Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Ruiz-Pérez, R.: Choice of author access points for online catalogs of monographs in Spanish (1998) 0.02 
    0.015105689 = product of:
  0.055387523 = sum of:
    0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 5315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005467103 = score(doc=5315,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5315, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5315)
    0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 5315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045059573 = score(doc=5315,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 5315, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5315)
    0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 5315) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0048608496 = score(doc=5315,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 5315, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5315)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 26(1998) no.4, S.5-32
    Type
    a
  2. Catalogue 2.0 : the future of the library catalogue (2013) 0.01 
    0.010596051 = product of:
  0.029139139 = sum of:
    0.0036259806 = product of:
      0.007251961 = sum of:
        0.007251961 = weight(_text_:h in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007251961 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0015620294 = weight(_text_:a in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0015620294 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=1339,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
    0.0211735 = weight(_text_:k in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0211735 = score(doc=1339,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.22311112 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Abstract
    Will there be a library catalogue in the future and, if so, what will it look like? In the last 25 years, the library catalogue has undergone an evolution, from card catalogues to OPACs, discovery systems and even linked data applications making library bibliographic data accessible on the web. At the same time, users expectations of what catalogues will be able to offer in the way of discovery have never been higher. This groundbreaking edited collection brings together some of the foremost international cataloguing practitioners and thought leaders, including Lorcan Dempsey, Emmanuelle Bermès, Marshall Breeding and Karen Calhoun, to provide an overview of the current state of the art of the library catalogue and look ahead to see what the library catalogue might become. Practical projects and cutting edge concepts are showcased in discussions of linked data and the Semantic Web, user expectations and needs, bibliographic control, the FRBRization of the catalogue, innovations in search and retrieval, next-generation discovery products and mobile catalogues.
    Classification
    BBVP (FH K)
    Editor
    Chambers, S.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: BuB. 66(2014) H.7/8, S.566-567 (D. Askey)
    GHBS
    BBVP (FH K)
    Pages
    XXVII, 212 S
    Type
    s
  3. Verwer, R.: Waar is W.F. Hermans? : het bedrog van de OPC (1996) 0.01 
    0.0092555415 = product of:
  0.033936985 = sum of:
    0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005411029 = score(doc=4919,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
    0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025748327 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=4919,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4919, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4919)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    A study of the online catalogues of major academic libraries and databases in the Netherlands shows considerable variation in the form of name used for the author W.F. Hermans. The problem lies with a lack of authority control in headings used in the Dutch national union Pica catalogue. Reactions from 2 cataloguers point to the difficulties in maintaining catalogues in the face of reduced funding and to the important role played by the Pica project in improving library services and reducing cataloguing backlogs
    Source
    Open. 28(1996) no.4, S.102-103
    Type
    a
  4. Khalid, H.M.; Mahmood, K.: Cataloguing practice in university libraries : a comparison of three developing countries (Pakistan, Malaysia, Saudia Arabia) (1997) 0.01 
    0.009099804 = product of:
  0.033365946 = sum of:
    0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047346503 = score(doc=3018,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=3018,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
    0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 3018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02620087 = score(doc=3018,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 3018, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3018)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Surveys the status of catalguing practice in university libraries in 3 Asian developing countries, Pakistan, Malaysia, and Saudia Arabia. Examines the extent of the usage of international cataloguing tools such as cataloguing codes (AACR, ISBD), classification schemes (DDC, LCC) and subject heading lists (Sears, LCSH). Results indicate that there is an overall uniformity in the use of such tools, with a trend towards automation of cataloguing services with more access points for catalogue searching. Online catalogues are also replacing all traditional catalogue forms (card, printed, and microform). Findings show that, in using information technology in technical services, Malaysian university libraries are more advanced than those of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia
    Source
    Library review. 46(1997) no.5, S.328-338
    Type
    a
  5. Erklärung zu Internationalen Katalogisierungsprinzipien : Verabschiedeter Entwurf des 1. IFLA Meeting an an International Cataloguing Code, Frankfurt, Deutschland, 2003. Deutsche Übersetzung des "Statement of International Cataloguing Principles" (2004) 0.01 
    0.007518492 = product of:
  0.020675853 = sum of:
    0.005127911 = product of:
      0.010255822 = sum of:
        0.010255822 = weight(_text_:h in 2145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010255822 = score(doc=2145,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 2145, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2145)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0015620294 = weight(_text_:a in 2145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0015620294 = score(doc=2145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 2145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2145)
    0.0013888142 = weight(_text_:s in 2145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0013888142 = score(doc=2145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 2145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2145)
    0.012597097 = weight(_text_:u in 2145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012597097 = score(doc=2145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14471136 = fieldWeight in 2145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2145)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Footnote
    Zu der Übersetzung gab es in INETBIB folgenden Kommentar von M. Münnich, J. Winkler u. H. Popst: In der deutschen Übersetzung der "Statement of Principles" hat die Arbeitsstelle freundlicherweise die Mitarbeit von Herrn Croissant, Herrn Popst und mir bei der Übersetzung erwähnt. Dabei muss aber unsererseits betont werden, dass an ganz entscheidenden Stellen unsere Vorschläge nicht akzeptiert wurden. Dies sind u.a.: -- expression: unser Vorschlag war "Fassung", da es Expression im Deutschen nicht im Sinn von FRBR gibt -- manifestation: unser Vorschlag "physische Form" - Manisfestation gibt es ebenfalls so nicht -- concept: unser Vorschlag: "Abstraktum". Es geht aus den Beispielen in FRBR hervor, dass nicht Konzept gemeint ist. -- object: unser Vorschlag: "Gegenstand" -- place: unser Vorschlag: "geographische Einheit". Die Bedeutung in FRBR geht über Ort weit hinaus, -- agent: unser Vorschlag "Person oder Körperschaft" -- creator: unser Vorschlag: verantwortliche Person oder Körperschaft. Eine Körperschaft kann kaum ein geistiger Schöfper sein und Schöpfer läßt eine andere Assoziation zu. Im Übrigen wollten wir die u.E. im Deutschen ungebräuchliche Bezeichnung "bibliografische Ressource" durch "Dokument" ersetzen.
