-
McKeown, K.; Daume III, H.; Chaturvedi, S.; Paparrizos, J.; Thadani, K.; Barrio, P.; Biran, O.; Bothe, S.; Collins, M.; Fleischmann, K.R.; Gravano, L.; Jha, R.; King, B.; McInerney, K.; Moon, T.; Neelakantan, A.; O'Seaghdha, D.; Radev, D.; Templeton, C.; Teufel, S.: Predicting the impact of scientific concepts using full-text features (2016)
0.04
0.039061286 = product of:
0.07161236 = sum of:
0.004532476 = product of:
0.009064952 = sum of:
0.009064952 = weight(_text_:h in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009064952 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0058576106 = weight(_text_:a in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0058576106 = score(doc=3153,freq=18.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.00924237 = product of:
0.03696948 = sum of:
0.03696948 = weight(_text_:o in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03696948 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.27716863 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=3153,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034720355 = score(doc=3153,freq=8.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.032415166 = weight(_text_:k in 3153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032415166 = score(doc=3153,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.34156775 = fieldWeight in 3153, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3153)
0.54545456 = coord(6/11)
- Abstract
- New scientific concepts, interpreted broadly, are continuously introduced in the literature, but relatively few concepts have a long-term impact on society. The identification of such concepts is a challenging prediction task that would help multiple parties-including researchers and the general public-focus their attention within the vast scientific literature. In this paper we present a system that predicts the future impact of a scientific concept, represented as a technical term, based on the information available from recently published research articles. We analyze the usefulness of rich features derived from the full text of the articles through a variety of approaches, including rhetorical sentence analysis, information extraction, and time-series analysis. The results from two large-scale experiments with 3.8 million full-text articles and 48 million metadata records support the conclusion that full-text features are significantly more useful for prediction than metadata-only features and that the most accurate predictions result from combining the metadata and full-text features. Surprisingly, these results hold even when the metadata features are available for a much larger number of documents than are available for the full-text features.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.11, S.2684-2696
- Type
- a
-
Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI-index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008)
0.03
0.03473352 = product of:
0.07641374 = sum of:
0.007251961 = product of:
0.014503922 = sum of:
0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014503922 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0031240587 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
0.020913094 = product of:
0.08365238 = sum of:
0.08365238 = weight(_text_:o in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08365238 = score(doc=2332,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.627161 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=2332,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
0.042347 = weight(_text_:k in 2332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042347 = score(doc=2332,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 2332, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2332)
0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
- Abstract
- The article by K. Järvelin & O. Persson published in JASIST 59(9), The DCI-Index: Discounted Cumulated Impact-Based Research Evaluation, (pp. 1433-1440) contains an unfortunate error in one of its formulas, Equation 3. The present paper gives the correction and an example of impact analysis based on the corrected formula.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.14, S.2350-2352
- Type
- a
-
Kretschmer, H.; Kretschmer, T.: Well-ordered collaboration structures of co-author pairs in journals (2006)
0.03
0.032500245 = product of:
0.059583783 = sum of:
0.004532476 = product of:
0.009064952 = sum of:
0.009064952 = weight(_text_:h in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009064952 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0027613041 = weight(_text_:a in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027613041 = score(doc=25,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.015746372 = weight(_text_:u in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015746372 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018714907 = score(doc=25,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.54545456 = coord(6/11)
- Abstract
- In single-authored bibliographies only single scientist distribution can be found. But in multi-authored bibliographies single scientists distribution, pairs distribution, triples distribution, etc., can be presented. Whereas regarding Lotka's law single scientists P distribution (both in single-authored and in multi-authored bibliographies) is of interest, in the future pairs P, Q distribution, triples P, Q, R distribution, etc. should be considered Starting with pair distribution, the following question arises in the present paper: Is there also any regularity or well-ordered structure for the distribution of coauthor pairs in journals in analogy to Lotka's law for the distribution of single authors? Usually, in information science "laws " or "regularities " (for example Lotka's law) are mathematical descriptions of observed data inform of functions; however explanations of these phenomena are mostly missing. By contrast, in this paper the derivation of a formula for describing the distribution of the number of co-author pairs will be presented based on wellknown regularities in socio psychology or sociology in conjunction with the Gestalt theory as explanation for well-ordered collaboration structures and production of scientific literature, as well as derivations from Lotka's law. The assumed regularities for the distribution of co-author pairs in journals could be shown in the co-authorship data (1980-1998) of the journals Science, Nature, Proc Nat Acad Sci USA and Phys Rev B Condensed Matter.
- Pages
- S.107-129
- Source
- Vom Wandel der Wissensorganisation im Informationszeitalter: Festschrift für Walther Umstätter zum 65. Geburtstag, hrsg. von P. Hauke u. K. Umlauf
- Type
- a
-
Persson, O.; Melin, G.: Equalization, growth and integration of science (1996)
0.03
0.026995495 = product of:
0.07423761 = sum of:
0.0067637865 = weight(_text_:a in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0067637865 = score(doc=6698,freq=6.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
0.01848474 = product of:
0.07393896 = sum of:
0.07393896 = weight(_text_:o in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07393896 = score(doc=6698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.55433726 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.045517046 = weight(_text_:r in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045517046 = score(doc=6698,freq=4.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.5172279 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
0.0034720355 = weight(_text_:s in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0034720355 = score(doc=6698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Presents a study of the production of scientific papers, coauthorships and R&D expenditures in the OECD countries. Discusses the distribution of papers in the journal 'Science' by OECD country in comparison with 'Science Citation Index' papers as a whole and compares these to the distribution of R&D investments
- Source
- Scientometrics. 37(1996) no.1, S.153-157
- Type
- a
-
Raan, A.F.J. van: Scaling rules in the science system : influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of research groups (2008)
0.03
0.025998982 = product of:
0.057197757 = sum of:
0.0052392064 = weight(_text_:a in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0052392064 = score(doc=2758,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.00294612 = weight(_text_:s in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.00294612 = score(doc=2758,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.018895645 = weight(_text_:u in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018895645 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.010805541 = product of:
0.021611081 = sum of:
0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021611081 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
- Abstract
- A representation of science as a citation density landscape is proposed and scaling rules with the field-specific citation density as a main topological property are investigated. The focus is on the size-dependence of several main bibliometric indicators for a large set of research groups while distinguishing between top-performance and lower-performance groups. It is demonstrated that this representation of the science system is particularly effective to understand the role and the interdependencies of the different bibliometric indicators and related topological properties of the landscape.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:03:12
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Costas, R., M. Bordons u. T.N. van Leeuwen u.a.: Scaling rules in the science system: Influence of field-specific citation characteristics on the impact of individual researchers. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.740-753.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.565-576
- Type
- a
-
Järvelin, K.; Persson, O.: ¬The DCI index : discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation (2008)
0.03
0.025599532 = product of:
0.05631897 = sum of:
0.007850478 = product of:
0.015700957 = sum of:
0.015700957 = weight(_text_:h in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015700957 = score(doc=2694,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23772003 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0064758323 = weight(_text_:a in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064758323 = score(doc=2694,freq=22.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.21126054 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
0.013070684 = product of:
0.052282736 = sum of:
0.052282736 = weight(_text_:o in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052282736 = score(doc=2694,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.39197564 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0024550997 = weight(_text_:s in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024550997 = score(doc=2694,freq=4.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
0.026466874 = weight(_text_:k in 2694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026466874 = score(doc=2694,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 2694, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2694)
0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
- Abstract
- Research evaluation is increasingly popular and important among research funding bodies and science policy makers. Various indicators have been proposed to evaluate the standing of individual scientists, institutions, journals, or countries. A simple and popular one among the indicators is the h-index, the Hirsch index (Hirsch 2005), which is an indicator for lifetime achievement of a scholar. Several other indicators have been proposed to complement or balance the h-index. However, these indicators have no conception of aging. The AR-index (Jin et al. 2007) incorporates aging but divides the received citation counts by the raw age of the publication. Consequently, the decay of a publication is very steep and insensitive to disciplinary differences. In addition, we believe that a publication becomes outdated only when it is no longer cited, not because of its age. Finally, all indicators treat citations as equally material when one might reasonably think that a citation from a heavily cited publication should weigh more than a citation froma non-cited or little-cited publication.We propose a new indicator, the Discounted Cumulated Impact (DCI) index, which devalues old citations in a smooth way. It rewards an author for receiving new citations even if the publication is old. Further, it allows weighting of the citations by the citation weight of the citing publication. DCI can be used to calculate research performance on the basis of the h-core of a scholar or any other publication data.
- Content
- Erratum in: Järvelin, K., O. Persson: The DCI-index: discounted cumulated impact-based research evaluation. Erratum re. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.14, S.2350-2352.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1433-1440
- Type
- a
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Bradford's law and perspective (1980)
0.03
0.025027458 = product of:
0.068825506 = sum of:
0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0046860883 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.022181686 = product of:
0.088726744 = sum of:
0.088726744 = weight(_text_:o in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.088726744 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.6652047 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0041664424 = weight(_text_:s in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0041664424 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.03779129 = weight(_text_:u in 4992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03779129 = score(doc=4992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.43413407 = fieldWeight in 4992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4992)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Pages
- S.101-105
- Source
- Theory and application of information research. Proc. of the 2nd Int. Research Forum on Information Science, 3.-6.8.1977, Copenhagen. Ed.: O. Harbo u. L. Kajberg
- Type
- a
-
Rostaing, H.; Barts, N.; Léveillé, V.: Bibliometrics: representation instrument of the multidisciplinary positioning of a scientific area : Implementation for an Advisory Scientific Committee (2007)
0.02
0.024567846 = product of:
0.05404926 = sum of:
0.007251961 = product of:
0.014503922 = sum of:
0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014503922 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0044180867 = weight(_text_:a in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0044180867 = score(doc=1144,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025194194 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.014407388 = product of:
0.028814776 = sum of:
0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 1144) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028814776 = score(doc=1144,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1144, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1144)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
- Date
- 30.12.2007 11:22:39
- Pages
- S.341-350
- Source
- ¬La interdisciplinariedad y la transdisciplinariedad en la organización del conocimiento científico : actas del VIII Congreso ISKO-España, León, 18, 19 y 20 de Abril de 2007 : Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in the organization of scientific knowledge. Ed.: B. Rodriguez Bravo u. M.L Alvite Diez
- Type
- a
-
Falkingham, L.T.; Reeves, R.: Context analysis : a technique for analysing research in a field, applied to literature on the management of R&D at the section level (1998)
0.02
0.024288097 = product of:
0.066792265 = sum of:
0.006695806 = weight(_text_:a in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006695806 = score(doc=3689,freq=12.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045059573 = score(doc=3689,freq=8.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.012606464 = product of:
0.025212929 = sum of:
0.025212929 = weight(_text_:22 in 3689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025212929 = score(doc=3689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Context analysis is a new method for appraising a body of publications. the process consists of creating a database of attributes assigned to each paper by the reviewer and then looking for interesting relationships in the data. Assigning the attributes requires an understanding of the subject matter of the papers. Presents findings about one particular research field, Management of R&D at the Section Level. The findings support the view that this body of academic publications does not meet the needs of practitioner R&D managers. Discusses practical aspects of how to apply the method in other fields
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:18:46
- Source
- Scientometrics. 42(1998) no.2, S.97-120
- Type
- a
-
Liu, D.-R.; Shih, M.-J.: Hybrid-patent classification based on patent-network analysis (2011)
0.02
0.023214027 = product of:
0.051070858 = sum of:
0.0055226083 = weight(_text_:a in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055226083 = score(doc=4189,freq=16.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016092705 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018714907 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.009004618 = product of:
0.018009236 = sum of:
0.018009236 = weight(_text_:22 in 4189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018009236 = score(doc=4189,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4189, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
- Abstract
- Effective patent management is essential for organizations to maintain their competitive advantage. The classification of patents is a critical part of patent management and industrial analysis. This study proposes a hybrid-patent-classification approach that combines a novel patent-network-based classification method with three conventional classification methods to analyze query patents and predict their classes. The novel patent network contains various types of nodes that represent different features extracted from patent documents. The nodes are connected based on the relationship metrics derived from the patent metadata. The proposed classification method predicts a query patent's class by analyzing all reachable nodes in the patent network and calculating their relevance to the query patent. It then classifies the query patent with a modified k-nearest neighbor classifier. To further improve the approach, we combine it with content-based, citation-based, and metadata-based classification methods to develop a hybrid-classification approach. We evaluate the performance of the hybrid approach on a test dataset of patent documents obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and compare its performance with that of the three conventional methods. The results demonstrate that the proposed patent-network-based approach yields more accurate class predictions than the patent network-based approach.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:04:21
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.246-256
- Type
- a
-
Schreiber, M.: ¬An empirical investigation of the g-index for 26 physicists in comparison with the h-index, the A-index, and the R-index (2008)
0.02
0.021667304 = product of:
0.059585083 = sum of:
0.016342074 = product of:
0.032684147 = sum of:
0.032684147 = weight(_text_:h in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032684147 = score(doc=1968,freq=26.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.4948537 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
26.0 = termFreq=26.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0055226083 = weight(_text_:a in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055226083 = score(doc=1968,freq=16.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
0.035984382 = weight(_text_:r in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035984382 = score(doc=1968,freq=10.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.40890455 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- J.E. Hirsch (2005) introduced the h-index to quantify an individual's scientific research output by the largest number h of a scientist's papers that received at least h citations. To take into account the highly skewed frequency distribution of citations, L. Egghe (2006a) proposed the g-index as an improvement of the h-index. I have worked out 26 practical cases of physicists from the Institute of Physics at Chemnitz University of Technology, and compare the h and g values in this study. It is demonstrated that the g-index discriminates better between different citation patterns. This also can be achieved by evaluating B.H. Jin's (2006) A-index, which reflects the average number of citations in the h-core, and interpreting it in conjunction with the h-index. h and A can be combined into the R-index to measure the h-core's citation intensity. I also have determined the A and R values for the 26 datasets. For a better comparison, I utilize interpolated indices. The correlations between the various indices as well as with the total number of papers and the highest citation counts are discussed. The largest Pearson correlation coefficient is found between g and R. Although the correlation between g and h is relatively strong, the arrangement of the datasets is significantly different depending on whether they are put into order according to the values of either h or g.
- Object
- h-Index
A-Index
R-Index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.9, S.1513-1522
- Type
- a
-
Schreiber, M.: Inconsistencies of recently proposed citation impact indicators and how to avoid them (2012)
0.02
0.01995145 = product of:
0.054866485 = sum of:
0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039050733 = score(doc=459,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.022758523 = weight(_text_:r in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022758523 = score(doc=459,freq=4.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25861394 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0017360178 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.026466874 = weight(_text_:k in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026466874 = score(doc=459,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2788889 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- It is shown that under certain circumstances in particular for small data sets, the recently proposed citation impact indicators I3(6PR) and R(6,k) behave inconsistently when additional papers or citations are taken into consideration. Three simple examples are presented, in which the indicators fluctuate strongly and the ranking of scientists in the evaluated group is sometimes completely mixed up by minor changes in the database. The erratic behavior is traced to the specific way in which weights are attributed to the six percentile rank classes, specifically for the tied papers. For 100 percentile rank classes, the effects will be less serious. For the six classes, it is demonstrated that a different way of assigning weights avoids these problems, although the nonlinearity of the weights for the different percentile rank classes can still lead to (much less frequent) changes in the ranking. This behavior is not undesired because it can be used to correct for differences in citation behavior in different fields. Remaining deviations from the theoretical value R(6,k) = 1.91 can be avoided by a new scoring rule: the fractional scoring. Previously proposed consistency criteria are amended by another property of strict independence at which a performance indicator should aim.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.10, S.2062-2073
- Type
- a
-
Debackere, K.; Clarysse, B.: Advanced bibliometric methods to model the relationship between entry behavior and networking in emerging technological communities (1998)
0.02
0.019598048 = product of:
0.05389463 = sum of:
0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027335514 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022529786 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02620087 = score(doc=330,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 330, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=330)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Organizational ecology and social network theory are used to explain entries in technological communities. Using bibliometric data on 411 organizations in the field of plant biotechnology, we test several hypotheses that entry is not only influenced by the density of the field, but also by the structure of the R&D network within the community. The empirical findings point to the usefulness of bibliometric data in mapping change and evolution in technological communities, as well as to the effects of networking on entry behavior
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.1, S.49-58
- Type
- a
-
Rousseau, R.; Ye, F.Y.: ¬A proposal for a dynamic h-type index (2008)
0.02
0.019052431 = product of:
0.05239418 = sum of:
0.016215878 = product of:
0.032431755 = sum of:
0.032431755 = weight(_text_:h in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032431755 = score(doc=2351,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.4910324 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0076523502 = weight(_text_:a in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0076523502 = score(doc=2351,freq=12.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=2351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=2351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2351)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- A time-dependent h-type indicator is proposed. This indicator depends on the size of the h-core, the number of citations received, and recent change in the value of the h-index. As such, it tries to combine in a dynamic way older information about the source (e.g., a scientist or research institute that is evaluated) with recent information.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1853-1855
- Type
- a
-
Ntuli, H.; Inglesi-Lotz, R.; Chang, T.; Pouris, A.: Does research output cause economic growth or vice versa? : evidence from 34 OECD countries (2015)
0.02
0.018953295 = product of:
0.04169725 = sum of:
0.0054389704 = product of:
0.010877941 = sum of:
0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010877941 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0040582716 = weight(_text_:a in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0040582716 = score(doc=2132,freq=6.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.010805541 = product of:
0.021611081 = sum of:
0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 2132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021611081 = score(doc=2132,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2132, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2132)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
- Abstract
- The causal relation between research and economic growth is of particular importance for political support of science and technology as well as for academic purposes. This article revisits the causal relationship between research articles published and economic growth in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries for the period 1981-2011, using bootstrap panel causality analysis, which accounts for cross-section dependency and heterogeneity across countries. The article, by the use of the specific method and the choice of the country group, makes a contribution to the existing literature. Our empirical results support unidirectional causality running from research output (in terms of total number of articles published) to economic growth for the US, Finland, Hungary, and Mexico; the opposite causality from economic growth to research articles published for Canada, France, Italy, New Zealand, the UK, Austria, Israel, and Poland; and no causality for the rest of the countries. Our findings provide important policy implications for research policies and strategies for OECD countries.
- Date
- 8. 7.2015 22:00:42
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.8, S.1709-1716
- Type
- a
-
Harzing, A.-W.; Wal, R. van der: ¬A Google Scholar h-index for journals : an alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business (2009)
0.02
0.01865286 = product of:
0.051295362 = sum of:
0.014503922 = product of:
0.029007845 = sum of:
0.029007845 = weight(_text_:h in 2630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029007845 = score(doc=2630,freq=8.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 2630, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2630)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008265483 = weight(_text_:a in 2630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008265483 = score(doc=2630,freq=14.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 2630, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2630)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 2630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=2630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 2630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2630)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 2630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=2630,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 2630, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2630)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- We propose a new data source (Google Scholar) and metric (Hirsch's h-index) to assess journal impact in the field of economics and business. A systematic comparison between the Google Scholar h-index and the ISI Journal Impact Factor for a sample of 838 journals in economics and business shows that the former provides a more accurate and comprehensive measure of journal impact.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.1, S.41-46
- Type
- a
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.02
0.018614793 = product of:
0.040952545 = sum of:
0.0054389704 = product of:
0.010877941 = sum of:
0.010877941 = weight(_text_:h in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010877941 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0033135647 = weight(_text_:a in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0033135647 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.10809815 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019311246 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0020832212 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.010805541 = product of:
0.021611081 = sum of:
0.021611081 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021611081 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.45454547 = coord(5/11)
- Abstract
- Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1917-1928
- Type
- a
-
Rousseau, R.: ¬A table for estimating the exponent in Lotka's law (1993)
0.02
0.017969478 = product of:
0.065888084 = sum of:
0.008836173 = weight(_text_:a in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008836173 = score(doc=5653,freq=4.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
0.051496655 = weight(_text_:r in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051496655 = score(doc=5653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
0.0055552567 = weight(_text_:s in 5653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0055552567 = score(doc=5653,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 5653, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5653)
0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 49(1993) no.4, S.409-412
- Type
- a
-
Bornmann, L.; Mutz, R.: From P100 to P100' : a new citation-rank approach (2014)
0.02
0.017884169 = product of:
0.04918146 = sum of:
0.0062481174 = weight(_text_:a in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0062481174 = score(doc=1431,freq=8.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.025748327 = weight(_text_:r in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025748327 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.29258826 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0027776284 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.014407388 = product of:
0.028814776 = sum of:
0.028814776 = weight(_text_:22 in 1431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028814776 = score(doc=1431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- Properties of a percentile-based rating scale needed in bibliometrics are formulated. Based on these properties, P100 was recently introduced as a new citation-rank approach (Bornmann, Leydesdorff, & Wang, 2013). In this paper, we conceptualize P100 and propose an improvement which we call P100'. Advantages and disadvantages of citation-rank indicators are noted.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:05:18
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.9, S.1939-1943
- Type
- a
-
Hovden, R.: Bibliometrics for Internet media : applying the h-index to YouTube (2013)
0.02
0.017825566 = product of:
0.049020305 = sum of:
0.017947687 = product of:
0.035895374 = sum of:
0.035895374 = weight(_text_:h in 1111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035895374 = score(doc=1111,freq=16.0), product of:
0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.54347324 = fieldWeight in 1111, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1111)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.006112407 = weight(_text_:a in 1111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006112407 = score(doc=1111,freq=10.0), product of:
0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1111, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1111)
0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 1111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022529786 = score(doc=1111,freq=2.0), product of:
0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1111, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1111)
0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0024304248 = score(doc=1111,freq=2.0), product of:
0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.026584605 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1111, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1111)
0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
- Abstract
- The h-index can be a useful metric for evaluating a person's output of Internet media. Here I advocate and demonstrate adaption of the h-index and the g-index to the top video content creators on YouTube. The h-index for Internet video media is based on videos and their view counts. The h-index is defined as the number of videos with >=h × 10**5 views. The g-index is defined as the number of videos with >=g × 10**5 views on average. When compared with a video creator's total view count, the h-index and g-index better capture both productivity and impact in a single metric.
- Object
- h-index
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.11, S.2326-2331
- Type
- a
