IFLA's Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR). Toward the end of the period bibliographic control began to be applied to newly invented electronic media, as "metadata." Trends point toward continued development of collaborative and international approaches to bibliographic control.
    Type
    a
  2. USMARC format for bibliographic data : including guidelines for content designation (1994) 0.00 
    2.8400533E-4 = product of:
  0.0031240587 = sum of:
    0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 8041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031240587 = score(doc=8041,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 8041, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8041)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Abstract
    Here is the standard for representing and exchanging bibliographic data in machine-readable form in the United States. This comprehensive publication defines the structure of the MARC bibliographic record in full detail. Also defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes and codes values) that identify the data elements in USMARC bibliographic records. Includes specifications for a National Level Bibliographic record (both full and minimal). The remaining future format integration changes are specified
  3. USMARC format for community information : including guidelines for content designation (1993) 0.00 
    2.8400533E-4 = product of:
  0.0031240587 = sum of:
    0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 8044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031240587 = score(doc=8044,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 8044, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8044)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Abstract
    The latest format. Features specifications for inputting and communicating community information - i.e., information about non-bibliographic resources (programs, services, organizations, individuals, one-time and ongoing events) that fulfill a community's information needs. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Includes full record examples showing how records are coded
  4. USMARC format for authority data : including guidelines for content designation (1993) 0.00 
    2.5251167E-4 = product of:
  0.0027776284 = sum of:
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=2713,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2713, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2713)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Pages
    650 S
  5. USMARC format for classification data : including guidelines for content designation (1991) 0.00 
    2.485047E-4 = product of:
  0.0027335514 = sum of:
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 4372) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=4372,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 4372, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4372)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Abstract
    Format specifications for the communication of MARC classification records, which may be used in online public catalog retrieval systems, in systems to maintain and develop classification schedules, and in online systems for library classifiers. Defines the codes and conventions (tags, indicators, subfield codes, and codes values) that identify the data elements in the records. Developed to support the 2 major US classification schemes: Library of Congress Classification and Dewey Decimal Classification, but also lets you communicate other classification schemes. Includes a glossary of classification terms and full record examples of LCC, DDC, NLM classification and UDC
  6. Willer, M.: UNIMARC format for authority records : its scope and issues for authority control (2004) 0.00 
    2.485047E-4 = product of:
  0.0027335514 = sum of:
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 5670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=5670,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5670, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5670)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Type
    a
  7. SiBiL: Système intégré pour les bibliothèques universitaires de Lausanne : 9 années d'automatisation à la Bibliothèque cantonale et universitaire (1980) 0.00 
    2.2094771E-4 = product of:
  0.0024304248 = sum of:
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=4294,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Pages
    276 S
  8. Richter, S.: ¬Die formale Beschreibung von Dokumenten in Archiven und Bibliotheken : Perspektiven des Datenaustauschs (2004) 0.00 
    1.7855273E-4 = product of:
  0.00196408 = sum of:
    0.00196408 = weight(_text_:s in 4982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00196408 = score(doc=4982,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 4982, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4982)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Pages
    101 S
  9. Nix, M.: ¬Die praktische Einsetzbarkeit des CIDOC CRM in Informationssystemen im Bereich des Kulturerbes (2004) 0.00 
    1.578198E-4 = product of:
  0.0017360178 = sum of:
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=3742,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3742, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3742)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    Pages
    77 S

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 337
  • m 39
  • s 19
  • el 16
  • r 5
  • x 5
  • l 4
  • b 2
  • n 2
  • ? 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications