Search (137 results, page 2 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme"
  1. Kumar, K.: Historical roots of Ranganathan's Colon Classification (Edition 1) (1992) 0.01
    0.009099804 = product of:
      0.033365946 = sum of:
        0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0047346503 = score(doc=50,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
        0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 50) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02620087 = score(doc=50,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 50, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=50)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Describes S.R. Ranganathan's contribution to library and information science in general, mentioning his library education at London and influence of W.C. Berwick Sayers. Describes the seeds of Colon Classification, ed.1 (CC-1) and discusses the salient features of the scheme. Brings out the indebtedness of Ranganathan to Melvil Dewey and describes the influence of UDC on CC-1. Discusses the growth and development of the concept of 'categories', mentioning the influence of W. Hulme, W.S. Biscoe and others. Concludes that Ranganathan possessed an amazing degree of ingenuity to apply established ideas in such a way in a distinctive and original way
    Source
    Journal of library and information science. 17(1992) no.1, S.71-81
    Type
    a
  2. Miksa, F.L.: ¬The concept of the universe of knowledge and the purpose of LIS classification (1992) 0.01
    0.008833611 = product of:
      0.03238991 = sum of:
        0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 2095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0044180867 = score(doc=2095,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 2095, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2095)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=2095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2095)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 2095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=2095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 2095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2095)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The concept of the universe of knowledge is traced from the nineteenth century in terms of its relationship to the purpose of LIS classification. Of two original purposes, book retrieval became predominant by the twentieth century and this has required, in turn, a complex rendering of the concept. Alternative purposes for LIS classification are afterward explored and speculations as to their effect on the concept of the universe of knowledge are provided
    Pages
    S.101-126
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
    Type
    a
  3. Jochum, U.: ¬Die Bibliothek als locus communis (1998) 0.01
    0.008480695 = product of:
      0.031095881 = sum of:
        0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0031240587 = score(doc=4025,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=4025,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
        0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 4025) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025194194 = score(doc=4025,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 4025, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4025)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Deutsche Vierteljahresschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Geistesgeschichte. 72(1998) Sonderh., S.14-30
    Type
    a
  4. Dewey, M.: Decimal classification beginnings (1990) 0.01
    0.008308258 = product of:
      0.030463612 = sum of:
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
        0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041664424 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
        0.021611081 = product of:
          0.043222163 = sum of:
            0.043222163 = weight(_text_:22 in 3554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043222163 = score(doc=3554,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3554, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3554)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Date
    25.12.1995 22:28:43
    Source
    Library journal. 115(1990) no.11, S.87-90
    Type
    a
  5. ¬Die Welt der Encyclopédie (2001) 0.01
    0.007908374 = product of:
      0.021748027 = sum of:
        0.0011715221 = weight(_text_:a in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0011715221 = score(doc=490,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.03821847 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
        0.009655623 = weight(_text_:r in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009655623 = score(doc=490,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.1097206 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
        0.00147306 = weight(_text_:s in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00147306 = score(doc=490,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.050964262 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
        0.009447822 = weight(_text_:u in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009447822 = score(doc=490,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10853352 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Editor
    Selg, A. u. R. Wieland
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Naumann, M. (Bearb.) u.a.: Diderots Enzyklopädie: eine Auswahl. Ausw. und Einf. von Manfred Naumann. Übers. aus dem Franz. von Theodor Lücke. Leipzig: Reclam 2001. 320 S.
    Pages
    X, 484 S
  6. Rückert, I.: Klassifikatorische Erschließung in der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek (2008) 0.01
    0.0077998317 = product of:
      0.028599381 = sum of:
        0.0040582716 = weight(_text_:a in 2153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0040582716 = score(doc=2153,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2153, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2153)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=2153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2153)
        0.022457888 = weight(_text_:k in 2153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022457888 = score(doc=2153,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2153, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2153)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The history of classified order relating to the Bavarian State Library dates back to the library's origins and the theoretical treatise its collections inspired. Many more classifications followed to facilitate practical access to the ever expanding collections, both in the open-access areas and in the closed stacks. The most comprehensive classifications used in the library are introduced in chronological order and as instruments to ensure the continuity of subject access in a kind of logical sequence: the Classified Shelf-Register of 1814, the Old Classified Catalogue 1501 - 1952 dating from the 1870s, the Hirschberger Catalogue 1953 - 1981, the Munich Classification of 1983 and the development of an Online Classification (DDC) based on the Dewey Decimal Classification from a predecessor in 1999 to announce the latest acquisitions in the special collection fields.
    Pages
    S.53-62
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
    Type
    a
  7. ¬Die Klassifikation der Wissenschaften als philosophisches Problem (1968) 0.01
    0.0077798064 = product of:
      0.042788934 = sum of:
        0.03862249 = weight(_text_:r in 8921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03862249 = score(doc=8921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.4388824 = fieldWeight in 8921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8921)
        0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 8921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041664424 = score(doc=8921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 8921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8921)
      0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    
    Editor
    Rochhausen, R.
    Pages
    158 S
  8. Lorenz, B.: ¬Die DDC im Umfeld der Entwicklung dezimaler Klassifikationen (2008) 0.01
    0.007422194 = product of:
      0.02721471 = sum of:
        0.0067637865 = weight(_text_:a in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0067637865 = score(doc=2152,freq=24.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                24.0 = termFreq=24.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
        0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 2152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018714907 = score(doc=2152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2152)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The decimal system is one system of a number of possible systems of ordering - and a very symbolic also. The ordering in ten chapters, themes, numbers, etc. you can find often in history. Indeed Dewey is not the genius-founder of decimal classification (against a number of authors)! For ordering and structuring separate schemes within a classification DDC creates a number of important negative solutions, e.g. in the main classes the 'lost' of physics and of medicine as special schemes: Nearly a catastrophe in the times of STM! And against an enormous tradition like Leibniz 1646 - 1716) et alii! Compare Bliss: The Bliss-Classification gives space for 6 numbers »sciences« in a context of 26 classes. Therefore the result in short: DDC (and UDC of course!) are »flowers« of the past, of the first decades of century 20! As a fact the Decimal Classification within the tradition of Melvil Dewey is not a final work: See the increasing number of newly constructed decimal classifications during the years 80 and 90 of the 20th century! Nevertheless DDC is a very great (problem and) solution in its development, internationality, reception - and edge-stone for many thinkers and librarians throughout the world - and an important example for modern translational work! Magda Heiner-Freiling has given to us a great stone for the edifice of Modern DDC: Requiescat in pace!
    Pages
    S.23-28
    Source
    New pespectives on subject indexing and classification: essays in honour of Magda Heiner-Freiling. Red.: K. Knull-Schlomann, u.a
    Type
    a
  9. Lorenz, B.: Notizen zur Geschichte dezimaler Klassifikationen (1994) 0.01
    0.0071747173 = product of:
      0.026307296 = sum of:
        0.014503922 = product of:
          0.029007845 = sum of:
            0.029007845 = weight(_text_:h in 8327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029007845 = score(doc=8327,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 8327, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8327)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 8327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0062481174 = score(doc=8327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 8327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8327)
        0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 8327) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0055552567 = score(doc=8327,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 8327, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8327)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Biblos. 43(1994) H.1/2, S.81-84
    Type
    a
  10. Beghtol, C.: Exploring new approaches to the organization of knowledge : the subject classification of James Duff Brown (2004) 0.01
    0.00697389 = product of:
      0.025570929 = sum of:
        0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033135647 = score(doc=869,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 869, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=869)
        0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019311246 = score(doc=869,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 869, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=869)
        0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 869) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00294612 = score(doc=869,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 869, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=869)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    James Duff Brown was an influential and energetic librarian in Great Britain in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. His Subject Classification has characteristics that were unusual and idiosyncratic during his own time, but his work deserves recognition as one of the precursors of modern bibliographic classification systems. This article discusses a number of theories and classification practices that Brown developed. In particular, it investigates his views on the order of main classes, on the phenomenon of "concrete" subjects, and on the need for synthesized notations. It traces these ideas briefly into the future through the work of S. R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group, and the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification system. It concludes that Brown's work warrants further study for the light it may shed on current classification theory and practice.
    Source
    Library trends. 52(2004) no.4, S.702-718
    Type
    a
  11. Krishnamurthy, M.; Satija, M.P.; Martínez-Ávila, D.: Classification of classifications : species of library classifications (2024) 0.01
    0.006941656 = product of:
      0.025452739 = sum of:
        0.0040582716 = weight(_text_:a in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0040582716 = score(doc=1158,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
        0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019311246 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=1158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1158)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Acknowledging the importance of classification not only for library and information science but also for the study and mapping of the world phenomena, in this paper we revisit and systematize the main types of classifications and focus on the species of classification mainly drawing on the work of S. R. Ranganathan. We trace the evolution of library classification systems by their structures and modes of design of various shades of classification systems and make a comparative study of enumerative and faceted species of library classifications. The value of this paper is to have a picture of the whole spectrum of existing classifications, which may serve for the study of future developments and constructions of new systems. This paper updates previous works by Comaromi and Ranganathan and is also theoretically inspired by them.
    Type
    a
  12. Diesch, K.: Katalogprobleme und Dezimalklassifikation : eine bibliothekswissenschaftliche Untersuchung und Abwehr (1929) 0.01
    0.006805421 = product of:
      0.07485963 = sum of:
        0.07485963 = weight(_text_:k in 1933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07485963 = score(doc=1933,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.7888169 = fieldWeight in 1933, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1933)
      0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
    
  13. Favier, L.; Mustafa El Hadi, W.: From text to image : the concept of universality in the knowledge organization system designed by Paul Otlet and the International Institute of Bibliography (2012) 0.01
    0.006625209 = product of:
      0.024292432 = sum of:
        0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0033135647 = score(doc=851,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
        0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0020832212 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
        0.018895645 = weight(_text_:u in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018895645 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Pages
    S.220-228
    Source
    Categories, contexts and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Twelfth International ISKO Conference 6-9 August 2012, Mysore, India. Eds.: Neelameghan, A. u. K.S. Raghavan
    Type
    a
  14. Kleinschmidt, H.: Vom System zur Ordnung: Bemerkungen zu Bewertungen von Sachkatalogen vornehmlich im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert (1987) 0.01
    0.0062778774 = product of:
      0.023018884 = sum of:
        0.012690932 = product of:
          0.025381863 = sum of:
            0.025381863 = weight(_text_:h in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025381863 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Libri. 37(1987), S.126-159
    Type
    a
  15. Holländer, H.: Denkwürdigkeiten der Welt oder sogenannte Relationes Curiosae ... : über Kunst- und Wunderkammern (1992) 0.01
    0.0062778774 = product of:
      0.023018884 = sum of:
        0.012690932 = product of:
          0.025381863 = sum of:
            0.025381863 = weight(_text_:h in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025381863 = score(doc=2451,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005467103 = score(doc=2451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
        0.0048608496 = weight(_text_:s in 2451) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0048608496 = score(doc=2451,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2451, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2451)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Source
    Rheydter Jahrbuch für Geschichte, Kunst und Heimatkunde. 20(1992) S.51-74
    Type
    a
  16. Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008) 0.01
    0.00576799 = product of:
      0.021149296 = sum of:
        0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006112407 = score(doc=2550,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
        0.012606464 = product of:
          0.025212929 = sum of:
            0.025212929 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025212929 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    The paper takes a retrospective look at the work of Henry Evelyn Bliss, classificationist theorist and author of the Bibliographic Classification. Major features of his writings and philosophy are examined and evaluated for the originality of their contribution to the corpus of knowledge in the discipline. Reactions to Bliss's work are analysed, as is his influence on classification theory of the 20th century. Contemporary work on knowledge organization is seen to continue a number of strands from Bliss's original writings. His standing as a classificationist is compared with that of Ranganathan, with the conclusion that he is not given the credit he deserves.
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 40(2008) no.1, S.45-58
    Type
    a
  17. Heuvel, C. van den: Multidimensional classifications : past and future conceptualizations and visualizations (2012) 0.01
    0.00576799 = product of:
      0.021149296 = sum of:
        0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006112407 = score(doc=632,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
        0.012606464 = product of:
          0.025212929 = sum of:
            0.025212929 = weight(_text_:22 in 632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025212929 = score(doc=632,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 632, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    This paper maps the concepts "space" and "dimensionality" in classifications, in particular in visualizations hereof, from a historical perspective. After a historical excursion in the domain of classification theory of what in mathematics is known as dimensionality reduction in representations of a single universe of knowledge, its potentiality will be explored for information retrieval and navigation in the multiverse of the World Wide Web.
    Content
    This paper is an adaptation and augmented version of a paper presented at the NASKO 2011 conference: Charles van den Heuvel. 2011. Multidimensional classifications: Past and future conceptualizations and visualizations. In Smiraglia, Richard P., ed. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, Vol. 3. Toronto, Canada, pp. 105-21. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_6_e.pdf.
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:31:25
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.6, S.446-460
    Type
    a
  18. Bliss, H.E.: ¬A bibliographic classification : principles and definitions (1985) 0.01
    0.005761156 = product of:
      0.021124238 = sum of:
        0.005844579 = weight(_text_:a in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005844579 = score(doc=3621,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19066721 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
        0.012874164 = weight(_text_:r in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012874164 = score(doc=3621,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
        0.002405497 = weight(_text_:s in 3621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002405497 = score(doc=3621,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 3621, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3621)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Henry Evelyn Bliss (1870-1955) devoted several decades of his life to the study of classification and the development of the Bibliographic Classification scheme while serving as a librarian in the College of the City of New York. In the course of the development of the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss developed a body of classification theory published in a number of articles and books, among which the best known are The Organization of Knowledge and the System of the Sciences (1929), Organization of Knowledge in Libraries and the Subject Approach to Books (1933; 2nd ed., 1939), and the lengthy preface to A Bibliographic Classification (Volumes 1-2, 1940; 2nd ed., 1952). In developing the Bibliographic Classification, Bliss carefully established its philosophical and theoretical basis, more so than was attempted by the makers of other classification schemes, with the possible exception of S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.) and his Colon Classification. The basic principles established by Bliss for the Bibliographic Classification are: consensus, collocation of related subjects, subordination of special to general and gradation in specialty, and the relativity of classes and of classification (hence alternative location and alternative treatment). In the preface to the schedules of A Bibliographic Classification, Bliss spells out the general principles of classification as weIl as principles specifically related to his scheme. The first volume of the schedules appeared in 1940. In 1952, he issued a second edition of the volume with a rewritten preface, from which the following excerpt is taken, and with the addition of a "Concise Synopsis," which is also included here to illustrate the principles of classificatory structure. In the excerpt reprinted below, Bliss discusses the correlation between classes, concepts, and terms, as weIl as the hierarchical structure basic to his classification scheme. In his discussion of cross-classification, Bliss recognizes the "polydimensional" nature of classification and the difficulties inherent in the two-dimensional approach which is characteristic of linear classification. This is one of the earliest works in which the multidimensional nature of classification is recognized. The Bibliographic Classification did not meet with great success in the United States because the Dewey Decimal Classification and the Library of Congress Classification were already weIl ensconced in American libraries by then. Nonetheless, it attracted considerable attention in the British Commonwealth and elsewhere in the world. A committee was formed in Britain which later became the Bliss Classification Association. A faceted edition of the scheme has been in preparation under the direction of J. Mills and V. Broughton. Several parts of this new edition, entitled Bliss Bibliographic Classification, have been published.
    Footnote
    Original in: Bliss, H.E.: A bibliographic classification extended by systematic auxuliary schedules for composite specification and notation. vols 1-2. 2nd ed. New York: Wilson 1952. S.3-11.
    Pages
    S.75-85
    Source
    Theory of subject analysis: a sourcebook. Ed.: L.M. Chan, et al
    Type
    a
  19. Green, R.: Facet analysis and semantic frames (2017) 0.01
    0.0056154616 = product of:
      0.020590026 = sum of:
        0.0027613041 = weight(_text_:a in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027613041 = score(doc=3849,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
        0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016092705 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
        0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0017360178 = score(doc=3849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3849)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Abstract
    Various fields, each with its own theories, techniques, and tools, are concerned with identifying and representing the conceptual structure of specific knowledge domains. This paper compares facet analysis, an analytic technique coming out of knowledge organization (especially as undertaken by members of the Classification Research Group (CRG)), with semantic frame analysis, an analytic technique coming out of lexical semantics (especially as undertaken by the developers of Frame-Net) The investigation addresses three questions: 1) how do CRG-style facet analysis and semantic frame analysis characterize the conceptual structures that they identify?; 2) how similar are the techniques they use?; and, 3) how similar are the conceptual structures they produce? Facet analysis is concerned with the logical categories underlying the terminology of an entire field, while semantic frame analysis is concerned with the participant-and-prop structure manifest in sentences about a type of situation or event. When their scope of application is similar, as, for example, in the areas of the performing arts or education, the resulting facets and semantic frame elements often bear striking resemblance, without being the same; facets are more often expressed as semantic types, while frame elements are more often expressed as roles.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 44(2017) no.6, S.397-404
    Type
    a
  20. Arntz, H.: Universality of classification? : Keynote address (1982) 0.01
    0.005381038 = product of:
      0.019730471 = sum of:
        0.010877941 = product of:
          0.021755882 = sum of:
            0.021755882 = weight(_text_:h in 49) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021755882 = score(doc=49,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 49, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=49)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 49) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0046860883 = score(doc=49,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 49, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=49)
        0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 49) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0041664424 = score(doc=49,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 49, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=49)
      0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    
    Pages
    S.31-40
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages

  • e 96
  • d 37
  • f 3
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 111
  • m 17
  • x 5
  • s 3
  • el 2
  • ? 1
  • d 1
  • More… Less…