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 38(2004) H.3, S.348-357
    Type
    a
  6. Fattahi, R.: ¬A uniform approach to the indexing of cataloguing data in online library systems (1997) 0.01 
    0.0072637293 = product of:
  0.026633674 = sum of:
    0.0052392064 = weight(_text_:a in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0052392064 = score(doc=131,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
    0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019311246 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Argues that in library cataloguing and for optional functionality of bibliographic records the indexing of fields and subfields should follow a uniform approach. This would maintain effectiveness in searching, retrieval and display of bibliographic information both within systems and between systems. However, a review of different postings to the AUTOCAT and USMARC discussion lists indicates that the indexing and tagging of cataloguing data do not, at present, follow a consistent approach in online library systems. If the rationale of cataloguing principles is to bring uniformity in bibliographic description and effectiveness in access, they should also address the question of uniform approaches to the indexing of cataloguing data. In this context and in terms of the identification and handling of data elements, cataloguing standards (codes, MARC formats and the Z39.50 standard) should be brought closer, in that they should provide guidelines for the designation of data elements for machine readable records
    Source
    Library review. 46(1997) no.5, S.339-343
    Type
    a
  7. Fattahi, R.; Parirokh, M.: Restructuring the bibliographic record for better organization, management, and representation of knowledge in the global online environment : a new spproach (2003) 0.01 
    0.0065463237 = product of:
  0.024003185 = sum of:
    0.0061744633 = weight(_text_:a in 2693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061744633 = score(doc=2693,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20142901 = fieldWeight in 2693, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2693)
    0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 2693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016092705 = score(doc=2693,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 2693, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2693)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 2693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=2693,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2693, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2693)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    The computer technology has considerable potential for better and more efficient management of knowledge and information sources. It is possible to provide easy, integrated and straightforward access to works of knowledge appearing in different expressions, editions, and manifestations (i.e., to bibliographic families). The online environment requires that the bibliographic record, as the surrogate for works of knowledge, should be restructured to provide users with a high-quality finding, identifying and collocating bibliographic tool. Unlike the existing flat structure, the multi-level structure of the Work Record would provide catalog users with the ability to discover if a work has been published/represented in different editions and manifestations and if there is any relationship among different works in a catalog or an the Internet. A similar structure for the Author Record would provide better access to different works by an author or about an author. A new structure for the bibliographic record is suggested through an analysis and categorization of the different relationships that exist in the bibliographic universe. A prototype catalogue developed based an the new structure (available an the Internet at: http://wilma.silas.unsw.edu.au/ students/rfattahi/super.html) illustrates the ability of providing multi-level, yet easy access to voluminous works and voluminous authors. Furthermore, the prototype catalog provides a clearer picture of bibliographic families and helps OPAC users decide an specific editions, manifestations, or items related to a specific work.
    Pages
    S.107-112
    Type
    a
  8. Martin, G.: Main entry : the argument for a defence of main entry in the OPAC (1996) 0.01 
    0.0063908547 = product of:
  0.023433134 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=7234,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
    0.014407388 = product of:
      0.028814776 = sum of:
        0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 7234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028814776 = score(doc=7234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7234)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Argues that the current understanding of main entry is the chief access point for the work in a physical item being described by a bibliographic record. Explains the justification for main entries while drawing attention to the few related problems as they relate to OPACs
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.1/2, S.21-25
    Type
    a
  9. Ballard, T.; Grimaldi, A.: Improve OPAC searching by reducing tagging errors in MARC records (1997) 0.01 
    0.0058917557 = product of:
  0.021603104 = sum of:
    0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0044180867 = score(doc=695,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
    0.014407388 = product of:
      0.028814776 = sum of:
        0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028814776 = score(doc=695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=695)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
    Source
    Library software review. 16(1997) no.3, S.152-155
    Type
    a
  10. Ayres, F.H.; Nielsen, L.P.S.; Ridley, M.J.: Bibliographic management : a new approach using the manifestations concept and the Bradford OPAC (1996) 0.01 
    0.005591998 = product of:
  0.020503992 = sum of:
    0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005467103 = score(doc=5162,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
    0.012606464 = product of:
      0.025212929 = sum of:
        0.025212929 = weight(_text_:22 in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025212929 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    The Bradford OPAC is an experimental prototype OPAC, with a graphical user interface, based on the manifestation concept. It was designed to study some of the problems in catalogues where there are many versions of the same work or complex multipart works. In place of the main entry based approach of one complete record for each item, the OPAC groups together into sets items that are manifestations of the same work. Users are presented with shorter lists of different intellectual works. Items in a set can be sorted, searched and displayed according to user supplied criteria
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.3-28
    Type
    a
  11. Striedieck, S.: Online catalog maintenance : the OOPS command in LIAS (1985) 0.01 
    0.005429845 = product of:
  0.01990943 = sum of:
    0.003865826 = weight(_text_:a in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.003865826 = score(doc=366,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
    0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00343714 = score(doc=366,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
    0.012606464 = product of:
      0.025212929 = sum of:
        0.025212929 = weight(_text_:22 in 366) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025212929 = score(doc=366,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 366, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=366)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    LIAS, the Pennsylvania State University's (Penn State) integrated interactive online system, provides for messaging by the user to inform library staff of errors found in bibliographic records. The message is sent by use of the OOPS command, and results in a printout which is used by processing staff for online catalog maintenance. This article describes LIAS, the use of the OOPS command, the processing of the resulting OOPS reports, an assessment of the effect of its use, and some speculation on the expansion of the LIAS message system for use in catalog maintenance.
    Date
    7. 1.2007 13:22:30
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 6(1985) no.1, S.21-32
    Type
    a
  12. Raine, H.; Stalker, L.: Rare book records in online systems (1996) 0.00 
    0.0044393744 = product of:
  0.016277706 = sum of:
    0.007251961 = product of:
      0.014503922 = sum of:
        0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014503922 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=911,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=911,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 911, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=911)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    Rare book cataloguers have on various occasions expressed frustration that their carefully constructed rare book records 'disappear' into 'vanilla' catalogues designed and maintained by system vendors or by local system staff with only the most general knowledge of cataloguing. Reports the results of a 1993 survey of online systems used for rare book cataloguing and takes a first step toward making a set of recommendations regarding the display and indexing of rare book records in such systems
    Source
    Rare books and manuscripts librarianship. 11(1996) no.2, S.103-118
    Type
    a
  13. Ayres, F.H.; Nielsen, L.P.S.; Ridley, M.J.: Design and display issues for a manifestation-based catalogue at Bradford (1997) 0.00 
    0.0019727435 = product of:
  0.01085009 = sum of:
    0.008766868 = weight(_text_:a in 7910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008766868 = score(doc=7910,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.28600082 = fieldWeight in 7910, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7910)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 7910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=7910,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 7910, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7910)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Describes the technical aspects of a feasibility study to test a new concept in bibliographic control based on the manifestations of a work. Conventional catalogues are based on the main entry principle which follows from the concept that there should be 1 main entry for each work. The Bradford OPAC project, at Bradford University, UK, aimed to develop a new type of hierarchical bibliographic record structure to cope with the problem of applying the main entry principle to multiple cataloguing records which are manisfestations of the same work. The project involved the storage of MARC data sets of bibliographic records, taken from the Bradford University Library OPAC and the OCLC WorldCat database, in a relational database (MS Access) on a PC. This was then used for an experimental Windows based OPAC, to evaluate the overall success of the idea and any problem areas identified with a view to a more substantial study. The project also aimed to test whether intelligent and responsive software, using a graphic user interface and based on sets of manifestations, could provide a better route to information than a display based on a single work
    Source
    Program. 31(1997) no.2, S.95-113
    Type
    a
  14. Weihs, J.: Cardinal rule change and the OPAC (1999) 0.00 
    0.0018778095 = product of:
  0.010327952 = sum of:
    0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 6813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005467103 = score(doc=6813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6813)
    0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 6813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0048608496 = score(doc=6813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 6813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6813)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Source
    Technicalities. 19(1999) no.4, S.11-12
    Type
    a
  15. Shannon, K.L.; Gibbs, M.E.: From catalog to OPAC : a look at 25 years of technical services in school libraries (1996) 0.00 
    0.0016593148 = product of:
  0.009126231 = sum of:
    0.006695806 = weight(_text_:a in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006695806 = score(doc=4427,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=4427,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Describes the major changes that have taken place in technical services in school libraries since 1967; cataloguing principles and practices, from earlier codes to AACR2; types of materials acquired, catalogued and processed, from mainly hardback books to a variety of audiovisual materials including CD-ROMs and videodiscs; and automation, which has allowed many school libraries to take advantage of shared cataloguing and to provide more standardized bibliographic control of library materials
    Pages
    S.41-53
    Source
    Technical services management: 1965-1990. A quarter of a century of change and a look into the future. Festschrift for Kathryn Luther Henderson. Ed.: L.C. Smith et al
    Type
    a
  16. Eliot, J.: MARC and OPAC systems : discussion document (1994) 0.00 
    0.0016410447 = product of:
  0.009025746 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=10,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=10,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    A discussion document produced following a meeting the Users of Book Industry Standards (UBIS) Bibliographic Standards Working Group at the University of London as part of a project to consider the Survey on the use of UK-MARC by Russell Sweeney published in 1991 by the British Library National Bibliographic Service. Considers the suitability, or otherwise, of the UKMARC format for use in OPACs. Summarizes the issues involved, discussing: the UKMARC exchange format, tagging and coding structure (record complexity, analytical entries, non filing indicators), data content (statements of responsibility, main versus added entry) and records standards
    Source
    UBIS news. 1994, Feb., S.9-11
    Type
    a
  17. Kniesner, D.; Willman, C.: ¬The analytical reference in serials cataloging : a new access point in online catalogs (1995) 0.00 
    0.0016410447 = product of:
  0.009025746 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 3827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=3827,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3827, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3827)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=3827,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3827, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3827)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Analytical references are needed in online library catalogues in order to provide volume specific author and title access to volumes in monographic series that have been catalogues as periodicals. Demonstrates how Oregon Health Science University Library has used the MARC bibliographic format to provide a record consisting almost entirely of indexed access points, in essence, many cross references assembled into one record, all pointing to a serial. Further proposes that AACR2 rules 13.2A and 21.30M1 be extended to prescribe analytical added entries as well as analytical references
    Source
    Serials librarian. 26(1995) no.2, S.113-123
    Type
    a
  18. Pelayo, J.J.J.; Cano, F.J.B.: Propuesta para la optimizacion de asientos catalograficos en catalogos en linea de primera generacion (1997) 0.00 
    0.0016410447 = product of:
  0.009025746 = sum of:
    0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062481174 = score(doc=736,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 736) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=736,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 736, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=736)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Makes a proposal for the optimization of first generation online catalogues which tries to unify the different institutional projects for the establishment of simplified ISBD standards and MARC formats, as well as the results of occasional studies and researches on cataloguing codification. Offers a feasible solution, for immediate application, for a definitive transition from card catalogue to automated catalogue
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 20(1997) no.1, S.9-24
    Type
    a
  19. Zumer, M.; Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Consequences of implementing FRBR : are we ready to open pandora's box? (2002) 0.00 
    0.0015837002 = product of:
  0.008710351 = sum of:
    0.0066271294 = weight(_text_:a in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0066271294 = score(doc=637,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    The study Functional Requirements for Bibliograpbic Records (FRBR) was commissioned by IFLA and published in 1998. It defines the core functions of a catalogue (and bibliographic records) as a gateway to information. For that purpose an abstract entity-relationship model of a catalogue is proposed. The FRBR model is revolutionary. The (computer) catalogue is not seen as a sequence of bibliographic records and a replica of the traditional card catalogue, but rather as a network of connected entities, enabling the user to perform seamlessly all the necessary functions. So far there has been some theoretical discussion of the model and some limited experiments, but there is a lack of research in how to implement this theoretical model in practice, in new-generation catalogues. In this paper some reactions to the model are analysed. The main focus is an consequences of the model for the OPAC interface design, particularly the searching functionality and display of results.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.78-86
    Type
    a
  20. Welsh, A.: ¬The rare books catalog and the scholarly database (2016) 0.00 
    0.0015532422 = product of:
  0.008542832 = sum of:
    0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.006112407 = score(doc=5128,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=5128,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    The article is a researcher's eye view of the value of the library catalog not only as a database to be searched for surrogates of objects of study, but as a corpus of text that can be analyzed in its own right, or incorporated within the researcher's own research database. Barriers are identified in the ways in which catalog data can be output and the technical skills researchers currently need to download, ingest, and manipulate data. Research tools and datasets created by, or in collaboration with, the library community are identified.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 54(2016) no.5/6, S.317-337
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 20
  • d 4
  • nl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 24
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • n 1
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications