Search (91 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Balakrishnan, U.: DFG-Projekt: Coli-conc : das Mapping Tool "Cocoda" (2016) 0.02 
    0.016684972 = product of:
  0.04588367 = sum of:
    0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 3036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031240587 = score(doc=3036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 3036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3036)
    0.01478779 = product of:
      0.05915116 = sum of:
        0.05915116 = weight(_text_:o in 3036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05915116 = score(doc=3036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.4434698 = fieldWeight in 3036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3036)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 3036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=3036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3036)
    0.025194194 = weight(_text_:u in 3036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025194194 = score(doc=3036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3036)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 3(2016) Nr.1, S.11-16
    Type
    a
  2. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic-Web-Technologie (2015) 0.01 
    0.0147756655 = product of:
  0.04063308 = sum of:
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
    0.012939317 = product of:
      0.05175727 = sum of:
        0.05175727 = weight(_text_:o in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05175727 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.38803607 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022529786 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 2(2015) Nr.4, S.161-175
    Type
    a
  3. Suchowolec, K.; Lang, C.; Schneider, R.: Re-designing online terminology resources for German grammar (2016) 0.01 
    0.01470862 = product of:
  0.040448703 = sum of:
    0.0039050733 = weight(_text_:a in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0039050733 = score(doc=3108,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
    0.016092705 = weight(_text_:r in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016092705 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18286766 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
    0.018714907 = weight(_text_:k in 3108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018714907 = score(doc=3108,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3108, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3108)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Abstract
    The compilation of terminological vocabularies plays a central role in the organization and retrieval of scientific texts. Both simple keyword lists as well as sophisticated modellings of relationships between terminological concepts can make a most valuable contribution to the analysis, classification, and finding of appropriate digital documents, either on the Web or within local repositories. This seems especially true for long-established scientific fields with various theoretical and historical branches, such as linguistics, where the use of terminology within documents from different origins is sometimes far from being consistent. In this short paper, we report on the early stages of a project that aims at the re-design of an existing domain-specific KOS for grammatical content grammis. In particular, we deal with the terminological part of grammis and present the state-of-the-art of this online resource as well as the key re-design principles. Further, we propose questions regarding ramifications of the Linked Open Data and Semantic Web approaches for our re-design decisions.
    Pages
    S.59-63
    Type
    a
  4. Mayr, P.; Walter, A.-K.: Zum Stand der Heterogenitätsbehandlung in vascoda : Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick (2007) 0.01 
    0.01407892 = product of:
  0.038717028 = sum of:
    0.006345466 = product of:
      0.012690932 = sum of:
        0.012690932 = weight(_text_:h in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012690932 = score(doc=59,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=59,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
    0.00343714 = weight(_text_:s in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00343714 = score(doc=59,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
    0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 59) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02620087 = score(doc=59,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 59, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=59)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des 96. Deutscher Bibliothekartag, Leipzig, 2007. - Vgl. auch den Bericht: Fiala, S.: Deutscher Bibliothekartag Leipzig 2007: Sacherschließung - Informationsdienstleistung. In: Mitt. VOEB 60(2007) H.2, S.44-48.
  5. Hafner, R.; Schelling, B.: Automatisierung der Sacherschließung mit Semantic Web Technologie (2015) 0.01 
    0.012776819 = product of:
  0.070272505 = sum of:
    0.045059573 = weight(_text_:r in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045059573 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.51202947 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
    0.025212929 = product of:
      0.050425857 = sum of:
        0.050425857 = weight(_text_:22 in 8365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050425857 = score(doc=8365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09309476 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 8365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8365)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Date
    22. 6.2015 16:08:38
  6. Euzenat, J.; Bach, T.Le; Barrasa, J.; Bouquet, P.; Bo, J.De; Dieng, R.; Ehrig, M.; Hauswirth, M.; Jarrar, M.; Lara, R.; Maynard, D.; Napoli, A.; Stamou, G.; Stuckenschmidt, H.; Shvaiko, P.; Tessaris, S.; Acker, S. Van; Zaihrayeu, I.: State of the art on ontology alignment (2004) 0.01 
    0.012005918 = product of:
  0.033016272 = sum of:
    0.0036259806 = product of:
      0.007251961 = sum of:
        0.007251961 = weight(_text_:h in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007251961 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0046860883 = weight(_text_:a in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0046860883 = score(doc=172,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
    0.022298707 = weight(_text_:r in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022298707 = score(doc=172,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25338888 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
    0.002405497 = weight(_text_:s in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.002405497 = score(doc=172,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Abstract
    In this document we provide an overall view of the state of the art in ontology alignment. It is organised as a description of the need for ontology alignment, a presentation of the techniques currently in use for ontology alignment and a presentation of existing systems. The state of the art is not restricted to any discipline and consider as some form of ontology alignment the work made on schema matching within the database area for instance. Heterogeneity problems on the semantic web can be solved, for some of them, by aligning heterogeneous ontologies. This is illustrated through a number of use cases of ontology alignment. Aligning ontologies consists of providing the corresponding entities in these ontologies. This process is precisely defined in deliverable D2.2.1. The current deliverable presents the many techniques currently used for implementing this process. These techniques are classified along the many features that can be found in ontologies (labels, structures, instances, semantics). They resort to many different disciplines such as statistics, machine learning or data analysis. The alignment itself is obtained by combining these techniques towards a particular goal (obtaining an alignment with particular features, optimising some criterion). Several combination techniques are also presented. Finally, these techniques have been experimented in various systems for ontology alignment or schema matching. Several such systems are presented briefly in the last section and characterized by the above techniques they rely on. The conclusion is that many techniques are available for achieving ontology alignment and many systems have been developed based on these techniques. However, few comparisons and few integration is actually provided by these implementations. This deliverable serves as a basis for considering further action along these two lines. It provide a first inventory of what should be evaluated and suggests what evaluation criterion can be used.
    Content
    This document is part of a research project funded by the IST Programme of the Commission of the European Communities as project number IST-2004-507482.
    Pages
    79 S
    Type
    r
  7. Hinrichs, I.; Milmeister, G.; Schäuble, P.; Steenweg, H.: Computerunterstützte Sacherschließung mit dem Digitalen Assistenten (DA-2) (2016) 0.01 
    0.010839418 = product of:
  0.029808398 = sum of:
    0.006345466 = product of:
      0.012690932 = sum of:
        0.012690932 = weight(_text_:h in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012690932 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0027335514 = weight(_text_:a in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027335514 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
    0.018298957 = product of:
      0.07319583 = sum of:
        0.07319583 = weight(_text_:o in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07319583 = score(doc=3563,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.5487659 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 3563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0024304248 = score(doc=3563,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 3563, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3563)
  0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/2016H4S156-185. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2016H4S144-155 . Vortrag, Leipziger Bibliothekskongresses 2016.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 3(2016) Nr.4, S.156-185
    Type
    a
  8. Mayr, P.; Walter, A.-K.: Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Crosskonkordanzen (2007) 0.01 
    0.009776056 = product of:
  0.035845537 = sum of:
    0.0031240587 = weight(_text_:a in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0031240587 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
    0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027776284 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
    0.02994385 = weight(_text_:k in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02994385 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Content
    Auch in: Lokal-Global: Vernetzung wissenschaftlicher Infrastrukturen; 12. Kongress der IuK-Initiative der Wissenschaftlichen Fachgesellschaft in Deutschland, Tagungsberichte, GESIS-IZ Sozialwissenschaft, Bonn, S.149-166.
  9. Suominen, O.; Hyvönen, N.: From MARC silos to Linked Data silos? (2017) 0.01 
    0.006446229 = product of:
  0.023636172 = sum of:
    0.0023430442 = weight(_text_:a in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0023430442 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
    0.019209906 = product of:
      0.076839626 = sum of:
        0.076839626 = weight(_text_:o in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076839626 = score(doc=3732,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.57608426 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0020832212 = weight(_text_:s in 3732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0020832212 = score(doc=3732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3732)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/2017H2S1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2017H2S1-13.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 4(2017) Nr.2, S.1-13
    Type
    a
  10. Nicholson, D.: Help us make HILT's terminology services useful in your information service (2008) 0.01 
    0.0055210073 = product of:
  0.020243693 = sum of:
    0.0027613041 = weight(_text_:a in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0027613041 = score(doc=3654,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=3654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
    0.015746372 = weight(_text_:u in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015746372 = score(doc=3654,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08704981 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    The JISC-funded HILT project is looking to make contact with staff in information services or projects interested in helping it test and refine its developing terminology services. The project is currently working to create pilot web services that will deliver machine-readable terminology and cross-terminology mappings data likely to be useful to information services wishing to extend or enhance the efficacy of their subject search or browse services. Based on SRW/U, SOAP, and SKOS, the HILT facilities, when fully operational, will permit such services to improve their own subject search and browse mechanisms by using HILT data in a fashion transparent to their users. On request, HILT will serve up machine-processable data on individual subject schemes (broader terms, narrower terms, hierarchy information, preferred and non-preferred terms, and so on) and interoperability data (usually intellectual or automated mappings between schemes, but the architecture allows for the use of other methods) - data that can be used to enhance user services. The project is also developing an associated toolkit that will help service technical staff to embed HILT-related functionality into their services. The primary aim is to serve JISC funded information services or services at JISC institutions, but information services outside the JISC domain may also find the proposed services useful and wish to participate in the test and refine process.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 14(2008) nos.3/4, x S
    Type
    a
  11. Bastos Vieira, S.; DeBrito, M.; Mustafa El Hadi, W.; Zumer, M.: Developing imaged KOS with the FRSAD Model : a conceptual methodology (2016) 0.01 
    0.0051739053 = product of:
  0.018970985 = sum of:
    0.0041327416 = weight(_text_:a in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0041327416 = score(doc=3109,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.13482209 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
    0.012874164 = weight(_text_:r in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012874164 = score(doc=3109,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
    0.00196408 = weight(_text_:s in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00196408 = score(doc=3109,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Abstract
    This proposal presents the methodology of indexing with images suggested by De Brito and Caribé (2015). The imagetic model is used as a compatible mechanism with FRSAD for a global information share and use of subject data, both within the library sector and beyond. The conceptual model of imagetic indexing shows how images are related to topics and 'key-images' are interpreted as nomens to implement the FRSAD model. Indexing with images consists of using images instead of key-words or descriptors, to represent and organize information. Implementing the imaged navigation in OPACs denotes multiple advantages derived from this rethinking the OPAC anew, since we are looking forward to sharing concepts within the subject authority data. Images, carrying linguistic objects, permeate inter-social and cultural concepts. In practice it includes translated metadata, symmetrical multilingual thesaurus, or any traditional indexing tools. iOPAC embodies efforts focused on conceptual levels as expected from librarians. Imaged interfaces are more intuitive since users do not need specific training for information retrieval, offering easier comprehension of indexing codes, larger conceptual portability of descriptors (as images), and a better interoperability between discourse codes and indexing competences affecting positively social and cultural interoperability. The imagetic methodology deploys R&D fields for more suitable interfaces taking into consideration users with specific needs such as deafness and illiteracy. This methodology arouse questions about the paradigms of the primacy of orality in information systems and pave the way to a legitimacy of multiple perspectives in document indexing by suggesting a more universal communication system based on images. Interdisciplinarity in neurosciences, linguistics and information sciences would be desirable competencies for further investigations about he nature of cognitive processes in information organization and classification while developing assistive KOS for individuals with communication problems, such autism and deafness.
    Pages
    S.36-47
    Type
    a
  12. Hoekstra, R.: BestMap: context-aware SKOS vocabulary mappings in OWL 2 (2009) 0.01 
    0.0050903438 = product of:
  0.02799689 = sum of:
    0.005467103 = weight(_text_:a in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005467103 = score(doc=1574,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
    0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 1574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022529786 = score(doc=1574,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1574, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1574)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    This paper describes an approach to SKOS vocabulary mapping that takes into account the context in which vocabulary terms are used in annotations. The standard vocabulary mapping properties in SKOS only allow for binary mappings between concepts. In the BestMap ontology, annotated resources are the contexts in which annotations coincide and allow for a more fine grained control over when mappings hold. A mapping between two vocabularies is defined as a class that groups descriptions of a resource. We use the OWL 2 features for property chains, disjoint properties, union, intersection and negation together with careful use of equivalence and subsumption to specify these mappings.
  13. Strötgen, R.: Anfragetransfers zur Integration von Internetquellen in Digitalen Bibliotheken auf der Grundlage statistischer Termrelationen (2007) 0.01 
    0.005035698 = product of:
  0.018464224 = sum of:
    0.0036259806 = product of:
      0.007251961 = sum of:
        0.007251961 = weight(_text_:h in 588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007251961 = score(doc=588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=588)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012874164 = weight(_text_:r in 588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012874164 = score(doc=588,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.14629413 = fieldWeight in 588, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=588)
    0.00196408 = weight(_text_:s in 588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.00196408 = score(doc=588,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 588, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=588)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des 96. Deutscher Bibliothekartag, Leipzig, 2007. - Vgl. auch den Bericht: Fiala, S.: Deutscher Bibliothekartag Leipzig 2007: Sacherschließung - Informationsdienstleistung. In: Mitt. VOEB 60(2007) H.2, S.44-48 (hier: 45-46).
  14. Bandholtz, T.; Schulte-Coerne, T.; Glaser, R.; Fock, J.; Keller, T.: iQvoc - open source SKOS(XL) maintenance and publishing tool (2010) 0.00 
    0.00495717 = product of:
  0.027264437 = sum of:
    0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047346503 = score(doc=604,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
    0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022529786 = score(doc=604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=604)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    iQvoc is a new open source SKOS-XL vocabulary management tool developed by the Federal Environment Agency, Germany, and innoQ Deutschland GmbH. Its immediate purpose is maintaining and publishing reference vocabularies in the upcoming Linked Data cloud of environmental information, but it may be easily adapted to host any SKOS- XL compliant vocabulary. iQvoc is implemented as a Ruby on Rails application running on top of JRuby - the Java implementation of the Ruby Programming Language. To increase the user experience when editing content, iQvoc uses heavily the JavaScript library jQuery.
    Type
    a
  15. Szostak, R.; Smiraglia, R.P.: Comparative approaches to interdisciplinary KOSs : use cases of converting UDC to BCC (2017) 0.00 
    0.00495717 = product of:
  0.027264437 = sum of:
    0.0047346503 = weight(_text_:a in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0047346503 = score(doc=3874,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
    0.022529786 = weight(_text_:r in 3874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022529786 = score(doc=3874,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 3874, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3874)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    We take a small sample of works and compare how these are classified within both the Universal Decimal Classification and the Basic concepts Classification. We examine notational length, expressivity, network effects, and the number of subject strings. One key finding is that BCC typically synthesizes many more terms than UDC in classifying a particular document - but the length of classificatory notations is roughly equivalent for the two KOSs. BCC captures documents with fewer subject strings (generally one) but these are more complex.
    Type
    a
  16. Kempf, A.O.; Ritze, D.; Eckert, K.; Zapilko, B.: New ways of mapping knowledge organization systems : using a semi­automatic matching­procedure for building up vocabulary crosswalks (2013) 0.00 
    0.0048211203 = product of:
  0.02651616 = sum of:
    0.0040582716 = weight(_text_:a in 989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0040582716 = score(doc=989,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 989, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=989)
    0.022457888 = weight(_text_:k in 989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022457888 = score(doc=989,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 989, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=989)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    Crosswalks between different vocabularies are an indispensable prerequisite for integrated and high quality search scenarios in distributed data environments. Offered through the web and linked with each other they act as a central link so that users can move back and forth between different data sources available online. In the past, crosswalks between different thesauri have primarily been developed manually. In the long run the intellectual updating of such crosswalks requires huge personnel expenses. Therefore, an integration of automatic matching procedures, as for example Ontology Matching Tools, seems an obvious need. On the basis of computer generated correspondences between the Thesaurus for Economics (STW) and the Thesaurus for the Social Sciences (TheSoz) our contribution will explore cross-border approaches between IT-assisted tools and procedures on the one hand and external quality measurements via domain experts on the other hand. The techniques that emerge enable semi-automatically performed vocabulary crosswalks.
    Type
    a
  17. Göldner, R.: Datenaustauschformate : Erfahrungen und Schlüsse aus ADeX (2010) 0.00 
    0.004681514 = product of:
  0.051496655 = sum of:
    0.051496655 = weight(_text_:r in 2435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051496655 = score(doc=2435,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.5851765 = fieldWeight in 2435, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2435)
  0.09090909 = coord(1/11)
  18. Busch, D.: Organisation eines Thesaurus für die Unterstützung der mehrsprachigen Suche in einer bibliographischen Datenbank im Bereich Planen und Bauen (2016) 0.00 
    0.004570701 = product of:
  0.016759237 = sum of:
    0.0019525366 = weight(_text_:a in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0019525366 = score(doc=3308,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
    0.013070684 = product of:
      0.052282736 = sum of:
        0.052282736 = weight(_text_:o in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052282736 = score(doc=3308,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13338262 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.39197564 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.017288 = idf(docFreq=795, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    0.0017360178 = weight(_text_:s in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0017360178 = score(doc=3308,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
  0.27272728 = coord(3/11)
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/2016H4S202-216. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2016H4S202-216. Vortrag, Leipziger Bibliothekskongresses 2016.
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 3(2016) Nr.4, S.202-216
    Type
    a
  19. Vizine-Goetz, D.; Hickey, C.; Houghton, A.; Thompson, R.: Vocabulary mapping for terminology services (2004) 0.00 
    0.0045546377 = product of:
  0.025050508 = sum of:
    0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057392623 = score(doc=918,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
    0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019311246 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    The paper describes a project to add value to controlled vocabularies by making inter-vocabulary associations. A methodology for mapping terms from one vocabulary to another is presented in the form of a case study applying the approach to the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) Thesaurus and the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). Our approach to mapping involves encoding vocabularies according to Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) standards, machine matching of vocabulary terms, and categorizing candidate mappings by likelihood of valid mapping. Mapping data is then stored as machine links. Vocabularies with associations to other schemes will be a key component of Web-based terminology services. The paper briefly describes how the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) is used to provide access to a vocabulary with mappings.
  20. Shaw, R.; Rabinowitz, A.; Golden, P.; Kansa, E.: Report on and demonstration of the PeriodO period gazetteer (2015) 0.00 
    0.0045546377 = product of:
  0.025050508 = sum of:
    0.0057392623 = weight(_text_:a in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0057392623 = score(doc=2249,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
    0.019311246 = weight(_text_:r in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019311246 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.088001914 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026584605 = queryNorm
        0.2194412 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
  0.18181819 = coord(2/11)
    Abstract
    The PeriodO period gazetteer documents definitions of historical period names. Each entry of the gazetteer identifies the definition of a single period. To be included in the gazetteer, a definition must a) give the period a name, b) impose some temporal bounds on the period, c) have some implicit or explicit association with a geographical region, and d) have been formally or informally published in some citable source. Much care has been put into giving period definitions stable identifiers that can be resolved to RDF representations of period definitions. Anyone can propose additions of new definitions to PeriodO, and we have implemented an open source web service and browser-based client for distributed versioning and collaborative maintenance of the gazetteer.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 74
  • d 14
  • no 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 31
  • r 3
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes